nach oben

Energy Efficiency

Erschienen in:

03.02.2018 | Original Article

Broadening to sustainability the perspective of industrial decision-makers on the energy efficiency measures adoption: some empirical evidence

verfasst von: Enrico Cagno, Alessandra Neri, Andrea Trianni

Erschienen in: Energy Efficiency | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The industry should take further efforts towards increased energy efficiency, that is a major contributor to improve industrial sustainability performance, by implementing energy efficiency measures (EEMs). However, the rate of adoption of these measures is still quite low. Hitherto, EEMs and barriers to their adoption have been evaluated almost exclusively from the viewpoint of energy efficiency decision-makers, not accounting for the broader sustainability perspective. This work aims at understanding whether an industrial sustainability perspective can better address issues related to EEMs adoption, analyzing the question through different viewpoints and insights offered by industrial decision-makers of different industrial sustainability areas within a firm. By doing this, we aim at offering a contribution in the understanding of the low rate of adoption of EEMs. As case studies, we investigated 12 firms from Northern Italy. In comparison to previous literature, results show that an industrial sustainability perspective can better explain the real decision-making process of adopting an EEM. Indeed, people knowledgeable about different industrial sustainability areas may perceive different barriers about the same EEM. EEMs may be negatively affected by reasons related to other areas of industrial sustainability, while positive reciprocal impacts may exist among areas of industrial sustainability; thus, EEMs may have effects on areas other than energy efficiency, and these effects may be perceived only by such areas. The study concludes with some remarks for policy and industrial decision-makers and advice for further research.

Vorheriger Artikel Energy efficiency networks—what are the processes that make them work?

Nächster Artikel Technical demand response potentials of the integrated steelmaking site of Tata Steel in IJmuiden

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

AIDA. (2017). https://aida.bvdinfo.com/version-20171011/home.serv?product=AidaNeo

Anderson, S. T., & Newell, R. G. (2004). Information programs for technology adoption: the case of energy-efficiency audits. Resource and Energy Economics, 26(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.07.001 CrossRef

Arvai, J., Campbell-Arvai, V., & Steel, P. (2012). Decision-making for sustainability: a systematic review of the body of knowledge. Network for Business Sustainability. https://nbs.net/p/systematic-review-decision-making-for-sustainability-32e9291b-e3be-41a8-a898-d49cb67752d0

Barratt, M., Choi, T. Y., & Li, M. (2011). Qualitative case studies in operations management: trends, research outcomes, and future research implications. Journal of Operations Management, 29(4), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.06.002 CrossRef

Baškarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.05.20.5.28.e327.

Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems case research. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/248684 CrossRef

Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). The dominant logic: retrospective and extenstion. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160104 CrossRef

Beverland, M., & Lindgreen, A. (2010). What makes a good case study? A positivist review of qualitative case research published in industrial marketing management, 1971-2006. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.09.005 CrossRef

Brunke, J. C., Johansson, M., & Thollander, P. (2014). Empirical investigation of barriers and drivers to the adoption of energy conservation measures, energy management practices and energy services in the Swedish iron and steel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84(1), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.078 CrossRef

Cagno, E., & Trianni, A. (2012). Analysis of the most effective energy efficiency opportunities in manufacturing primary metals, plastics, and textiles small- and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 134(2), 21005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006043 CrossRef

Cagno, E., Worrell, E., Trianni, A., & Pugliese, G. (2013). A novel approach for barriers to industrial energy efficiency. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 290–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.007 CrossRef

Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., Franzò, S., Frattini, F., & Latilla, V. M. (2017). Overcoming internal barriers to industrial energy efficiency through energy audit: a case study of a large manufacturing company in the home appliances industry. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(4), 1031–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1298-5 CrossRef

Cooremans, C. (2011). Make it strategic! Financial investment logic is not enough. Energy Efficiency, 4(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-011-9125-7 CrossRef

Cooremans, C. (2012a). Energy-efficiency investments an interpretative perspective and energy management. Proceedings of the International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4787.5529

Cooremans, C. (2012b). Investment in energy efficiency: do the characteristics of investments matter? Energy Efficiency, 5(4), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-012-9154-x CrossRef

Das, A., Pagell, M., Behm, M., & Veltri, A. (2008). Toward a theory of the linkages between safety and quality. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.005 CrossRef

Dicicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x CrossRef

Dincer, I., & Rosen, M. C. (2012). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Applied Energy, 64, 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0109-4 CrossRef

EASHW (2007). The business benefits of good occupational safety and health. https://osha.europa.eu/en/tools-and-publications/publications/factsheets/77

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385 CrossRef

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130904 CrossRef

Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21-st century business. In Capstone new edition, 1–16.

ENEA. (2016). Rapporto Annuale Efficienza Energetica (RAEE). http://www.enea.it/it/pubblicazioni/edizioni-enea/2016/rapporto-annuale-efficienza-energetica-2016.

Evans, S., Bergendahl, M., Gregory, M., & Ryan, C. (2009). Towards a sustainable industrial system. The Institute for Manufacturing, Cardiff. http://orbit.dtu.dk/fedora/objects/orbit:81752/datastreams/file_4085316/content.

Fleiter, T., Hirzel, S., & Worrell, E. (2012a). The characteristics of energy-efficiency measures—a neglected dimension. Energy Policy, 51, 502–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.054 CrossRef

Fleiter, T., Schleich, J., & Ravivanpong, P. (2012b). Adoption of energy-efficiency measures in SMEs—an empirical analysis based on energy audit data from Germany. Energy Policy, 51, 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.041 CrossRef

Frini, A., & Benamor, S. (2017). Making decisions in a sustainable development Context: A State-of-the-Art Survey and Proposal of a Multi-Period Single Synthesizing Criterion Approach. Computational Economics. In press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-017-9677-5.

Fresner, J., Morea, F., Krenn, C., Uson, J. A., & Tomasi, F. (2017). Energy efficiency in small and medium enterprises: lessons learned from 280 energy audits across Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1650–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.126 CrossRef

Gibson, R. B. (2006). Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 8(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002517 CrossRef

Gill, J. (2009). Quality follows quality: add quality to the business and quality will multiply the profits. The TQM Journal, 21(5), 530–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730910983434 CrossRef

Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035 CrossRef

Gong, M., Simpson, A., Koh, L., & Tan, K.H. (2016). Inside out: the interrelationships of sustainable performance metrics and its effect on business decision Making: Theory and Practice. Resources, Conservation and Recycling In press. Elsevier B.V. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.001.

Hassan, M. T., Burek, S., & Asif, M. (2017). Barriers to industrial energy efficiency improvement—manufacturing SMEs of Pakistan. Energy Procedia, 113, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.04.040 CrossRef

Henriques, J., & Catarino, J. (2016). Motivating towards energy efficiency in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.026 CrossRef

Hillebrand, B., Kok, R. A. W., & Biemans, W. G. (2001). Theory-testing using case studies. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(8), 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(00)00115-2 CrossRef

IEA (2014). Capturing the multiple benefits of energy efficiency. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Captur_the_MultiplBenef_ofEnergyEficiency.pdf

Langley, A., Mintzberg, H., Pitcher, P., Posada, E., & Saint-Macary, J. (1995). Opening up decision making: the view from the black stool. Organization Science, 6(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.3.260 CrossRef

Lucato, W. C., Costa, E. M., & De Oliveira Neto, G. D. (2017). The environmental performance of SMEs in the Brazilian textile industry and the relationship with their financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 203(Pt 1), 550–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.028 CrossRef

Masi, D., Cagno, E., & Micheli, G. J. L. (2014). Developing, implementing and evaluating OSH interventions in SMEs: an exploratory study. International Journal of Occupationale Safety and Ergonomics, 20(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2014.11077059

Massoud, M. A., Fayad, R., El-Fadel, M., & Kamleh, R. (2010). Drivers, barriers and incentives to implementing environmental management systems in the food industry: a case of Lebanon. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(3), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.022 CrossRef

McKinsey & Company. (2012). McKinsey on sustainability & resource productivity. Number 1, Summer 2012. https://www.mckinsey.com/client_service/sustainability/latest_thinking/~/media/5E14ED58049D44148B5A47C0124A7E66.ashx.

Morrow, W. R., Hasanbeigi, A., Sathaye, J., & Xu, T. (2014). Assessment of energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction potentials in India’s cement and iron & steel industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.022 CrossRef

Nehler, T., & Ottosson, M. (2014). Including non-energy benefits in investment calculations in industry—empirical findings from Sweden In ECEEE 2014 Industrial Summer Study - Retool for a Competitive and Sustainable Industry, 711–19.

Nehler, T., & Rasmussen, J. (2016). How do firms consider non-energy benefits? Empirical findings on energy-efficiency investments in Swedish Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.070 CrossRef

Nicolăescu, E., Alpopi, C., & Zaharia, C. (2015). Measuring corporate sustainability performance. Sustainability, 7(1), 851–865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7010851 CrossRef

Omer, A. M. (2008). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(9), 2265–2300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001 MathSciNetCrossRef

Ouyang, J., & Ju, P. (2017). The choice of energy saving modes for an energy-intensive manufacturer under non-coordination and coordination scenarios. Energy, 126, 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.059 CrossRef

Pagell, M., & Gobeli, D. (2009). How plant managers’ experiences and attitudes toward sustainability relate to operational performance. Production and Operations Management, 18(3), 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01050.x CrossRef

Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. H. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03162.x CrossRef

Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2ND. Newbury Park, California: SAGE.

Pehlken, A., Decker, A., Kottowski, C., Kirchner, A., & Thoben, K. D. (2015). Energy efficiency in processing of natural raw materials under consideration of uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.076 CrossRef

Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: a new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070602 CrossRef

Pye, M., & McKane, A. (2000). Making a stronger case for industrial energy efficiency by quantifying non-energy benefits. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 28(3-4), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00042-7 CrossRef

Rademaekers, K., Zaki, S. S., & Smith, M. (2011). Sustainable industry: going for growth and resource efficiency. ECORYS Nederland, 1, 1–164 http://www.chemicalleasing.com/sites/default/files/17_6_Brochure-Sustainable_industry-Growth-Resource_efficiency-15072011.pdf

Rasmussen, J. (2014). Energy-efficiency investments and the concepts of non-energy benefits and investment behaviour. 2014 Eceee Industrial Summer Study Proceedings, 733–44.

Remler, D. K., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2014). Research methods in practice: strategies for description and causation (2nd ed.) SAGE.

Rowley, J. (2002). Using case studies in research. Management Research News, 25(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170210782990 CrossRef

Saldaña, J.. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.

Shakir, M. (2002). The selection of case studies: strategies and their applications to IS implementation cases studies. Maha Shakir. Research Letters in the Information and Mathematical Sciences, 3, 191–198.

Sorrell, S., Mallett, A., & Nye, S. (2010). Barriers to industrial energy efficiency: a literature review, background study for the UNIDO industrial development report (IDR) Industrial Energy Efficiency Pays, Why Is It Not Happening?. SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/53957/1/WP102011_Barriers_to_Industrial_Energy_Efficiency_-_A_Literature_Review.pdf.

Sorrell, S., Schleich, J., Scott, S., O’Malley, E., Trace, F., Boede, U., Ostertag, K., & Radgen, P. (2000) Reducing barriers to energy efficiency in public and private organizations. SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/publications/reports/barriers/final.html.

Stuart, I., Mccutcheon, D., Handfield, R., Mclachlin, R., & Samson, D. (2002). Effective case research in operations management : a process perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00022-0 CrossRef

Svensson, A., & Paramonova, S. (2017). An analytical model for identifying and addressing energy efficiency improvement opportunities in industrial production systems – Model development and testing experiences from Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2407–2422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.034 CrossRef

Thollander, P., & Palm, J. (2012). Efficiency in industrial energy systems: an interdisciplinary perspective on barriers, energy audits, energy management, policies, and programs. London: Springer.

Thollander, P., & Palm, J. (2015). Industrial energy management decision making for improved energy efficiency—strategic system perspectives and situated action in combination. Energies, 8(6), 5694–5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8065694 CrossRef

Tonelli, F., Evans, S., & Taticchi, P. (2013). Industrial sustainability : challenges, perspectives, actions. International Journal of Business Inovation and Research, 7(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2013.052576 CrossRef

Trianni, A., Cagno, E., & De Donatis, A. (2014). A framework to characterize energy efficiency measures. Applied Energy, 118, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.042 CrossRef

Trianni, A., Cagno, E., & Neri, A. (2017). Modelling barriers to the adoption of industrial sustainability measures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1482–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.244 CrossRef

Trianni, A., Cagno, E., Worrell, E., & Pugliese, G. (2013). Empirical investigation of energy efficiency barriers in Italian manufacturing SMEs. Energy, 49, 444–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.10.012 CrossRef

Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210414329 CrossRef

Worrell, E., Laitner, J. A., Ruth, M., & Finman, H. (2003). Productivity benefits of industrial energy efficiency measures. Energy, 28(11), 1081–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(03)00091-4 CrossRef

Yin, R.K., (2009). Case study research design and methods fourth. Applied Social Research Method Series Volume 5. Sage, London ISBN-10: 1412960991.

Zorzini, M., Hendry, L., Stevenson, M., & Pozzetti, A. (2008). Customer enquiry management and product customization an empirical multi-case study analysis in the Italian capital goods sector. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(12), 1186–1218. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570810919369 CrossRef

Titel: Broadening to sustainability the perspective of industrial decision-makers on the energy efficiency measures adoption: some empirical evidence
verfasst von: Enrico Cagno
Alessandra Neri
Andrea Trianni
Publikationsdatum: 03.02.2018
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Energy Efficiency / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1570-646X
Elektronische ISSN: 1570-6478
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9621-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

The potential of WHR/batch and cullet preheating for energy efficiency in the EU ETS glass industry and the related energy incentives

Hybrid heating system for increased energy efficiency and flexible control of low temperature heat

Energy savings through additive manufacturing: an analysis of selective laser sintering for automotive and aircraft components

Weighing regional scrap availability in global pathways for steel production processes

Energy efficiency networks—what are the processes that make them work?

A bottom-up estimation of the heating and cooling demand in European industry