Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Despite major theoretical progress in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL), relatively less attention has been paid to the problem of how research advances may impact schools and classrooms. Given the global changes and educational policies for twenty-first century education, issues of how research in CSCL can be integrated with classroom practice for innovation pose important challenges. This paper draws on experiences in Hong Kong and examines research-based CSCL classroom innovations in the context of scaling up and sustaining a knowledge-building model in Hong Kong classrooms. It begins with an examination of the rationale for CSCL research in classrooms and then considers a range of problems and constraints for school implementation. Classroom innovations involve complex and emergent changes occurring at different levels of the educational system. The experience of CSCL knowledge-building classroom innovations in Hong Kong schools is reported, including: the macro-context of educational policies and educational reform, the meso-context of a knowledge-building teacher network, and the micro-context of knowledge-building design in classrooms. Three interacting themes—context and systemic change, capacity and community building, and innovation as inquiry—are proposed for examining collaboration and knowledge creation for classroom innovation.
Arnseth, H. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2006). Appropriating institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 167–185. CrossRef
Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 2003(4), 454–467. CrossRef
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2008). Toward research-based innovation. In Innovating to learn, learning to innovate (pp. 67–87). Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 301–329. CrossRef
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environment for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Chan, C. K. K. (2008). Pedagogical transformation and knowledge building for the Chinese learner. Evaluation and Research in Education, 21(3), 235–251. CrossRef
Chan, C. K. K. & Chan, Y. Y. (2011). Student views of collaboration and online participation in Knowledge Forum. Computers & Education 57(1), 1445-1457.
Chan, C. K. K. & Fu, E. L. F. (2011 July). Principle-based design for collective growth: From knowledge-sharing to explanatory knowledge-building discourse. Conference proceeding paper presented at the International Conference of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Hong Kong.
Chan, C. K. K., & Lam, C. K. (2010 June). Conceptual change and epistemic growth through reflective assessment in computer-supported knowledge building. Conference proceeding paper presented at the International Conference of Learning Sciences, Chicago.
Chan, C. K. K., Law, N., & van Aalst, J. (2008 April). Developing principle-based understanding for knowledge building in a teacher community. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42. CrossRef
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834. CrossRef
Dede, C. (2006). Evolving innovations beyond ideal settings to challenging contexts of practice. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 551–566). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dede, C., & Honan, J. P. (2005). Scaling up success: A synthesis of themes and insights. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & L. C. Peters (Eds.), Lessons learned from technology-based educational innovation (pp. 227–239). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dillenbourg, P. (2004). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Open Universiteit Nederland: Heerlen.
Dillenbourg, P., Jarvela, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. Technology-Enhanced Learning, 1, 3–19. CrossRef
Doyle, W. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486–516). New York: Macmillan.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity—theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.) Learning for life in the 21st century.
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.). (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43–76. CrossRef
Goldman, S. (2005). Designing for scalable educational improvement: Processes of inquiry in practice. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & L. C. Peters (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp.67-96). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6(2), 199–220. CrossRef
Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 213–231. CrossRef
Hakkinen, P., & Makitalo-Siegl, K. (2007). Educational perspectives in scripting CSCL. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 263–274). New York: Springer. CrossRef
Hmelo-Silver, C., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–107.
Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., & Zhang, J. W. (2010). Knowledge Society Network: Toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36 (1).
Jones, C., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Lindström, B. (2006). A relational, indirect, meso-level approach to CSCL design in the next decade. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 35–56. CrossRef
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. CrossRef
Koschman, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (2002). CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Krange, I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2009). The historical and situated nature of design experiments—Implications for data analysis. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 25(3), 268–279. CrossRef
Laferrière, T., & Law, N. (2010). Knowledge building international project (KBIP): A nested network of learning and knowledge creation. Conference proceeding paper presented at the International Conference of Learning Sciences, Chicago.
Laferrière, T., Erickson, G., & Breuleux, A. (2007). Innovative models of web-supported university–school partnerships. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(1), 211–238. CrossRef
Lai, M., & Law, N. (2006). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaborative groups with differential learning experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 123–144. CrossRef
Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT in schools around the world: Findings from the SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERC.
Lee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 277–307. CrossRef
Lemke, J. L., & Sabelli, N. H. (2008). Complex systems and educational change: Towards a new research agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 118–129. CrossRef
Looi, C. K., So, H. J., Toh, Y., & Chen, W. (2011). The Singapore experience: Synergy of national policy, classroom practice and design research. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 9–38. CrossRef
Means, B., & Penuel, W. R. (2005). Scaling up technology-based educational innovations. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & L. C. Peters (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 176–197). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.
Rasmussen, I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2009). The hedgehog and the fox: A discussion on the approaches to the analysis of ICT reforms in teacher education of Larry Cuban and Yrjö Engeström. Mind, Culture and Activity, 16, 83–104. CrossRef
Resnick, L. B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39(3), 183–197. CrossRef
Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Shechtman, N., & Knudsen, J. (2008). The role of scaling up research and designing for and evaluating robustness. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 149–170. CrossRef
Sabelli, N., & Dede, C. (2000). Integrating educational research and practice: Reconceptualizing the goals and process of research to improve educational practice. Retrieved from http://www.virtual.gmu.edu/SS_research/cdpapers/policy.pdf
Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1997). Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational consideration. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M. (Ed.). (2010). Knowledge building [special issue]. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 36 (1).
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265–283. CrossRef
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006). Notes on the educational steeplechase: Hurdles and jumps in the development of research-based mathematics instruction. In Constas MA & Sternberg RJ (Eds.), Translating theory and research into educational practice (pp. 9–30). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and on the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT.
Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. (2010). The CSCL field matures. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 1–3. CrossRef
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington: Brookings.
van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 259–287. CrossRef
van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175–220.
van Aalst, J., & Truong, M. S. (2010). Promoting knowledge-building discourse in an Asian primary five classrooms; Results from an inquiry into life cycles. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 487-515.
Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Melbourne/Hong Kong: Australian Council for Educational Research/Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
Wiske, M. S., & Perkins, D. (2005). Dewey goes digital: Scaling up constructivist pedagogies and the promise of new technologies. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & L. C. Peters (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-enhanced educational improvement (pp. 27–47). San Francisco: Jossey-Boss.
Zhang, J. (2010). Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural context. Educational Technology and Research Development, 58(2), 229–242. CrossRef
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44. CrossRef
Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C.L., & Morley, E. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262-307.
- Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms
Carol K. K. Chan
- Springer US
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
An Official Publication of the International Society of the Learning Sciences
Print ISSN: 1556-1607
Elektronische ISSN: 1556-1615
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA, Best Practices für die Mitarbeiter-Partizipation in der Produktentwicklung/© astrosystem | stock.adobe.com