nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

01.07.2019

Capitalizing on new forms of academic library’s intellectual assets: a new library mobile application proposition

verfasst von: Stavroula Sant-Geronikolou, Dimitris Kouis, Alexandros Koulouris

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Library and information science experts around the globe are currently exploring ways of capitalizing student workflow data within library walls. Within this realm, the researchers designed and pilot-tested a user-driven lightweight application that envisions library as a crucial contributor of co-curricular data to learner profiles’ contextual integrity. The prototype usability test conducted in December 2018 with the participation of 30 students at the University of West Attica, Greece, aimed not only to record participants’ perspectives about the application but also to trace their attitudes towards this new kind of intervention. Post-test questionnaires yield a variety of positive rich-textured comments indicating students’ interest in the emerging conversation around library use data capitalization. The participants felt positive about the need to develop a culture that fosters the reconsideration of library value constituents and their new dynamic role in the educational context. The pilot-tested application could serve as a reference for the improvement of academic library use data collection practices.

Vorheriger Artikel Participants and completers in programming MOOCs

Nächster Artikel A review of tools and techniques for computer aided pronunciation training (CAPT) in English

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

According to Beagle (2004) and REBIUN (2003), a new library model, which is a dynamic student-centered setting that accommodates all the information and IT services necessary to support learning and research in the university. Since the year 2000, Information Commons have expanded their facilities and scope of activities by incorporating tutorial programs, writing centers, and faculty development centers to include a new focus on student learning, while many of them have also taken an additional step to changing their designation to Learning Commons.

More information available from: https://library.hud.ac.uk/blogs/lidp/

Abbott, A., Cyranoski, D., Jones, N., Maher, B., Schiermeier, Q., & Van Noorden, R. (2010). Metrics: Do metrics matter? Nature News, 465(7300), 860–862. https://doi.org/10.1038/465860a.CrossRef

Allison, D. (2015). Measuring the academic impact of libraries. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 15(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2015.0001.MathSciNetCrossRef

Arminio, J., Roberts, D. C., & Bonfiglio, R. (2009). The professionalization of student learning practice: An ethos of scholarship. About Campus, 14(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.279.CrossRef

Asher, A, Briney K.A., Perry, M.R., Goben, A., Salo, D., Robertshaw, M.B. & Jones, K.M. (2018). Spec Kit 360: Learning Analytics. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, September 2018, https://doi.org/10.29242/spec.360.CrossRef

Assila, A., De Oliveira, K.M. & Ezzedine, H. (2016). Standardized usability questionnaires: Features and quality focus. Electronic Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology: eJCIST, 6(1). http://ejcsit.uniten.edu.my/index.php/ejcsit/article/view/96. Accessed 20 Nov 2018.

Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123.

Beagle, D. (2004). From information commons to learning commons, white paper. In: University of Southern California Leavey Library 2004 Conference on Information Commons: Learning Space Beyond the Classroom.

Bennetot Pruvot, E., Estemann, T. & Kupriyanova, V. (2017). Public Funding Observatory Report 2017”, European University Association, Brussels, Belgium. https://www.eua.eu/downloads/publications/eua-pfo-report-december-2017.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 4–7.

Chan, J. C., & Lam, S. F. (2010). Effects of different evaluative feedback on students’ self-efficacy in learning. Instructional Science, 38(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9077-2.CrossRef

Chen, H., Doty, P., Mollman, C., Niu, X., Yu, J., & Zhang, T. (2015). Library assessment and data analytics in the big data era: practice and policies. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.14505201002.CrossRef

Clark, M., De Leon, E., Edgar, L. & Perrin, J. (2012). Library Usability: Tools for Usability Testing in the Library. In: Texas Library Association Annual Conference, March 2012.

Cormack, A. N, (2016). A data protection framework for learning analytics a data protection framework for learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.31.6.

Donham, J., & Green, C. W. (2004). Perspectives on… developing a culture of collaboration: Librarian as consultant. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2004.04.005.CrossRef

Dow, R. F. (1998). Using assessment criteria to determine library quality. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 24, 277–281.CrossRef

Drucker, P.F. (1993). The post-capitalist society. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann. In: De Jong, T., (2010), Linking social capital to knowledge productivity: an explorative study on the relationship between social capital and learning in knowledge-productive networks, Enschede.

Duval, E. (2011). Attention please!: learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, February 27–March 01, 2011, Banff, Albert, Canada [online]. ACM. pp. 9–17, https://doi.org/10.1145/2090116.2090118.

Germano, M. A., & Stretch-Stephenson, S. M. (2012). Strategic value planning for libraries. The Bottom Line, 25(2), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/08880451211256405.CrossRef

Goldhaber, M.H. (1997). The attention economy and the Net. First Monday, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i4.519.

Harrison, R., & Kessels, J. (2004). Human resource development in a knowledge economy. An organizational view. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan.

Hellenic Quality Assurance and Accreditation Agency (2017). Higher education quality report. HQA Council. https://www.adip.gr/data/HQA_report2016.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2019.

Jantti, M.H. (2014). Aspiring to excellence: Maximizing data to sustain, shift and reshape a library for the future. In: Library Assessment Conference, Association of Research Libraries, Seattle. pp. 1–9. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1506&context=asdpapers. Accessed 12 Aug 2018.

Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Specht, M. & Drachsler, H. (2018). License to evaluate: Preparing learning analytics dashboards for educational practice. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, March 7–9, 2018. Sydney, ACM. pp. 31–40. http://hdl.handle.net/1820/9138. Accessed 10 Dec 2018.

Jong, T.D. (2010). Linking social capital to knowledge productivity. PhD Thesis, Proefschrift, Universiteit Twente. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/6082371/thesis_T_de_Jong.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2018.

Kay, D.& Van Harmelen, M, (2015). Activity data - delivering benefits from the data deluge. [online]. JISC. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/activity-data-delivering-benefits-from-the-data-deluge. Accessed 20 Sept 2018.

Kezar, A. (2003). Enhancing innovative partnerships: Creating a change model for academic and student affairs collaboration. Innovative Higher Education, 28(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000006289.31227.25.CrossRef

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.CrossRef

Kroski, E. (2008). On the move with the mobile web: Libraries and mobile technologies. Library Technology Reports, 44(5), 1–48 http://hdl.handle.net/10760/12463. Accessed 15 June 2018.

Kyrillidou, M. (1997). The use of statistics by libraries in North America. In: 6ο Panhellenic Academic Libraries Conference, November 5–7. Athens, http://hdl.handle.net/10760/9814. Accessed 12 May 2018.

Kyrillidou, M., & Cook, C. (2008). The evolution of measurement and evaluation of libraries: A perspective from the Association of Research Libraries. Library Trends, 56(4), 888–909. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/9498. Accessed 12 May 2018.CrossRef

Lakes, K. D. (2013). Restricted sample variance reduces generalizability. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030912.CrossRef

Lakos, A. (2007). Evidence-based library management: The leadership challenge. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(4), 431–450. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2007.0049.CrossRef

Landøy, A., & Repanovici, A. (2010). Knowing the needs: a system for evaluating the university library. In Proceedings of the International Conference on QQML2009 (pp. 329–334). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814299701_0041.CrossRef

Lessick, S. (2015). Enhancing library impact through technology. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(4), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.015.CrossRef

Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 7(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319509526110.CrossRef

Lim, Y.K., Pangam, A., Periyasami, S. & Aneja, S. (2006). Comparative analysis of high-and low-fidelity prototypes for more valid usability evaluations of mobile devices. [online]. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles, October 14–18, 2006, Oslo. ACM. pp. 291–300, https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182506.

Long, D. (2016). Librarians and student affairs professionals as collaborators for student learning and success. PhD Thesis. Illinois State University, https://doi.org/10.30707/ETD2016.Long.D.

Luna Scott, C. (2015). The Futures of Learning 3: what kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? UNESCO Education Research and Foresight, Paris. ERF Working Papers Series, No. 15, https://rpinternacional.com.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ARTICULO-5.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2018.

Murray, A.L. (2014). The Academic Library and High-Impact Practices for Student Retention: Perspectives of Library Deans. PhD Thesis. Western Kentucky University. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/diss/57. Accessed 14 Feb 2018.

Mylonas, P. (2017). Turning Greece into an education hub. [online]. National Bank of Greece Sectoral report. https://www.nbg.gr/greek/the-group/press-office/e-spot/reports/Documents/Education.pdf. Accessed 17 Feb 2019.

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. xiv edn. Boston: Academic Press.

Oakleaf, M. (2010). The value of academic libraries: A comprehensive research review and report. Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries.

Oakleaf, M. (2018). LIILA project Report, Library Integration in Institutional Learning Analytics. https://library.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2018/11/liila.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2018.

Parsons, G. (2010). Information provision for HE distance learners using mobile devices. The Electronic Library, 28(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471011033594.CrossRef

Red de Bibliotecas Universitarias Españolas (REBIUN) (2003). Centros de Recursos para el Aprendizaje y la Investigación: Un nuevo modelo de biblioteca universitaria, Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas, Madrid.

Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction-what can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning?. European Psychologist, 10(3), 199-208.

Sant-Geronikolou, S. (2018a). Greek and Spanish University Community Perspective of Challenges Affecting Library Integration in Learning Analytics Initiatives. Poster presented at 10th Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries International Conference (QQML2018), Chania (Greece), 22 - 25 May 2018. http://eprints.rclis.org/32914/. Accessed 10 Dec 2018.

Sant-Geronikolou, S. (2018b). Understanding in-library use data lifecycle within Greek and Spanish higher education ecosystems. Library Hi Tech News, 35(7):13-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-10-2017-0077.CrossRef

Sauro, J. (2018). Can you use a single item to predict SUS scores? MeasuringU [online]. 4 December 2018. https://measuringu.com/single-item-sus/. Accessed 16 Nov 2018.

Showers, B., & Stone, G. (2014). Safety in numbers: Developing a shared analytics Service for Academic Libraries. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 15(1/2), 13–22.CrossRef

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.CrossRef

Somerville, M.M. & Harlan, S. (2008). From information commons to learning commons and learning spaces: An evolutionary context. Learning commons: Evolution and collaborative essentials, In: Schader, B., (Ed.) (2008), Learning Commons: Evolution and Collaborative Essentials. pp. 1–36.

Soria, K.M., Peterson, K., Fransen, J. & Nackerud, S., (2017). The Impact of Academic Library Resources on First-Year Students’ Learning Outcomes. [online]. Research Library Issues, 290(2017): 5–20. http://publications.arl.org/rli290/. Accessed 22 Sept 2018.

Stone, G., & Ramsden, B. (2013). Library impact data project: looking for the link between library usage and student attainment. College and Research Libraries, 74(6), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl12-406.CrossRef

Strakantouna, V. (2005). Epexeryasia Prosopikon Dedomenon kai Prostasia tes Idiotikotetas sto Sychrono Perivallon ton Vivliothekon kai Eperesion Pleroforeses [processing of personal data and protection of privacy in the modern environment of libraries and information services]. Master's thesis, Ionian University, Department of Archives and Library Science.

Tevaniemi, J., Poutanen, J., & Lähdemäki, R. (2015). Library as a partner in co-designing learning spaces: A case study at Tampere University of Technology, Finland. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 21(3), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2015.1025147.CrossRef

Town, S. (2015). Implementing the value scorecard. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 16(3), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-10-2015-0033.CrossRef

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 11(1), 1–15.

Tullis, T. & Albert, W. (2008a). Tips and Tricks for Measuring the User Experience [PowerPoint presentation]. Usability and User Experience, UPA-Boston’s Seventh Annual Mini UPA Conference, 28 May 2008. https://www.bentley.edu/files/centers/duc/albert-tullis-tips-trix-2008.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 2018.

Tullis, T. & Albert, W. (2008b). Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, analyzing and Presenting Usability Metrics. 1st ed. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.

Väätäjä, H. & Roto, V. (2010). Mobile questionnaires for user experience evaluation. In: CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 10–15, 2010. Atlanta. ACM. pp. 3361–3366, https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753985.

Van Trigt, M. (2016). How data can improve the quality of higher education. [online]. SURF Net. https://www.surf.nl/binaries/content/assets/surf/en/knowledgebase/2016/whitepaper-learning-analytics_en-def.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2017.

Wang, C. Y., Ke, H. R., & Lu, W. C. (2012). Design and performance evaluation of mobile web services in libraries: a case study of the oriental institute of technology library. The Electronic Library, 30(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471211204051.CrossRef

Yanosky, R. & Arroway, P. (2015). The Analytics Landscape in Higher Education, 2015. Louisville, ECAR, https://library.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2015/5/ers1504cl.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2018.

Titel: Capitalizing on new forms of academic library’s intellectual assets: a new library mobile application proposition
verfasst von: Stavroula Sant-Geronikolou
Dimitris Kouis
Alexandros Koulouris
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09944-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Fine-grained affect detection in learners’ generated content using machine learning

Understanding learning in video games: A phenomenological approach to unpacking boy cultures in virtual worlds

Investigating medical students’ readiness for technology-mediated autonomous learning situations in ESP programs

Investigating multimedia effects on concept map building: Impact on map quality, information processing and learning outcome

Wirelessly bridging the homework gap: Technical options and social challenges in getting broadband to disconnected students

Open educational resources (OER) Edupreneurship business models for different stakeholders