nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Building Industry and Energy Efficiency: A Review of Three Major Issues at Stake

verfasst von : Sergio Copiello, Laura Gabrielli, Ezio Micelli

Erschienen in: Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

During the last two decades, the European Union regulation has paid more and more attention to the issue of energy efficiency, especially as far as the building sector is concerned. Lately, the adoption of the European Green Deal (EGD) has further fueled interest in the topic. The building industry is expected to step forward towards decarbonization, as well as to mobilize towards a clean and circular economy, so supporting the pursuit of climate neutrality. In this position paper, we aim to discuss three major issues at stake, which are crucial to increase the renovation rate of the building stock and, hence, to the success of the EGD. The first key issue is whether a cost premium has to be expected due to retrofit projects. The second key issue is whether or not the large swing currently experienced in the price premium for building energy efficiency undermines stakeholders’ confidence. The third key issue is whether we need tailored evaluation methodologies for energy-efficient building portfolios.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Ecosystem Services and Land Take. A Composite Indicator for the Assessment of Sustainable Urban Projects

Nächstes Kapitel An Evaluation Model for the Optimization of Property Sales in Auction Markets

Gauzin-Müller, D.: Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism. Birkhäuser, Basel (2002)

Copiello, S.: Leveraging energy efficiency to finance public-private social housing projects. Energy Policy 96, 217–230 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.003CrossRef

Schimschar, S.: Policy Instruments: The Case of Germany. In: Torgal, F.P., Mistretta, M., Kaklauskas, A., Granqvist, C.G., Cabeza, L.F. (eds.) Nearly Zero Energy Building Refurbishment, pp. 15–60. Springer London, London (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5523-2_2CrossRef

Weißenberger, M., Jensch, W., Lang, W.: The convergence of life cycle assessment and nearly zero-energy buildings: the case of Germany. Energy Build. 76, 551–557 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.028CrossRef

Tommerup, H., Svendsen, S.: Energy savings in Danish residential building stock. Energy Build. 38, 618–626 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.08.017CrossRef

Nässén, J., Holmberg, J.: Energy efficiency—a forgotten goal in the Swedish building sector? Energy Policy 33, 1037–1051 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.11.004CrossRef

Economidou, M., Todeschi, V., Bertoldi, P., D’Agostino, D., Zangheri, P., Castellazzi, L.: Review of 50 years of EU energy efficiency policies for buildings. Energy Build. 225, 110322 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110322CrossRef

Copiello, S.: Building energy efficiency: a research branch made of paradoxes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 69, 1064–1076 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.094CrossRef

Kerr, N., Gouldson, A., Barrett, J.: The rationale for energy efficiency policy: assessing the recognition of the multiple benefits of energy efficiency retrofit policy. Energy Policy 106, 212–221 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.053CrossRef

10.

Ramos, A., Gago, A., Labandeira, X., Linares, P.: The role of information for energy efficiency in the residential sector. Energy Econ. 52, S17–S29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.022CrossRef

11.

Bonifaci, P., Copiello, S.: Incentive Policies for Residential Buildings Energy Retrofit: An Analysis of Tax Rebate Programs in Italy. In: Bisello, A., Vettorato, D., Laconte, P., Costa, S. (eds.) SSPCR 2017. GET, pp. 267–279. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_19CrossRef

12.

European Commission: The European Green Deal. Brussels (2019)

13.

Haines, A., Scheelbeek, P.: European green deal: a major opportunity for health improvement. Lancet 395, 1327–1329 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30109-4CrossRef

14.

European Commission: A Clean Planet for all. A European long-term strategic vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. Brussels (2018)

15.

Trippel, E.: How green is green enough? The changing landscape of financing a sustainable European economy. ERA Forum 21(2), 155–170 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00611-zCrossRef

16.

Copiello, S., Grillenzoni, C.: Economic development and climate change. Which is the cause and which the effect? Energy Rep. 6, 49–59 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.08.024CrossRef

17.

Pohoryles, D.A., Maduta, C., Bournas, D.A., Kouris, L.A.: Energy performance of existing residential buildings in Europe: a novel approach combining energy with seismic retrofitting. Energy Build. 223, 110024 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110024CrossRef

18.

Fleckinger, P., Glachant, M., Tamokoué Kamga, P.H.: Energy performance certificates and investments in building energy efficiency: a theoretical analysis. Energy Econ. 84, 104604 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104604CrossRef

19.

Broberg, T., Egüez, A., Kažukauskas, A.: Effects of energy performance certificates on investment: a quasi-natural experiment approach. Energy Econ. 84 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104480

20.

Aydin, E., Correa, S.B., Brounen, D.: Energy performance certification and time on the market. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 98, 102270 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102270CrossRef

21.

Comerford, D.A., Lange, I., Moro, M.: Proof of concept that requiring energy labels for dwellings can induce retrofitting. Energy Econ. 69, 204–212 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.013CrossRef

22.

Gonzalez-Caceres, A., Lassen, A.K., Nielsen, T.R.: Barriers and challenges of the recommendation list of measures under the EPBD scheme: a critical review. Energy Build. 223, 110065 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110065CrossRef

23.

Hardy, A., Glew, D.: An analysis of errors in the energy performance certificate database. Energy Policy 129, 1168–1178 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.022CrossRef

24.

Organ, S.: Minimum energy efficiency – is the energy performance certificate a suitable foundation? Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. ahead-of-print (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbpa-03-2020-0016.

25.

Li, Y., Kubicki, S., Guerriero, A., Rezgui, Y.: Review of building energy performance certification schemes towards future improvement. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 113, 109244 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109244CrossRef

26.

Ahern, C., Norton, B.: Energy performance certification: misassessment due to assuming default heat losses. Energy Build. 224, 110229 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110229CrossRef

27.

Tronchin, L., Fabbri, K.: Energy performance certificate of building and confidence interval in assessment: an Italian case study. Energy Policy 48, 176–184 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.011CrossRef

28.

Gilmer, R.W.: Energy labels and economic search. Energy Econ. 11, 213–218 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-9883(89)90026-1CrossRef

29.

Dinan, T.M., Miranowski, J.A.: Estimating the implicit price of energy efficiency improvements in the residential housing market: a hedonic approach. J. Urban Econ. 25, 52–67 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(89)90043-0CrossRef

30.

Bio Intelligence Service, Lyons, R., IEEP: Energy performance certificates in buildings and their impact on transaction prices and rents in selected EU countries. Final report prepared for European Commission (DG Energy) (2013).

31.

Bonifaci, P., Copiello, S.: Real estate market and building energy performance: data for a mass appraisal approach. Data Brief 5, 1060–1065 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2015.11.027CrossRef

32.

Cajias, M., Piazolo, D.: Green performs better: energy efficiency and financial return on buildings. J. Corp. Real Estate 15, 53–72 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-12-2012-0031CrossRef

33.

Manganelli, B., Morano, P., Tajani, F., Salvo, F.: Affordability assessment of energy-efficient building construction in Italy. Sustainability. 11, 249 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010249CrossRef

34.

Davis, P.T., McCord, J., McCord, M.J., Haran, M.: Modelling the effect of energy performance certificate rating on property value in the Belfast housing market. Int. J. Hous. Mark. Anal. 8, 292–317 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2014-0077CrossRef

35.

Fuerst, F., McAllister, P., Nanda, A., Wyatt, P.: Energy performance ratings and house prices in Wales: an empirical study. Energy Policy 92, 20–33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.024CrossRef

36.

Fuerst, F., Oikarinen, E., Harjunen, O.: Green signalling effects in the market for energy-efficient residential buildings. Appl. Energy. 180, 560–571 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.076CrossRef

37.

Evangelista, R., Ramalho, E., Andrade, J., e Silva, : On the use of hedonic regression models to measure the effect of energy efficiency on residential property transaction prices: evidence for Portugal and selected data issues. Energy Econ. 86, 104699 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104699CrossRef

38.

Brounen, D., Kok, N.: On the economics of energy labels in the housing market. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 62, 166–179 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.11.006CrossRef

39.

Jensen, O.M., Hansen, A.R., Kragh, J.: Market response to the public display of energy performance rating at property sales. Energy Policy 93, 229–235 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.029CrossRef

40.

McCord, M., Haran, M., Davis, P., McCord, J.: Energy performance certificates and house prices: a quantile regression approach. J. Eur. Real Estate Res. 13, 409–434 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-06-2020-0033CrossRef

41.

Bonifaci, P., Copiello, S.: Price premium for buildings energy efficiency: empirical findings from a hedonic model. Valori e Valutazioni 14, 5–15 (2015)

42.

Hyland, M., Lyons, R.C., Lyons, S.: The value of domestic building energy efficiency—evidence from Ireland. Energy Econ. 40, 943–952 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.07.020CrossRef

43.

Fuerst, F., Oikarinen, E., Shimizu, C., Szumilo, N.: Measuring “Green Value”: An International Perspective. London (2014)

44.

Fuerst, F., McAllister, P., Nanda, A., Wyatt, P.: Does energy efficiency matter to home-buyers? An investigation of EPC ratings and transaction prices in England. Energy Econ. 48, 145–156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.12.012CrossRef

45.

Stanley, S., Lyons, R.C., Lyons, S.: The price effect of building energy ratings in the Dublin residential market. Energ. Effic. 9(4), 875–885 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9396-5CrossRef

46.

Cerin, P., Hassel, L.G., Semenova, N.: Energy performance and housing prices. Sustain. Dev. 22, 404–419 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1566CrossRef

47.

Wahlström, M.H.: Doing good but not that well? A dilemma for energy conserving homeowners. Energy Econ. 60, 197–205 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.025CrossRef

48.

Taltavull de La Paz, P., Perez-Sanchez, V., Mora-Garcia, R.-T., Perez-Sanchez, J.-C.: Green premium evidence from climatic areas: a case in Southern Europe, Alicante (Spain). Sustainability 11, 686 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030686CrossRef

49.

Fuerst, F., Shimizu, C.: Green luxury goods? The economics of eco-labels in the Japanese housing market. J. Jpn. Int. Econ. 39, 108–122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2016.01.003CrossRef

50.

Zheng, S., Wu, J., Kahn, M.E., Deng, Y.: The nascent market for “green” real estate in Beijing. Eur. Econ. Rev. 56, 974–984 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.02.012CrossRef

51.

Soriano, F.: Energy efficiency rating and house prices in the ACT – Modelling the relationship of energy efficiency attributes to house price: the case of detached houses sold in the Australian Capital Territory in 2005 and 2006. Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra (2008)

52.

Pride, D., Little, J., Mueller-Stoffels, M.: The value of residential energy efficiency in interior Alaska: a hedonic pricing analysis. Energy Policy 123, 450–460 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.09.017CrossRef

53.

Bloom, B., Nobe, M.C., Nobe, M.D.: Valuing green home designs: a study of ENERGY STAR homes. J. Sustain. Real Estate. 3, 109–126 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2011.12091818CrossRef

54.

Mesthrige Jayantha, W., Sze Man, W.: Effect of green labelling on residential property price: a case study in Hong Kong. J. Facil. Manag. 11, 31–51 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961311301457CrossRef

55.

Kahn, M.E., Kok, N.: The capitalization of green labels in the California housing market. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 47, 25–34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.07.001CrossRef

56.

Bruegge, C., Carrión-Flores, C., Pope, J.C.: Does the housing market value energy efficient homes? Evidence from the energy star program. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 57, 63–76 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.12.001CrossRef

57.

Aroul, R.R., Rodriguez, M.: The increasing value of green for residential real estate. J. Sustain. Real Estate 9, 112–130 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2017.12091894CrossRef

58.

Fuerst, F., Warren-Myers, G.: Does voluntary disclosure create a green lemon problem? Energy-efficiency ratings and house prices. Energy Econ. 74, 1–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.041CrossRef

59.

Mangialardo, A., Micelli, E., Saccani, F.: Does sustainability affect real estate market values? Empirical Evidence from the office buildings market in Milan (Italy). Sustainability 11, 12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010012CrossRef

60.

Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., Quigley, J.M.: Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 2492–2509 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.5.2492CrossRef

61.

Fuerst, F., McAllister, P.: The impact of energy performance certificates on the rental and capital values of commercial property assets. Energy Policy 39, 6608–6614 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.005CrossRef

62.

Das, P., Wiley, J.A.: Determinants of premia for energy-efficient design in the office market. J. Prop. Res. 31, 64–86 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2013.788543CrossRef

63.

Kok, N., Jennen, M.: The impact of energy labels and accessibility on office rents. Energy Policy 46, 489–497 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.015CrossRef

64.

Reichardt, A., Fuerst, F., Rottke, N.B., Zietz, J.: Sustainable building certification and the rent premium: a panel data approach. J. Real Estate Res. 34, 99–126 (2012)CrossRef

65.

Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., Quigley, J.M.: The economics of green building. Rev. Econ. Stat. 95, 50–63 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00291CrossRef

66.

Chegut, A., Eichholtz, P., Kok, N.: Supply, demand and the value of green buildings. Urban Stud. 51, 22–43 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013484526CrossRef

67.

Devine, A., Kok, N.: Green certification and building performance: implications for tangibles and intangibles. J. Portf. Manag. 41, 151–163 (2015)CrossRef

68.

Fuerst, F., McAllister, P.: Green noise or green value? Measuring the effects of environmental certification on office values. Real Estate Econ. 39, 45–69 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2010.00286.xCrossRef

69.

Deng, Y., Wu, J.: Economic returns to residential green building investment: the developers’ perspective. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 47, 35–44 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.09.015CrossRef

70.

Heinzle, S., Yip, A., Xing, M.: The influence of green building certification schemes on real estate investor behaviour: evidence from Singapore. Urban Stud. 50(10), 1970–1987 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013477693CrossRef

71.

Addae-Dapaah, K., Chieh, S.J.: Green mark certification: does the market understand ? J. Sustain. Real Estate 3, 162–191 (2011)CrossRef

72.

Deng, Y., Li, Z., Quigley, J.M.: Economic returns to energy-efficient investments in the housing market: evidence from Singapore. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 42, 506–515 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.04.004CrossRef

73.

Fesselmeyer, E.: The value of green certification in the Singapore housing market. Econ. Lett. 163, 36–39 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.11.033CrossRef

74.

Dell’Anna, F., Bottero, M.: Green premium in buildings: evidence from the real estate market of Singapore. J. Clean. Prod. 286, 125327 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125327CrossRef

75.

Copiello, S., Gabrielli, L., Bonifaci, P.: Evaluation of energy retrofit in buildings under conditions of uncertainty: the prominence of the discount rate. Energy 137, 104–117 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.159CrossRef

76.

McGreal, S., Taltavull de La Paz, P.: Implicit house prices: variation over time and space in Spain. Urban Stud. 50(10), 2024–2043 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012471978CrossRef

77.

Copiello, S.: Achieving affordable housing through energy efficiency strategy. Energy Policy 85, 288–298 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.017CrossRef

78.

Copiello, S., Bonifaci, P.: Green housing: toward a new energy efficiency paradox? Cities 49, 76–87 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.07.006CrossRef

79.

Copiello, S.: Economic viability of building energy efficiency measures: a review on the discount rate. AIMS Energy 9, 257–285 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2021014CrossRef

80.

McCord, M., Lo, D., Davis, P.T., Hemphill, L., McCord, J., Haran, M.: A spatial analysis of EPCs in the Belfast metropolitan area housing market. J. Prop. Res. 37, 25–61 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2019.1697345CrossRef

81.

Walls, M., Gerarden, T., Palmer, K., Bak, X.F.: Is energy efficiency capitalized into home prices? Evidence from three US cities. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 82, 104–124 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.11.006CrossRef

82.

Bisello, A., Antoniucci, V., Marella, G.: Measuring the price premium of energy efficiency: a two-step analysis in the Italian housing market. Energy Build. 208, 109670 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109670CrossRef

83.

Copiello, S.: Spatial dependence of housing values in Northeastern Italy. Cities 96, 102444 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102444CrossRef

84.

Dell’Anna, F., Bravi, M., Marmolejo-Duarte, C., Bottero, M.C., Chen, A.: EPC green premium in two different European climate zones: a comparative study between Barcelona and Turin. Sustainability 11, 5605 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205605CrossRef

85.

Ekung, S., Odesola, I., Oladokun, M.: Dimensions of cost misperceptions obstructing the adoption of sustainable buildings. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. ahead-of-print (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-10-2020-0160

86.

Dwaikat, L.N., Ali, K.N.: Green buildings cost premium: a review of empirical evidence. Energy Build. 110, 396–403 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.11.021CrossRef

87.

Kats, G.: The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings – A Report to California’s Sustainable Building Task Force. Washington, DC (2003)

88.

Lucuik, M., Trusty, W., Larsson, N., Charette, R.: A Business Case for Green Building in Canada. Toronto (2005)

89.

Berry, T.: Towards a Green Building and Infrastructure Investment Fund: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities. Compass Resource Management, Vancouver (2007)

90.

Matthiessen, L., Morris, P.: Costing Green: A Comprehensive Cost Database and Budgeting Methodology. Davis Langdon, London (2004)

91.

Rehm, M., Ade, R.: Construction costs comparison between ‘green’ and conventional office buildings. Build. Res. Inform. 41, 198–208 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.769145CrossRef

92.

Bartlett, E., Howard, N.: Informing the decision makers on the cost and value of green building. Build. Res. Inform. 28, 315–324 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/096132100418474CrossRef

93.

Uğur, L.O., Leblebici, N.: An examination of the LEED green building certification system in terms of construction costs. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 1476–1483 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.210CrossRef

94.

Taemthong, W., Chaisaard, N.: An analysis of green building costs using a minimum cost concept. J. Green Build. 14, 53–78 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.14.1.53CrossRef

95.

Rajagopalan, N., Bilec, M.M., Landis, A.E.: Life cycle assessment evaluation of green product labeling systems for residential construction. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 17, 753–763 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0416-9CrossRef

96.

Miller, N., Spivey, J., Florance, A.: Does Green Pay Off? San Diego (2008)

97.

Mangialardo, A., Micelli, E.: Off-site Retrofit to Regenerate Multi-family Homes: Evidence from Some European Experiences. In: Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C. (eds.) ISHT 2018. SIST, vol. 101, pp. 629–636. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92102-0_68CrossRef

98.

Ruggeri, A.G., Gabrielli, L., Scarpa, M.: Energy retrofit in European building portfolios: A review of five key aspects. Sustainability 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12187465

99.

Mata, É., Sasic Kalagasidis, A., Johnsson, F.: Building-stock aggregation through archetype buildings: France, Germany, Spain and the UK. Build. Environ. 81, 270–282 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.06.013CrossRef

100.

Luddeni, G., Krarti, M., Pernigotto, G., Gasparella, A.: An analysis methodology for large-scale deep energy retrofits of existing building stocks: case study of the Italian office building. Sustain. Cities Soc. 41, 296–311 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.038CrossRef

101.

Guardigli, L., Bragadin, M.A., Della Fornace, F., Mazzoli, C., Prati, D.: Energy retrofit alternatives and cost-optimal analysis for large public housing stocks. Energy Build. 166, 48–59 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.003CrossRef

102.

Ascione, F., Bianco, N., Stasio, C., Mauro, G., Vanoli, G.: Addressing large-scale energy retrofit of a building stock via representative building samples: Public and private perspectives. Sustainability 9(6), 940 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060940CrossRef

103.

Nägeli, C., Jakob, M., Sunarjo, B., Catenazzi, G.: A building specific, economic building stock model to evaluate energy efficiency and renewable energy. Cisbat 2015, 877–882 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmeb.45.638CrossRef

104.

European Commission: Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast), pp. 13–35. Off. J. Eur. Union (2010). https://doi.org/10.3000/17252555.L_2010.153.eng

105.

Swan, L.G., Ugursal, V.I.: Modeling of end-use energy consumption in the residential sector: a review of modeling techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 1819–1835 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.033CrossRef

106.

Ma, Z., Cooper, P., Daly, D., Ledo, L.: Existing building retrofits: methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy Build. 55, 889–902 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.018CrossRef

107.

Fathabadi, H.: Increasing energy efficiency of PV-converter-battery section of standalone building integrated photovoltaic systems. Energy Build. 101, 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.024CrossRef

108.

Hu, B., Sun, W.P.: Research on green residential buildings based on energy efficiency and renewable energy. Appl. Mech. Mater. 361–363, 331–334 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4028/AMM.361-363.331CrossRef

109.

Pukhkal, V., Vatin, N., Murgul, V.: Central ventilation system with heat recovery as one of the measures to upgrade energy efficiency of historic buildings. Appl. Mech. Mater. 633, 1077–1081 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4028/AMM.633-634.1077CrossRef

110.

Gabor, T., Dan, V., Badila, I.-N., Tiuc, A.-E., Sur, I.M.: Improving the energy efficiency of residential buildings by using a drain water heat recovery system. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 16, 1631–1636 (2017)CrossRef

111.

Wang, Y., Shao, L.: Understanding occupancy pattern and improving building energy efficiency through Wi-Fi based indoor positioning. Build. Environ. 114, 106–117 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.015CrossRef

112.

Pallis, P., et al.: Cost effectiveness assessment and beyond: a study on energy efficiency interventions in Greek residential building stock. Energy Build. 182, 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.10.024CrossRef

113.

Yılmaz, Y., Koçlar Oral, G.: An approach for an educational building stock energy retrofits through life-cycle cost optimization. Archit. Sci. Rev. 61, 122–132 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2018.1447438CrossRef

114.

Barthelmes, V.M., Becchio, C., Bottero, M., Corgnati, S.P.: Cost-optimal analysis for the definition of energy design strategies: the case of a nearly-zero energy building. Valori Valutazioni 16, 57–70 (2016)

115.

Amstalden, R.W., Kost, M., Nathani, C., Imboden, D.M.: Economic potential of energy-efficient retrofitting in the Swiss residential building sector: the effects of policy instruments and energy price expectations. Energy Policy 35, 1819–1829 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.05.018CrossRef

116.

Kumbaroğlu, G., Madlener, R.: Evaluation of economically optimal retrofit investment options for energy savings in buildings. Energy Build. 49, 327–334 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.02.022CrossRef

117.

Brotman, B.A.: Green office construction: a discounted after-tax cash flow analysis. J. Prop. Invest. Financ. 32, 474–484 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-01-2014-0007CrossRef

118.

Gaglia, A.G., Balaras, C.A., Mirasgedis, S., Georgopoulou, E., Sarafidis, Y., Lalas, D.P.: Empirical assessment of the Hellenic non-residential building stock, energy consumption, emissions and potential energy savings. Energy Convers. Manag. 48, 1160–1175 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.10.008CrossRef

119.

Espen, L.: Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11, 1584–1595 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.11.005CrossRef

120.

European Commission: Guidelines accompanying Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 244/2012 of 16 January 2012 supplementing Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings by establishing a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost-optimal levels, vol.. 55, pp. 1–28. Off. J. Eur. Union (2012). https://doi.org/10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.115.eng

121.

Carli, R., Dotoli, M., Pellegrino, R., Ranieri, L.: A decision making technique to optimize a buildings’ stock energy efficiency. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst. 47(5), 794–807 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2016.2521836CrossRef

122.

Pombo, O., Allacker, K., Rivela, B., Neila, J.: Sustainability assessment of energy saving measures: A multi-criteria approach for residential buildings retrofitting – a case study of the Spanish housing stock. Energy Build. 116, 384–394 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.019CrossRef

123.

Vimmr, T., Enseling, A., Lützkendorf, T., Behr, I., Vache, M., Beer, A.: Decision support tools for economically viable energy efficiency retrofitting in the European rental housing stock. In: K., S., J., T., A., L., P., H. (eds.) Central Europe Towards Sustainable Building 2016: Innovations for Sustainable Future, CESB 2016, pp. 1518–1525. Grada Publishing, STU-K, a.s., Praha, Czech Republic (2016)

124.

Gabrielli, L., Ruggeri, A.: Developing a model for energy retrofit in large building portfolios: energy assessment, optimization and uncertainty. Energy Build. 202, 109356 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109356CrossRef

Titel: Building Industry and Energy Efficiency: A Review of Three Major Issues at Stake
verfasst von: Sergio Copiello
Laura Gabrielli
Ezio Micelli
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86978-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-86979-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_17

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"