Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
All authors contributed equally to this paper. This research was supported by a research grant at the City University of Hong Kong (7002348), the National Science Foundation (CAREER SES 0552089), and the UTD Provost’s Distinguished Professorship. The views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the sponsors. We thank Rae Pinkham for editorial assistance.
Few scholars would dispute the argument that mergers and acquisitions (M&As) are different in China and the United States, but we know little about how they differ. This article reports one of the first studies that systematically compares and contrasts how M&As differ in these two countries. While prior research on M&As tends to emphasize economic and financial explanations while treating firms as atomistic actors severed from their institutional and network relations, we develop a new theoretical framework based on relational, behavioral, and institutional perspectives. We not only consider firms as learning actors embedded in network relations, but also compare and contrast their M&A patterns between China and the United States, two distinctive institutional contexts. We find that both a firm’s structural hole position and its learning orientation (exploration/exploitation) in alliances have direct and joint impacts on subsequent M&As. Further, such impacts differ across the two countries, due to their institutional disparities.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Anand, J., Mesquita, L. F., & Vassolo, R. S. 2009. The dynamics of multimarket competition in exploration and exploitation activities. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4): 802-821.
Baum, J. A. C., Li, S. X., & Usher, J. M. 2000. Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Administration Science Quarterly, 45(4): 766-801. CrossRef
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cartwright, S., & Schoenberg, R. 2006. Thirty years of mergers and acquisitions research: Recent advances and future opportunities. British Journal of Management, 17: S1-S5. CrossRef
Chen, Y. Y., & Young, M. N. 2010. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies: A principal-principal perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi: 10.1007/s10490-009-9150-7.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152. CrossRef
Cooke, F. L. 2006. Acquisitions of Chinese state-owned enterprises by multinational corporations: Driving forces, barriers and implications for HRM. British Journal of Management, 17: S105-S121. CrossRef
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. 2000. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2): 183-196. CrossRef
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481-510. CrossRef
Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from?. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5): 1439-1493. CrossRef
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 693-706.
Haunschild, P. R., & Beckman, C. M. 1998. When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4): 815-844. CrossRef
Jiang, Y., & Peng, M. W. 2010. Principal-principal conflicts during crisis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi: 10.1007/s10490-009-9186-8.
Koza, M. P., & Lewin, A. Y. 1998. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(3): 255-264. CrossRef
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2): 95-112. CrossRef
Li, Y., & Peng, M. W. 2008. Developing theory from strategic management research in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25: 563-572. CrossRef
Li, Y., Xie, E., Teo, H.-H., & Peng, M. W. 2010. Formal control and social control in domestic and international buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management (in press).
Lin, Z., Peng, M. W., Yang, H., & Sun, S. L. 2009. How do networks and learning drive M&As? An institutional comparison of China and the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 30(10): 1113-1132. CrossRef
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87. CrossRef
Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. 2009. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1): 61-80. CrossRef
Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275-296. CrossRef
Peng, M. W. 2004. Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 453-471. CrossRef
Peng, M. W. 2006. Making M&A fly in China. Harvard Business Review, 84(3): 26-27.
Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21(2): 492-528. CrossRef
Peng, M. W., Li, Y., Xie, E., & Su, Z. 2010. CEO duality, organizational slack, and firm performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi: 10.1007/s10490-009-9161-4.
Peng, M. W., Luo, Y., & Sun, S. L. 1999. Firm growth via mergers and acquisitions in China. In L. Kelley & Y. D. Luo (Eds.). China 2000: Emerging business issues: 73-100. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. 2009. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4): 63-81.
Peng, M. W., Wang, D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 920-936. CrossRef
Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. 2007. Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3): 479-516. CrossRef
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. 2001. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12(4): 502-517. CrossRef
Ren, B., Au, K., & Birtch, T. A. 2009. China business network structure during institutional transitions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26: 219-240. CrossRef
Robins, J. A., & Lin, Z. 2000. Institutional influences on organizational control: A comparative examination of agency theory in Sino-Japanese and Sino-American joint ventures. Advances in International Comparative Management, 13: 119-148.
Rothaermel, F. T. 2001. Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6): 687-699. CrossRef
Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. 2000. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 369-386. CrossRef
Soda, G., Usai, A., & Zaheer, A. 2004. Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6): 893-906. CrossRef
Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. 2003. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13): 1249-1263. CrossRef
Tong, T. W., Reuer, J., & Peng, M. W. 2008. International joint ventures and the value of growth options. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5): 1014-1029.
Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4): 674-698. CrossRef
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 1-33. CrossRef
Xia, J., Tan, J., & Tan, D. 2008. Mimetic entry and bandwagon effect: The rise and decline of international equity venture in China. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 195-217. CrossRef
Xiao, Z. X., & Tsui, A. S. 2007. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 1-31.
Yin, X., & Shanley, M. 2008. Industry determinants of the “merger versus alliance” decision. Academy of Management Review, 33: 473-491.
Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. 2005. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9): 809-825. CrossRef
- Behind M&As in China and the United States: Networks, learning, and institutions
Sunny Li Sun
Zhiang (John) Lin
Mike W. Peng
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Voraussetzungen für wirtschaftliche additive Fertigung/© Marco2811 | Fotolia