Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 3/2013

01.05.2013

Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Investigation in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Era

verfasst von: Jason Q. Zhang, Hong Zhu, Hung-bin Ding

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Although the composition of the board of directors has important implications for different aspects of firm performance, prior studies tend to focus on financial performance. The effects of board composition on corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance remain an under-researched area, particularly in the period following the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). This article specifically examines two important aspects of board composition (i.e., the presence of outside directors and the presence of women directors) and their relationship with CSR performance in the Post-SOX era. With data covering over 500 of the largest companies listed on the U.S. stock exchanges and spanning 64 different industries, we find empirical evidence showing that greater presence of outside and women directors is linked to better CSR performance within a firm’s industry. Treating CSR performance as the reflection of a firm’s moral legitimacy, our study suggests that deliberate structuring of corporate boards may be an effective approach to enhance a firm’s moral legitimacy.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
As an example of illustration, we first eliminated the least statistically significant control variable, Financial leverage (p = 0.96) in Model 1 (i.e., the full model), to arrive at an intermediate reduced model. Both AIC and SC statistics indicate that this reduced model is preferred (AICfull = 327.49 vs. AICreduced = 325.49; SCfull = 363.45 vs. SCreduced = 357.46). The likelihood ratio test also suggests that this reduced model is preferred because the exclusion of Financial leverage does not significantly worsen model goodness-of-fit (χ2 = 0.003, df = 1, p = 0.96). We continued the process as we selected the next variable to remove until model diagnostic criteria indicated otherwise.
 
2
Model 1 does not find a significant relationship between firm CSR performance and financial performance. This finding is documented in prior literature. McWilliams and Siegel (2000), with a specific focus on this issue, suggest that, after firm innovativeness is controlled for, the relationship between firm CSR performance and financial performance is “neutral” (i.e., statistically non-significant) (p. 603).
 
3
In addition to Models S1 and S2, we also conducted data analyses with CSR_KLD retained as a continuous variable. Results from these analyses (not reported for brevity) are not substantially different.
 
4
Pragmatic legitimacy is based on stakeholders’ calculation of self-interest. Cognitive legitimacy is based on taken-for-granted social assumptions. See more discussion in Suchman (1995).
 
5
The partitioning is done through using three variables to account for the four types of directors: the proportion of women outside directors, proportion of women inside directors, proportion of men outside directors, and proportion of men inside directors.
 
6
For instance, we found that among outside directors, women have greater effects on CSR performance than men. The difference (β = 2.96) is statistically significant at the 10 % level.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ayuso, S., & Argandona, A. (2009). Responsible corporate governance: Towards a stakeholder board of directors? Corporate Ownership & Control, 6(4), 9–19. Ayuso, S., & Argandona, A. (2009). Responsible corporate governance: Towards a stakeholder board of directors? Corporate Ownership & Control, 6(4), 9–19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.CrossRef Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beliveau, B., Cottrill, M., & O’Neill, H. M. (1994). Predicting corporate social responsiveness: A model drawn from three perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(9), 731–738.CrossRef Beliveau, B., Cottrill, M., & O’Neill, H. M. (1994). Predicting corporate social responsiveness: A model drawn from three perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(9), 731–738.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria, D. (2006). The relationship between women corporate directors and women corporate officers. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(1), 47–61. Bilimoria, D. (2006). The relationship between women corporate directors and women corporate officers. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(1), 47–61.
Zurück zum Zitat Boeker, W., & Goodstein, J. (1991). Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 805–826.CrossRef Boeker, W., & Goodstein, J. (1991). Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 805–826.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boutin-Dufresne, F., & Savaria, P. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and financial risk. Journal of Investing, 13(1), 57–66.CrossRef Boutin-Dufresne, F., & Savaria, P. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and financial risk. Journal of Investing, 13(1), 57–66.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, J. L. (2006). Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavior Scientist, 49(7), 925–938.CrossRef Campbell, J. L. (2006). Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavior Scientist, 49(7), 925–938.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll, A. B. (1994). Social issues in management research: Experts’ views, analysis, and commentary. Business & Society, 33(1), 5–29.CrossRef Carroll, A. B. (1994). Social issues in management research: Experts’ views, analysis, and commentary. Business & Society, 33(1), 5–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.CrossRef Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Catalyst. (2005). 2005 catalyst census of women board directors of the fortune 500. New York: Catalyst. Catalyst. (2005). 2005 catalyst census of women board directors of the fortune 500. New York: Catalyst.
Zurück zum Zitat Certo, S. T., Covin, J. G., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2001). Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO-stage new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 641–658.CrossRef Certo, S. T., Covin, J. G., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2001). Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO-stage new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 641–658.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu, S. C., & Sharfman, M. (2011). Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: An investigation of instrumental perspective. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1558–1585.CrossRef Chiu, S. C., & Sharfman, M. (2011). Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: An investigation of instrumental perspective. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1558–1585.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, H. J., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 555–575.CrossRef Cho, H. J., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 555–575.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coffey, B., & Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1595–1603.CrossRef Coffey, B., & Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1595–1603.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper, S., Crowther, D., Davies, M., & Davis, E. (2001). Shareholder or stakeholder value: The development of indicators for the control and measurement of performance. London: CIMA Publishing. Cooper, S., Crowther, D., Davies, M., & Davis, E. (2001). Shareholder or stakeholder value: The development of indicators for the control and measurement of performance. London: CIMA Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Cottrill, M. T. (1990). Corporate social responsibility and the marketplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(9), 723–729.CrossRef Cottrill, M. T. (1990). Corporate social responsibility and the marketplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(9), 723–729.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2010). Women and corporate boards of directors: The promise of increased, and substantive, participation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Business Horizons, 53(3), 257–268.CrossRef Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2010). Women and corporate boards of directors: The promise of increased, and substantive, participation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Business Horizons, 53(3), 257–268.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Graaf, F. J., & Herkströter, C. A. J. (2007). How corporate social performance is institutionalized within the governance structure: The Dutch corporate governance model. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(2), 581–597.CrossRef de Graaf, F. J., & Herkströter, C. A. J. (2007). How corporate social performance is institutionalized within the governance structure: The Dutch corporate governance model. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(2), 581–597.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dobson, A. (2002). An introduction to generalized linear models (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC. Dobson, A. (2002). An introduction to generalized linear models (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Zurück zum Zitat Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591.CrossRef Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Filatotchev, I., & Bishop, K. (2002). Board composition, share ownership, and ‘underpricing’ of U.K. IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 941–955.CrossRef Filatotchev, I., & Bishop, K. (2002). Board composition, share ownership, and ‘underpricing’ of U.K. IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 941–955.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.CrossRef Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fortune. (2008). America’s most admired companies. (March 17), 65–67. Fortune. (2008). America’s most admired companies. (March 17), 65–67.
Zurück zum Zitat Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldschmidt, N. P., & Finkelstein, J. H. (2001). Academics on board: University presidents as corporate directors. Academe, 87(5), 33–37.CrossRef Goldschmidt, N. P., & Finkelstein, J. H. (2001). Academics on board: University presidents as corporate directors. Academe, 87(5), 33–37.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–156.CrossRef Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional investors and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1035–1046.CrossRef Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional investors and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1035–1046.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: 25 years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31.CrossRef Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: 25 years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrigan, K. R. (1981). Numbers and positions of women elected to corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 24(3), 619–625.CrossRef Harrigan, K. R. (1981). Numbers and positions of women elected to corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 24(3), 619–625.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 7–18.CrossRef Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 7–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14(3), 244–263. Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14(3), 244–263.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2006). Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 1–25.CrossRef Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2006). Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 1–25.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.CrossRef Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Houston, M. B., & Johnson, S. A. (2000). Buyer–supplier contracts versus joint ventures: Determinants and consequences of transaction structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 1–15.CrossRef Houston, M. B., & Johnson, S. A. (2000). Buyer–supplier contracts versus joint ventures: Determinants and consequences of transaction structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 1–15.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1994). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(1), 35–41. Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1994). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(1), 35–41.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1995). The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: Are there differences between inside and outside directors? Journal of Business Ethics, 14(5), 405–410.CrossRef Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1995). The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: Are there differences between inside and outside directors? Journal of Business Ethics, 14(5), 405–410.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ibrahim, N. A., Howard, D. P., & Angelidis, J. P. (2003). Board members in the service industry: An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation and directorial type. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(4), 393–401.CrossRef Ibrahim, N. A., Howard, D. P., & Angelidis, J. P. (2003). Board members in the service industry: An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation and directorial type. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(4), 393–401.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.CrossRef Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kesner, I. F. (1988). Directors’ characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 66–84.CrossRef Kesner, I. F. (1988). Directors’ characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 66–84.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leonard, H. B., & Rangan, V. K. (2006). Corporate social responsibility strategy and boards of directors. Directors & Boards, 3(4), 12–14. Leonard, H. B., & Rangan, V. K. (2006). Corporate social responsibility strategy and boards of directors. Directors & Boards, 3(4), 12–14.
Zurück zum Zitat Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2009). The effects and unintended consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the supply and demand for directors. Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3287–3328.CrossRef Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2009). The effects and unintended consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the supply and demand for directors. Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3287–3328.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liston-Heyes, C., & Ceton, G. (2007). An investigation of real versus perceived CSP in S&P-500 firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 283–296.CrossRef Liston-Heyes, C., & Ceton, G. (2007). An investigation of real versus perceived CSP in S&P-500 firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 283–296.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Logsdon, J. M., & Yuthas, K. (1997). Corporate social performance, stakeholder orientation, and organizational moral development. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(12–13), 1213–1226.CrossRef Logsdon, J. M., & Yuthas, K. (1997). Corporate social performance, stakeholder orientation, and organizational moral development. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(12–13), 1213–1226.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.CrossRef Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mahoney, L., & Thorn, L. (2006). An examination of the structure of executive compensation and corporate social responsibility: A Canadian investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 149–162.CrossRef Mahoney, L., & Thorn, L. (2006). An examination of the structure of executive compensation and corporate social responsibility: A Canadian investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 149–162.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRef Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45(1), 20–46.CrossRef Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45(1), 20–46.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 341–359.CrossRef McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 341–359.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRef McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McKendall, M., Samchez, C., & Sicilian, P. (1999). Corporate governance and corporate illegality: The effects of board structure on environmental violations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7(3), 201–223.CrossRef McKendall, M., Samchez, C., & Sicilian, P. (1999). Corporate governance and corporate illegality: The effects of board structure on environmental violations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7(3), 201–223.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.CrossRef McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore, G. (2001). Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the U.K. Supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3–4), 299–315.CrossRef Moore, G. (2001). Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the U.K. Supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3–4), 299–315.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136–148.CrossRef Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136–148.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRef Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(2), 71–88.CrossRef Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(2), 71–88.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 773–775.CrossRef Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 773–775.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1974). Organizational decision making as a political process: The case of the university budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2), 135–151.CrossRef Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1974). Organizational decision making as a political process: The case of the university budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2), 135–151.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Zurück zum Zitat Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189–213.CrossRef Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189–213.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saiia, D. H. (2007). Stakeholder salience, issues management and mapping new ways to sustainability. In S. Sharma, M. Starik, & B. Husted (Eds.), Organizations and the sustainability mosaic: Crafting long-term ecological and societal solutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Saiia, D. H. (2007). Stakeholder salience, issues management and mapping new ways to sustainability. In S. Sharma, M. Starik, & B. Husted (Eds.), Organizations and the sustainability mosaic: Crafting long-term ecological and societal solutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRef Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.CrossRef Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The determinants of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. American Business Review, 16(1), 86–93. Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The determinants of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. American Business Review, 16(1), 86–93.
Zurück zum Zitat Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Zurück zum Zitat Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.CrossRef Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vaaland, T. I., Heide, M., & Grønhaug, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Investigating theory and research in the marketing context. European Journal of Marketing, 42(9/10), 927–953.CrossRef Vaaland, T. I., Heide, M., & Grønhaug, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Investigating theory and research in the marketing context. European Journal of Marketing, 42(9/10), 927–953.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Valenti, A. (2007). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Has it brought about changes in the boards of large U.S. Corporations? Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 7–18. Valenti, A. (2007). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Has it brought about changes in the boards of large U.S. Corporations? Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 7–18.
Zurück zum Zitat Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRef Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, J., & Coffey, B. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778.CrossRef Wang, J., & Coffey, B. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, J., & Dewhirst, H. D. (1992). Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(2), 115–123.CrossRef Wang, J., & Dewhirst, H. D. (1992). Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(2), 115–123.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Webb, E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms’ board structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(3), 255–277.CrossRef Webb, E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms’ board structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(3), 255–277.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10.CrossRef Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, J. Q., Craciun, G. C., & Shin, D. S. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1336–1341.CrossRef Zhang, J. Q., Craciun, G. C., & Shin, D. S. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1336–1341.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Investigation in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Era
verfasst von
Jason Q. Zhang
Hong Zhu
Hung-bin Ding
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1352-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Journal of Business Ethics 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe