Skip to main content

The Role of Students’ Epistemological Knowledge in the Process of Conceptual Change in Science

  • Chapter
Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice

Abstract

This chapter addresses the role of students’ epistemological knowledge in the process of conceptual change in science. The chapter begins by making a case that students’ conceptual knowledge in science has an epistemological dimension, and that models of conceptual change in science should therefore make reference to this epistemological dimension. The following claims are then developed: (1) many science students tend to over-attribute significance to empirical processes in suggesting how scientific disputes might be resolved, and in justifying viewpoints on scientific issues; and (2) students draw upon different epistemological knowledge in different situations, and for this reason it makes no sense to refer to students’ epistemological knowledge in isolation from the situations in which that knowledge is used. Each claim is supported with data from recent studies, involving the authors, of students’ epistemological knowledge in science. The chapter concludes with suggestions about potentially fruitful directions for future research on epistemological knowledge and conceptual change in science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism and Popper’s World 3. Educational Researcher, 23, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W., Dagher, Z, R., Shipman, H. L., & Letts, W. J. IV (2000). Teaching about the nature of science in a college astronomy course. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: the contribution of research, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1992). Teaching science for social responsibility. Sydney: St. Louis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Désautels, J., & Larochelle, M. (1998). The epistemology of students: the “thingified” nature of scientific knowledge. In B. Frazer & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of Science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1991). Common knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1993). Philosophic stance of secondary school science teachers, curriculum experiences, and children’s understanding of science: Some preliminary findings. Interchange, 24, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 703–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education. Driffield, UK: Studies in Education Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, J. & Scott, P. (1999, August). Teaching and learning science: linking personal and sociocultural perspectives. Paper presented at the 8th European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Göteborg, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, J., Millar, R., Ryder, J., Séré, M-G., Niedderer, H., Paulsen, A. C., & Tselfes, V. (1998). Survey 2: Students’ images of science as they relate to labwork learning. Leeds, UK: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, J., Millar, R., Ryder, J., & Séré, M-G. (2000). Epistemological understanding in science learning: the consistency of representations across contexts. Learning and Instruction, 10, 497–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, J., Lewis, J., Driver, R., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1996). Young people’s understanding of, and attitude to, “the new genetics”. Working Paper 3: Opinions on, and attitudes towards, genetic screening A: prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Leeds, UK: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., Leach, J., Driver, R., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1996). Young people’s understanding of, and attitude to, “the new genetics”. Working Paper 2: Understanding of basic genetics and DNA technology. Leeds, UK: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1996). The guided construction of knowledge. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, J., & Dawson, C. (1983). Laboratory counterexamples and the growth of knowledge in science. International Journal of Science Education, 5, 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder J, & Leach, J (1999). University science students’ experiences of investigative project work and their images of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 945–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samarapungavan, A. (1992, April). Scientists’ conceptions of science: a study of epistemic belief. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoultz, J., Säljö, R., & Wyndhamn, J. (in press). Heavenly Talk: Discourse, artifacts, and children’s understanding of elementary astronomy. Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, B. (1975). Scientific literacy and the public understanding of science. In S. B. Day (Ed.), Communication of scientific information (pp. 44–52). Basel: S. Karger AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, A. (1996). Construction of prototypical situations in teaching the concept of energy. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe: Current issues and themes (pp 100–114). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Robinson, C., Lewis, J., Driver, R., & Leach, J.(1996). Young people’s understanding of, and attitude to, “the new genetics”. Working Paper 3: Understanding the genetics of cells A: The discussion task. Leeds, UK: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. (1980). Teaching and learning about science and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, A. & Nemet, F. (1998, November). Fostering student’s argumentation skills through bio-ethical dilemmas in Genetics. Paper presented at ERIDOB (European Researchers in Didactics of Biology) conference, Göteborg, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leach, J., Lewis, J. (2002). The Role of Students’ Epistemological Knowledge in the Process of Conceptual Change in Science. In: Limón, M., Mason, L. (eds) Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47637-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47637-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0494-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47637-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics