Skip to main content

The Shifting Roles of Acceptance and Dispositions in Understanding Biological Evolution

  • Chapter
Beyond Cartesian Dualism

Part of the book series: Science & Technology Education Library ((CTISE,volume 29))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, W. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W. W. (1994). Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 583–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demastes-Southerland, S., Good, R., & Peebles, P. (1996). Students’ conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education, 79(6), 637–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demastes-Southerland, S., Settlage, J., & Good, R. (1995). Students’ conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 535–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dole, J., Sinatra, G. M., & Reynolds, R. (1991, December). The effects of strong beliefs on text processing: The case of evolution and creationism. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S., & Meier, P. (1989). Constructive thinking: A broad coping variable with specific components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 332–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, T. D. (1983). The Scale of Intellectual Development: Measuring Perry’s scheme. Journal of College Student Personnel, 24, 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 147–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. F. (2000). Shifting the relationship between personal and professional beliefs and practices with regard to evolution and religion: Three years of feedback from prospective middle school science teachers. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Epistemological beliefs and dispositions: Are we measuring the same construct? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E., & Worsnop, W. A. (1992). Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief, and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 143–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, T., & Marino, S. (1993). How university students view the theory of evolution. Journal of College Science Teaching, XXII(6), 353–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, L., Doster, E., & Jackson, D. F. (2000). Managing the conflict between evolution and religion. The American Biology Teacher, 62(2), 102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sá, W., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias in reasoning and judgement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 497–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharmann, L. C. (1990). Enhancing an understanding of the premises of evolutionary theory: The influence of a diversified instructional strategy. School Science and Mathematics, 90(2), 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settlage, J., & Jensen, M. (1996). Investigating the inconsistencies in college student responses to natural selection test questions. Electronic Journal of Science Education. Available at: <http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/settlage.html> (Version current at January 11, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., & Demastes, J. (2004). A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: Using beliefs and dispositions to make judgments about the validity of scientific theories. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. (2003). Affective and intentional influences on understanding: Intersections of understanding, acceptance/belief, and epistemology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U. (1994). Counterpoint: Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 591–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 83, 493–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U., Siegel, H., & McInerney, J. D. (1995). Foundational issues in evolution education. Science & Education, 4, 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southerland, S. A., Sinatra, G. M., & Matthews, M. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 325–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl and R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). New York: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troldahl, V., & Powell, F. (1965). A short-form dogmatism scale for use in field studies. Social Forces, 44, 211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P., & Kardash, C.A. (2002). Critical elements in the design and analysis of studies of epistemology (pp. 231–260). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Reference

  • Sjoberg, S. (2002). Science for the children? Report from the science and scientists-project. University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway: Department of Teacher Education and School Development.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Southerland, S.A., Sinatra, G.M. (2005). The Shifting Roles of Acceptance and Dispositions in Understanding Biological Evolution. In: Cobern, W.W., et al. Beyond Cartesian Dualism. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3808-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics