Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Cluster Computing
Erschienen in: Cluster Computing 1/2021

03.11.2020

Blockchain technology in supply chain management: an empirical study of the factors affecting user adoption/acceptance

verfasst von: Moutaz Alazab, Salah Alhyari, Albara Awajan, Ayman Bahjat Abdallah

Erschienen in: Cluster Computing | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Blockchain overcomes numerous complicated problems related to confidentiality, integrity, availability of fast and secure distributed systems. Using data from a cross-sectoral survey of 449 industries, we investigate factors that hinder or facilitate blockchain adoption in supply chains. To capture the most vital aspects of blockchain adoption in supply chains, our conceptual model integrates the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model with the task-technology fit (TTF) and information system success (ISS) models, with trust-based information technology innovation adoption constructs. Using structural equation modelling, we find that the ISS, TTF, and UTAUT models positively influence the key factors affecting supply chain employees’ willingness to adopt blockchain. Our results show that the UTAUT’s social influence factor has no significant effect on the intention to adopt blockchain, while inter-organisational trust has a significant effect on the relationship between the UTAUT dimension and intention to adopt blockchain.
Vorheriger Artikel Battling against cyberattacks: towards pre-standardization of countermeasures
Nächster Artikel MMHGE: detecting mild cognitive impairment based on multi-atlas multi-view hybrid graph convolutional networks and ensemble learning

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Berdik, D., Otoum, S., Schmidt, N., Porter, D., Jararweh, Y.: A survey on blockchain for information systems management and security. Inform. Process. Manage. 58(1), 102397 (2012)CrossRef
2.
Tseng, L., Wong, L., Otoum, S., Aloqaily, M., Othman, J.B.: Blockchain for managing heterogeneous internet of things: a perspective architecture. IEEE Netw. 34(1), 16–23 (2020)CrossRef
3.
Alazab, M., Venkatraman, S., Watters, P., Alazab, M., Alazab, A.: Cybercrime: The Case of Obfuscated Malware. In: Georgiadis, C., Jahankhani, H., Pimenidis, E., Bashroush, R., Al-Nemrat, A. (eds.) Global security, safety and sustainability & e-democracy, vol. 99, pp. 204–211. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRef
4.
Alazab, M., Venkatraman, S., Watters, P., Alazab, M.: Information security governance: the art of detecting hidden malware. In: IT Security Governance Innovations: Theory and Research. pp. 293–315. IGI Global (2013)
5.
Maleh, Y., Shojafar, M., Alazab, M., Romdhani, I.: Blockchain for Cybersecurity and Privacy: Architectures, Challenges, and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2020)CrossRef
6.
Cole, R., Stevenson, M., Aitken, J.: Blockchain technology: implications for operations and supply chain management. Supp. Chain Manage. 24(4), 469–483 (2019)CrossRef
7.
Tseng, L., Yao, X., Otoum, S., Aloqaily, M., Jararweh, Y.: Blockchain-based database in an IoT environment: challenges, opportunities, and analysis. Clust. Comput. 21, 1–15 (2020)
8.
Niranjanamurthy, M., Nithya, B., Jagannatha, S.: Analysis of blockchain technology: pros, cons and SWOT. Clust. Comput. 22(6), 14743–14757 (2019)CrossRef
9.
Khalid, U., Asim, M., Baker, T., Hung, P.C., Tariq, M.A., Rafferty, L.: A decentralized lightweight blockchain-based authentication mechanism for IoT systems. Clust. Comput. 14, 1–21 (2020)
10.
Kim, J.-S., Shin, N.: The impact of blockchain technology application on supply chain partnership and performance. Sustainability 11(21), 6181 (2019)CrossRef
11.
Salmerón-Manzano, E., Manzano-Agugliaro, F.: The role of smart contracts in sustainability: worldwide research trends. Sustainability 11(11), 3049 (2019)CrossRef
12.
Bodkhe, U., Tanwar, S., Parekh, K., Khanpara, P., Tyagi, S., Kumar, N., Alazab, M.: Blockchain for industry 40: a comprehensive review. IEEE Access 8, 79764–79800 (2020)CrossRef
13.
Alkhalifah, A., Ng, A., Kayes, A., Chowdhury, J., Alazab, M., Watters, P.: A taxonomy of blockchain threats and vulnerabilities. Preprints (2019).
14.
Alazab, M., Venkatraman, S., Watters, P., Alazab, M.: Zero-day malware detection based on supervised learning algorithms of API call signatures. In: Ninth Australasian Data Mining Conference: AusDM 2011, Ballarat, (2011), pp. 171–181
15.
Alazab., M., Alazab., A., Batten., L.: Smartphone malware based on synchronisation vulnerabilities. In: ICITA 2011: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications, Sydney, (2012), pp. 1–6. ICITA
16.
17.
18.
Hald, K.S., Kinra, A.: How the blockchain enables and constrains supply chain performance. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. 49(4), 376–397 (2019)CrossRef
19.
Queiroz, M.M., Wamba, S.F.: Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: an empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 46, 70–82 (2019)CrossRef
20.
Cao, D., Tao, H., Wang, Y., Tarhini, A., Xia, S.: Acceptance of automation manufacturing technology in China: an examination of perceived norm and organizational efficacy. Product. Plan. Control 31(8), 660–672 (2020)CrossRef
21.
Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., Arha, H.: Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57(7), 2009–2033 (2019)CrossRef
22.
Wang, Z., Yang, L., Wang, Q., Liu, D., Xu, Z., Liu, S.: ArtChain: blockchain-enabled platform for art marketplace. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain) 2019, pp. 447–454. IEEE
23.
Chukwu, E., Garg, L.: A systematic review of blockchain in healthcare: Frameworks, prototypes, and implementations. IEEE Access 8, 21196–21214 (2020)CrossRef
24.
Kshetri, N.: 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 39, 80–89 (2018)CrossRef
25.
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., Shen, L.: Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57(7), 2117–2135 (2019)CrossRef
26.
Alazab, M.: Analysis on smartphone devices for detection and prevention of malware. Deakin University (2014)
27.
Alazab, A., Hobbs, M., Abawajy, J., Alazab, M.: Using feature selection for intrusion detection system. In: 2012 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT), pp. 296–301. IEEE (2012)
28.
Helo, P., Hao, Y.: Blockchains in operations and supply chains: a model and reference implementation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 136, 242–251 (2019)CrossRef
29.
Thiruchelvam, V., Mughisha, A.S., Shahpasand, M., Bamiah, M.: Blockchain-based technology in the coffee supply chain trade: case of burundi coffee. J. Telecommun. Electr. Comput. Eng. 10(3–2), 121–125 (2018)
30.
Maroun, E.A., Daniel, J.: Opportunities for use of blockchain technology in supply chains: Australian manufacturer case study. In: International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Bangkok, pp. 1603–1613 (2019)
31.
Maroun, E.A., Daniel, J., Fynes, B.: Adoption of blockchain technology in supply chain transparency: Australian manufacturer case study. In: 10th Annual European Decision Sciences Conference Decision Sciences in a Connected World University of Nottingham (2019)
32.
Maroun, E.A., Daniel, J., Zowghi, D., Talaei-Khoei, A.: Blockchain in supply chain management: Australian manufacturer case study. In: Service Research and Innovation. pp. 93–107. Springer (2018)
33.
Francisco, K., Swanson, D.: The supply chain has no clothes: technology adoption of blockchain for supply chain transparency. Logistics 2(1), 2–13 (2018)CrossRef
34.
Knauer, F., Mann, A.: What is in it for me? Identifying drivers of blockchain acceptance among German consumers. J. Brit. Blockchain Assoc. 3(1), 1–16 (2019)
35.
Chang, Y., Iakovou, E., Shi, W.: Blockchain in global supply chains and cross border trade: a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58(7), 2082–2099 (2019)CrossRef
36.
37.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quart. 36(1), 157–178 (2012)CrossRef
38.
Taherdoost, H.: A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manuf. 22(1), 960–967 (2018)CrossRef
39.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., Davis, F.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)CrossRef
40.
Tarhini, A., Alalwan, A.A., Shammout, A.B., Al-Badi, A.: An analysis of the factors affecting mobile commerce adoption in developing countries. Rev. Int. Bus. Strategy 29(3), 157–179 (2019)CrossRef
41.
Lin, X., Wu, R., Lim, Y.-T., Han, J., Chen, S.-C.: Understanding the sustainable usage intention of mobile payment technology in Korea: cross-countries comparison of Chinese and Korean Users. Sustainability 11(19), 5532 (2019)CrossRef
42.
Thatcher, J.B., McKnight, D.H., Baker, E.W., Arsal, R.E., Roberts, N.H.: The role of trust in postadoption IT exploration: an empirical examination of knowledge management systems. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 58(1), 56–70 (2010)CrossRef
43.
Suifan, T., Alazab, M., Alhyari, S.: Trade-off among lean, agile, resilient and green paradigms: an empirical study on pharmaceutical industry in Jordan using a TOPSIS-entropy method. Int. J. Adv. Operat. Manag. 11(1–2), 69–101 (2019)CrossRef
44.
Alqudah, S., Shrouf, H., Suifan, T., Alhyari, S.: A moderated mediation model of lean, agile, resilient, and green paradigms in the supply chain. Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt. 9(4), 1–16 (2020)
45.
46.
Suifan, T.S., Diab, H., Alhyari, S., Sweis, R.J.: Does ethical leadership reduce turnover intention? The mediating effects of psychological empowerment and organizational identification. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ. 30(4), 410–428 (2020)CrossRef
47.
Wamba, S.F., Queiroz, M.M.: The role of social influence in blockchain adoption: the Brazilian supply chain case. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52(13), 1715–1720 (2019)CrossRef
48.
Suifan, T.S., Alhyari, S., Sweis, R.J.: A moderated mediation model of intragroup conflict. Int. J. Confl. Manage. 31(1), 91–114 (2019)CrossRef
49.
Alazab, M.: Automated malware detection in mobile app stores based on robust feature generation. Electronics 9(3), 435 (2020)CrossRef
50.
Dujak, D., Sajter, D.: Blockchain applications in supply chain. In: SMART Supply Network. pp. 21–46. Springer (2019)
51.
Suifan, T., Saada, R., Alazab, M., Sweis, R., Abdallah, A., Alhyari, S.: Quality of information sharing, agility, and sustainability of humanitarian aid supply chains: an empirical investigation. Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt. 9(5), 1–13 (2020)
52.
Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., Williams, M.D.: Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): towards a revised theoretical model. Inform. Syst. Front. 21(3), 719–734 (2019)CrossRef
53.
Alhyari, S., Alazab, M., Venkatraman, S., Alazab, M., Alazab, A.: Six sigma approach to improve quality in e-services: an empirical study in Jordan. Int. J. Electr. Gov. Res. (IJEGR) 8(2), 57–74 (2012)CrossRef
54.
Alhyari, S., Alhyari, M.: Toward quality measurement approaches for improving E-government services in Jordan. In: IT in the public sphere: applications in administration, government, politics, and planning. pp. 82–98. IGI Global (2014)
55.
Alhyari, S., Alazab, M., Venkatraman, S., Alazab, M., Alazab, A.: Performance evaluation of e-government services using balanced scorecard. Benchmarking 20(4), 512–536 (2013)CrossRef
56.
Alazab, M., Batten, L.: Survey in smartphone malware analysis techniques. In: New threats and countermeasures in digital crime and cyber terrorism. pp. 105–130. IGI Global (2015)
57.
Alhyari, S.: Supply chain management paradigms and their impact on competitive priorities: an applied study on Jordanian Airlines Industry. Unpublished PhD thesis, The World Islamic Sciences and Education University (2015)
58.
Alhyari, S., Al-Ali, A.M., Nuseir, M.: Assessing supply chain partnership performance in services organization: conceptual model. Africa Dev Resour Res Inst J 7(2), 1–16 (2014)
59.
60.
Hakak, S., Khan, W.Z., Gilkar, G.A., Imran, M., Guizani, N.: Securing smart cities through blockchain technology: architecture, requirements, and challenges. IEEE Netw. 34(1), 8–14 (2020)CrossRef
61.
62.
Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. 19, 213–236 (1995)CrossRef
63.
Tam, C., Oliveira, T.: Understanding the impact of m-banking on individual performance: DeLone & McLean and TTF perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61, 233–244 (2016)CrossRef
64.
Alazab, A., Alazab, M., Abawajy, J., Hobbs, M.: Web application protection against SQL injection attack. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications 2011, pp. 1–7
65.
Supranee, S., Rotchanakitumnuai, S.: The acceptance of the application of Blockchain technology in the supply chain process of the Thai Automotive Industry. In: Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB 2017), ITG 2017, pp. 252–257
66.
New, S., Green, K., Morton, B.: An analysis of private versus public sector responses to the environmental challenges of the supply chain. J. Public Procure. 2(1), 93–105 (2002)CrossRef
67.
Sekaran, U., Bougie, R.: Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. Wiley, New York (2016)
68.
Lippert, S.K.: Investigating postadoption utilization: an examination into the role of interorganizational and technology trust. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 54(3), 468–483 (2007)CrossRef
69.
Mentzer, J.T., Lambert, D.M.: Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys: a replication study. In: Marketing Horizons: a 1980's Perspective. pp. 222–224. Springer (2015)
70.
Wang, Y.-Y., Wang, Y.-S., Lin, T.-C.: Developing and validating a technology upgrade model. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 38(1), 7–26 (2018)CrossRef
71.
Hair, J.F., Jr., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M.: A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (2016)MATH
72.
Hair, J.F., Jr., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., Kuppelwieser, V.G.: Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Eur. Bus. Rev. 26(2), 106–121 (2014)CrossRef
73.
Roldán, J.L., Sánchez-Franco, M.J.: Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research. In: Research Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software Systems Engineering and Information Systems. pp. 193–221. IGI Global (2012)
74.
Henseler, J.: Partial least squares path modeling. In: Advanced Methods for Modeling Markets. pp. 361–381. Springer (2017)
75.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(1), 115–135 (2015)CrossRef
76.
Gan, C., Li, H., Liu, Y.: Understanding mobile learning adoption in higher education. Electron. Library 35, 15 (2017)CrossRef
77.
Oliveira, T., Faria, M., Thomas, M.A., Popovič, A.: Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption: when UTAUT meets TTF and ITM. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 34(5), 689–703 (2014)CrossRef
78.
79.
Batten, L.M., Moonsamy, V., Alazab, M.: Smartphone applications, malware and data theft. In: Computational Intelligence, Cyber Security and Computational Models. pp. 15–24. Springer (2016)
80.
Moonsamy, V., Alazab, M., Batten, L.: Towards an understanding of the impact of advertising on data leaks. Int. J. Secur. Netwk. (IJSN) 7(3), 181–192 (2012)CrossRef
81.
Alazab, M., Monsamy, V., Batten, L., Lantz, P., Tian, R.: Analysis of malicious and benign android applications. In: International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW) 32nd 2012, pp. 608–616. IEEE (2012)
82.
Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., Baptista, G., Campos, F.: Mobile payment: understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61, 404–414 (2016)CrossRef
83.
Baker, J., Steiner, J.: Blockchain: The Solution for Transparency in Product Supply Chains. Provenance, London (2015)
84.
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13, 319–340 (1989)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Blockchain technology in supply chain management: an empirical study of the factors affecting user adoption/acceptance
verfasst von
Moutaz Alazab
Salah Alhyari
Albara Awajan
Ayman Bahjat Abdallah
Publikationsdatum
03.11.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Cluster Computing / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1386-7857
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7543
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-020-03200-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Cluster Computing 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

A Spark-based differential evolution with grouping topology model for large-scale global optimization

OriginalPaper

A survey on boosting IoT security and privacy through blockchain

OriginalPaper

Multi-matrix verifiable computation

OriginalPaper

BDDT: use blockchain to facilitate IoT data transactions

OriginalPaper

TempoCode-IoT: temporal codebook-based encoding of flow features for intrusion detection in Internet of Things

OriginalPaper

Collective periodic pattern discovery for understanding human mobility