Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
It was argued in Sect. 2.6 that mathematical Brownian motion (MBM) is the overdamped limit of the Langevin displacement process. It is tempting, therefore, to coarse-grain the two-dimensional phase space simulation of the overdamped one-dimensional Langevin equation into the one-dimensional configuration space of an MBM. This simplification, however, comes at a price: it inherits the artifacts of the MBM, such as the infinite rate of level crossing, with fatal consequences. An MBM that crosses a boundary (a point, a curve, or a surface) recrosses it infinitely many times in any time interval. Therefore, the number of recrossings of a boundary increases indefinitely as the step size of the simulation is decreased. Consequently, it becomes impossible to determine when a simulated trajectory is on one side of the boundary or the other. This phenomenon shows up, for example, in the simulation of ions in a given (small) volume in solution: simulated ionic trajectories have to enter and leave the simulation domain an unbounded number of times as the step size of the simulation decreases, leaving no room for determining the convergence of the simulation. Quoting Einstein (1956) in this context, “the movements of one and the same particle after different intervals of time must be considered as mutually independent processes, so long as we think of these intervals of time as being chosen not too small.” This means that the MBM idealization should be taken with a grain of salt; the time step in a simulation cannot be refined beyond a certain limit. This limit has to be determined from the more refined Langevin model of the Brownian movement in the limit of large damping.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Allen, M.P. and D.J. Tildesley (1991), Computer Simulation of Liquids, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Allen, M.P. and D.J. Tildesley (editors) (1992), Computer Simulation in Chemical Physics, NATO ASI Ser. C Math. Phys. Sci. 397. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Belch, A.C. and M. Berkowitz (1985), “Molecular dynamics simulations of TIPS2 water restricted by a spherical hydrophobic boundary,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 113, 278–282. CrossRef
Berkowitz, M. and J.A. McCammon (1982), “Molecular dynamics with stochastic boundary conditions,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 90, 215–217. CrossRef
Berry, R.S., S. Rice, and J. Ross (2000), Physical Chemistry, Oxford University Press, 2nd edition.
Brooks, C.L., III and M. Karplus (1983), “Deformable stochastic boundaries in molecular dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys., 79, 6312. CrossRef
Brush, S.G. (1986), The Kind of Motion We Call Heat, I, II, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Caillol, J.M. (1993), “A new potential for the numerical simulations of electrolyte solutions on a hyper-sphere,” J. Chem. Phys., 99, 8953–8963. CrossRef
Caillol, J.M. (1995), “A Monte Carlo study of the dielectric constant of the restricted primitive model of electrolytes on the vapor branch of the coexistence line,” J. Chem. Phys., 102, 5471–5479 (1995).
Caillol, J.M., D. Levesque, and J.J. Weiss (1989), “Electrical properties of polarizable ionic solutions II: computer simulation results,” J. Chem. Phys., 91, 5555–5566. CrossRef
Chandrasekhar, S. (1943), “Stochastic Problems In Physics and Astronomy,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 15, 2–89. CrossRef
Ciccotti, G. and A. Tenenbaum (1980), “Canonical ensemble and nonequilibrium states by molecular dynamics,” J. Statist. Phys., 23, 767–772. CrossRef
Corry, B., S. Kuyucak and S.H. Chung (1979), “Tests of continuum theories as models of ion channels. II. Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory versus Brownian dynamics,” Biophys. J., 78, 2364–2381. CrossRef
Einstein, A. (1956), Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement, translated and reprinted by Dover Publications, N.Y.
Eisenberg, R.S. (1996), “Computing the field in proteins and channels,” J. Membrane Biol., 150, 1–25. CrossRef
Eisenberg, R.S., M.M. Kłosek, and Z. Schuss (1995), “Diffusion as a chemical reaction: Stochastic trajectories between fixed concentrations,” J. Chem. Phys., 102 (4), 1767–1780. CrossRef
Friedman, R.A. and M. Mezei (1995), “The potentials of mean force of sodium chloride and sodium dimethylphosphate in water: An application of adaptive umbrella sampling,” J. Chem. Phys., 102, 419–426. CrossRef
Geyer, T., C. Gorba, and V. Helms (2004), “Interfacing Brownian dynamics simulations,” J. Chem. Phys., 120 (10), 4573–4580. CrossRef
Hänggi, P., P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec (1990), “50 years after Kramers,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 62, 251–341. CrossRef
Hille, B. (2001), Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes, Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, 3rd edition.
Horbach, J., W. Kob, K. Binder, and C.A. Angell (1996), “Finite size effects in simulations of glass dynamics,” Phys. Rev. E, 54, 5897–5900. CrossRef
Im, B., S. Seefeld, and B. Roux (2000), “A grand canonical Monte-Carlo-Brownian dynamics algorithm for simulating ion channel,” Biophysical Journal, 79, 788–801. CrossRef
Karlin, S. and H.M. Taylor (1975), A First Course in Stochastic Processes, Academic Press, NY, 2nd edition.
King, G. and A. Warshel (1989), “A surface constraint all atom solvent model for effective simulations of polar solutions,” J. Chem. Phys., 91, 3647. CrossRef
Nadler, B. (1995), Density Fluctuations, MSc dissertation, Tel-Aviv University.
Nadler, B., Z. Schuss, and A. Singer (2005), “Langevin trajectories between fixed concentrations,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 218101. CrossRef
Naeh, T. (2001), Simulation of Ionic Solution, PhD dissertation, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Nymand, T.M. and P. Linse (2000), “Ewald summation and reaction field methods for potentials with atomic charges, dipoles, and polarizabilities,” J. Chem. Phys., 112, 6152–6160. CrossRef
Roman, F.L., J.A. White, and S. Velasco (1997), “Fluctuations in an equilibrium hard-disk fluid: Explicit size effects,” J. Chem. Phys., 107, 4635–4641. CrossRef
Roman, F.L., J.A. White, and S. Velasco (1999), “Fluctuations in the number of particles of the ideal gas: A simple example of explicit finite-size effects,” Amer. J. Phys., 67, 1149–1151. CrossRef
Schuss, Z., B. Nadler, and R.S. Eisenberg (2001), “Derivation of PNP equations in bath and channel from a molecular model,” Phys. Rev. E, 64 (2–3), 036116–1–036116–14.
Schuss, Z. (2010b), Theory and Applications of Stochastic Processes, and Analytical Approach, Springer series on Applied Mathematical Sciences 170, NY.
Shamm, Y.Y. and A. Warshel (1998), “The surface constraint all atom model provides size independent results in calculations hydration free energies,” J. Chem. Phys., 109, 7940–7944. CrossRef
Singer, A. and Z. Schuss (2005), “Brownian simulations and unidirectional flux in diffusion,” Phys. Rev. E, 71, 026115. CrossRef
Singer, A., Z. Schuss, B. Nadler, and R.S. Eisenberg (2004), “Memoryless control of boundary concentrations of diffusing particles,” Phys. Rev. E – Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 70 (6) part 1, 061106.
M.R. von Smolan (1906), “Zarys kinetycznej teorji ruchów Browna i roztworów mȩtnych.” Rozprawy Wydziału matematyczno-przyrodniczego Akademii Umiejȩtności w Krakowie, 46A, 257–281.
Valleau, J.P. and S.G. Whittington (1977), “A guide to Monte Carlo for statistical mechanics: 1. Highways,” in Statistical Mechanics: Part A: Equilibrium Techniques, Modern Theoretical Chemistry, 5, 15. Plenum Press, NY.
- Brownian Simulation of Langevin’s
- Springer New York
- Chapter 3
microm, Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Avaloq/© Avaloq