nach oben

Journal of Materials Science

Erschienen in:

11.05.2021 | Materials for life sciences

Boost antimicrobial effect of CTAB-capped Ni_xCu_1−xO (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05) nanoparticles by reformed optical and dielectric characters

verfasst von: Basit Ali Shah, Bin Yuan, Yu Yan, Syed Taj Ud Din, Asma Sardar

Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Science | Ausgabe 23/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Chemical doping and coating have been considered as efficient semiconductor physics strategies to modulate the physical, chemical, and biological properties of materials for the required applications. In this study, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) stabilizer-capped nickel-doped cupric oxide (Ni_xCu_1−xO) nanoparticles (NPs) with different doping concentrations (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05) were synthesized via a one-step rapid and low-cost solvothermal synthesis route. The as-synthesized CTAB-capped Ni_xCu_1−xO NPs have been sightseen for their structural/morphological, optical/dielectric, and antimicrobial properties using XRD/SEM/TEM, FT-IR/UV–visible/Impedance spectroscopies, and Agar well diffusion method, respectively. Relevant results show enhanced optical, dielectric and antimicrobial properties with Ni doping due to the smaller size effect. Importantly, in vitro examination, the antimicrobial activity of the grown NPs was evaluated against four microbial species, exhibits that the CTAB-capped Ni-doped CuO NPs possess a command antimicrobial toxicity to Staphylococcus aureus (25923-ATCC), Klebsiella pneumoniae (700603-ATCC), and Escherichia coli (25922-ATCC) and an intermediate performance towards Candida albicans (24433-ATCC). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay for the obtained CTAB-Ni_0.05Cu_0.95O sample upon S. aureus or K. pneumoniae pathogens reaches extremely as low as 5 μg ml⁻¹ for all reported CuO NPs. The improved dose-dependent antimicrobial effect has been found to be strongly dependent on the particle size, surface morphology, elemental compositions, and surface bio-functionality of the catalytic nanomaterials. Additionally, Ni-dopant, CTAB-stabilizer, and binding of Cu⁺/Cu²⁺ ions with respiratory enzymes collectively produce an excess amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the bacterial culture medium, which determines a predominant antibacterial mechanism for bacterial cells damage. Overall, these inorganic (Ni_xCu_1−xO) NPs with antimicrobial cationic surfactant (CTAB) have advantages to use as a functionalized disinfection nanoagent to control the microbial infections in the healthcare sector together with various electronic and photonic medical diagnoses.

Graphical abstract

Vorheriger Artikel Self-activated ‘green’ carbon nanoparticles for symmetric solid-state supercapacitors

Nächster Artikel Improve the binding force of PEEK coating with Mg surface by femtosecond lasers induced micro/nanostructures

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Farjadian F, Ghasemi A, Gohari O, Roointan A, Karimi M (2019) Nanopharmaceuticals and nanomedicine currently on the market: challenges and opportunities. Nanomedicine (London) 14(1):93–126. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2018-0120CrossRef

Tanwar J, Das S, Fatima Z, Hameed S (2014) Multidrug resistance: an emerging crises. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2014:541340. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/541340CrossRef

Munoz-Escobar A, Reyes-López SY (2020) Antifungal susceptibility of Candida species to copper oxide nanoparticles on polycaprolactone fibers (PCL-CuONPs). PLoS ONE 15(2):e0228864. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228864CrossRef

Spellberg B, Blaser M, Guidos R, Boucher H, Bradley J, Eisenstein BI (2011) Combating antimicrobial resistance: policy recommendations to save lives. Clin Infect Dis 52:S397–S428. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir153CrossRef

Basak S, Singh P, Rajurkar M (2016) Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant bacteria: a study. J Pathog 2016:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4065603CrossRef

Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (2016) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318–1322. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318CrossRef

Kim MH (2016) Nanoparticle-based therapies for wound biofilm infection: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 15(3):294–304. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNB.2016.2527600CrossRef

Flemming HC, Wingender J, Szewzyk U (2016) Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Microbiol 14(9):563–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94CrossRef

Hu X, Kang F, Yang B, Zhang W (2019) Extracellular polymeric substances acting as a permeable barrier hinder the lateral transfer of antibiotic resistance. Front Microbial 10:736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00736CrossRef

10.

Bjarnsholt T, Ciofu O, Molin S, Givskov M (2013) Applying insights from biofilm biology to drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12(10):791–808. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4000CrossRef

11.

Aggarwall T, Wadhwa R, N, Thaoliyal, (2019) Recent trends of nanomaterials as antimicrobial agents. Nanotechnol Mod Anim Biotechnol 13:978–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6004-6_5CrossRef

12.

Yaqoob AA, Ahmad A, Parveen T, Ahmad A, Oves M (2020) Recent advances in metal decorated nanomaterials and their various biological applications: a review. Front Chem 8:341. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00341CrossRef

13.

Azam A, Ahmad A, Oves M, Khan M, Habib S, Memic A (2012) Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comprehensive study. Int J Nanomed 7:6003–6009. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S35347CrossRef

14.

Khairnar SD, Shinde S, Shrivastava VS (2019) A short review on the improvement of antimicrobial activity by metal and nonmetal doping in nanoscale antimicrobial materials. Nanomed Biother Discov 9(1):163. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-983X.1000163CrossRef

15.

Bhattacharya P, Neogi S (2018) Antibacterial properties of doped nanoparticles. Rev Chem Eng 35(7):861–876. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2017-0116CrossRef

16.

Ranghar S, Sirohi P, Verma P, Agarwal V (2014) Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems: promising approaches against infections. Braz Arch Biol Technol 57(2):209–222. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132013005000011CrossRef

17.

Covarrubias P (2013) Nanoparticles in drug delivery: past, present and future. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(1):21–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.010CrossRef

18.

Wang Z, Hu T, Liang R, Wei M (2020) Application of zero-dimensional nanomaterials in biosensing. Front Chem 8:320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00320CrossRef

19.

Chang YN, Zhang M, Xia L (2012) The toxic effects and mechanisms of CuO and ZnO nanoparticles. Materials 5(12):2850–2871. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma5122850CrossRef

20.

Ojas M, Bhagat M, Gopalakrishnan C (2008) Ultrafine dispersed CuO nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity. Exp Nanosci 3(3):185–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080802395460CrossRef

21.

Mantecca P, Moschini E, Bonfanti P, Fascio U, Kedenken A (2015) Toxicity evaluation of a new Zn-doped CuO nanocomposites with highly antibacterial properties. Toxicol Sci 146(1):16–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfv067CrossRef

22.

Asamoah RB, Annan E, Mensah B, Nbelayim P, Apalangya V, Onwona-Agyeman B, Yaya A (2020) A comparative study of antibacterial activitty of CuO/Ag and ZnO/Ag Nanocomposites. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2020:7814324. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7814324CrossRef

23.

Duffy LL, Osmond-McLeod MJ, Judy J, King T (2018) Investigation into the antibacterial activity of silver, zinc oxide and copper oxide nanoparticles against poultry-relevant isolates of Salmonella and Campylobacter. Food Control 92:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.05.008CrossRef

24.

Shkodenko L, Kassiroy I, Koshel E (2020) Metal oxide nanoparticles against bacterial biofilms: perspectives and limitations. Microorganisms 8(10):1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8101545CrossRef

25.

Pugazhendhi A, Kumar SS, Mayilmurugan M, Muthupandian S (2018) Photocatalytic and antimicrobial efficacy of Fe doped CuO nanoparticles against the pathogenic bacteria and fungi. J Microb Pathog 122:84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.06.016CrossRef

26.

Yang J, Yin W, Zhou B, Cui A, Xu L, Zhang D, Li W, Hu Z, Chu J (2019) Composition dependence of optical properties and band structures in p-type Ni-doped CuO films: spectroscopic experiment and first-principles calculation. J Phys Chem C 123(44):27164–27171. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08604CrossRef

27.

Malka E, Perelshtein I, Lipovsky A, Shalom Y, Naparstek L, Perkas N, Patick T, Lubart R (2013) Eradication of multi-drug resistant bacteria by a novel Zn-doped CuO nanocomposites. Small 9(23):4069–4076. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201301081CrossRef

28.

Lv Y, Li L, Yin P, Lei T (2020) Synthesis and evaluation of the structural and antibacterial properties of doped copper oxide. Dalton Trans 49:4699–4709. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0DT00201ACrossRef

29.

Varghese D, Catherine T, Chandar NK (2017) Effect of CTAB on structural and optical properties of CuO nanoparticles prepared by co-precipitation route. Mater Sci Eng 263:022002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/263/2/022002CrossRef

30.

Amri SA, Ansari MS, Rafique S, Aldhahri M, Rahimuddin S (2015) Ni-doped CuO nanoparticles: structural and optical characterizations. Curr Nanosci 11(2):191–197. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573413710666141024212856CrossRef

31.

Baturay S, Tombak A, Kaya DK, Ocak YS, Tokus M (2016) Modification of electrical and optical properties of CuO thin films by Ni doping. Sol–Gel Sci Technol 78(2):422–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-015-3953-4CrossRef

32.

Basith M, Vijaya J, Kennedy LJ, Bououdina M (2014) Structural, morphological, optical and magnetic properties of Ni-doped CuO nanostructures. Mater Sci Semicond Process 17:110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2013.09.013CrossRef

33.

Sasikala R, Rani SK, Karthikeyan K, Easwaramoorthy D (2016) Synthesis and antibacterial studies of Lanthanum, Cerium and Ebrium loaded copper oxide nanoparticles. Eng Chem Fuel 1(4):43–51. https://doi.org/10.18831/djchem.org/2016041004CrossRef

34.

Ramya S, Viruthagiri G, Gobi R, Shanmugam N, Kannadasan N (2016) Synthesis and characterization of Ni²⁺ ions incorporated CuO nanoparticles and its application in antibacterial activity. Mater Sci Mater Electron 27(3):2701–2711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-015-4080-2CrossRef

35.

Nesa M, Momin MA, Sharmin M, Bhuiyan AH (2020) Structural, optical and electronic properties of CuO and Zn doped CuO: DFT based first-principles calculations. Chem Phys 528:110536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2019.110536CrossRef

36.

Kamble SP, Mote VD (2019) Structural, optical and magnetic properties of Co doped nanoparticles. Solid State Sci 95:105936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2019.105936CrossRef

37.

Pugazhendhi A, Kumar SS, Manikandan M, Saravanan M (2018) Photocatalytic properties and antimicrobial efficacy of Fe doped CuO nanoparticles against the pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Microb Pathog 122:84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.06.016CrossRef

38.

Thakur N, Anu K. Kumar (2020) Effect of (Ag, Co) co-doping on the structural and antibacterial efficiency of CuO nanoparticles. J Environ Chem Eng 8(4):104011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104011CrossRef

39.

Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG (2012) Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microb Infect 18(3):268–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570CrossRef

40.

Thekkae Padil VV, Cernik M (2013) Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using gum karaya as a biotemplate and their antibacterial application. Int J Nanomed 8:889–898. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S40599CrossRef

41.

Dwivedi LM, Shukla N, Baranwal K, Gupta S, Siddiqui S, Singh V (2020) Gum acacia modified Ni doped CuO nanoparticles: an excellent antibacterial materials. J Clust Sci 32:209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-020-01779-7CrossRef

42.

Patterson AL (1939) The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. Phys Rev 56(10):978–982. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.56.978CrossRef

43.

Cullity BD, Weymouth JW (1957) Elements of X-ray diffraction. Am J Phys 26(6):394–395. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1934486CrossRef

44.

Asbrink S, Norrby LJ (1970) A refinement of the crystal structure of copper(II) oxide with a discussion of some exceptiona. Acta Crystallogr Sect B Struct Crystallogr Cryst Chem 26(B):8–15. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567740870001838CrossRef

45.

Mrabet C, Boukhchem A, Amlouk M, Manoubi T (2016) Improvement of the optoelectronic properties of tin oxide transparent conductive thin film through lanthanum doping. Alloys Compd 666:392–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.104CrossRef

46.

Mallika AN, Ramachandra AR, Sowri KB, Sujatha CH, Venugopal KR (2014) Structural and photoluminescence properties of Mg substituted ZnO nanoparticles. Opt Mater 36:879–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2013.12.015CrossRef

47.

Mehraj S, Ansari MS, Alimuddin A (2013) Structural, dielectric and complex impedance properties of Cd doped SnO₂ nanoparticles. J Nanoeng Nanomanuf 3(3):229–236. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnan.2013.1137CrossRef

48.

