Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction: The Road to Paris: Intellectual Property, Human Rights, and Climate Justice Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

22. Benefit Sharing Under the REDD+ Mechanism: Implications for Women

verfasst von : Rowena Maguire

Erschienen in: Intellectual Property and Clean Energy

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper examines benefit-sharing under the REDD+ Mechanism, focusing upon implications for women. In particular it will focus upon the competing motivations and constraints that are at play amongst the different networks and stakeholders involved (government, community and international institutions) and how these may manifest themselves in decisions about benefit-sharing claims. It also examines the importance of gender equity in ensuring socially effective REDD+ investments through a discussion of property rights, participation rights and accountability.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Conserving Genetic Resources, Access and Benefit-Sharing, Intellectual Property and Climate Change
Nächstes Kapitel Northern Exposure: Alaska, Climate Change, Indigenous Rights, and Atmospheric Trust Litigation
Fußnoten
1
Pachauri and Meyer (2014, p. 47).
 
2
Humphreys (2009, p. 171).
 
3
UNFCCC.
 
4
Convention on Biological Diversity.
 
5
Forest Convention.
 
6
Mickelson (1996, p. 239).
 
7
Article 3 of the Kyoto Protocol allows parties to take into account the effect of land-use policies and measures into their emission reduction calculations. During the first Kyoto commitment period, Parties were not obliged to report upon the sink and or source emission from land-use change practices, but Parties are required to report upon such activities under the second commitment period of Kyoto.
 
8
Maguire (2013, p. 125).
 
9
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in Developing Countries: Approaches to Stimulate Action, FCCC/CP/2005/MISC.1, 11 November 2005.
 
10
McDermott (2014, pp. 14–16).
 
11
Chapman et al. (2015, pp. 103–104).
 
12
Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, FCCC/CP/2010/Add.1.
 
13
The UNFCCC has created a booklet on all relevant COP decisions: UNFCCC Secretariat (2016) Key decisions relevant for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD +).
 
14
Paris Agreement, art. 5.
 
15
Savaresi (2016, p. 129).
 
16
Decision 1/CP.16- Policy approaches and positive incentives on issues relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries; and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries, Appendix 1, paragraph 2.
 
17
Agarwal (2009a), Coleman and Mwangi (2013), Hecht (2007), Peach Brown et al. (2011).
 
18
Sunderland et al. (2014, p. 56).
 
19
Agarwal (2000, p. 288).
 
20
Larson et al. (2015).
 
21
Gurung and Billah Setyowati (2012).
 
22
Nagoya Protocol.
 
23
Eggerts (2015).
 
24
Chapman et al. (2015).
 
25
Weatherley-Sing and Gupta (2015).
 
26
Hosonuma (2012).
 
27
Ibid.
 
28
Rakatama et al. (2017, p. 104).
 
29
Ibid.
 
30
Ibid.
 
31
Chomba et al. (2016, p. 203).
 
32
Agarwal (2001).
 
33
Agarwal (2009a, p. 2786).
 
34
Ibid.
 
35
Ibid.
 
36
Taccoi et al. (2009).
 
37
Gupta and Siebert (2004, p. 339).
 
38
Vijge et al. (2016).
 
39
Ibid, p. 63.
 
40
Dunlop and Corbera (2016).
 
41
Ibid, p. 49.
 
42
Davies and Daviet (2015).
 
43
Fach and Timilsina (eds) (2011, p. 31).
 
44
Ibid.
 
45
Ibid, p.11.
 
46
Ibid, p. 27.
 
47
Ibid.
 
48
Irland (2008, pp. 189–223).
 
49
Kanowski et al. (2011).
 
50
Maguire (2013).
 
51
White and Martin (2002).
 
52
Sayer et al. (2008).
 
53
Rose (1986, p. 712).
 
54
Torpey-Saboe et al. (2015).
 
55
Larson (2011, p. 541).
 
56
Ibid, p. 544.
 
57
Duncan and Ping (2001).
 
58
Larson et al. (2013).
 
59
Ibid, p. 679.
 
60
Ibid, p. 687.
 
61
Keene and Ginsburg (2017, p. 13).
 
62
Ibid.
 
63
Ibid.
 
64
Ibid, pp. 18–19.
 
65
Ibid, p. 19.
 
66
Ibid.
 
67
Ibid, p. 47.
 
68
Ibid, p. 52.
 
69
Sunderlin et al. (2013, p. 43).
 
70
Torpey-Saboe et al. (2015, p. 416).
 
71
Agarwal (2010).
 
72
Ibid.
 
73
The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (Decision 1/CP.16) FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1.
 
74
Subsidiary Body for Implementation (2015) Report on the in-session workshop on gender-responsive climate policy with a focus on mitigation action and technology development and transfer FCCC/SBI/2015/12; Subsidiary Body for Implementation (2016) In-session workshop on gender-responsive climate policy with a focus on adaptation, capacity-building and training for delegates on gender issues’ FCCC/SBI/2016/10, Annex.
 
75
Decision 18/CP.20, Lima work Programme on gender, FCCC/CP/2014/10/Add.3. For an overview of women and representation in the UNFCCC, also see Maguire and Lewis (2018).
 
76
Decision 18/CP.20, Lima work Programme on gender, [2] and [4].
 
77
Subsidiary Body for Implementation (2017) Informal summary report on the Subsidiary Body for Implementation in-session workshop to develop possible elements of the gender action plan under the UNFCCC ‘Forty-sixth session, Bonn, Germany, 8-18 May 2017.
 
78
Decision CP.23, Establishment of a gender action plan (2017).
 
79
Colemen and Mwangi (2013, pp. 193–194).
 
80
Agarwal (2015, pp. 3–4).
 
81
Coleman and Mwangi (2013, pp. 193–194).
 
82
Ibid, p. 201.
 
83
Agarwal (2009b).
 
84
Ibid, p. 2301.
 
85
Ibid, p. 2306.
 
86
Ibid.
 
87
Decision CP.23, Establishment of a gender action plan.
 
88
Eggerts (2015, p. 278).
 
89
Coleman and Mwangi (2013), Agarwal (2001).
 
Literatur
Humphreys D (2009) Forest politics: the evolution of international cooperation. Earthscan Publications, London
Maguire R (2013) Global forest governance: legal concepts and policy trends. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamCrossRef
Mickelson K (1996) Seeing the forest, the trees and the people: coming to terms with developing perspectives on the proposed global forest regime. In: Johnson S (ed) Global forests and international environmental law. Kluwer Law International, London, Boston, p 239
Savaresi A (2016) The legal status and role of safeguards. In: Voight Christina (ed) Research handbook on REDD+ and international law. Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, p 126–156
Agarwal B (2000) Conceptualizing environmental collective action: why gender matters. Camb J Econ 24:283–310CrossRef
Agarwal B (2001) Participatory exclusions. Community forestry and gender: an analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Dev 29:1623–1648CrossRef
Agarwal B (2009a) Gender and forest conservation: the impact of women’s participation in community forest governance. Ecol Econ 68:2785–2799CrossRef
Agarwal B (2009b) Rule making in community forestry institutions: the difference women make. Ecol Econ 68:2296–2308CrossRef
Agarwal B (2010) Does women’s proportional strength affect their participation? Governing local forests in South Asia. World Dev 38(1):98–112CrossRef
Agarwal B (2015) The power of numbers in gender dynamics: illustrations from community forestry groups. J Peasant Stud 42(1):1–20CrossRef
Chapman S et al (2015) The elements of benefit-sharing for REDD+ in Kenya: a legal perspective. Carbon Clim Law Rev 4:283–297
Chapman S, Wilder M, Millar I, Dibley A (2015) Implementing REDD+ under the UNFCCC: basic requirements and guidance for developing national policy and legal frameworks. Carbon Clim Law Rev 2:101–112
Chomba S, Kariuki J, Friis Lund J, Sinclair S (2016) Roots of inequity: how the implementation of REDD+ reinforces past injustices. Land Use Policy 50:202–213CrossRef
Coleman E, Mwangi E (2013) Women’s participation in forest management: a cross-country analysis. Glob Environ Change 23:193–205CrossRef
Dunlop T, Corbera E (2016) Incentivising REDD+: how developing countries are laying the groundwork for benefit—sharing. Environ Sci Policy 63:44CrossRef
Gupta A, Siebert U (2004) Combating forest corruption: the forest integrity network. Sustain For 19(1):337CrossRef
Hecht S (2007) Factories, forests, fields and family: gender and neoliberalism in extractive reserves. J Agrar Change 7(3):316–349CrossRef
Hosonuma N (2012) An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environ Res Lett 4:044009CrossRef
Irland L (2008) State failure, corruption and warfare: challenges for forest policy. J Sustain For 189
Kanowski P, McDermott C, Cashore B (2011) Implementing REDD+: lessons from analysis of forest governance. Environ Sci Policy 14:111–117CrossRef
Larson A (2011) Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: lessons for REDD+. Glob Environ Change 21:540–549CrossRef
Larson A et al (2013) Land tenure and REDD+: the good, the bad and the ugly. Glob Environ Change 23:678–689CrossRef
Larson A et al (2015) The role of women in early REDD+ implementation: lessons for future engagement. Int For Rev 17(1):43–65CrossRef
McDermott C (2014) REDDuced: from sustainability to legality to units of carbon—the search for common interests in international forest governance. Environ Sci Policy 35:12–19CrossRef
Maguire R, Lewis B (2018) Women, human rights and the global climate regime. J Hum Rights Environ 9(1):51–67CrossRef
Peach Brown C et al (2011) Institutional perceptions of opportunities and challenges of REDD+ in the Congo Basin. J Environ Dev 20(4):381–404CrossRef
Rakatama A, Pandit R, Ma C, Iftekhar S (2017) The costs and benefits of REDD+: a review of the literature. For Policy Econ 75:103–111CrossRef
Rose C (1986) The comedy of the commons: custom, commerce and inherently public property. Univ Chicago Law Rev 53:711–781CrossRef
Sunderland T et al (2014) Challenging perceptions about men, women and forest product use: a global comparative study. World Dev 64:56–66CrossRef
Sunderlin W et al (2013) How are REDD+ proponents addressing tenure problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia and Vietnam. World Dev 55:37–52CrossRef
Torpey-Saboe N et al (2015) Benefit sharing among local resource users: the role of property rights. World Dev 72:408–416CrossRef
Vijge M, Brockhaus M, Di Gregorio M, Muharrom E (2016) Framing national REDD+ benefits, monitoring, governance and finance: a comparative analysis of seven countries. Glob Environ Change 39:57–68CrossRef
Weatherley-Sing J, Gupta A (2015) Drivers of deforestation and REDD+ benefit-sharing: a meta-analysis of the (missing) link. Environ Sci Policy 54:97–105
Fach E, Timilsina A (eds) (2011) Staying on track: tackling corruption risks in climate change. United Nations Development Program, Nairobi, Kenya
Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds) (2014) Climate change 2014 synthesis report: contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland
Sayer J et al (2008) Local rights and tenure for forests: opportunity or threat for conservation? Rights and resource initiative
Taccoi L, Downs F, Larmour P (2009) Anti-corruption policies in the forest sector and REDD+. In: Angelsen A (ed) Realising REDD+: national strategy and policy options. Center for International Forestry Research
White A, Martin A (2002) Who owns the world’s forests? Forest tenure and public forests in transition. Forest trends
Convention on Biological Diversity, 1760 UNTS 79 (entered into force 29 Dec 1993). (‘Convention on Biological Diversity’)
Decision 1/CP.16, Policy approaches and positive incentives on issues relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries; and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries, Appendix 1, paragraph 2
Decision 18/CP.20, Lima work Programme on gender, FCCC/CP/2014/10/Add.3
Decision CP.23, Establishment of a gender action plan (2017)
Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1, 10 Dec 1997. (‘Kyoto Protocol’)
Nagoya Protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization to the convention on biological diversity, UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/1, 29 Oct 2010. (‘Nagoya Protocol’)
Non-legally binding authoritative statement of principles for a global consensus on the management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests, A/conf.151/26 (Vol III), 14 Aug 1992. (‘Forest Convention’)
Paris Agreement to the United Nations framework convention on climate change, opened for signature 12 Dec 2015 (entered into force 4 November 2016) (in UNFCCC, Report of the conference of the parties on its twenty-first session, Addendum, UN Doc FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1, 29 Jan 2016), (‘Paris Agreement’)
Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation in developing countries: approaches to stimulate action, FCCC/CP/2005/MISC.1, 11 Nov 2005
Report of the conference of the parties on its sixteenth session, FCCC/CP/2010/Add.1
Subsidiary Body for Implementation (2015) Report on the in-session workshop on gender-responsive climate policy with a focus on mitigation action and technology development and transfer FCCC/SBI/2015/12
Subsidiary Body for Implementation (2016) In-session workshop on gender-responsive climate policy with a focus on adaptation, capacity-building and training for delegates on gender issues’ FCCC/SBI/2016/10, Annex
Subsidiary Body for Implementation (2017) Informal summary report on the subsidiary body for implementation in-session workshop to develop possible elements of the gender action plan under the UNFCCC forty-sixth session, Bonn, Germany, 8–18 May 2017
The Cancun Agreements: outcome of the work of the ad hoc working group on long-term cooperative action under the convention (Decision 1/CP.16) FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1994) 1771 UNTS 107 (entered into force 21 Mar 1994) (‘UNFCCC’)
Metadaten
Titel
Benefit Sharing Under the REDD+ Mechanism: Implications for Women
verfasst von
Rowena Maguire
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Intellectual Property and Clean Energy

Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2154-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-13-2155-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2155-9_22