Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality & Quantity 5/2016

18.07.2015

Big Five for work and organizations: FLORA (Role Related Personal Profile), an Italian personality test based on the Five-Factor Model and developed for the assessment of candidates and employees

verfasst von: Riccardo Sartori, Andrea Ceschi, Arianna Costantini, Andrea Scalco

Erschienen in: Quality & Quantity | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The needs for personality assessment in organizations are peculiar. For example, personality measures for the assessment of candidates or employees should be related to job performance. Even strong correlations between personality tests and job performance might not be sufficient, though, because some tests make use of a language people working in organizations are not accustomed to and, therefore, the personality profiles obtained by those tests may sound meaningless or even abstruse to organizational managers and decision makers. The paper reports the results of the qualitative actions and the quantitative operations carried out in order to create and validate a new Italian personality test (named FLORA) based on the Five-Factor Model (FFM) and expressly developed for the assessment of specific professional profiles in organizations. The qualitative actions consisted of 32 interviews with 16 job profiles. Content analyses of interviews led to the identification of 28 personality traits distributed into the 5 categories of the FFM. For each trait, 6 items were generated. Another 8 items were added to form a Lie Scale. The quantitative operations involved a validation sample of 407 employees, a confirmation sample of 418 other employees and the monitoring of the concurrent validity with another test (n = 1028) and job performance (n = 220). After analyses, FLORA seems to meet the criteria to be a test based on the FFM and usable for the assessment of specific professional profiles as its dimensions are uncorrelated with the Lie Scale and correlated according to hypotheses to both another test and job performance.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
SRMR = Standardized Root Mean Square Residual; RMSEA = Root-Mean-Square Error of Approximation. The closer these indexes to 0 the more empirically tested the theoretical model is. NFI = Normed Fit Index; CFI = Comparative Fix Index. The closer these indexes to 1 the more empirically tested the theoretical model is.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ashton, M.C., Lee, K.: Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 11, 150–166 (2007)CrossRef Ashton, M.C., Lee, K.: Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 11, 150–166 (2007)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G.V., Steca, P.: BFA. Big Five Adjectives. Manuale. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze (2002) Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G.V., Steca, P.: BFA. Big Five Adjectives. Manuale. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze (2002)
Zurück zum Zitat Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K.: The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 44, 1–26 (1991)CrossRef Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K.: The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 44, 1–26 (1991)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L.: BFQ. Big Five Questionnaire. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze (1993) Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L.: BFQ. Big Five Questionnaire. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze (1993)
Zurück zum Zitat Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L.: BFO Big Five Observer: Manuale. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze (1994) Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L.: BFO Big Five Observer: Manuale. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze (1994)
Zurück zum Zitat Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Vecchione, M.: BFQ 2. Big Five Questionnaire 2. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze (2007) Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Vecchione, M.: BFQ 2. Big Five Questionnaire 2. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze (2007)
Zurück zum Zitat Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R.: Personality in adulthood: a six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 853–863 (1988)CrossRef Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R.: Personality in adulthood: a six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 853–863 (1988)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cronbach, L.J., Meehl, P.E.: Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52, 281–302 (1955)CrossRef Cronbach, L.J., Meehl, P.E.: Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52, 281–302 (1955)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Crowne, D.P., Marlow, D.: A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J. Consul. Psychol. 24, 349–354 (1960)CrossRef Crowne, D.P., Marlow, D.: A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J. Consul. Psychol. 24, 349–354 (1960)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat De Fruyt, F., McCrae, R.R., Szirmák, Z., Nagy, J.: The Five-Factor personality inventory as a measure of the Five-Factor Model: belgian, American, and Hungarian comparisons with the NEO-PI-R”. Assessment 11, 207–215 (2004). doi:10.1177/1073191104265800 CrossRef De Fruyt, F., McCrae, R.R., Szirmák, Z., Nagy, J.: The Five-Factor personality inventory as a measure of the Five-Factor Model: belgian, American, and Hungarian comparisons with the NEO-PI-R”. Assessment 11, 207–215 (2004). doi:10.​1177/​1073191104265800​ CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat De Vellis, R.F.: Scale development. Sage, Newbury Park (2003) De Vellis, R.F.: Scale development. Sage, Newbury Park (2003)
Zurück zum Zitat Flanagan, J.C.: The critical incident technique. Psychological Bullettin 51, 327–358 (1954)CrossRef Flanagan, J.C.: The critical incident technique. Psychological Bullettin 51, 327–358 (1954)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberg, L.R.: Language and individual differences: the search for universals in personality lexicon. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59, 1216–1229 (1981)CrossRef Goldberg, L.R.: Language and individual differences: the search for universals in personality lexicon. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59, 1216–1229 (1981)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberg, L.R.: An alternative “description of personality”: the big five factor structure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59, 1216–1229 (1990)CrossRef Goldberg, L.R.: An alternative “description of personality”: the big five factor structure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59, 1216–1229 (1990)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grucza, R.A., Goldberg, L.R.: The comparative validity of 11 modern personality inventories: predictions of behavioral acts, informant reports, and clinical indicators. J. Pers. Assess. 89, 167–187 (2007). doi:10.1080/00223890701468568 CrossRef Grucza, R.A., Goldberg, L.R.: The comparative validity of 11 modern personality inventories: predictions of behavioral acts, informant reports, and clinical indicators. J. Pers. Assess. 89, 167–187 (2007). doi:10.​1080/​0022389070146856​8 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Holland, J.L.: The Psychology of Vocational Choice: A Theory of Personality Types and Model Environments. Blaisdel, Walthman (1966) Holland, J.L.: The Psychology of Vocational Choice: A Theory of Personality Types and Model Environments. Blaisdel, Walthman (1966)
Zurück zum Zitat Hogan, R., Hogan, J., Roberts, B.W.: Personality measurement and employment decisions: questions and Answers. Am. Psychol. 51, 469–477 (1996)CrossRef Hogan, R., Hogan, J., Roberts, B.W.: Personality measurement and employment decisions: questions and Answers. Am. Psychol. 51, 469–477 (1996)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kline, P.: The Handbook of Psychological Testing. Routledge, London (1993) Kline, P.: The Handbook of Psychological Testing. Routledge, London (1993)
Zurück zum Zitat Kline, P.: The New Psychometrics. Routledge, London (1998) Kline, P.: The New Psychometrics. Routledge, London (1998)
Zurück zum Zitat Manganelli Rattazzi, A.M., Canova, L., Marcorin, R.: La desiderabilità sociale. Un’analisi di forme brevi della scala di Marlowe e Crowne. Test. Psicometria Metodol. 7, 5–16 (2000) Manganelli Rattazzi, A.M., Canova, L., Marcorin, R.: La desiderabilità sociale. Un’analisi di forme brevi della scala di Marlowe e Crowne. Test. Psicometria Metodol. 7, 5–16 (2000)
Zurück zum Zitat McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T.: Personality trait structure as human universal. Am. Psychol. 52, 509–516 (1997)CrossRef McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T.: Personality trait structure as human universal. Am. Psychol. 52, 509–516 (1997)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T.: A Five-Factor theory of personality. In: Pervin, L.A., John, O.P. (eds.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2nd edn, pp. 139–153. Guilford Press, New York (1999) McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T.: A Five-Factor theory of personality. In: Pervin, L.A., John, O.P. (eds.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2nd edn, pp. 139–153. Guilford Press, New York (1999)
Zurück zum Zitat McCrae, R.R., Terracciano, A., & 79 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project: Personality Profiles of Cultures: aggregate Personality Traits. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89, 407–425 (2005)CrossRef McCrae, R.R., Terracciano, A., & 79 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project: Personality Profiles of Cultures: aggregate Personality Traits. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89, 407–425 (2005)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rothmann, S., Coetzer, E.P.: The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. J. Indust. Psychol. 29, 68–74 (2003) Rothmann, S., Coetzer, E.P.: The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. J. Indust. Psychol. 29, 68–74 (2003)
Zurück zum Zitat Sartori, R.: Validità, attendibilità, sensibilità e sensatezza dei metodi e delle misure in psicologia: questionari e test. DiPAV 9, 147–165 (2004) Sartori, R.: Validità, attendibilità, sensibilità e sensatezza dei metodi e delle misure in psicologia: questionari e test. DiPAV 9, 147–165 (2004)
Zurück zum Zitat Sartori, R.: Acquiescenza e desiderabilità sociale nella versione italiana della Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES) di Mehrabian. Test. Psicometria Metodol. 12, 317–330 (2005) Sartori, R.: Acquiescenza e desiderabilità sociale nella versione italiana della Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES) di Mehrabian. Test. Psicometria Metodol. 12, 317–330 (2005)
Zurück zum Zitat Sartori, R.: FLORA. Role Related Personal Profile. Manuale d’uso. Edizioni UTilia, Verona (2014) Sartori, R.: FLORA. Role Related Personal Profile. Manuale d’uso. Edizioni UTilia, Verona (2014)
Zurück zum Zitat Sartori, R., Ceschi, A.: Assessment and development centers: judgment biases and risks of using idiographic and nomothetic approaches to collecting information on people to be evaluated and trained in organizations. Qual. Quant. 47, 3277–3288 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11135-012-9718-z CrossRef Sartori, R., Ceschi, A.: Assessment and development centers: judgment biases and risks of using idiographic and nomothetic approaches to collecting information on people to be evaluated and trained in organizations. Qual. Quant. 47, 3277–3288 (2013). doi:10.​1007/​s11135-012-9718-z CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sartori, R., Rolandi, A.: Validation study of a model for the assessment of potential in Italian Young Professionals working in medium-sized to large companies in different business sectors. Qual. Quant. 47, 2729–2737 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11135-012-9683-6 CrossRef Sartori, R., Rolandi, A.: Validation study of a model for the assessment of potential in Italian Young Professionals working in medium-sized to large companies in different business sectors. Qual. Quant. 47, 2729–2737 (2013). doi:10.​1007/​s11135-012-9683-6 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sartori, R., Ceschi, A., Cubico, S., Favretto, G.: Quality and quantity in the construction and validation of a psychological test for the assessment and selection of aspiring volunteer rescuers: the action-research in an Italian health association. Qual. Quant. 48, 3037–3051 (2014). doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9939-9 CrossRef Sartori, R., Ceschi, A., Cubico, S., Favretto, G.: Quality and quantity in the construction and validation of a psychological test for the assessment and selection of aspiring volunteer rescuers: the action-research in an Italian health association. Qual. Quant. 48, 3037–3051 (2014). doi:10.​1007/​s11135-013-9939-9 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sartori, R., Ceschi, A., Dorofeeva, K., Bellotto, M.: Psychological assessment in human resources management: characteristics, biases and solutions. Eur. J. Manag. 13, 43–50 (2013)CrossRef Sartori, R., Ceschi, A., Dorofeeva, K., Bellotto, M.: Psychological assessment in human resources management: characteristics, biases and solutions. Eur. J. Manag. 13, 43–50 (2013)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Soto, C.J., John, O.P., Gosling, S.D., Potter, J.: Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100, 300–348 (2011). doi:10.1037/a0021717 CrossRef Soto, C.J., John, O.P., Gosling, S.D., Potter, J.: Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100, 300–348 (2011). doi:10.​1037/​a0021717 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van der Linden, D., te Nijenhuis, J., Bakker, A.B.: The general factor of personality: a meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. J. Res. Pers. 44, 315–327 (2010)CrossRef van der Linden, D., te Nijenhuis, J., Bakker, A.B.: The general factor of personality: a meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. J. Res. Pers. 44, 315–327 (2010)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Big Five for work and organizations: FLORA (Role Related Personal Profile), an Italian personality test based on the Five-Factor Model and developed for the assessment of candidates and employees
verfasst von
Riccardo Sartori
Andrea Ceschi
Arianna Costantini
Andrea Scalco
Publikationsdatum
18.07.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Quality & Quantity / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0250-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Quality & Quantity 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe