Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415–427.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, W. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.
Cobern, W. W. (1994). Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 583–590.
Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13.
Demastes-Southerland, S., Good, R., & Peebles, P. (1996). Students’ conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education, 79(6), 637–666.
Demastes-Southerland, S., Settlage, J., & Good, R. (1995). Students’ conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 535–550.
Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109–128.
Dole, J., Sinatra, G. M., & Reynolds, R. (1991, December). The effects of strong beliefs on text processing: The case of evolution and creationism. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, CA.
Epstein, S., & Meier, P. (1989). Constructive thinking: A broad coping variable with specific components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 332–350.
Erwin, T. D. (1983). The Scale of Intellectual Development: Measuring Perry’s scheme. Journal of College Student Personnel, 24, 6–12.
Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 147–179.
Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203–211.
Jackson, D. F. (2000). Shifting the relationship between personal and professional beliefs and practices with regard to evolution and religion: Three years of feedback from prospective middle school science teachers. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Kardash, C. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Epistemological beliefs and dispositions: Are we measuring the same construct? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Lawson, A. E., & Worsnop, W. A. (1992). Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief, and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 143–166.
Lord, T., & Marino, S. (1993). How university students view the theory of evolution. Journal of College Science Teaching, XXII(6), 353–357.
Meadows, L., Doster, E., & Jackson, D. F. (2000). Managing the conflict between evolution and religion. The American Biology Teacher, 62(2), 102–107.
National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
Sá, W., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias in reasoning and judgement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 497–510.
Scharmann, L. C. (1990). Enhancing an understanding of the premises of evolutionary theory: The influence of a diversified instructional strategy. School Science and Mathematics, 90(2), 91–100.
Settlage, J., & Jensen, M. (1996). Investigating the inconsistencies in college student responses to natural selection test questions. Electronic Journal of Science Education. Available at: <http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/settlage.html> (Version current at January 11, 2005).
Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., & Demastes, J. (2004). A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: Using beliefs and dispositions to make judgments about the validity of scientific theories. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, BC.
Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. (2003). Affective and intentional influences on understanding: Intersections of understanding, acceptance/belief, and epistemology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510–528.
Smith, M. U. (1994). Counterpoint: Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 591–597.
Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 83, 493–509.
Smith, M. U., Siegel, H., & McInerney, J. D. (1995). Foundational issues in evolution education. Science & Education, 4, 23–46.
Southerland, S. A., Sinatra, G. M., & Matthews, M. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 325–351.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342–357.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161–188.
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl and R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). New York: State University of New York.
Troldahl, V., & Powell, F. (1965). A short-form dogmatism scale for use in field studies. Social Forces, 44, 211–215.
Wood, P., & Kardash, C.A. (2002). Critical elements in the design and analysis of studies of epistemology (pp. 231–260). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Reference
Sjoberg, S. (2002). Science for the children? Report from the science and scientists-project. University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway: Department of Teacher Education and School Development.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Southerland, S.A., Sinatra, G.M. (2005). The Shifting Roles of Acceptance and Dispositions in Understanding Biological Evolution. In: Cobern, W.W., et al. Beyond Cartesian Dualism. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3808-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3808-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3807-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3808-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)