Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12116-016-9232-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
While previous studies on political connections have empirically estimated the effects of connections on firm value, we still know relatively little about how political connections are formed, or about how the formation of political connections affects the way politicians influence firms. I address these two questions by examining recent cases in China in which two powerful politicians—Bo Xilai and Chen Liangyu—were removed from office. I show that Bo’s removal only affected nationally connected firms, while Chen’s fall only affected locally connected firms. I argue that this difference should be explained by their different career paths: Bo was a national politician, whereas Chen spent his whole career in local government. There is strong evidence that firms were betting on Bo and hence lost market value after his fall. These findings have important implications for our understanding of state-business relations in developing countries.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
(PDF 229 KB)12116_2016_9232_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Acemoglu, D, Johnson S, Kermani A, Kwak J, Mitton T. 2016. Forthcoming. The value of connections in turbulent times: Evidence from the united states. Journal of Financial Economics.
Agrawal, A, Knoeber CR. 2001. Do some outside directors play a political role?, Vol. 44.
Ang, Y Y. 2016. Forthcoming. Co-optation & Clientelism: Nested Distributive Politics in China’s Single-Party Dictatorship. Studies in Comparative International Development.
Ang, YY, Jia N. Perverse complementarity: political connections and the use of courts among private firms in china. J Polit 2014;76(02):318–332. CrossRef
Bardhan, P. Corruption and development: a review of issues. J Econ Lit 1997;35(3):1320–1346.
Bernhard, W, Leblang D. Democratic processes and financial markets: Pricing politics: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
Boubakri, N, Cosset J-C, Saffar W. Political connections of newly privatized firms. J Corp Finance 2008;14(5):654–673. CrossRef
Dickson, B. Red capitalists in china: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
Eggers, AC, Hainmueller J. MPs for sale? returns to office in postwar british politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 2009;103(4):513–533. CrossRef
Faccio, M. Politically connected firms. Am Econ Rev 2006;96(1):369–386. CrossRef
Fama, EF, Jensen MC. Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 1983;26(2):301–325. CrossRef
Fan, JPH, Rui OM, Zhao M. Public governance and corporate finance: evidence from corruption cases. J Comp Econ 2008;36(3):343–364. CrossRef
Fan, JPH, Wong TJ, Zhang T. Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of china’s newly partially privatized firms. J Financ Econ 2007;84(2):330–357. CrossRef
Ferguson, T, Voth H-J. Betting on hitler–the value of political connections in nazi germany. Q J Econ 2008;123(1):101–137. CrossRef
Fisman, R. Estimating the value of political connections. Am Econ Rev 2001;91(4):1095–1102. CrossRef
Gallagher, M E. Contagious capitalism: Princeton University Press; 2005.
Gandhi, J, Przeworski A. Dictatorial institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comp Polit Stud 2007;40:1279–1301. CrossRef
Gans-Morse, J, Mazzuca S, Nichter S. Varieties of clientelism: Machine politics during elections. Am J Polit Sci 2014;58(2):415–432. CrossRef
Groseclose, T, Snyder JM. Buying supermajorities. Am Polit Sci Rev 1996;90(2):303–315. CrossRef
Hermalin, BE, Weisbach MS. The determinants of board composition. RAND J Econ 1988;19(4):589–606. CrossRef
Hicken, A. Clientelism. Ann Rev Polit Sci 2011;14:289–310. CrossRef
Hsueh, R. China’s regulatory state: A new strategy for globalization: Cornell University Press; 2011.
Jayachandran, S. The jeffords effect. J Law Econ 2006;49(2):397–425. CrossRef
Johnson, S, Mitton T. Cronyism and capital controls: evidence from malaysia. J Financ Econ 2003;67(2):351–382. CrossRef
Khwaja, AI, Mian A. Tracing the impact of bank liquidity shocks: Evidence from an emerging market. Am Econ Rev 2008;98(4):1413–1442. CrossRef
Khwaja, AI, Mian A. Rent seeking and corruption in financial markets. Ann Rev Econ 2011;3(1):579–600. CrossRef
Landry, P. Decentralized authoritarianism in china: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
Lieberthal, K G. Introduction: The ‘fragmented authoritarianism’ model and its limitations. Bureaucracy, Politics and Decision Making in Post-Mao China. In: Lieberthal KG and Lampton DM, editors. University of California Press; 1992. p. 1–22.
MacKinlay, AC. Event studies in economics and finance. J Econ Lit 1997;35(1): 13–39.
Manion, M. Retirement of revolutionaries in china: Public policies, Social norms, Private interests: Princeton University Press; 1993.
Mertha, A. Fragmented authoritarianism 2.0: political pluralization in the chinese policy process. China Q 2009;200:995–1012. CrossRef
Montinola, G, Qian Y, Weingast B. Federalism, Chinese style: The political basis for economic success. World Polit 1995;48(1):50–81. CrossRef
Naughton, B. The chinese economy: Transitions and growth: The MIT Press; 2007.
Roberts, BE. A dead senator tells no lies: seniority and the distribution of federal benefits. Am J Polit Sci 1990;34(1):31–58. CrossRef
Shih, V, Adolph C, Liu M. Getting ahead in the communist party: Explaining the advancement of central committee members in china. Am Polit Sci Rev 2012;106(01):166–187. CrossRef
Shirk, S L. The political logic of economic reform in china: University of California Press; 1993.
Shleifer, A, Vishny RW. Corruption. Q J Econ 1993;108(3):599–617. CrossRef
Stigler, GJ. The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 1971;2 (1):3–21. CrossRef
Stokes, SC. Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from argentina. Am Polit Sci Rev 2005;99(03):315–325. CrossRef
Sun, P, Xu H, Zhou J. The value of local political capital in transition china. Econ Lettx 2011;110(3):189–192. CrossRef
Treisman, D. The architecture of government: Rethinking political decentralization: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
Truex, R. The returns to office in a “rubber stamp” parliament. Am Polit Sci Rev 2014;108(02):235–251. CrossRef
Tsai, K. Adaptive informal institutions and endogenous institutional change in china. World Polit 2006;59:116–141. CrossRef
Vidal, JBI, Draca M, Fons-Rosen C. Revolving door lobbyists. Am Econ Rev 2012;102(7):3731–3748. CrossRef
Wang, Y. Tying the autocrat’s hands: The rise of the rule of law in china: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
Wang, Y. Beyond local protectionism: china’s state-business relations in the last two decades. China Q 2016;226:319–341. CrossRef
Wong, CPW. Central-local relations revisited: The 1994 tax-sharing reform and public expenditure management in china. China Perspectives 2000:52–63.
Yang, DL. Economic transformation and its political discontents in china: authoritarianism, unequal growth, and the dilemmas of political development. Ann Rev Polit Sci 2006;9:143–164. CrossRef
- Betting on a Princeling
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia