Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

14.07.2024 | Original Paper

Board gender diversity and corporate social performance: the moderating effect of family firms

verfasst von: Asma Houcine, Imen Derouiche

Erschienen in: Journal of Management Control | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Although previous research has separately investigated the impact of board gender diversity (BGD) and ownership structure on corporate social performance (CSP), there is a lack of research examining their joint effect on CSP. We discuss this joint effect in the French context featuring the dominance of family-controlled firms. Our sample comprises 2,674 firm-year observations of French listed firms from 2006 to 2019, and we use the 2011 gender quota regulatory change as an exogenous shock. Unlike most studies, we control for potential sources of endogeneity using the generalized method of moments estimator. Our results show that BGD significantly influences CSP and that family firms strengthen the relationship between female directors and CSP. In addition, we reveal that a critical mass of women significantly increases CSP, supporting the effective role of BGD in promoting CSP. Finally, the findings reveal that boardroom gender diversity regulations can be considered an exogenous shock to female representation and, consequently, to CSP. Our results contribute to the research on CSP and corporate governance and provide important practical implications for regulators, management, and scholars.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Obviously, family firms are also interested in profit; however, it is not their prime motivation (Sharma et al., 1997).
 
2
In this regard, Wintoki et al. (2012) argue that “any empirical estimation of the effect of board structure on past firm performance that ignores the dynamic relation between current board structure and past performance (as do traditional fixed effects estimators) will yield inconsistent estimates” (p. 582).
 
3
Not reported in Table 2 but available upon request.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abdullah, S. (2014). The causes of gender diversity in Malaysian large firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 18, 1137–1159.CrossRef Abdullah, S. (2014). The causes of gender diversity in Malaysian large firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 18, 1137–1159.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309.CrossRef Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Adams, R. B., Licht, A. N., & Sagiv, L. (2011). Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1331–1355.CrossRef Adams, R. B., Licht, A. N., & Sagiv, L. (2011). Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1331–1355.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 137–197.CrossRef Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 137–197.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmad, N. B. J., Rashid, A., & Gow, J. (2017). Board independence and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting in Malaysia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(2), 61–85.CrossRef Ahmad, N. B. J., Rashid, A., & Gow, J. (2017). Board independence and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting in Malaysia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(2), 61–85.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 447–471.CrossRef Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 447–471.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.CrossRef Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.CrossRef Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Atif, M., Alam, M. S., & Hossain, M. (2020). Firm sustainable investment: Are female directors greener? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3449–3469.CrossRef Atif, M., Alam, M. S., & Hossain, M. (2020). Firm sustainable investment: Are female directors greener? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3449–3469.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221.CrossRef Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beji, R., Yousfi, O., Loukil, N., & Omri, A. (2021). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(1), 133–155.CrossRef Beji, R., Yousfi, O., Loukil, N., & Omri, A. (2021). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(1), 133–155.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bingham, J. B., Dyer, W. G., Jr., Smith, I., & Adams, G. L. (2011). A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 565–585.CrossRef Bingham, J. B., Dyer, W. G., Jr., Smith, I., & Adams, G. L. (2011). A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 565–585.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Collier Macmillan. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Collier Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Boeker, W., & Goodstein, J. (1991). Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 805–826.CrossRef Boeker, W., & Goodstein, J. (1991). Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 805–826.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boukattaya, S., & Omri, A. (2021). Corporate social practices and firm financial performance: Empirical evidence from France. MDPI, 9(4), 1–17. Boukattaya, S., & Omri, A. (2021). Corporate social practices and firm financial performance: Empirical evidence from France. MDPI, 9(4), 1–17.
Zurück zum Zitat Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 185–197.CrossRef Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 185–197.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bouten, L., Everaert, P., & Roberts, R. W. (2012). How a two-step approach discloses different determinants of voluntary social and environmental reporting. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39, 567–605.CrossRef Bouten, L., Everaert, P., & Roberts, R. W. (2012). How a two-step approach discloses different determinants of voluntary social and environmental reporting. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39, 567–605.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brickson, S. L. (2005). Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 576–609.CrossRef Brickson, S. L. (2005). Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 576–609.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brickson, S. L. (2007). Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Academy of Management Review, 32, 864–888.CrossRef Brickson, S. L. (2007). Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Academy of Management Review, 32, 864–888.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bruna, M.-G., Đặng, R., Ammari, A., & Houanti, H. (2021). The effect of board gender diversity on corporate social performance: An instrumental variable quantile regression approach. Finance Research Letters, 40(C), 1–12. Bruna, M.-G., Đặng, R., Ammari, A., & Houanti, H. (2021). The effect of board gender diversity on corporate social performance: An instrumental variable quantile regression approach. Finance Research Letters, 40(C), 1–12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruna, M.-G., Đặng, R., Houanti, L., Sahut, J.-M., & Simioni, M. (2022). By what way women on corporate boards influence corporate social performance? Evidence from a semiparametric panel model. Finance Research Letters, 49(C), 1–7. Bruna, M.-G., Đặng, R., Houanti, L., Sahut, J.-M., & Simioni, M. (2022). By what way women on corporate boards influence corporate social performance? Evidence from a semiparametric panel model. Finance Research Letters, 49(C), 1–7.
Zurück zum Zitat Buertey, S. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility assurance: The moderating effect of ownership concentration. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28, 1579–1590.CrossRef Buertey, S. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility assurance: The moderating effect of ownership concentration. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28, 1579–1590.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24, 428–442.CrossRef Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24, 428–442.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, J. Y. (1996). Understanding risk and return. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 298–345.CrossRef Campbell, J. Y. (1996). Understanding risk and return. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 298–345.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.CrossRef Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48.CrossRef Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chandler, A. (2016). Women on corporate boards: a comparison of parliamentary discourse in the United Kingdom and France. Politics & Gender, 1(3), 1–26 Chandler, A. (2016). Women on corporate boards: a comparison of parliamentary discourse in the United Kingdom and France. Politics & Gender, 1(3), 1–26
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1–23.CrossRef Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chevrot-Bianco, E. (2021). IZA Workshop on Gender and Family Economics: “Women in Leadership”. Conference Chevrot-Bianco, E. (2021). IZA Workshop on Gender and Family Economics: “Women in Leadership”. Conference
Zurück zum Zitat Chi, J. D. (2005). Understanding the endogeneity between firm value and shareholder rights. Financial Management, 34, 65–76.CrossRef Chi, J. D. (2005). Understanding the endogeneity between firm value and shareholder rights. Financial Management, 34, 65–76.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117.CrossRef Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cole, P. M. (1997). Women in family business. Family Business Review, 10, 353–371.CrossRef Cole, P. M. (1997). Women in family business. Family Business Review, 10, 353–371.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cordeiro, J. J., Profumo, G., & Tutore, I. (2020). Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual-class majority ownership structures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 1127–1144.CrossRef Cordeiro, J. J., Profumo, G., & Tutore, I. (2020). Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual-class majority ownership structures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 1127–1144.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dale-Olsen, H., Schøne, P., & Verner, M. (2013). Diversity among Norwegian boards of directors: Does a quota for women improve firm performance? Feminist Economics, 19(4), 110–135.CrossRef Dale-Olsen, H., Schøne, P., & Verner, M. (2013). Diversity among Norwegian boards of directors: Does a quota for women improve firm performance? Feminist Economics, 19(4), 110–135.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2013). Ownership concentration and CSR policy of European multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 117–126.CrossRef Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2013). Ownership concentration and CSR policy of European multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 117–126.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dang, R., Houanti, L. H., Sahut, J.-M., & Simioni, M. (2021). Do women on corporate boards influence corporate social performance? A control function approach. Finance Research Letters, 39(C), 1–18. Dang, R., Houanti, L. H., Sahut, J.-M., & Simioni, M. (2021). Do women on corporate boards influence corporate social performance? A control function approach. Finance Research Letters, 39(C), 1–18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dang, R., Lubica, H., Michel, S., & Sahut, J.-M. (2023). How do women on corporate boards shape corporate social performance? Evidence drawn from semiparametric regression. Annals of Operations Research, 330, 361–388.CrossRef Dang, R., Lubica, H., Michel, S., & Sahut, J.-M. (2023). How do women on corporate boards shape corporate social performance? Evidence drawn from semiparametric regression. Annals of Operations Research, 330, 361–388.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dumas, C. (1998). Women’s pathways to participation and leadership in the family-owned firm. Family Business Review, 11, 219–228.CrossRef Dumas, C. (1998). Women’s pathways to participation and leadership in the family-owned firm. Family Business Review, 11, 219–228.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dutton, J. E., & Duncan, R. B. (1987). The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 279–295.CrossRef Dutton, J. E., & Duncan, R. B. (1987). The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 279–295.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644–658.CrossRef Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644–658.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 781–797.CrossRef Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 781–797.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569.CrossRef Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Elm, D. R., Kennedy, E. J., & Lawton, L. (2001). Determinants of moral reasoning: Sex role orientation, gender, and academic factors. Business & Society, 40, 241–265.CrossRef Elm, D. R., Kennedy, E. J., & Lawton, L. (2001). Determinants of moral reasoning: Sex role orientation, gender, and academic factors. Business & Society, 40, 241–265.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., Elamer, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 206–220.CrossRef Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., Elamer, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 206–220.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38(C), 45–64.CrossRef Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38(C), 45–64.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.CrossRef Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Blackwell. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Galbreath, J. (2013). ESG in focus: The Australian evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 529–541.CrossRef Galbreath, J. (2013). ESG in focus: The Australian evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 529–541.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-Blandon, J., Argilés-Bosch, J.M., Ravenda, D., Castillo-Merino, D. (2023). Direct and spillover effects of board gender quotas: Revisiting the Norwegian experience. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(4), 1297–1309.CrossRef Garcia-Blandon, J., Argilés-Bosch, J.M., Ravenda, D., Castillo-Merino, D. (2023). Direct and spillover effects of board gender quotas: Revisiting the Norwegian experience. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(4), 1297–1309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giannarakis, G. (2014). The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 56, 393–416.CrossRef Giannarakis, G. (2014). The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 56, 393–416.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ginglinger, E. (2018). Familles actionnaires. Revue d’Economie Financière, 2(130), 99–111.CrossRef Ginglinger, E. (2018). Familles actionnaires. Revue d’Economie Financière, 2(130), 99–111.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Glass, C., & Cook, A. (2018). Do women leaders promote positive change? Analyzing the effect of gender on business practices and diversity initiatives. Human Resource Management, 57(4), 823–837.CrossRef Glass, C., & Cook, A. (2018). Do women leaders promote positive change? Analyzing the effect of gender on business practices and diversity initiatives. Human Resource Management, 57(4), 823–837.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez-Mejia L.R, Berrone, P. & Franco-Santos, M. (2010), Compensation and organizational performance. In: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1st Edition, 284. Gomez-Mejia L.R, Berrone, P. & Franco-Santos, M. (2010), Compensation and organizational performance. In: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1st Edition, 284.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez-Mejía, L. R., & Herrero, I. (2022). Back to square one: The measurement of socioemotional wealth (SEW). Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(4), 1–9.CrossRef Gomez-Mejía, L. R., & Herrero, I. (2022). Back to square one: The measurement of socioemotional wealth (SEW). Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(4), 1–9.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K., Nunez-Nickel, M., et al. (2007). Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risk in Family Controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106–137.CrossRef Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K., Nunez-Nickel, M., et al. (2007). Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risk in Family Controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106–137.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443.CrossRef Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 391–430.CrossRef Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 391–430.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 641–660.CrossRef Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 641–660.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, 88, 96–118. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, 88, 96–118.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 131–154.CrossRef Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 131–154.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and Racial Minorities in the Boardroom: How Do Directors Differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747–7632002.CrossRef Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and Racial Minorities in the Boardroom: How Do Directors Differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747–7632002.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28, 383–396.CrossRef Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28, 383–396.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 941–952.CrossRef Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 941–952.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 371–394.CrossRef Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 371–394.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24, 253–273.CrossRef Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24, 253–273.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Javeed, S. A., Latief, R., Cai, X., Ong, T. S., & Qian, S. (2022). What is the role of the board sustainable committee for corporate social responsibility? The moderating effect of gender diversity and ownership concentration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379(2), 1–15. Javeed, S. A., Latief, R., Cai, X., Ong, T. S., & Qian, S. (2022). What is the role of the board sustainable committee for corporate social responsibility? The moderating effect of gender diversity and ownership concentration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379(2), 1–15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRef Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a ‘critical mass?’ Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 61–72.CrossRef Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a ‘critical mass?’ Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 61–72.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–576.CrossRef Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–576.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.CrossRef Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Joyce, S., Umney, C., Whittaker, X., & Stuart, M. (2023). New social relations of digital technology and the future of work: Beyond technological determinism. New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(2), 145–161.CrossRef Joyce, S., Umney, C., Whittaker, X., & Stuart, M. (2023). New social relations of digital technology and the future of work: Beyond technological determinism. New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(2), 145–161.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965–990.CrossRef Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965–990.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahloul, I., Sbai, H., & Grira, J. (2022). Does corporate social responsibility reporting improve financial performance? The moderating role of board diversity and gender composition. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 84, 305–314.CrossRef Kahloul, I., Sbai, H., & Grira, J. (2022). Does corporate social responsibility reporting improve financial performance? The moderating role of board diversity and gender composition. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 84, 305–314.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Khatri, I. (2023). Board gender diversity and sustainability performance: Nordic evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 1–13.CrossRef Khatri, I. (2023). Board gender diversity and sustainability performance: Nordic evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 1–13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Konrad, A. M., & Cannings, K. (1997). The effects of gender role congruence and statistical discrimination on managerial advancement. Human Relations, 50(10), 1305–1328.CrossRef Konrad, A. M., & Cannings, K. (1997). The effects of gender role congruence and statistical discrimination on managerial advancement. Human Relations, 50(10), 1305–1328.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 145–164.CrossRef Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 145–164.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krüger, P. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and the board of directors. Mimeo, Toulouse School of Economics. Krüger, P. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and the board of directors. Mimeo, Toulouse School of Economics.
Zurück zum Zitat Li, J., Zhao, F., Chen, S., & J, W. (2017). Gender Diversity on Boards and Firms’ Environmental Policy: Gender Diversity on Boards. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 306–315.CrossRef Li, J., Zhao, F., Chen, S., & J, W. (2017). Gender Diversity on Boards and Firms’ Environmental Policy: Gender Diversity on Boards. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 306–315.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lin, C. C., & Nguyen, T. P. (2022). Board attributes and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 1–17.CrossRef Lin, C. C., & Nguyen, T. P. (2022). Board attributes and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 1–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184.CrossRef Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lu, J., Herremans, & I.M. (2019). Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective,". Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1449–1464.CrossRef Lu, J., Herremans, & I.M. (2019). Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective,". Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1449–1464.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez-Jimenez, R. (2009). Research on women in family firms: Current status and future directions. Family Business Review, 22(1), 53–64.CrossRef Martinez-Jimenez, R. (2009). Research on women in family firms: Current status and future directions. Family Business Review, 22(1), 53–64.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mavin, S., & Grandy, G. (2016). A theory of abject appearance: Women elite leaders’ intra-gender ‘management’ of bodies and appearance. Human Relations, 69(50), 1095–1120.CrossRef Mavin, S., & Grandy, G. (2016). A theory of abject appearance: Women elite leaders’ intra-gender ‘management’ of bodies and appearance. Human Relations, 69(50), 1095–1120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nadeem, M., Gyapong, E., & Ahmed, A. (2020). Board gender diversity and environmental, social, and economic value creation: Does family ownership matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1268–1284.CrossRef Nadeem, M., Gyapong, E., & Ahmed, A. (2020). Board gender diversity and environmental, social, and economic value creation: Does family ownership matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1268–1284.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nadeem, M., Suleman, T., & Ahmed, A. (2019). Women on boards, firm risk and the profitability nexus: Does gender diversity moderate the risk and return relationship? International Review of Economics and Finance, 64, 427–442.CrossRef Nadeem, M., Suleman, T., & Ahmed, A. (2019). Women on boards, firm risk and the profitability nexus: Does gender diversity moderate the risk and return relationship? International Review of Economics and Finance, 64, 427–442.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Naveed, K., Cosmina, L., Voinea, Zahid A., Fawad, R., & Cosmin, F. (2021). "Board gender diversity and corporate social performance in different industry groups: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(6), 1–15.CrossRef Naveed, K., Cosmina, L., Voinea, Zahid A., Fawad, R., & Cosmin, F. (2021). "Board gender diversity and corporate social performance in different industry groups: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(6), 1–15.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nekhili, M., & Gatfaoui, H. (2013). Are demographic attributes and firm characteristics drivers of gender diversity? Investigating women’s positions on French boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 227–249.CrossRef Nekhili, M., & Gatfaoui, H. (2013). Are demographic attributes and firm characteristics drivers of gender diversity? Investigating women’s positions on French boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 227–249.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23.CrossRef Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nekhili, M., Gull, A. A., Chtioui, T., & Radhouane, I. (2020). Gender-diverse boards and audit fees: What difference does gender quota legislation make? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 47(1–2), 52–99.CrossRef Nekhili, M., Gull, A. A., Chtioui, T., & Radhouane, I. (2020). Gender-diverse boards and audit fees: What difference does gender quota legislation make? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 47(1–2), 52–99.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18, 136–148.CrossRef Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18, 136–148.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paine, L. S. (2014). Sustainability in the boardroom. Harvard Business Review, 92, 86–94. Paine, L. S. (2014). Sustainability in the boardroom. Harvard Business Review, 92, 86–94.
Zurück zum Zitat Perry-Smith, J. E., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1107–1117.CrossRef Perry-Smith, J. E., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1107–1117.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Poletti-Hughes, J., & Dimungu-Hewage, D. (2022). The Effectiveness of Gender Diversity Reforms and the Impact of a Familial Culture: A Spillover Effect on Board Independence. British Journal of Management, 34(3), 1316–1339.CrossRef Poletti-Hughes, J., & Dimungu-Hewage, D. (2022). The Effectiveness of Gender Diversity Reforms and the Impact of a Familial Culture: A Spillover Effect on Board Independence. British Journal of Management, 34(3), 1316–1339.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50, 189–223.CrossRef Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50, 189–223.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Radu, C., Smaili, N., & Constantinescu, A. (2022). "The impact of the board of directors on corporate social performance: A multivariate approach. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(5), 1135–1156.CrossRef Radu, C., Smaili, N., & Constantinescu, A. (2022). "The impact of the board of directors on corporate social performance: A multivariate approach. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(5), 1135–1156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2015). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy, and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 1–21. Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2015). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy, and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 1–21.
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson, B. J. (2009). Keeping ethical investment ethical: Regulatory issues for investing for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 555–572.CrossRef Richardson, B. J. (2009). Keeping ethical investment ethical: Regulatory issues for investing for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 555–572.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rodríguez-Ariza, L., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2017). The role of female directors in promoting CSR practices: An international comparison between family and non-family firms. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26, 162–174.CrossRef Rodríguez-Ariza, L., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2017). The role of female directors in promoting CSR practices: An international comparison between family and non-family firms. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26, 162–174.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosener, J. B. (1995). America’s competitive secret: Utilizing women as a management strategy. Oxford University Press. Rosener, J. B. (1995). America’s competitive secret: Utilizing women as a management strategy. Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.CrossRef Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sachs, J., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2022). Sustainable development report 2022. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Sachs, J., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2022). Sustainable development report 2022. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Salganicoff, M. (1990). Women in family firms: Challenges and opportunities. Family Business Review, 3(2), 125–137.CrossRef Salganicoff, M. (1990). Women in family firms: Challenges and opportunities. Family Business Review, 3(2), 125–137.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seierstad, C., Tatli, A., Aldossari, M., & Huse, M. (2021). Broadening of the Field of Corporate Boards and Legitimate Capitals: An Investigation into the Use of Gender Quotas in Corporate Boards in Norway. Work, Employment & Society, 35(4), 753–773.CrossRef Seierstad, C., Tatli, A., Aldossari, M., & Huse, M. (2021). Broadening of the Field of Corporate Boards and Legitimate Capitals: An Investigation into the Use of Gender Quotas in Corporate Boards in Norway. Work, Employment & Society, 35(4), 753–773.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10, 1–35.CrossRef Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10, 1–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sila, V., Gonzaleza, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 26–53.CrossRef Sila, V., Gonzaleza, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 26–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84, 937–967.CrossRef Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84, 937–967.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26(1), 48–58.CrossRef Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26(1), 48–58.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Singh, V., Point, S., & Moulin, Y. (2015). French supervisory board gender composition and quota threat: Changes from 2008 to 2010. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 30, 551–571.CrossRef Singh, V., Point, S., & Moulin, Y. (2015). French supervisory board gender composition and quota threat: Changes from 2008 to 2010. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 30, 551–571.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26, 48–58.CrossRef Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26, 48–58.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sraer, D., & Thesmar, D. (2007). Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the French stock market. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5, 709–751.CrossRef Sraer, D., & Thesmar, D. (2007). Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the French stock market. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5, 709–751.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 320–337.CrossRef Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 320–337.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 299–317.CrossRef Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 299–317.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Gils, A., Dibrell, C., Neubaum, D. O., & Craig, J. B. (2014). Social issues in the family enterprise. Family Business Review, 27, 193–205.CrossRef van Gils, A., Dibrell, C., Neubaum, D. O., & Craig, J. B. (2014). Social issues in the family enterprise. Family Business Review, 27, 193–205.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Veltri, S., Mazzotta, R., & Rubino, F. E. (2021). Board diversity and corporate social performance: Does the family firm status matter? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(6), 1664–1679.CrossRef Veltri, S., Mazzotta, R., & Rubino, F. E. (2021). Board diversity and corporate social performance: Does the family firm status matter? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(6), 1664–1679.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385–417.CrossRef Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385–417.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRef Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, J. C., Markoczy, L., Sun, S. L., & Peng, M. W. (2019). She-E-O compensation gap: A role congruity view. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 745–760.CrossRef Wang, J. C., Markoczy, L., Sun, S. L., & Peng, M. W. (2019). She-E-O compensation gap: A role congruity view. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 745–760.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Webb, E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms’ board structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8, 255–277.CrossRef Webb, E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms’ board structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8, 255–277.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 93–114.CrossRef Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 93–114.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 581–606.CrossRef Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 581–606.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1998). A Behavioral Agency Model of Managerial Risk Taking. Academy of Management Review, 23, 133–153.CrossRef Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1998). A Behavioral Agency Model of Managerial Risk Taking. Academy of Management Review, 23, 133–153.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.CrossRef Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2009). Gender identity. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 109–125). Guilford Press. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2009). Gender identity. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 109–125). Guilford Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Yarram, S.-R., & Adapa, S. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility: Is there a case for critical mass? Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 1–11.CrossRef Yarram, S.-R., & Adapa, S. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility: Is there a case for critical mass? Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 1–11.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zellweger, T. M., & Nason, R. S. (2008). A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance. Family Business Review, 21, 203–216.CrossRef Zellweger, T. M., & Nason, R. S. (2008). A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance. Family Business Review, 21, 203–216.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, J., Zhu, H., & Ding, H.-B. (2013). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 381–392.CrossRef Zhang, J., Zhu, H., & Ding, H.-B. (2013). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 381–392.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Board gender diversity and corporate social performance: the moderating effect of family firms
verfasst von
Asma Houcine
Imen Derouiche
Publikationsdatum
14.07.2024
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Management Control / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 2191-4761
Elektronische ISSN: 2191-477X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-024-00374-5

Premium Partner