Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Ethics and Information Technology
Erschienen in: Ethics and Information Technology 2/2016

02.03.2016 | Original Paper

Building theory from consumer reactions to RFID: discovering Connective Proximity

verfasst von: Anna Margulis, Harold Boeck, Ygal Bendavid, Fabien Durif

Erschienen in: Ethics and Information Technology | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Academic research into RFID technology has largely neglected ethics. What scarce research was being performed has now dwindled despite having some consumers continue to express their ethical concerns. This article aims at reducing this apparent void by exploring the antecedents that cause the public to react when consumers are targeted by RFID technology. Through the analysis of 11 real RFID implementations used to target consumers, our research indicates that several factors can influence consumer response through the distinct nature of the technology, namely, (1) Customization of communications, (2) Imposition of tag use, (3) Segmentation and targeting, (4) Modified role of the sales representative, (5) Physical distance between the consumer and the tag, and (6) Security of transactions. The article then proposes a construct to determine the risk of raising consumer ethical concerns. The construct of “Connective Proximity” and its three components (physical proximity, exposure time, and information proximity) are defined. Our research highlights the need for further studies on the ethical considerations of tagging humans and specifically tracking consumers when performing marketing activities with RFID technology. Our article aims at invigorating research on this topic, which has a lot to contribute to both society and corporations.
Vorheriger Artikel Using Aristotle’s theory of friendship to classify online friendships: a critical counterview
Nächster Artikel Against the moral Turing test: accountable design and the moral reasoning of autonomous systems

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Barnes, B. (2013). At Disney Parks, a Bracelet Meant to Build-Loyalty (and Sales). New York Times.
Desmarais, C. (2012). Texas school uses RFID badges to track student locations. PCWorld.
IDTechEx Knowledge Database. (2006). Prada apparel item level New York USA.
IDTechEx Knowledge Database. (2007). GeDenim Cards France.
IDTechEx Knowledge Database. (2008). McDonlad’s Phone Payment Japan.pdf.
IDTechEx Knowledge Database. (2010a). McDonald’s Phone Vouchers Japan.
IDTechEx Knowledge Database. (2010b). Smug Coffee LLC Coffee Mugs USA.
Johnson, C. (2013a). RFID-embedded smart mug makes coffee shops even more smug. Switched.
Johnson, J. R. (2011a). Vail extends rfid social media program; nba, nhl and mlb may be next to adopt. RFID 24-7.
Johnson, J. R. (2011b). Tampa Bay lightning boost sales with RFID-enables team Jerseys. RFID 24-7.
Johnson, J. R. (2012). Social media and RFID: A golden opportunity for retailers. RFID 24-7.
Johnson, J. R. (2013b). Disney fires back at privacy concerns over mymagic+. RFID 24-7.
Johnson, J. R. (2013c). Sunglass hut deploys RFID to boost consumer engagement. RFID 24-7.
Montgomery, K. (2010). Smart Coffee Mug Features RFID Chip for Easy Purchases. PC Magazine.
Oremus, W. (2013). Student loses lawsuit challenging Texas school’s RFID tracking program. Slate.
Staggs, T. (2013, March 10). Taking the Disney Guest Experience to the Next Level. DisneyParks Blog.
Swedberg, C. (2010). To reduce waste, smug customers use RFID coffee mugs. RFID Journal, pp. 1–2.
Zara, C. (2013). Disney World’s RFID tracking bracelets are a slippery slope, Warns Privacy Advocate. International Business Times.
Aluri, A., & Palakurthi, R. (2011). The influence of demographic factors on consumer attitudes and intentions to use RFID technologies in the US hotel industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 2(3), 188–203.CrossRef
Angeles, R. (2007). An empirical study of the anticipated consumer response to RFID product item tagging. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(4), 461–483.CrossRef
Astani, M., & Bjorke, J. (2007). Radio frequency identification technology and consumer privacy. Issues in Information Systems, VIII(2), 341–347.
Barnes, B. (2013). At Disney Parks, a Bracelet Meant to Build-Loyalty (and Sales). New York Times.
Beitelspacher, L. S., Hansen, J. D., Johnston, A. C., & Deitz, G. D. (2012). Exploring consumer privacy concerns and RFID technology: The impact of fear appeals on consumer behaviors. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(2), 147–160.CrossRef
Bendavid, Y., Boeck, H., & Philippe, R. (2012). RFID-enabled traceability system for consignment and high value products: A case study in the healthcare sector. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(6), 3473–3489.CrossRef
Bentham, J. (1791). Panopticon or the inspection house, 2.
Black, J. (2004). Shutting shopping bags to prying eyes. Business Week.
Boeck, H., Roy, J., Durif, F., & Gregoire, M. (2011). The effect of perceived intrusion on consumers’ attitude towards using an RFID-based marketing program. Procedia Computer Science, 5, 841–848.CrossRef
Boeck, H., & Wamba, S. F. (2008). RFID and buyer–seller relationships in the retail supply chain. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 36(6), 433–460.CrossRef
Brey, P. (2005). Editorial introduction—Surveillance and privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 183–184.CrossRef
CASPIAN. (2003a). Boycott Gillette—Fight Back. Caspian.
CASPIAN. (2003b). Send Benetton a message: Don’t buy clothing with tracking devices! Caspian.
Clarke, R. (2001). Person location and person tracking—Technologies, risks and policy implications. Information Technology & People, 14(2), 206–231.CrossRef
Clifford, S., & Hardy, Q. (2013). Attention, shoppers: Store is tracking your cell. The New York Times, pp. 5–9.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage Publi.
Daly, E. (2010). Personal autonomy in the travel panopticon. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(2), 97–108.CrossRef
De George, R. T. (2008). The ethics of information technology and business. New York: Wiley.
Dean, D. H. (2013). Anticipating consumer reaction to RFID-enabled grocery checkout. Services Marketing Quarterly, 34(1), 86–101.CrossRef
DeCew, J. W. (2004). Privacy and policy for genetic research. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(1), 5–14.CrossRef
Denning, T., Borning, A., Friedman, B., Gill, B. T., Tadayoshi, K., & Maise, W. H. (2010). Patients, pacemakers, and implantable defibrillators: Human values and security for wireless implantable medical devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp. 917–926.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Floridi, L. (2005). The ontological interpretation of informational privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 185–200.CrossRef
Gartner Research. (2015). Gartner identifies the top 10 strategic technology trends for 2015.
Gilbert, A., & Shim, R. (2003). Wal-Mart cancels ‘smart shelf’ trial. CNET News.
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. The Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602.
Glasser, D. J., Goodman, K. W., & Einspruch, N. G. (2007). Chips, tags and scanners: Ethical challenges for radio frequency identification. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 101–109.CrossRef
Goel, R. (2007). Managing RFID consumer privacy and implementation barriers. Information Systems Security, 16(4), 217–223.CrossRef
Guillemette, M. G., Fontaine, I., & Caron, C. (2008). Hybrid RFID-GPS real-time location system for human resources: Development, impacts and perspectives. In Proceedings of the annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp. 1–10.
Günther, O., & Spiekermann, S. (2005). RFID and the perception of control: The consumer’s view. Communications of the ACM, 48(9), 73–76.CrossRef
Hassan, T., & Chatterjee, S. (2006). A taxonomy for RFID. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
Heath, H., & Cowley, S. (2004). Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 141–150.CrossRef
Hsu, C.-H., Chao, H.-C., & Park, J. H. (2011). Threshold jumping and wrap-around scan techniques toward efficient tag identification in high density RFID systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(4), 471–480.
IDTechEx Knowledge Database. (2006), Prada Apparel Item Level New York USA.
IDTechEx Knowledge Database. (2008). McDonlad’s Phone Payment Japan.pdf.
Introna, L. D. (2005). Disclosive ethics and information technology: Disclosing facial recognition systems. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(2), 75–86.CrossRef
Jaccard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2010). Theory construction and model-building skills. A practical guide for social scientists. New York: The Guilfo.
Johnson, J. R. (2013). Disney Fires Back at Privacy Concerns Over MyMagic+. RFID 24-7.
Johnson, J. R. (2014). Marks and Spencer Expands RFID Rollout; Will Tag 400M Items in 2014. RFID 24-7.
Johnson, R. (2012). Transcript: JC Penney CEO Ron Johnson. CNNMoney.
Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2009). Public views of mobile medical devices and services: A US national survey of consumer sentiments towards RFID healthcare technology. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78, 104–114.CrossRef
Kelly, E. P., & Erickson, G. S. (2005). RFID tags: Commercial applications v. privacy rights. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(6), 703–713.CrossRef
Krotov, V., & Junglas, I. (2008). RFID as a disruptive innovation. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 3(2), 44–59.CrossRef
Lefebvre, L. A., Lefebvre, É., Bendavid, Y., Fosso Wamba, S., & Boeck, H. (2006). RFID as an Enabler of B-to-B e-Commerce and its impact on business processes: A pilot study of a supply chain in the retail industry. In 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS’06), IEEE, pp. 1–10.
Li, X., Liu, J., Sheng, Q. Z., Zeadally, S., & Zhong, W. (2011). TMS-RFID: Temporal management of large-scale RFID applications. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(4), 481–500.
Lockton, V., & Rosenberg, R. S. (2005). RFID: The next serious threat to privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 221–231.CrossRef
Lopez, T. S., Ranasinghe, D. C., Patkai, B., & McFarlane, D. (2011). Taxonomy, technology and applications of smart objects. Information Systems Frontiers Special Issue on RFID, 13(2), 281–300.
Martinko, M. J., Henry, J. W., & Zmud, R. W. (1996). An attributional explanation of individual resistance to the introduction of information technologies in the workplace. Behaviour & Information technology, 15(5), 313–330.CrossRef
McLean, A. (2011). Ethical frontiers of ICT and older users: Cultural, pragmatic and ethical issues. Ethics and Information Technology, 13, 313–326.CrossRef
Michael, K. (2010). RFID implantable devices for humans and the risk versus reward. PerAda Workshop on Security, Trust and Privacy, Universita di Roma “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy.
Michael, M. G., & Michael, K. (2010). Toward a State of Überveillance [Special Section Introduction]. IEEE on Technology and Society Magazine, 29(2), 9–16.MathSciNetCrossRef
Penders, J. (2004). Privacy in (mobile) telecommunications services. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(4), 247–260.CrossRef
Peslak, A. R. (2005). An ethical exploration of privacy and radio frequency identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 327–345.CrossRef
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2003). The new frontier of experience innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 12–18.
Pramatari, K., & Theotokis, A. (2009). Consumer acceptance of RFID-enabled services: a model of multiple attitudes, perceived system characteristics and individual traits. European Journal of Information Systems, Palgrave Macmillan, 18(6), 541–552.CrossRef
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. (2014, March 10). RFID Position Statement of Consumer Privacy and Civil Liberties Organizations. Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.
Razzouk, N. Y., Seitz, V., & Nicolaou, M. (2008). Consumer concerns regarding RFID Privacy: An empirical study. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 4(1), 69–79.
Reiman, J. H. (1995). Driving to the panopticon: A philosophical exploration of the risks to privacy posed by the highway technology of the future. Santa Clara Computer & high Tech LJ, 11, 27.
Resatsch, F., Sandner, U., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2008). Do point of sale RFID-based information services make a difference? Analyzing consumer perceptions for designing smart product information services in retail business. Electronic Markets, 18(3), 216–231.CrossRef
Rispal, M. H. (2002). La méthode des cas: Application à la recherche en gestion. De Boeck S.
Roberti, M. (2003). The real scandal. RFID Journal.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Fifth Edit: Free Press.
Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Sheng, Q. Z., Zeadally, S., Luo, Z., Jung, J.-Y., & Maamar, Z. (2010). Ubiquitous RFID: Where are we? Information Systems Frontiers Special Issue on RFID, 12(5), 485–490.CrossRef
Shepherd, D. A., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2011). Inductive top-down theorizing: A source of new theories of organization. The Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 361–380.
Slettemeas, D. (2009). RFID—The ‘Next Step’ in consumer–product relations or orwellian nightmare? Challenges for research and policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32(3), 219–244.CrossRef
Sreastman. (2013). San Antonio schools withdraw student RFID chip. Before it’s News.
Staggs, T. (2013, March 10). Taking the Disney Guest Experience to the Next Level. DisneyParks Blog.
Swedberg, C. (2013). NFC-enabled refrigerator shares data with mobile phones. RFID Journal.
Taghaboni-Dutta, F., & Velthouse, B. (2014). RFID technology is revolutionary: Who should be involved in this game of tag? Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(4), 65–78.CrossRef
Trocchia, P., & Ainscough, T. (2012). Consumer attitudes toward RFID tracking in the retail environment. Review of Business Information, 16(2), 67–73.
Uhrich, F., Sandner, U., Resatsch, F., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2008). RFID in retailing and customer relationship management. The Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 23(13), 219–234.
Vance, A. (2003), Wal-Mart turns customers into RFID lab rats. The Register.
Vara-Orta, F. (2013). Northside ISD drops student tracking program. MySA San Antonio’s Home Page.
Violino, B. (2003). Benetton talks about RFID plans. RFID Journal.
Wamba, S. F., & Boeck, H. (2008). Enhancing information flow in a retail supply chain using RFID and the EPC network: A proof-of-concept approach. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 3(1), 92–105.
Wang, J. L., & Loui, M. C. (2009). Privacy and ethical issues in location-based tracking systems. In International Symposium on Technology and Society, Proceedings, pp. 2–5.
Warren and Brandeis. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, IV(5), 1890.
Wasieleski, D. M., & Gal-Or, M. (2008). An enquiry into the ethical efficacy of the use of radio frequency. Ethics and Information Technology, 10, 27–40.CrossRef
Van Wel, L., & Royakkers, L. (2004). Ethical issues in web data mining. Ethics and Information Technology, 6, 129–140.CrossRef
Winter, J. S. (2014). Surveillance in ubiquitous network societies: Normative conflicts related to the consumer in-store supermarket experience in the context of the Internet of Things. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(1), 27–41.CrossRef
Wu, Y. A., Prybutok, V. R., Koh, C. E., & Habus, B. (2012). A nomological model of RFID privacy concern. Business Process Management Journal, 18(3), 420–444.CrossRef
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research, design and methods (Vol. 5). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Zara, C. (2013), “Disney World’s RFID Tracking Bracelets Are A Slippery Slope, Warns Privacy Advocate”, International Business Times.
Ziekow, H., & Gunther, O. (2010). Sharing RFID and complex event data among organizations. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(5), 541–549.
Zimmer, M. (2005). Surveillance, privacy and the ethics of vehicle safety communication technologies. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 201–210.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Building theory from consumer reactions to RFID: discovering Connective Proximity
verfasst von
Anna Margulis
Harold Boeck
Ygal Bendavid
Fabien Durif
Publikationsdatum
02.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Ethics and Information Technology / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1388-1957
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8439
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9388-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Ethics and Information Technology 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Against the moral Turing test: accountable design and the moral reasoning of autonomous systems

Original Paper

Hacking the brain: brain–computer interfacing technology and the ethics of neurosecurity

Original Paper

Profiling vandalism in Wikipedia: A Schauerian approach to justification

Original Paper

Using Aristotle’s theory of friendship to classify online friendships: a critical counterview

Original Paper

More than just a game: ethical issues in gamification

Original Paper

AI assisted ethics