nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Biogas: An Effective and Common Energy Tool – Part II

verfasst von : Gupta Monika, Panpatte Deepak, Jhala Yogeshvari, Vyas Rajababu

Erschienen in: Biofuel Production Technologies: Critical Analysis for Sustainability

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Combustion of nonrenewable energy sources brings about emission of greenhouse gases which lead to global warming. A large number of renewable energy sources are available as an alternative for mitigation of climate change, among which biogas seems to be more popular and attractive option. Biogas is presently still typically used for heating and electricity generation, but in the future, it may find its way as vehicle fuel. Biogas production technology has potential to utilize a large number and variety of lignocellulosic biomass such as vegetable wastes, crop residues, food waste, cattle dung, and other organic fractions. Anaerobic degradation of waste to yield biogas is a widely adopted cost-effective strategy for generation of renewable energy. In addition to energy generation, biogas technology provides additional benefits, such as reduction of odor, improved sanitation, and removal of organic waste, thereby solving a majority of modern-day problems. The slurry left after biogas production can be utilized as manure and thereby aids in nutrient recycling to the soil. Besides a large number of applications, full potential of biogas technology cannot be harnessed due to various limitations associated with it. A large number of technological improvements are done during recent years to increase conversion rates of biomass to biogas. The present article provides an insight regarding recent research for sustainable biogas production.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Biogas: An Effective and Common Energy Tool – Part I

Nächstes Kapitel Biogas: An Effective and Common Energy Tool – Part III

Abdeshahian P, Lim JS, Ho WS, Hashim H, Lee CT (2016) Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:714–723CrossRef

Ahammad SZ, Sreekrishnan TR (2016) Biogas: an evolutionary perspective in the Indian context. In: Green fuels technology; green energy and technology. Springer, Cham, pp 431–443CrossRef

Ahring BK, Jensen K, Nielsen P, Bjerre AB, Schmidt AS (1996) Pretreatment of wheat straw and conversion of xylose and xylan to ethanol by thermophilic anaerobic bacteria. Bioresour Technol 58(2):107–113CrossRef

Alexander M (1961) Introduction to soil microbiology. Wiley, New York

American Biogas Council American Biogas Council Announces 2016 Biogas Industry Awardees.. Available online: http://americanbiogascouncil.org/pdf/ABC%20Press%20Release2016%20Biogas%20Award% 20Winners.pdf. Accessed 4 July 2018

Aryal N, Kvist T, Aryal N, Kvist T (2018) Alternative of biogas injection into the Danish gas grid system – a study from demand perspective. Chem Eng 2:43

Batstone DJ, Keller J, Angelidaki I, Kalyuzhnyi SV, Pavlostathis SG, Rozzi A, Sanders WTM, Siegrist H, Vavilin VA (2002) The IWA anaerobic digestion model no 1 (ADM 1). Water Sci Technol 45(10):65–73CrossRef

Braun R (1982) Biogas – methane treatment of organic waste. Springer, Wien

Braun R (2007) Anaerobic digestion: A multi-faceted process for energy, environmental management and rural development. In: Ranalli P (ed) Improvement of crop plants for industrial end uses. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 335–415CrossRef

Chandra RP, Bura R, Mabee WE, Berlin A, Pan X, Saddler JN (2007) Substrate pretreatment: the key to effective enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics? In: Olsson L (ed) Biofuels. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 67–93CrossRef

Chasnyk O, Sołowski G, Shkarupa O (2015) Historical, technical and economic aspects of biogas development: case of Poland and Ukraine. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:227–239CrossRef

Chaiyapong P, Chavalparit O (2016) Enhancement of biogas production potential from Acacia leaf waste using alkaline pre-treatment and co-digestion. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18:427–436CrossRef

Chen Y, Cheng J, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:4044–4064CrossRef

Claassen PAM, Van Lier JB, Contreras AML, Van Niel EWJ, Sijtsma L et al (1999) Utilisation of biomass for the supply of energy carriers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52(6):741–755CrossRef

CPCB (2013) Consolidated annual review report on implementation of municipal solid wastes (management and handling) rules, 2000. In: BOARD, C.P.C. (ed) Ministry of Environment Forests & Climate Change, New Delhi

Crable BR, Plugge CM, McInerney MJ, Stams AJM (2011) Formate formation and formate conversion in biological fuels production. Enzyme Res:1–8

CSO (2014) Energy statistics. In: Office, C.S. (ed) Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.027

de Vries JW, Vinken TMWJ, Hamelin L, De Boer IJM (2012) Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and codigestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy – a life cycle perspective. Bioresour Technol 125:239–248CrossRef

Demirel B, Scherer P (2011) Trace element requirements of agricultural biogas digesters during biological conversion of renewable biomass to methane. Biomass Bioenergy 35:992–998

Deublein D, Steinhauser A (2011) Biogas from waste and renewable resources: an introduction. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Mörlenbach, p 578

Deo P, Modak S, Shukla PR (1991) Decentralized energy planning. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India

Diamantis V, Melidis P, Aivasidis A (2006) Continuous determination of volatile products in anaerobic fermenters by on-line capillary gas chromatography. Anal Chim Acta 573–574:189–194CrossRef

Donkin SS, Doane PH, Cecava MJ (2013) Expanding the role of crop residues and biofuel co-products as ruminant feedstuffs. Anim Front 3(2):54–60CrossRef

Falk HM, Reichling P, Andersen C, Benz R (2015) Online monitoring of concentration and dynamics of volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion processes with mid-infrared spectroscopy. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38:237–249CrossRef

Forgács G, Pourbafrani M, Niklasson C, Taherzadeh MJ, Sárvári Horváth I (2012) Methane production from citrus wastes: process development and cost estimation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87(2):250–255CrossRef

Fox MH, Noike T, Ohki T (2003) Alkaline subcritical-water treatment and alkaline heat treatment for the increase in biodegradability of newsprint waste. Water Sci Technol 48(4):77–84CrossRef

Griffin ME, McMahon KD, Mackie RI, Raskin L (1998) Methanogenic population dynamics during start-up of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and biosolids. Biotechnol Bioeng 57(3):342–355CrossRef

Hendriks ATWM, Zeeman G (2009) Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 100(1):10–18CrossRef

Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. World Bank, Washington, DC

Horváth SI, Tabatabaei M, Karimi K, Kumar R (2016) Recent updates on biogas production – a review. Biofuel Res J 10:394–402CrossRef

Jin S, Chen H (2006) Superfine grinding of steam-exploded rice straw and its enzymatic hydrolysis. Biochem Eng J 30(3):225–230CrossRef

Jin X, Li X, Zhao N, Angelidaki I, Zhang Y (2017) Bio-electrolytic sensor for rapid monitoring of volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion process. Water Res 111:74–80CrossRef

Kabir MM, del Pilar Castillo M, Taherzadeh MJ, Sárvári Horváth I (2013) Enhanced methane production from forest residues by N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO) pretreatment. Bio Resour 8(4):5409–5423

Kabir MM, Rajendran K, Taherzadeh MJ, Sarvari Horvath I (2015) Experimental and economical evaluation of bioconversion of forest residues to biogas using organosolv pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 178:201–208CrossRef

Kaur A, Kim JR, Michie I, Dinsdale RM, Guwy AJ, Premier GC (2013) Microbial fuel cell type biosensor for specific volatile fatty acids using acclimated bacterial communities. Biosens Bioelectron 47:50–55CrossRef

Kemausuor F, Adaramola MS, Morken J (2018) A review of commercial biogas systems and lessons for Africa. Energies 11:2984CrossRef

Kolchakov V, Petrova V, Mitova T, Ivanov P, Marinova S (2017) Possibilities for biogas production from waste—potential, barriers, and legal notices. In: Energy solutions to combat global warming; lecture notes in energy. Springer, Cham, pp 181–191

Kuttner P, Weißböck AD, Leitner V, Jäger A (2015) Examination of commercial additives for biogas production. Agron Res 13:337–347

Langeveld JWA, Peterson EC (2018) Feedstocks for biogas production: biogas and electricity generation potentials. In: Biogas; biofuel and biorefinery technologies. Springer, Cham, pp 35–49

Larsson M, Grönkvist S, Alvfors P (2016) Upgraded biogas for transport in Sweden—effects of policy instruments on production, infrastructure deployment and vehicle sales. J Clean Prod 112:3774–3784CrossRef

Lehtomäki A (2006) Biogas production from energy crops and crop residues. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä

Lennartsson PR, Niklasson C, Taherzadeh MJ (2011) A pilot study on lignocelluloses to ethanol and fish feed using NMMO pretreatment and cultivation with zygomycetes in an air-lift reactor. Bioresour Technol 102(6):4425–4432CrossRef

Merlin Christy P, Gopinath LR, Divya D (2014) A review on anaerobic decomposition and enhancement of biogas production through enzymes and microorganisms. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 34:167–173CrossRef

Metcalf and Eddy (2004) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. Revised by Tchobanoglous G, Franklin LB, Stensel DH. 4th edn. McGraw-Hill

Mieliauskiene R, Nistor M, Laurinavicius V, Csöregi E (2006) Amperometric determination of acetate with a tri-enzyme based sensor. Sens Actuat Biochem 113:671–676CrossRef

Mittal S, Ahlgren EO, Shukla PR (2018) Barriers to biogas dissemination in India: a review. Energy Policy 112:361–370CrossRef

Mizutani F, Sawaguchi T, Yabuki S, Iljima S (2001) Amperometric determination of acetic acid with a tri enzyme/poly (dimethyl siloxane)-bilayer based sensor. Anal Chem 73:5738–5742CrossRef

MNRE (2015) Annual report, 2015–16. In: Energy, M.O.N.A.R. (ed) New Delhi

Møller HB, Sommer SG, Ahring BK (2004) Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass Bioenergy 26(5):485–495CrossRef

Monavari S, Galbe M, Zacchi G (2009) Impact of impregnation time and chip size on sugar yield in pretreatment of softwood for ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 100(24):6312–6316CrossRef

Pablo-Romero MDP, Sánchez-Braza A, Salvador-Ponce J, Sánchez-Labrador N (2017) An overview of feed-in tariffs, premiums and tenders to promote electricity from biogas in the EU-28. Renew Sust Energ Rev 73:1366–1379CrossRef

Pasqual J, Bollmann H, Scott C, Edwiges T, Baptista T, Pasqual JC, Bollmann HA, Scott CA, Edwiges T, Baptista TC (2018) Assessment of collective production of biomethane from livestock waste for urban transportation mobility in Brazil and the United States. Energies 11:997CrossRef

Pecorini I, Baldi F, Carnevale EA, Corti A (2016) Biochemical methane potential tests of different autoclaved and microwaved lignocellulosic organic fractions of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 56:143–150CrossRef

Pilas J, Yazici Y, Selmer T, Keusgen M, Schöning MJ (2017) Optimization of an amperometric biosensor array for simultaneous measurement of ethanol, formate, D- and L-lactate. Electrochim Acta 251:256–262CrossRef

Renewable Energy Network of the 21st Century. Renewables 2019 Global Status Report. 2018. Available online: http://www.ren21.net/status-of-renewables/global-status-report/. Accessed 2 Feb 2019

Salminen E, Rintala J (2002) Anaerobic digestion of organic solid poultry slaughterhouse waste-a review. Bioresour Technol 83(1):13–26CrossRef

Sam A, Bi X, Farnsworth D (2017) How incentives affect the adoption of anaerobic digesters in the United States. Sustainability 9:1221CrossRef

Schiffels J, Baumann MEM, Selmer T (2011) Facile analysis of shortchain fatty acids as 4-nitrophenyl esters in complex anaerobic fermentation samples by high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 1218:5848–5851CrossRef

Sehgal K (2018) Current state and future prospects of global biogas industry. In: Biogas; biofuel and biorefinery technologies. Springer, Cham, pp 449–472

Seppälä M, Paavola T, Rintala J (2007) Methane yields of different grass species on the second and third harvest in boreal conditions. In: Proceedings of 11th IWA world congress on anaerobic digestion, Brisbane, Australia, 23–27

Sharma KR (2008) Kinetics and modeling in anaerobic processes. In: Khanal SK (ed) Anaerobic technology for bioenergy production: principles and applications. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames

Shukla PR (2007) Biomass energy strategies for aligning development and climate goals in India. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency

Shukla PR (2019) Biomass energy strategies for aligning development and climate goals in India. Available online: https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/500101002.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2019

Sode K, Tsugawa W, Aoyagi M, Rajashekhara E, Watanabe K (2008) Propionate sensor using coenzyme-A transferase and Acyl-CoA oxidase. Protein Pept Lett 15:779–781CrossRef

Stockl A, Lichti F (2018) Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for a real time monitoring of the biogas process. Bioresour Technol 247:1249–1252CrossRef

Stürmer B (2017) Biogas—part of Austria’s future energy supply or political experiment? Renew Sust Energ Rev 79:525–532CrossRef

Sweeney JB, Murphy CD, McDonnell K (2018) Development of a bacterial propionate-biosensor for anaerobic digestion monitoring. Enzym Microb Technol 109:51–57CrossRef

Taherzadeh M, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci 9(9):1621–1651CrossRef

Takeuchi Y, Andriamanohiarisoamanana FJ, Yasui S, Iwasaki M, Nishida T, Ihara I, Umetsu K (2018) Feasibility study of a centralized biogas plant performance in a dairy farming area. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:314–322CrossRef

Teghammar A, Karimi K, Sárvári Horváth I, Taherzadeh MJ (2012) Enhanced biogas production from rice straw, triticale straw and softwood spruce by NMMO pretreatment. Biomass Bioenergy 36:116–120CrossRef

Torrijos M (2016) State of development of biogas production in Europe. Procedia Environ Sci 35:881–889CrossRef

Valenti F, Zhong Y, Sun M, Porto SMC, Toscano A, Dale BE, Sibilla F, Liao W (2018) Anaerobic co-digestion of multiple agricultural residues to enhance biogas production in southern Italy. Waste Manag 78:151–157CrossRef

Vavilin VA, Rytov SV, Lokshina LY (1996) A description of hydrolysis kinetics in anaerobic degradation of particulate organic matter. Bioresour Technol 56(2):229–237CrossRef

Vochozka M, Maroušková A, Šuler P (2018) Economic, environmental and moral acceptance of renewable energy: a case study-the agricultural biogas plant at Pěčín. Sci Eng Ethics 24:299–305CrossRef

Ward AJ, Hobbs PJ, Holliman PJ, Jones DL (2008) Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour Technol 99(17):7928–7940CrossRef

Weng JK, Li X, Bonawitz ND, Chapple C (2008) Emerging strategies of lignin engineering and degradation for cellulosic biofuel production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19(2):166–172CrossRef

Xu P, Koffas MAG (2010) Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for biofuel production. Biofuels 1(3):493–504CrossRef

Yadvika S, Sreekrishnan TR, Kohli S, Rana V et al (2004) Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques – a review. Bioresour Technol 95:1–10CrossRef

Yang B, Wyman CE (2008) Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2(1):26–40CrossRef

Yong Z, Dong Y, Zhang X, Tan T (2015) Anaerobic codigestion of food waste and straw for biogas production. Renew Energy 78:527–530CrossRef

Zeng M, Mosier NS, Huang CP, Sherman DM, Ladisch MR (2007) Microscopic examination of changes of plant cell structure in corn stover due to hot water pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(2):265–278CrossRef

Zhang YHP (2008) Reviving the carbohydrate economy via multiproduct lignocellulose biorefineries. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35(5):367–375CrossRef

Zubr J (1986) Methanogenic fermentation of fresh and ensiled plant materials. Biomass 11(3):159–171CrossRef

Zumbusch PV, Meyer-Jens T, Brunner G, Märkl H (1994) On-line monitoring of organic substances with high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) during the anaerobic fermentation of waste-water. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 42:140–146CrossRef

Titel: Biogas: An Effective and Common Energy Tool – Part II
verfasst von: Gupta Monika
Panpatte Deepak
Jhala Yogeshvari
Vyas Rajababu
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Buch: Biofuel Production Technologies: Critical Analysis for Sustainability
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8636-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-13-8637-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8637-4_4