Abstract
This chapter addresses the role of students’ epistemological knowledge in the process of conceptual change in science. The chapter begins by making a case that students’ conceptual knowledge in science has an epistemological dimension, and that models of conceptual change in science should therefore make reference to this epistemological dimension. The following claims are then developed: (1) many science students tend to over-attribute significance to empirical processes in suggesting how scientific disputes might be resolved, and in justifying viewpoints on scientific issues; and (2) students draw upon different epistemological knowledge in different situations, and for this reason it makes no sense to refer to students’ epistemological knowledge in isolation from the situations in which that knowledge is used. Each claim is supported with data from recent studies, involving the authors, of students’ epistemological knowledge in science. The chapter concludes with suggestions about potentially fruitful directions for future research on epistemological knowledge and conceptual change in science.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism and Popper’s World 3. Educational Researcher, 23, 21–23.
Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 53–62.
Brickhouse, N. W., Dagher, Z, R., Shipman, H. L., & Letts, W. J. IV (2000). Teaching about the nature of science in a college astronomy course. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: the contribution of research, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1992). Teaching science for social responsibility. Sydney: St. Louis Press.
Désautels, J., & Larochelle, M. (1998). The epistemology of students: the “thingified” nature of scientific knowledge. In B. Frazer & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of Science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1991). Common knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.
Hodson, D. (1993). Philosophic stance of secondary school science teachers, curriculum experiences, and children’s understanding of science: Some preliminary findings. Interchange, 24, 41–52.
Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 703–710.
Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education. Driffield, UK: Studies in Education Ltd.
Leach, J. & Scott, P. (1999, August). Teaching and learning science: linking personal and sociocultural perspectives. Paper presented at the 8th European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Göteborg, Sweden.
Leach, J., Millar, R., Ryder, J., Séré, M-G., Niedderer, H., Paulsen, A. C., & Tselfes, V. (1998). Survey 2: Students’ images of science as they relate to labwork learning. Leeds, UK: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
Leach, J., Millar, R., Ryder, J., & Séré, M-G. (2000). Epistemological understanding in science learning: the consistency of representations across contexts. Learning and Instruction, 10, 497–527.
Leach, J., Lewis, J., Driver, R., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1996). Young people’s understanding of, and attitude to, “the new genetics”. Working Paper 3: Opinions on, and attitudes towards, genetic screening A: prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Leeds, UK: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
Lewis, J., Leach, J., Driver, R., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1996). Young people’s understanding of, and attitude to, “the new genetics”. Working Paper 2: Understanding of basic genetics and DNA technology. Leeds, UK: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
Mercer, N. (1996). The guided construction of knowledge. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rowell, J., & Dawson, C. (1983). Laboratory counterexamples and the growth of knowledge in science. International Journal of Science Education, 5, 203–215.
Ryder J, & Leach, J (1999). University science students’ experiences of investigative project work and their images of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 945–956.
Samarapungavan, A. (1992, April). Scientists’ conceptions of science: a study of epistemic belief. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Schoultz, J., Säljö, R., & Wyndhamn, J. (in press). Heavenly Talk: Discourse, artifacts, and children’s understanding of elementary astronomy. Human Development.
Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Shen, B. (1975). Scientific literacy and the public understanding of science. In S. B. Day (Ed.), Communication of scientific information (pp. 44–52). Basel: S. Karger AG.
Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
Tiberghien, A. (1996). Construction of prototypical situations in teaching the concept of energy. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe: Current issues and themes (pp 100–114). London: Falmer Press.
Wood-Robinson, C., Lewis, J., Driver, R., & Leach, J.(1996). Young people’s understanding of, and attitude to, “the new genetics”. Working Paper 3: Understanding the genetics of cells A: The discussion task. Leeds, UK: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
Ziman, J. (1980). Teaching and learning about science and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zohar, A. & Nemet, F. (1998, November). Fostering student’s argumentation skills through bio-ethical dilemmas in Genetics. Paper presented at ERIDOB (European Researchers in Didactics of Biology) conference, Göteborg, Sweden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leach, J., Lewis, J. (2002). The Role of Students’ Epistemological Knowledge in the Process of Conceptual Change in Science. In: Limón, M., Mason, L. (eds) Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47637-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47637-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0494-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47637-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive