Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This study examines the impact of board diversity on firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance. Using seven different measures of board diversity across 1,489 U.S. firms from 1999 to 2011, the study finds that board diversity is positively associated with CSR performance. Board diversity is associated with a greater number of areas in which CSR is strong and a fewer number of areas in which CSR is a concern. These findings support the stakeholder theory and are consistent with the view that board diversity enhances firms’ ability to satisfy the needs of their broader groups of stakeholders. We find that gender, tenure, and expertise diversities seem to be the driving factors of firms’ CSR activities. Furthermore, we find that board diversity significantly increases CSR performance by increasing CSR strengths and reducing CSR concerns for firms producing consumer-oriented products and firms operating in more competitive industries. Our results remain robust using different measures of CSR performance, different estimation methods, and different samples.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Presley, T. J. (2012). Female board presence and the likelihood of financial restatement. Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 607–629. CrossRef
Adams, R., & Ferreria, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. CrossRef
Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86. CrossRef
Baron, D. P. (2009). Credence standards and social pressure. In Aseem Prakash & Matthew Potoski (Eds.), Voluntary programs: A club theory perspective (pp. 41–66). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Baron, D., Harjoto, M., & Jo, H. (2011). The economics and politics of corporate social performance. Business and Politics, 13(2), 1–46. CrossRef
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221. CrossRef
Benson, B. W., & Davidson, W. N. (2010). The relation between stakeholder management, firm value, and CEO compensation: A test of enlightened value maximization. Financial Management, 39(3), 929–963. CrossRef
Benson, B. W., Davidson, W. N, I. I. I., Wang, H., & Worrell, D. L. (2011). Deviations from expected stakeholder management, firm value, and corporate governance. Financial Management, 40(1), 39–81. CrossRef
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506. CrossRef
Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: The Free Press.
Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2011). Vice or virtue? The impact of corporate social responsibility on executive compensation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 159–173. CrossRef
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967. CrossRef
Carroll, A. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295. CrossRef
Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414. CrossRef
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53. CrossRef
Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16(1), 5–14. CrossRef
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dhaliwal, D., Li, O., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. CrossRef
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431. CrossRef
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C., & Mishra, D. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406. CrossRef
Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111. CrossRef
Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Fama, E., & French, K. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 153–197. CrossRef
Fisman, R., Heal, G., & Nair, V. (2005). A model of corporate philanthropy. Working Paper. New York: Columbia University.
Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.
Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagne, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 83–95. CrossRef
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (p. 46). Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15, 364–369. CrossRef
Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71. CrossRef
Gillan, S., Hartzell, J., Koch, A., & Starks, L. (2010). Firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) choices, performance and managerial motivation. Working Paper. http://www.business.pitt.edu/faculty/papers/koch3.pdf. Accessed Nov 10 2010.
Goss, A., & Roberts, G. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loan. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 1794–1810. CrossRef
Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51, 314–338. CrossRef
Harjoto, M., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 45–67. CrossRef
Harrison, D., Price, K., & Bell, M. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107. CrossRef
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139. CrossRef
Huse, M., Nielsen, S., & Hagen, I. (2009). Women and employee-elected board members, and their contributions to board control tasks. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 581–597. CrossRef
Ilgen, D., Hollenbeck, J., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output process models to IMOI models. Annual Review Psychology, 56, 517–543. CrossRef
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1–23. CrossRef
Jackson, S., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801–830. CrossRef
Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14, 8–21. CrossRef
Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 235–256. CrossRef
Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383. CrossRef
Johnson, S., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262. CrossRef
Kim, Y., Park, M., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review, 87(3), 761–796. CrossRef
Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review Psychology, 58, 515–541. CrossRef
Kotchen, M., & Moon, J. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility for irresponsibility. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 12. doi: 10.3386/w17254.
Larcker, D., & Tayan, B. (2013). Corporate governance matters: A closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. (FT Press).
Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179. CrossRef
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.
Miller, T., & del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755–786. CrossRef
Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2012). The impact of corporate social performance on financial risk and utility: A longitudinal analysis. Financial Management, 41, 483–515. CrossRef
Palepu, K. (1985). Diversification strategy, profit performance and entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 239–255.
Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. CrossRef
Rubin, A. (2008). Political views and corporate decision making: The case of corporate social responsibility. Financial Review, 43, 337–360. CrossRef
Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 77(3), 58–64. CrossRef
Siegel, D. S., & Vitaliano, D. F. (2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16, 773–792. CrossRef
Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644. CrossRef
Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319. CrossRef
Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 771–778. CrossRef
Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1595–1603. CrossRef
Westphal, J. D., & Milton, L. P. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 366–398. CrossRef
Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 1–10. CrossRef
- Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta