nach oben

Environmental Earth Sciences

Erschienen in:

01.08.2015 | Original Article

Changeability of simulated hydrograph from a steep watershed resulted from applying Clark’s IUH and different time–area histograms

verfasst von: S. H. R. Sadeghi, R. Mostafazadeh, A. Sadoddin

Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Reflecting the shape and drainage characteristics of the watershed, time–area histogram (TAH) seems to be the most important parameter for derivation of the transformation hydrograph. In this study, a semi-distributed instantaneous unit hydrograph was established and applied to the steep 103 km²-Galazchai watershed in Iran to improve the results of the rainfall–runoff modelling. Towards this attempt, twenty-three runoff producing events with wide different characteristics were used for the analysis. The direct surface runoff hydrographs (DSRHs) were obtained and consequently compared for the study area using Clark’s instantaneous unit hydrograph (IUH) and through applying different TAHs calculated based on channel profile, dimensionless TAH, average velocity and spatially distributed travel time methods. A weight grid developed from kinematic wave travel time equation for overland flow was prepared and used as input to derive the spatial TAH of the watershed. The results indicated that the different TAHs had noticeable impacts on the estimated hydrographs. The results also proved that the spatial TAH method performed well with efficiency criteria of 0.75 and 0.69 in calibration and validation steps. The implemented method also offered the advantages of flexibility, efficiency and physically powerful links to the spatial data set and GIS software.

Vorheriger Artikel Seasonal variation in trace element concentrations and Pb isotopic composition of airborne particulates during Asian dust and non-Asian dust periods in Daejeon, Korea

Nächster Artikel Developing and testing a best management practices tool for estimating effectiveness of nonpoint source pollution control

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ab Banan-Azardasht Engineering Consulting Inc. (2010) Final report on study and design of drainage network for surface runoff and urban floods in the Oshnavieh city, p 122. (in Persian)

Abid A, Salarijazi M, Vaghefi M, Mahmoodian Shoshtari M, Akhondali AM (2010) Comparison between GcIUH-Clark, GIUH-Nash, Clark-IUH, and Nash-IUH models. Turkish J Eng Env Sci 34:91–103

Agirre U, Goni M, Lopez JJ, Gimena FN (2005) Application of a unit hydrograph based on subwatershed division and comparison with Nash’s instantaneous unit hydrograph. Catena 64:321–332CrossRef

Ahmad MM, Ghumman AR, Ahmad S (2009) Estimation of Clark’s instantaneous unit hydrograph parameters and development of direct surface runoff hydrograph. Water Resour Manag 32(12):2417–2435CrossRef

Ammukutty A, Nair BT (2009) Rainfall runoff modelling using distributed unit hydrograph approach. 10th national conference on technological trends (NCTT09), Trivandrum, Kerala, India, pp 105–109, 6–7 Nov 2009

ASCE (1993) Criteria for evaluation of watershed models. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 119(3):429–442CrossRef

Bardossy A (2007) Calibration of hydrological model parameters for ungauged catchments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:703–710CrossRef

Bertrand G, Siergieiev D, Ala-Aho P, Rossi PM (2014) Environmental tracers and indicators bringing together groundwater, surface water and groundwater-dependent ecosystems: importance of scale in choosing relevant tools. Environ Earth Sci 72(3):813–827CrossRef

Bhawan JV (1998) Application of GIUH and GIS based approach for design flood estimation. National Institute of Hydrology, TR/BR-1/98-99, p 76

Chiang S, Tachikawa Y, Takara K (2004) Rainfall–runoff simulation by using distributed instantaneous unit hydrograph derived from applying flow accumulation. J Hydrol Eng 48:1–6

Chow VT (1964) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 1400

Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 572

Clark CO (1945) Storage and the unit hydrograph. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 110(2261):1419–1446

Das G (2000) Hydrology and soil conservation engineering. Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi, p 489

Dongquan Z, Jining C, Haozheng W, Qingyuan T, Shangbing C, Zheng S (2009) GIS-based urban rainfall–runoff modeling using an automatic catchment-discretization approach: a case study in Macau. Environ Earth Sci 59(2):465–472CrossRef

Dooge JCI (1959) A general theory of the unit hydrograph. J Geophys Res 64:241–256CrossRef

Engman ET (1986) Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 112(1):39–53CrossRef

Fang X, Cleveland T, Garcia C, Thompson D, Malla R (2005) Estimating timing parameters for direct runoff and unit hydrograph for Texas Watersheds, Lamar University. Technical report 0-4696-1, p 83

Froehlich DC (2011) NRCS overland flow travel time calculation. Technical note. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 137(4):258–262CrossRef

Gad MA (2013) A useful automated rainfall–runoff model for engineering applications in semi-arid regions. Comput Geosci 52:443–452CrossRef

Ghasemizade M, Schirmer M (2013) Subsurface flow contribution in the hydrological cycle: lessons learned and challenges ahead-a review. Environ Earth Sci 69(2):707–718CrossRef

Ghavidelfar S, Alvankar SR, Razmkhah A (2011) Comparison of the lumped and quasi-distributed Clark runoff models in simulating flood hydrographs on a semi-arid watershed. Water Resour Manag 25:1775–1790CrossRef

Gibbs MS, Maier H, Dandy GC (2009) The use of GIS to derive distributed unit hydrographs for streamflow prediction. 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia, pp 3704–3710, 13–17 July

Hadadin N (2013) Evaluation of several techniques for estimating stormwater runoff in arid watersheds. Environ Earth Sci 69(5):1773–1782CrossRef

Her YG (2011) HYSTAR: hydrology and sediment transport simulation using time–area method. Thesis (PhD), Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, p 636

Hunukumbura PB, Weerakoon SB, Herathm S (2007) Development of a cell-based model to derive direct runoff hydrographs for ungauged mountainous basins. J Mt Sci 4(4):309–320CrossRef

Jain SK, Singh RD, Sethi SM (2000) Design flood estimation using GIS supported GIUH approach. Water Resour Manag 14:369–376CrossRef

Karymbalis E, Chalkias C, Ferentinou M, Maistrali A (2011) Flood hazard evaluation in small catchments based on quantitative geomorphology and GIS modeling: the case of Diakoniaris torrent (W. Peloponnese, Greece). Adv Res Aquat Environ 1:137–145CrossRef

Kilgore JL (1997) Development and evaluation of a GIS-based spatially distributed unit hydrograph model. Thesis (MSc), Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, p 118

Kirpich ZP (1940) Time of concentration of small agricultural watersheds. Civ Eng 10(6):362

Kull DW, Feldman AD (1998) Evaluation of Clark’s unit graph method to spatially distributed runoff. J Hydrol Eng 3(1):9–19CrossRef

Kumar R, Chatterjee C, Lohani AK, Kumar S, Singh RD (2002) Sensitivity analysis of the GIUH based Clark model for a catchment. Water Resour Manag 16:263–278CrossRef

Kute A, Stuart N (2008) Predicting GIS-based spatially distributed unit hydrograph from urban development scenarios. WaPUG Spring Meeting, 3 Jun 2008, Coventry, UK, p 19

Lee G, Yu W, Jung K, APIP (2013) Catchment-scale soil erosion and sediment yield simulation using a spatially distributed erosion model. Environ Earth Sci 70(1):33–47CrossRef

Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35(1):233–241CrossRef

Linsley RK, Kohler MA, Paulhus JLH (1940) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 689

Liu G, Schwartz FW, Kim Y (2013) Complex baseflow in urban streams: an example from central Ohio, USA. Environ Earth Sci 70(7):3005–3014CrossRef

Maidment DR (1993) GIS and hydrologic modeling, in environmental modeling with GIS. In: Goodchild MF, Parks BO, Steyaert LT (eds) Oxford University Press, New York, pp 147–167

Maidment DR, Olivera JF, Calver A, Eatherral A, Fraczek W (1996) A unit hydrograph derived from a spatially distributed velocity field. Hydrol Process 10(6):831–844CrossRef

Matei D (2012) Runoff modeling using GIS. Application in torrential basins in the Apuseni Mountains. Thesis (PhD), Physical and Technical Geography, University Cluj-Napoca, Romania, p 2712

McCuen RH (1989) Hydrologic analysis and design. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, p 867

Melesse AM, Graham W (2004) Storm runoff prediction using spatially distributed travel time concept utilizing remote sensing and GIS. Am Water Res 40(4):863–879CrossRef

Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900CrossRef

Mostafazadeh R, Sadeghi SHR (2012) Flow simulation using time–area method in Mohammad Abad Watershed in Golestan Province. 8th national conference on watershed management, Lorestan, 16–17 May, p 2048. (in Persian)

Mostafazadeh R, Bahremand A, Sadaddin A (2009) Simulating the direct runoff hydrograph using Clark instantaneous unit hydrograph (case study: Jafar-Abad Watershed, Golestan Province). J Water Soil Conserv 16(3):105–122 (in Persian)

Nash JE (1957) The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph. Int Assoc Sci Hydrol 45:114–121

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (2010) National engineering handbook, part 630 hydrology, chapter 15 time of concentration. 210–VI–NEH, p 29

Odeh T, Rödiger T, Geyer S, Schirmer M (2015) Hydrological modelling of a heterogeneous catchment using an integrated approach of remote sensing, a geographic information system and hydrologic response units: the case study of Wadi Zerka Ma’in catchment area, north east of the Dead Sea. Environ Earth Sci 73(7):3309–3326CrossRef

Overton DE, Meadows ME (1976) Stormwater modeling. Academic Press, New York, p 358

Ponce VM (1994) Engineering hydrology: principles and practices. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, p 640

Rivard C, Lefebvre R, Paradis D (2014) Regional recharge estimation using multiple methods: an application in the Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia (Canada). Environ Earth Sci 71(3):1389–1408CrossRef

Rodrıguez-Iturbe I, Valdes JB (1979) The geomorphologic structure of hydrology response. Water Resour Res 15:1409–1420CrossRef

Sadeghi SHR, Asadi H (2010) Importance of travel time duration between isochrones in estimation of flood resulting from Clark instantaneous unit hydrograph. J Water Soil 24(4):625–635 (in Persian)

Sadeghi SHR, Dehghani M (2006) Efficiency of estimation methods for storage coefficient of instantaneous unit hydrograph in flood unit hydrograph regeneration. J Agri Sci Nat Resour 13(3):52–160 (in Persian)

Sadeghi SHR, Singh JK (2005) Development of a synthetic sediment graph using hydrological data. J Agri Sci Tech 7:69–77

Sadeghi SHR, Mizuyama T, Singh JK, Tofighi B (2009) Applicability of instantaneous unit sedimentgraph model in an Iranian large watershed. Int J Ecol Econ Stat 13(9):30–45

Saghafian B, Julien PY, Rajaie H (2000) Spatial travel-time method for watershed routing. 4th international conference on integrating GIS and environmental modeling (GIS/EM4): problems, prospects and research needs. Banff, Alberta, Canada. September 2–8, p 10

Saghafian B, Julien PY, Rajaie H (2002) Runoff hydrograph simulation based on time variable isochrone technique. J Hydrol 261:193–203CrossRef

Sahoo B, Chatterjee C, Raghuwanshi NS, Singh R, Kumar R (2006) Flood estimation by GIUH based Clark and Nash models. J Hydrol Eng 11(6):515–525CrossRef

Sarangi A, Madramootoo CA, Enright P (2006) Comparison of spatial variability techniques for runoff estimation from a Canadian Watershed. Biosyst Eng 95(2):295–308CrossRef

Sarangi A, Madramootoo CA, Enright P, Prasher SO (2007) Evaluation of three unit hydrograph models to predict the surface runoff from a Canadian watershed. Water Resour Manag 21:1127–1143CrossRef

SCS (1972) Hydrology: national engineering handbook, section 4. USDA, Washington, D. C

Seong KW, Lee YH (2011) A practical estimation of Clark IUH parameters using root selection and linear programming. Hydrol Process 25:3676–3687CrossRef

Seong KW, Ball JE, Lee YK (2008) Application of a regionalized Clark IUH model with limited hydrologic data availability. Hydrol Process 22:3651–3660CrossRef

Singh VP (1988) Hydrologic systems. Rainfall–runoff modeling, vol 1. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, p 480

Singh PK, Bhunya PK, Mishra SK, Chaube UC (2007) An extended hybrid model for synthetic unit hydrograph derivation. J Hydrol 336:347–360CrossRef

Sreedevi PD, Sreekanth PD, Khan HH, Ahmed S (2012) Drainage morphometry and its influence on hydrology in a semi arid region: using SRTM data and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 70(2):1389–1408

Subramanya K (2000) Engineering hydrology, 2nd edn. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company Limited, Eighth reprint, New Delhi, p 392

Usul N, Yilmaz M (2002) Estimation of instantaneous unit hydrograph with Clark’s technique in GIS. 22nd international of ESRI user conference, ESRI on-line, San Diego, p 21

Welle PI, Woodward D (1986) Time of concentration. Hydrology technical note no. N4, USDA, Soil Conservation Service, NETC, June 17

Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Hassan AM (2011) Flash flood risk estimation along the St. Katherine road, southern Sinai, Egypt using GIS based morphometry and satellite imagery. Environ Earth Sci 62:611–623CrossRef

Titel: Changeability of simulated hydrograph from a steep watershed resulted from applying Clark’s IUH and different time–area histograms
verfasst von: S. H. R. Sadeghi
R. Mostafazadeh
A. Sadoddin
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4426-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

A single-site reactive transport model of Cs+ for the in situ diffusion and retention (DR) experiment

Chemical properties of soil and runoff water under different land uses in Abbottabad, Pakistan

Application of GIS-based fuzzy logic and rock engineering system (RES) approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping in Selelkula area of the Lower Jema River Gorge, Central Ethiopia

Hydrochemical disturbances measured in groundwater during the construction and operation of a large-scale underground facility in deep crystalline rock in Japan

Deterioration mechanisms of the compact clay-bearing limestone of Tournai used in the Romanesque portals of the Tournai Cathedral (Belgium)

Human comfort evaluation criteria for blast planning