Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This paper lies within the debate on GDP and beyond and provides an empirical assessment of the Italian equitable and sustainable well-being (BES) as a composite measure of multidimensional well-being. From a policy perspective, the goal is to deliver a reading of the Italian BES able to shed light on its usability. The aim is to offer a suitable method for making the information included in the BES more viable for policy design. To this end, the paper is grounded in an interpretation of the Italian BES through the lens of the capability approach and investigates the relations among BES indicators and life domains. The empirical assessment uses Italian data from the national survey “Aspects of daily life” and applies the Structural Equation Model to estimate several life capabilities and their causal path. Outcomes show the interrelated nature of multi-dimensional well-being and prove the role of exogenous causes in the determination of capabilities. Moreover, the paper provides a final ranking analysis where Italian regions are compared based on their position per capability and income performance. Results confirm, on one hand, the disparity of income and well-being measurements and the importance of multidimensional assessment for human development and, on the other, the importance of focusing on the single components of multidimensional well-being and their interconnections.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181–205. CrossRef
Alkire, S. (2007). Choosing dimensions: The capability approach and multidimensional poverty. In N. Kakwani & J. Silber (Eds.), The many dimensions of poverty (pp. 89–119). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Alkire, S., Foster, J., & Santos, M. E. (2011). Where did identification go? Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(3), 501–505. CrossRef
Alkire, S., Foster, J. E., Seth, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M., & Ballon, P. (2015). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis (Chap. 5). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anand, P., Hunter, G., Carter, I., Dowding, K., & Guala, F. (2007). Measurement of human capabilities (No. 53). Open Discussion Papers in Economics, The Open University.
Balestrino, A., & Sciclone, N. (2001). Should we use functionings instead of income to measure well-being? Theory, and some evidence from Italy. Rivista internazionale di scienze sociali, 3(561), 3–22.
Bandura, R. (2008). A survey of composite indices measuring country performance: 2008 update. New York: United Nations Development Programme, Office of Development Studies (UNDP/ODS working paper).
Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. (1980). Linear structural equations with latent variables. Psychometrika, 45(3), 289–308. CrossRef
Betti, G., & Verma, V. (2008). Fuzzy measures of the incidence of relative poverty and deprivation: A multi-dimensional perspective. Statistical Methods and Applications, 17(2), 225–250. CrossRef
Bourguignon, F. (2006). From income to endowments: the difficult task of expanding the income poverty paradigm. In Poverty and inequality (pp. 76–102). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Burchi, F., De Muro, P., & Kollar, E. (2014). Which dimensions should matter for capabilities? A constitutional approach. Ethics and Social Welfare, 8(3), 233–247. CrossRef
Cerioli, A., & Zani, S. (1990). A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty (pp. 272–284). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Chakravarty, S. R. (2006). An axiomatic approach to multidimensional poverty measurement via fuzzy sets. In A. Lemmi & G. Betti (Eds.), Fuzzy set approach to multidimensional poverty measurement (pp. 49–72). New York: Springer.
Cheli, B., & Lemmi, A. (1995). A “totally” fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Economic Notes Siena, 24, 115–134.
Crocker, D. A. (2008). Ethics of global development: Agency, capability, and deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
D’Ambrosio, C., Deutsch, J., & Silber, J. (2011). Multidimensional approaches to poverty measurement: An empirical analysis of poverty in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, based on the European panel. Applied Economics, 43(8), 951–961. CrossRef
Di Tommaso, M. L. (2007). Children capabilities: A strutural equation model for India. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 436–450. CrossRef
Foster, J., & Handy, C. (2008). External capabilities (No. ophiwp008). Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
Hirschberg, J. G., Maasoumi, E., & Slottje, D. J. (2001). Clusters of attributes and well-being in the USA. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 445–460. CrossRef
Ibrahim, S. (2013). Collective capabilities: What are they and why are they important? E-Bulletin of the Human Development & Capability Association, 22.
Joint Research Centre-European Commission. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and User guide. Paris: OECD publishing.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1988). Analysis of covariance structures. In: J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Perspectives on individual differences. Boston, MA: Springer.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Goldberger, A. S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(351a), 631–639. CrossRef
Kalsen, S. (2000). Measuring poverty and deprivation in South Africa. Review of Income and Wealth, 46, 33–58. CrossRef
Krishnakumar, J. (2007). Going beyond functionings to capabilities: An econometric model to explain and estimate capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 8(1), 39–63. CrossRef
Krishnakumar, J., & Ballon, P. (2008). Estimating basic capabilities: A structural equation model applied to Bolivia. World Development, 36(6), 992–1010. CrossRef
Krishnakumar, J., & Nagar, A. L. (2008). On exact statistical properties of multidimensional indices based on principal components, factor analysis, MIMIC and structural equation models. Social Indicators Research, 86(3), 481–496. CrossRef
Kuklys, W. (2005). Amartya Sen’s capability approach: Theoretical insights and empirical applications. New York: Springer.
Lelli, S. (2001). Factor analysis vs. fuzzy sets theory: Assessing the influence of different techniques on Sen’s functioning approach. Kath. Univ., Department Economie, Center for Economic Studies.
Maasoumi, E., & Nickelsburg, G. (1988). Multivariate measures of well-being and an analysis of inequality in the Michigan data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 6(3), 327–334.
Martinetti, E. C. (1994). A new approach to evaluation of well-being and poverty by fuzzy set theory. Giornale degli economisti e annali di economia, 367–388.
Martinetti, E. C. (2000). A multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning approach. Rivista internazionale di scienze sociali, 2, 207–239.
Martinetti, E. C. (Ed.). (2009). Debating global society: Reach and limits of the capability approach. Milano: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.
Neff, D. F. (2007). Subjective well-being, poverty and ethnicity in South Africa: Insights from an explanatory analysis. Social Indicators Research, 80, 313–341. CrossRef
Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Qizilbash, M. (2006). Philosophical accounts of vagueness, fuzzy poverty measures and multidimensionality. In A. Lemmi & G. Betti (Eds.), Fuzzy set approach to multidimensional poverty measurement. Economic studies in inequality, social exclusion and well-being (Vol. 3). Boston, MA: Springer.
Raiser, M., & Weeks, M. (2000, August). A structural model of institutional change: Evidence from transition economies. In Econometric Society World Congress 2000 contributed papers (No. 1689). Econometric Society
Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173–184. CrossRef
Riccardini, F. (2014, September). Sustainability of well-being: The case of BES for Italy. In paper presentato alla XII conference quality of Life ISQOLS, sustaining quality of life across the globe, Free University Berlin (pp. 15–18).
Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117. CrossRef
Roche, J. M. (2008). Monitoring inequality among social groups: A methodology combining fuzzy set theory and principal component analysis 1. Journal of Human Development, 9(3), 427–452. CrossRef
Schokkaert, E., & Van Ootegem, L. (1990). Sen’s concept of the living standard applied to the Belgian unemployed. Louvain Economic Review, 56(3–4), 429–450.
Sen, A. (1980). Equality of What? In S. McMurrin (Ed.), Tanner lectures on human values (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: OUP Catalogue.
Sen, A. (2004). Capabilities, lists, and public reason: Continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics, 10(3), 77–80. CrossRef
Sen, A. (2010). L’idea di giustizia, trad. it. Mondadori, Milano.
Srinivasan, T. (1994). Human development: A new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel? American Economic Review, 84(2), 238–243.
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.
Sugden, R. (1993). Welfare, resources, and capabilities: A review of inequality re-examined by Amartya Sen. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 1947–1962.
Volkert, J. (2013). Concepts of agency. Sustainable human development (SHD) and collective abilities. Maitreyee-E-Bulletin of the Human Development and Capability Association, 22, 9–12.
Wagle, U. (2009). Multidimensional poverty measurement: Concepts and applications (Vol. 4). New York: Springer.
Ziglio, E., Currie, C., & Rasmussen, V. B. (2004). The WHO cross-national study of health behavior in school aged children from 35 countries: findings from 2001–2002. Journal of School Health, 74(6), 204–206. CrossRef
- Capability Approach and Multidimensional Well-Being: The Italian Case of BES
Dalila De Rosa
- Springer Netherlands
Social Indicators Research
An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, So bewältigen Sie Stress im Fernstudium/© granata68 | stock.adobe.com | AdobeStock