Raghasudha M, Ravinder D, Veerasomaiah P (2013) Characterization of chromium substituted cobalt nano ferrites synthesized by citrate-gel auto combustion method. Adv Mater Phys Chem 3(2):89–96. https://doi.org/10.4236/ampc.2013.32014CrossRef

49.

Eslami A, Modanlou N, Hosseini SG, Abbasi M (2017) Synthesis and characterization of CuO Nanoparticles by the chemical liquid deposition method and investigation of its catalytic effect on the thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate. Cent Eur J Energ Mater 14(1):152–168. https://doi.org/10.22211/cejem/67560CrossRef

50.

Awad MA, Ahmed AM, Khavrus VO, Abrahim EM (2015) Tuning the morphology of ZnO nsnostructures by In doping and the associated variation in electrical and optical properties. Ceram Int 41(8):10116–10124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.04.108CrossRef

51.

Rios PR, Fonseca GS (2010) Grain boundary pinning by particles. Mater Sci Forum 638(642):3907–3912. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.638-642.3907CrossRef

52.

Anli ST, Ebeoglugil MF, Celik E (2020) Effect of dopant elements on the structure and morphology of SnO₂ nanoparticles. J Aust Ceram Soc 56:403–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-019-00344-4CrossRef

53.

Sui ZM, Chen X, Wang LY, Xu LM, Zhuang WC, Chai YC, Yang CJ (2006) Capping effect of CTAB on positively charged Ag nanoparticles. Physica E 33:308–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2006.03.15CrossRef

54.

Kuzmenko AB, Van der Marel D, Van-Bentum PJ, Tishchenko EA, Presura C, Bush AA (2000) Extensive infrared spectroscopic study of CuO: signature of strong spin-phonon interaction and structural distortion. Phys Rev B 63(8):10060. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.094303CrossRef

55.

Thangamani C, Ponnar M, Priyadharshini P, Monisha P, Gomathi S (2019) Optical and magnetic behavior of Ni doped CuO. Surf Rev Lett 26(5):1793–6667. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X18501846CrossRef

56.

Debbichi L, Marco MC, Pierson JF, Kruger P (2012) Vibrational properties of CuO and Cu₄O₃ from first-principles calculations, and Raman and Infrared spectroscopy. Phys Chem C 116(18):10232–10237. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp303096mCrossRef

57.

Sarkar J, Chakraborty N, Chatterjee A, Bhattacharjee A, Dasgupta D, Acharya K (2020) Green synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles ameliorate defence and antioxidant enzymes in Lens culinaris. Nanomaterials (Basel) 10(2):312. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10020312CrossRef

58.

Tamil Selvi SS, Linet JM, Sagadevan S (2018) Influence of CTAB surfactant on structural and optical properties of CuS and CdS nanoparticles. Exp Nanosci 13(1):130–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2018.1445306CrossRef

59.

Zhang H, Liu Y, Zhu K, Xiong Y, Xiong C (1999) Infrared spectra of nanometer grnular zirconia. J Phys Condens Matter 11(8):2035–2042. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/11/8/016CrossRef

60.

Dahrul M, Alatas H, Irzaman (2016) Preparation and optical properties study of CuO thin film. Procedia Environ Sci 33:661–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.121CrossRef

61.

Borgohain K, Singh JB, Rao MR, Shripathi T, Mahamuni S (2000) Quantum size effects in CuO nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 61:11093–11096. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.11093CrossRef

62.

Moss TS, Burrell GJ, Ellis B (1973) Semiconductor opto-electronics. Butterworths, Heinemann, London, pp 1–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-04197-7CrossRef

63.

Burstein E (1954) Anomalous optical absorption limit in InSb. Phys Rev 93:632–633. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.93.632CrossRef

64.

Dhineshbabu NR, Rajendran V, Nithyavathy N (2016) Study of structural and optical properties of cupric oxide nanoparticles. Appl Nanosci 6:933–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-015-0499-2CrossRef

65.

Singh DP, Srivastava ON (2009) Synthesis and optical properties of different CuO (Ellipsoid, Ribbon and Sheet Like) nanostructures. Nanosci Nanotechnol 9(9):5345–5350. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2009.1159CrossRef

66.

Tareev B, Troitsky A (1975) Physics of dielectric materials. Mir Publishers, Moscow

67.

Wagner KW (1973) The distribution of relaxation times in typical dielectrics. Ann Phys 40:817–819

68.

Koops CG (1951) On the dispersion of resistivity and dielectric constant of some semiconductors at audio frequencies. Phys Rev 83:121–124. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.83.121CrossRef

69.

Melagiriyappa E, Jayanna HS, Chougule BK (2008) Dielectric behavior and ac electrical conductivity study of Sm⁺³ substituted Mg–Zn ferrites. Mater Chem Phys 112(1):68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.05.014CrossRef

70.

Ahmad AS, Azam A (2012) Structural, Optical and Electrical properties of Ni doped CuO Nanoparticles. Department of applied Physics, Aligar Muslim University. Chapter 7:194–220. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/11281

71.

Norouzzadeh P, Mabhouti K, Golzan MM (2020) Comparative study on dielectric and structural properties of undoped, Mn-doped, and Ni-doped ZnO nanoparticles by impedance spectroscopy analysis. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 31:7335–7347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-02517-0CrossRef

72.

Sahay PP, Tewari S, Nath RK, Jha S, Shamsuddin M (2008) Studies on ac response of Zinc Oxide pellets. Mater Sci 43:4534–4540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2641-xCrossRef

73.

Oruc C, Altindal A (2017) Structural and dielectric properties of CuO nanoparticles. Ceram Int 43(14):10708–10714. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2017.05.006CrossRef

74.

Pollak M, Geballe TH (1961) Low-frequency conductivity due to hopping process in Silicon. Phys Rev 122:1742–1744. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.122.1742CrossRef

75.

Elliot SR (1987) AC conduction in amorphous chalcogenide and pnictide semiconductors. Adv Phys 36:135–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018738700101971CrossRef

76.

Sunilkumar M, Gafoor A, Anas A (2014) Dielectric properties: a gateway to antibacterial assay—a case study of low-density polyethylene/chitosan composite films. J Polym 46:422–429. https://doi.org/10.1038/pj.2014.19CrossRef

77.

Abd ST, Ali AF (2015) Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on Candida albicans of human saliva (in vitro study). Int J Res Dev Pharm Life Sci 4(6):1892–1900. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejm.2015.10.235CrossRef

78.

Sarai E, Heidari H, Razaei V, Mortazayi J, Motamedifar M (2018) Promising antibacterial effect of Copper Oxide nanoparticles against several multidrug resistant Uropathogens. Pharm Sci 24(3):213–218. https://doi.org/10.15171/PS.2018.31CrossRef

79.

Amiri M, Etemadifar Z, Daneshkazemi A, Nateghi M (2017) Antimicrobial Effect of copper oxide nanoparticles on some oral bacteria and candida species. J Dent Biomater 4(1):347–352

80.

Karimiyan A, Najafzadeh H, Ghorbanpour M, Hekmati-Moghaddam SH (2015) Antifungal effect of magnesium oxide, zinc oxide, silicon oxide and copper oxide nanoparticles against Candida albicans. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 17(10):e2179. https://doi.org/10.17795/zjrms-2179CrossRef

81.

Khan MF, Hameedullah M, Ansari AH, Ahmad E, Lohani MB, Khan RH, Alam MM, Khan W, Husain FM, Ahmad I (2014) Flower-shaped ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by a novel approach at near-room temperatures with antibacterial and antifungal properties. Int J Nanomed 9:853–864. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S47351CrossRef

82.

Bolla JM, Franco SA, Lik H, Evalier C, Mahmoud A, Boyer K (2011) Strategies for bypassing the membrane barrier in multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. FEBS Lett 585(11):1682–1690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.054CrossRef

83.

Thill A, Zeyon O, Spalla O, Chauvat F, Rose J, Auffan M, Flank AM (2006) Cytotoxicity of CeO₂ nanoparticles for E. coli: physic-chemical insight of cytotoxicity mechanism. Environ Sci Technol 40(19):6151–6156. https://doi.org/10.1021/es060999bCrossRef

84.

Pardhi DM, Karaman DŞ, Timonen J, Wu W, Zhang Q, Satija S, Mehta M (2020) Antibacterial activity of inorganic nanomaterials and their antimicrobial peptide conjugates against resistant and non-resistant pathogens. Int J Pharm 586:0378–5173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020CrossRef

85.

Sawai J, Kawada E, Kanou F, Igarashi H, Hashimoto A, Kokugan T, Shimizu M (1996) Detection of active oxygen generated from ceramic powders having antibacterial activity. J Chem Eng Jpn 29(4):627–633. https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.29.627CrossRef

86.

Raghupathi KR, Koodali RT, Manna AC (2011) Size dependent bacterial growth inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles. Langmuir 27(7):4020–4028. https://doi.org/10.1021/la104825uCrossRef

87.

Ranghar S, Sirohi P, Verma P, Agarwal V (2012) Nanoparticles based drug delivery systems: promising approaches against infections. Braz Arch Biol Technol 57(2):209–222. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132013005000011CrossRef

88.

Saleh NB, Milliron DJ, Aich N, Katz LE, Liljestrand HM (2016) Importance of doping, dopant distribution and defects on electronic band structure alteration of metal oxide nanoparticles: implication for reactive oxygen species. Sci Total Environ 568:926–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.145CrossRef

89.

Maurer-Jones MA, Gunsolus IL, Murphy CJ, Haynes CL (2013) Toxicity of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Anal Chem 85(6):3036–3049. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac303636sCrossRef

90.

Lin YE, Vidic RD, Stout JE, McCartney CA, Yu VL (2000) Inactivation of Mycobacterium avium by copper and silver ions. Water Res 32(7):1997CrossRef

91.

Gajwicz A, Schaeublin N, Rasulev B, Hussain S, Puzyn T (2015) Towards understanding mechanisms governing cytotoxicity of metal oxides nanoparticles: hints from nano-QSAR studies. Nanotoxicology 9(3):313–325. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2014.930195CrossRef

92.

Stohs BSJ, Bagchi D (1995) Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicology of metal ions. Free Radical Biol Med 18(2):432–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(94)00159-HCrossRef

93.

Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC (2015) Free radicals in biology and medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717478.001.0001CrossRef

94.

Ahmadinejad F, Moller SG, Bidkori G, Jami MS (2017) Molecular mechanisms behind free radical scavengers function against oxidative stress. Antioxidants (Basel) 6(3):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox6030051CrossRef

95.

Kumar P, Mathpal MC, Prakash J, Roos WD, Swart HC (2020) Bandgap tailoring of cauliflower-shaped CuO nanostructures by Zn doping for antibacterial applications. Alloys Compd 832:154958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154968CrossRef

96.

Heli H, Golamhossein T, Sattarahmady N, Rezvan DV, Hamed VK (2017) Nanoparticles of copper and copper oxides: synthesis and determination of antibacterial activity. J Kerman Univ Med Sci 24(2):166–170

97.

Thampi VVA, Rajan ST, Anupriya K (2015) Fabrication of fabrics with PANI/CuO nanoparticles by precipitation route for antibacterial applications. Nanoparticle Res 17:57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2853-9CrossRef

Titel: Boost antimicrobial effect of CTAB-capped NixCu1−xO (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05) nanoparticles by reformed optical and dielectric characters
verfasst von: Basit Ali Shah
Bin Yuan
Yu Yan
Syed Taj Ud Din
Asma Sardar
Publikationsdatum: 11.05.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Science / Ausgabe 23/2021
Print ISSN: 0022-2461
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-4803
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06130-7

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 23/2021

A flame-retardant post-synthetically functionalized COF sponge as absorbent for spilled oil recovery

Paraffin-filled boron carbide/polyvinyl alcohol scaffolds with enhanced thermal energy storage and form stability

Self-activated ‘green’ carbon nanoparticles for symmetric solid-state supercapacitors

Effect of methane and acetaldehyde precursor on the microstructures of pyrocarbon films grown on quartz substrates

Strategies for enhancing the room-temperature stretch formability of magnesium alloy sheets: a review

Simultaneous enhancement of breakdown strength and discharged energy efficiency of tri-layered polymer nanocomposite films by incorporating modified graphene oxide nanosheets

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten