Skip to main content

Abstract

Citizenship has been studied from almost every standpoint except that of participation in public policy. The influence of citizens on the making and changing of policy, citizens’ power (or the lack thereof) over public officials who make and administer policy, and the ability of the general public to hold these elites accountable, even citizens’ ability to create and dissolve government itself, have been subject to scrutiny. But participation as part of policy (with the exception of Michael Lipsky’s “Street Corner Bureaucrats”) has been neglected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • Jean Piaget, To Understand Is to Invent: The Future of Education (New York: Grossman, 1973), pp. 118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • This section on strategy is adapted from Aaron Wildavsky, Leadership in a Small Town (Totowa, N.J.: Bedminster Press, 1964), pp. 353–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • See T. H. Marshall, Class, Citizenship and Social Development (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjell Eide, “Assessing and Evaluating Educational Performance,” Norsdick Forum, Vol. 4 (1972), p. 225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amitai Etzioni, “Future Analysis,” Stop News, No. 38 (June 1976), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations (New York: Basic Books, 1962), p. 238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry S. Rowen, “Policy Analysis as Heuristic Aid: The Design of Means, Ends, and Institutions,” in When Values Conflict, Laurence H. Tribe, Corinne S. Schelling, and John Voss, eds. (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1976), p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul Feyerabend, Against Method — Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge (London: NLB, Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1975), p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • John B. Starr and Nancy A. Dyer, Post-Liberation Works of Mao Zedong: A Bibliography and Index (Berkeley Center for Chinese Studies, University of California, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Wright Mills, The Power Elite (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956);

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert A. Dahl, Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961);

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson W. Polsby, Community Power and Political Theory (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963);

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond E. Wolfinger, Politics of Progress (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974);

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd Hunter, Community Power Structure (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaron Wildavsky, Leadership in a Small Town (Totowa, N.J.: Bedminster Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin Landau, “The Proper Domain of Policy Analysis” in “The Workshop: The Place of Policy Analysis in Political Science: Five Perspectives,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 21, No. 2 (May 1977), pp. 426–427.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 Aaron Wildavsky

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wildavsky, A. (1979). Citizens as Analysts. In: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04955-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics