nach oben

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft

Erschienen in:

12.01.2021

Blockchain or Aggregator? An Assessment of Service Provision Approaches for Prosumer Engagement in Grid Congestion Management

verfasst von: Gregor Jaschke, Alexander Morgan, Simon Johanning, Ankita Mitra, Thomas Bruckner

Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Der Artikel "Blockchain oder Aggregator? Eine Bewertung der Ansätze zur Bereitstellung von Dienstleistungen für prosumersches Engagement im Netzstaumanagement "untersucht die Herausforderungen und Lösungen für das Engpassmanagement, die durch die zunehmende Nutzung erneuerbarer Energiequellen angetrieben werden. Er untersucht die Rolle von Prosumenten, die sowohl Energie produzieren als auch verbrauchen, sowie das Potenzial der Blockchain-Technologie und der Aggregatoren zur Erleichterung des Netzmanagements. Die Studie führt eine multikriterielle Analyse durch, um die Machbarkeit und Nachhaltigkeit öffentlicher und konsortialer Blockchains sowie von Aggregatoren, die relationale Datenbanken verwenden, zu vergleichen. Die Ergebnisse bieten wertvolle Einblicke in die praktischen Implikationen dieser Ansätze und bilden eine Grundlage für politische Entscheidungsträger und Interessengruppen aus der Industrie, fundierte Entscheidungen über zukünftige Strategien für das Netzmanagement zu treffen.

KI-Generiert

Diese Zusammenfassung des Fachinhalts wurde mit Hilfe von KI generiert.

Vorheriger Artikel Getting Prices for Prosumers Right? Incentivizing Investment and Operation of Small-scale PV-Battery Storage Systems Through Prices, Charges and Levies

Nächster Artikel Regionalität aus Sicht von Energieversorgungsunternehmen – Eine qualitative Inhaltsanalyse zu Regionalstrom in Deutschland

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft (ZfE) ist eine unabhängige Fachzeitschrift mit aktuellen Themen zu Energiewirtschaft, Energiepolitik und Energierecht. JETZT BESTELLEN

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Such as versioning information, the merkle-tree root, difficulty target, nonce, uncles, beneficiaries, logs bloom, block number, gas limit, gas used, mix hash, state root, transaction root, receipt root, stake root, vote bites, final state, voters, fresh stake, revocations, pool size, stake difficulty, height, size, stake version or other data, depending on the specific blockchain.

More specifically, it is the value determined by a (cryptographic) hash function, a mathematical one-way function that assigns data of arbitrary length a string of fixed length and that is designed to withstand cryptographic attacks, such as replacing or modifying the data without changing this number.

In private blockchains a single node or institution controls the chain, whereas in the consortium paradigm a selected set of nodes share these rights.

Private blockchains were not considered as they are implemented within one organisation or institution, and thus are not suitable for prosumers who require a separate institution to facilitate their engagement.

In the TenneT and Sonnen pilot project not all information was stored on the blockchain; and thus in practice was a combination of an aggregator and consortium blockchain model.

Only two of three fundamental blockchain properties can hold simultaneously; the properties mentioned differ between the literature and comprise scalability, decentralisation and security (Lyons et al. 2019; Schäffer et al. 2019) or scalability, interoperability and sustainability (Holotescu and Vasiu 2020) or decentralization, consistency and scalability (Zhang and Jacobsen 2018).

Which would determine whether they need to be supervised by financial regulatory authorities such as the BaFin and the duties coming with this.

such as the applicability of the GoBD (Grundsätze zur ordnungsmäßigen Führung und Aufbewahrung von Büchern, Aufzeichnungen und Unterlagen in elektronischer Form sowie zum Datenzugriff).

Accenture (2013) Realizing the full potential of smart metering; Accenture’s digitally enabled grid program. https://www.accenture.com/t20160413t230144__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/accenture/conversion-assets/dotcom/documents/global/pdf/industries_9/accenture-smart-metering-report-digitally-enabled-grid.pdf. Accessed: 23 Dec 2019

Albrecht S, Reichert S, Schmid J, Strüker J, Neumann D, Fridgen G (2018) Dynamics of Blockchain implementation—A case study from the energy sector. In: Bui T (ed) Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Andoni M, Robu V, Flynn D, Abram S, Geach D, Jenkins D, McCallum P, Peacock A (2019) Blockchain technology in the energy sector: a systematic review of challenges and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 100:143–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.014CrossRef

Aung Z (2013) Database systems for the smart grid. In: Ali ABMS (ed) Smart Grids. Springer London, London, pp 151–168CrossRef

Bahrami S, Amini MH (2017) A decentralized framework for real-time energy trading in distribution networks with load and generation uncertainty. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.02575v1. Accessed: 1 Oct 2020

Batubara FR, Ubacht J, Janssen M (2018) Challenges of blockchain technology adoption for e‑government: a systematic literature review. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (dg.o ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209317 (Article 76)CrossRef

Bedi G, Venayagamoorthy GK, Singh R, Brooks RR, Wang K‑C (2018) Review of Internet of Things (IoT) in electric power and energy systems. IEEE Internet Things J 5:847–870. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2802704CrossRef

Beria P, Maltese I, Mariotti I (2012) Multicriteria versus cost benefit analysis: a comparative perspective in the assessment of sustainable mobility. Eur Transp Res Rev 4:137–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-012-0074-9CrossRef

BEUC (2018) Electricity aggregators; starting off on the right foot with consumers. https://www.beuc.eu/publications/beuc-x-2018-010_electricity_aggregators_starting_off_on_the_right_foot_with_consumers.pdf. Accessed: 14 Febr 2019

BNetzA, BKartA (2019) Monitoring Report 2019. https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Areas/ElectricityGas/CollectionCompanySpecificData/Monitoring/MonitoringReport2019.pdf;jsessionid=5138C439C56313669C6779F2D875CA22?__blob=publicationFile&v=2. Accessed: 1 Oct 2020

Bogensperger A, Zeiselmair A, Hinterstocker M, Dufter C (2018) Die Blockchain-Technologie; Chance zur Transformation der Energiewirtschaft? https://www.ffe.de/attachments/article/846/Blockchain_Teilbericht_UseCases.pdf. Accessed: 1 June 2019

Bruninx K, Madzharov D, Delarue E, D’haeseleer W (2013) Impact of the German nuclear phase-out on Europe’s electricity generation—A comprehensive study. Energy Policy 60:251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.026CrossRef

Deloitte (2018) Breaking blockchain open; Deloitte’s 2018 global blockchain survey. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Energy-and-Resources/gx-us-fsi-2018-global-blockchain-survey-report.pdf. Accessed: 10 Nov 2020

dena (2019) Blockchain in der integrierten Energiewende. https://www.dena.de/fileadmin/dena/Publikationen/PDFs/2019/dena-Studie_Blockchain_Integrierte_Energiewende_DE4.pdf. Accessed: 1 June 2019

Dodgson JS, Spackman M, Pearman A, Phillips LD (2009) Multi-criteria analysis; A manual. Department for Communities and Local Government, Wetherby, London

Döppenbecker K (2017) Controlling weather-dependent renewable electricity production with blockchain. IBM Online, TenneT. https://www.tennet.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Our_Key_Tasks/Innovations/blockchain_technology/Artikel_IBM.pdf. Accessed: 23 Febr 2019

Dorri A, Kanhere SS, Jurdak R (2019) MOF-BC: a memory optimized and flexible blockchain for large scale networks. Future Gener Comput Syst 92:357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.10.002CrossRef

Enerchain (2017) Gridchain—Blockchain-based process integration for the smart grids of the future. https://enerchain.ponton.de/index.php/16-gridchain-blockchain-based-process-integration-for-the-smart-grids-of-the-future. Accessed: 20 Dec 2019

European Union (2016on) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679 (and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance)). Accessed: 14 Nov 2020

Grant GG (2003) Strategic alignment and enterprise systems implementation: the case of Metalco. J Inf Technol 18(3):159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268396032000122132CrossRef

Green J, Newman P (2017) Citizen utilities: the emerging power paradigm. Energy Policy 105:283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.004CrossRef

Haber S, Stornetta WS (1991) How to time-stamp a digital document. In: Menezes AJ, Vanstone SA (eds) Advances in Cryptology-CRYPT0’ 90. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 437–455CrossRef

Hake J‑F, Fischer W, Venghaus S, Weckenbrock C (2015) The German Energiewende—History and status quo. Energy 92:532–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.027CrossRef

Hekkert MP, Suurs RAA, Negro SO, Kuhlmann S, Smits REHM (2007) Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74:413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002CrossRef

Holotescu V, Vasiu R (2020) Challenges and emerging solutions for public blockchains. Brain 11(1):58–83. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/11.1/15CrossRef

Hughes L, Dwivedi YK, Misra SK, Rana NP, Raghavan V, Akella V (2019) Blockchain research, practice and policy: applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda. Int J Inf Manage 49:114–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.005CrossRef

IEA (2017) Digitalization and energy. Technology report. International Energy Agency. Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/digitalisation-and-energy. Accessed: 18 Febr 2019

IRENA (2017) Electricity storage and renewables: costs and markets to 2030. International Renewable Energy Agency. https://www.irena.org/publications/2017/Oct/Electricity-storage-and-renewables-costs-and-markets. Accessed: 1 Oct 2020

Johanning S, Bruckner T (2019) Blockchain-based peer-to-peer energy trade: a critical review of disruptive potential. 16th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM). https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2019.8916268CrossRef

Khaqqi KN, Sikorski JJ, Hadinoto K, Kraft M (2018) Incorporating seller/buyer reputation-based system in blockchain-enabled emission trading application. Appl Energy 209:8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.070CrossRef

Klievink B, Romijn BJ, Cunningham S, de Bruijn H (2016) Big data in the public sector: uncertainties and readiness. Inf Syst Front. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9686-2CrossRef

Konidari P, Mavrakis D (2007) A multi-criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments. Energy Policy 35:6235–6257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.007CrossRef

Labazova O (2019) Towards a framework for evaluation of blockchain implementations. December 2019 Conference: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS).

Lemieux VL (2017) Evaluating the use of blockchain in land transactions: an archival science perspective. Eur Prop Law J. https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2017-0019CrossRef

Liasi SG, Golkar MA (2017) Electric vehicles connection to microgrid effects on peak demand with and without demand response. 2017 Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), Tehran, pp 1272–1277 https://doi.org/10.1109/IranianCEE.2017.7985237CrossRef

Lyons T, Courcelas L, Timsit K (2019) Scalability interoperability and sustainability of blockchains. Thematic report. EU Blockchain observatory and forum. https://www.eublockchainforum.eu/sites/default/files/reports/report_scalaibility_06_03_2019.pdf. Accessed: 14 Nov 2020

Margetts H, Dunleavy P (2013) The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the web. Philos Trans R Soc A 371:20120382. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382CrossRef

Mengelkamp E, Gärttner J, Rock K, Kessler S, Orsini L, Weinhardt C (2018) Designing microgrid energy markets. Appl Energy 210:870–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.054CrossRef

Mylrea M, Gourisetti SNG (2017) Blockchain for smart grid resilience: exchanging distributed energy at speed, scale and security. 2017 resilience week (RWS). IEEE, pp 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/RWEEK.2017.8088642

Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. Accessed: 26 Sept 2019

Parag Y (2015) Beyond energy efficiency: a ‘prosumer market’ as an integrated platform for consumer engagement with the energy system. ECEEE summer study proceedings

Parag Y, Sovacool BK (2016) Electricity market design for the prosumer era. Nat Energy 1:16032. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.32CrossRef

Pearce D (1998) Cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 14:84–100CrossRef

Ponds K, Arefi A, Sayigh A, Ledwich G (2018) Aggregator of demand response for renewable integration and customer engagement: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Energies 11:2391. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092391CrossRef

Pop C, Cioara T, Antal M, Anghel I, Salomie I, Bertoncini M (2018) Blockchain based decentralized management of demand response programs in smart energy grids. Sensors 18(1):162. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010162CrossRef

Prewett KW, Prescott GL, Phillips K (2020) Blockchain adoption is inevitable—Barriers and risks remain. J Corp Acct Fin 31:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22415CrossRef

Rahman MM, Arefi A, Shafiullah GM, Hettiwatte S (2018) A new approach to voltage management in unbalanced low voltage networks using demand response and OLTC considering consumer preference. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 99:11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.12.034CrossRef

Schäffer M, Di Angelo M, Salzer G (2019) Performance and Scalability of private Ethereum Blockchains. In: Business process management: blockchain and central and eastern europe forum in lecture notes in business information processing, vol 361, pp 103–118 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30429-4_8CrossRef

Sedlmeir J, Buhl HU, Fridgen G, Keller R (2020) The energy consumption of blockchain technology: beyond myth. Bus Inf Syst Eng 62(6):599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00656-xCrossRef

Sikorski JJ, Haughton J, Kraft M (2017) Blockchain technology in the chemical industry: machine-to-machine electricity market. Appl Energy 195:234–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.039CrossRef

Van der Stelt S, AlSkaif T, van Sark W (2018) Techno-economic analysis of household and community energy storage for residential prosumers with smart appliances. Appl Energy 209:266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.096CrossRef

Szinai JK, Sheppard CJ, Abhyankar N, Gopal AR (2020) Reduced grid operating costs and renewable energy curtailment with electric vehicle charge management. Energy Policy 136:111051CrossRef

TenneT, Sonnen (2017a) Europaweit erstes Blockchain-Projekt zur Stabilisierung des Stromnetzes startet: TenneT und sonnen erwarten Ergebnisse 2018. https://www.tennet.eu/de/news/news/europaweit-erstes-blockchain-projekt-zur-stabilisierung-des-stromnetzes-startet-tennet-und-sonnen-e/. Accessed: 18 Febr 2019

TenneT, Sonnen (2017b) Haushalte stabilisieren das Stromnetz: TenneT und sonnen vernetzen erstmals Stromspeicher mit Blockchain-Technologie. https://www.tennet.eu/de/news/news/haushalte-stabilisieren-das-stromnetz-tennet-und-sonnen-vernetzen-erstmals-stromspeicher-mit-blockc/. Accessed: 18 Febr 2019

United Nations (2015) Transforming our world; the 2030 agenda for sustainable development

Wang Z, Wang S (2013) Grid power peak shaving and valley filling using vehicle-to-grid systems. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 28(3):1822–1829CrossRef

Weber F, Jenal C, Rossmeier A, Kühne O (2017) Conflicts around Germany’s Energiewende: discourse patterns of citizens’ initiatives. Quaest Geogr 36:117–130. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2017-0040CrossRef

Zhang K, Jacobsen HA (2018) Towards dependable, scalable, and pervasive distributed ledgers with blockchains. IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pp 1337–1346 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.2018.00134CrossRef

Zheng Z, Xie S, Dai HN, Chen X, Wang H (2018) Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. IJWGS 14:352. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWGS.2018.095647CrossRef

Titel: Blockchain or Aggregator? An Assessment of Service Provision Approaches for Prosumer Engagement in Grid Congestion Management
verfasst von: Gregor Jaschke
Alexander Morgan
Simon Johanning
Ankita Mitra
Thomas Bruckner
Publikationsdatum: 12.01.2021
Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0343-5377
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-2765
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12398-020-00294-6

Measuring the Impact of Renewable Energy Sources on Power Sector Carbon Emissions in Germany—a Methodological Inquiry

Getting Prices for Prosumers Right? Incentivizing Investment and Operation of Small-scale PV-Battery Storage Systems Through Prices, Charges and Levies

Regionalität aus Sicht von Energieversorgungsunternehmen – Eine qualitative Inhaltsanalyse zu Regionalstrom in Deutschland

Einfluss der CO2-Bepreisung nach BEHG auf die Kosten von Wärmeversorgung und Nutzung von Abwärme in deutschen Industriebetrieben

Veranstaltungskalender

Veranstaltungskalender

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft

Springer Professional "Technik"

Measuring the Impact of Renewable Energy Sources on Power Sector Carbon Emissions in Germany—a Methodological Inquiry

Getting Prices for Prosumers Right? Incentivizing Investment and Operation of Small-scale PV-Battery Storage Systems Through Prices, Charges and Levies

Regionalität aus Sicht von Energieversorgungsunternehmen – Eine qualitative Inhaltsanalyse zu Regionalstrom in Deutschland

Einfluss der CO2-Bepreisung nach BEHG auf die Kosten von Wärmeversorgung und Nutzung von Abwärme in deutschen Industriebetrieben

Veranstaltungskalender