Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Chances and Risks of Using Clicker Software in XL Engineering Classes – From Theory to Practice

verfasst von : Valerie Stehling, Ursula Bach, René Vossen, Sabina Jeschke

Erschienen in: Engineering Education 4.0

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Teaching and learning in XL-classes is a huge challenge to both lecturers as well as students. While lecturers face the difficulty of speaking to a mostly loud and very heterogenic audience, students often lack the opportunity of being an active participant in class. To counteract these difficulties and give the opportunity of immediate feedback, an audience response system has been introduced in the class of information technology in mechanical engineering at RWTH Aachen University. In a previously published paper [1] the theoretical background has been outlined and presumptions have been drawn. The described redeployment of a lecture of the mentioned size was expected to bring about an enhancement of the quality in teaching of professional knowledge. It was also supposed to foster the often desired shift from teaching to learning. Now, after a first trial and evaluation of the method, these presumptions can be tested. In this paper clicker questions from the lecture and their results are the groundwork that allow for a review of the evaluation of the first trial using clicker software in class. Results shall then allow for a comparison of the intended goals with the actual outcomes from the students’ point of view. In addition to that, feedback and ideas for improvement through the evaluation of the “further comments” section by the “users” themselves can be gathered. The results of the analysis will then allow for an adjustment and improvement of the concept and may in the future give support to lecturers of other XL-classes that intend to implement an audience response system in their own lecture.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The language taught in the described lecture is Java.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat V. Stehling, U. Bach, A. Richert, S. Jeschke, Teaching professional knowledge to xl – classes with the help of digital technologies. In: ProPEL Conference Proceedings 2012. 2012 V. Stehling, U. Bach, A. Richert, S. Jeschke, Teaching professional knowledge to xl – classes with the help of digital technologies. In: ProPEL Conference Proceedings 2012. 2012
3.
Zurück zum Zitat J.L. Rosenberg, M. Lorenzo, E. Mazur, Peer instruction: Making science engaging. In: Handbook of College Science Teaching, ed. by J.J. Mintzes, W.H. Leonard, 2008 J.L. Rosenberg, M. Lorenzo, E. Mazur, Peer instruction: Making science engaging. In: Handbook of College Science Teaching, ed. by J.J. Mintzes, W.H. Leonard, 2008
4.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Sievers, W. Reinhardt, D. Kundisch, P. Herrmann. Developing electronic classroom response apps for a wide variety of mobile devices – lessons learned from the pingo project, 2012 M. Sievers, W. Reinhardt, D. Kundisch, P. Herrmann. Developing electronic classroom response apps for a wide variety of mobile devices – lessons learned from the pingo project, 2012
5.
Zurück zum Zitat E. Mazur, Farewell, lecture? Science 323 (5910), 2009, pp. 50–51 E. Mazur, Farewell, lecture? Science 323 (5910), 2009, pp. 50–51
6.
Zurück zum Zitat A.R. Trees, M.H. Jackson, The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learning Media and Technology 32 (1), 2007, pp. 21–40CrossRef A.R. Trees, M.H. Jackson, The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learning Media and Technology 32 (1), 2007, pp. 21–40CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat N. Scheele, A. Wessels, W. Effelsberg, Die interaktive vorlesung in der praxis. In: DeLFI 2004: 2. e-Learning Fachtagung Informatik, Tagung der Fachgruppe e-Learning der Gesellschaft für Informatik e. V. (GI), 6-8. September 2004 in Paderborn, P-52. 2004, pp. 283–294 N. Scheele, A. Wessels, W. Effelsberg, Die interaktive vorlesung in der praxis. In: DeLFI 2004: 2. e-Learning Fachtagung Informatik, Tagung der Fachgruppe e-Learning der Gesellschaft für Informatik e. V. (GI), 6-8. September 2004 in Paderborn, P-52. 2004, pp. 283–294
8.
Zurück zum Zitat J. Watkins, E. Mazur, Using jitt with peer instruction. In: Just in Time Teaching Across the Disciplines, across the academy, ed. by S. Simkins, M. Maier, 2010, pp. 39–62 J. Watkins, E. Mazur, Using jitt with peer instruction. In: Just in Time Teaching Across the Disciplines, across the academy, ed. by S. Simkins, M. Maier, 2010, pp. 39–62
9.
Zurück zum Zitat M.K. Smith, W.B. Wood, W.K. Adams, C. Wieman, J.K. Knight, N. Guild, T.T. Su, Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. The Science Educcation Initiative 323, 2009, p. 122 M.K. Smith, W.B. Wood, W.K. Adams, C. Wieman, J.K. Knight, N. Guild, T.T. Su, Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. The Science Educcation Initiative 323, 2009, p. 122
10.
Zurück zum Zitat C.H. Crouch, J. Watkins, A.P. Fagen, E. Mazur, Peer instruction: Engaging students one-on-one, all at once. Reviews in Physics Education Research, 2007, p. 11 C.H. Crouch, J. Watkins, A.P. Fagen, E. Mazur, Peer instruction: Engaging students one-on-one, all at once. Reviews in Physics Education Research, 2007, p. 11
11.
Zurück zum Zitat I.D. Beatty, Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. EDUCAUSE, Research Bulletin 2004 (3), 2004 I.D. Beatty, Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. EDUCAUSE, Research Bulletin 2004 (3), 2004
Metadaten
Titel
Chances and Risks of Using Clicker Software in XL Engineering Classes – From Theory to Practice
verfasst von
Valerie Stehling
Ursula Bach
René Vossen
Sabina Jeschke
Copyright-Jahr
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46916-4_15