Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The authors wish to acknowledge the research assistance provided on this project by Sunny Choi and Han Mo Oh who are PhD students at Texas Tech University.
Using multiple methods to study a phenomenon is proposed to produce results that are more robust and compelling than single method studies. This research note investigates the implementation of multiple methods research in marketing. In the main study, we conducted a content analysis of articles published in five leading marketing journals from 1990 to 2008: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, and Marketing Science. To aid in interpretation of findings from the content analysis, we gathered verbal data from authors of recent multiple methods studies to gain further insight into the benefits and challenges of conducting and publishing multiple methods research.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Alise, M. A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral Sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 103–126. CrossRef
Boyer, K. K., & Swink, M. L. (2009). Empirical elephants—Why multiple methods are essential to quality research in operations and supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 26, 337–348. CrossRef
Campbell, D., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 297–312. CrossRef
Carter, C. R., Sanders, N. R., & Dong, Y. (2008). Paradigms, revolutions and tipping points: The need for using multiple methodologies within the field of supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 26, 693–696. CrossRef
Commuri, S., & Gentry, J. W. (2005). Resource allocation in households with women as chief wage earners. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 185–195. CrossRef
Coulter, R. A., Price, L. L., & Feick, L. (2003). Rethinking the origins of involvement and brand commitment: Insights from postsocialist central Europe. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 151–169. CrossRef
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Multiple Methods Research, 3(2), 95–108.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Dahl, D. W., & Moreau, P. (2002). The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 47–60. CrossRef
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The logic of naturalistic inquiry. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Sociological methods: A sourcebook. New York: McGraw Hill.
Deshpande, R. (1983). Paradigms lost: On theory and method in research in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 101–110. CrossRef
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hirschman, E. (1986). Humanistic inquiry in marketing research: Philosophy, method, and criteria. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(3), 237–249. CrossRef
Hudson, L. A., & Ozanne, J. L. (1988). Alternative ways of seeking knowledge in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), 508–521. CrossRef
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611. CrossRef
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. CrossRef
Kirkwood, J. A., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2007). Using multiple paradigm research methodologies to gain new insights into entrepreneurial motivations. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 15(3), 219–241. CrossRef
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
QSR International. (2008). NVivo, Version 8 (qualitative data analysis software). Melbourne, Australia: QSR International Pty Ltd.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Pfeffer, J. (2007). A modest proposal: How we might change the process and product of managerial research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1334–1345. CrossRef
Stewart, D. W. (2009). The role of method: Some parting thoughts from a departing editor. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(4), 381–383. CrossRef
Stewart, D. W. (2007). New and improved! A look at the future. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 1–4. CrossRef
Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. C. (2007). The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 171–193. CrossRef
Svensson, G. (2006). The paradoxnoia of top journal(s) in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 40(11/12), 1153–1168. CrossRef
Tashakkori, A. (2010). Are we there yet?: The state of the mixed methods community. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(4), 287–291. CrossRef
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combing qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Tellis, G. J., Chandy, R. K., & Ackerman, D. S. (1999). In search of diversity: The record of major marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 120–131. CrossRef
Venable, B. T., Rose, G. M., Bush, V. D., & Gilbert, F. W. (2005). The role of brand personality in charitable giving: An assessment and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 95–312. CrossRef
Zinkhan, G. M. (2003). A look to the future of JAMS: Three years out, thirty years out.. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3), 225–228. CrossRef
- Benefits and challenges of conducting multiple methods research in marketing
Donna F. Davis
Susan L. Golicic
Courtney N. Boerstler
- Springer US
Entwicklung einer Supply-Strategie bei der Atotech Deutschland GmbH am Standort Feucht