Abstract
By the end of the 1950s the rapid expansion of the television audience (particularly for ITV) had provided a new stimulus to that debate about popular cultural standards which had been continuous in Britain since the mid nineteenth century. Increasingly this debate came to be structured in terms of a modern morality play, with the cultural health of Everyman (the ‘ordinary’ person or, more usually, the schoolchild) being protected by the good angel (the education system) and corrupted by the bad angel (the commercial mass media). This was at least how it looked from the point of view of many teachers and educationalists, as is apparent from a resolution passed at the National Union of Teachers (NUT) Conference in the spring of 1960:
Conference believes that a determined effort must be made to counteract the debasement of standards which results from the misuse of press, radio, cinema and television; the deliberate exploitation of violence and sex; and the calculated appeal to self-interest.
It calls especially upon those who use and control the media of mass communication, and upon parents, to support the efforts of teachers in an attempt to prevent the conflict which too often arises between the values inculcated in the classroom and those encountered by young people in the world outside.1
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
S. Hall and P. Whannel, The Popular Arts (London: Hutchinson, 1964) p. 23.
R. Williams, Communications (London: Chatto and Windus, 1966) p. 7.
A full transcript of the conference was later published under the title of Popular Culture and Personal Responsibility (National Union of Teachers: London, 1961).
C. Sparks, ‘The abuses of literacy’, Working Papers in Cultural Studies No. 6, p. 8.
R. Hoggart and R. Williams, ‘Working class attitudes’, New Left Review, No. 1 (January-February 1960) p. 26.
R. Hoggart, The Uses of Literacy (London: Chatto and Windus, 1957) p. 11.
Ibid., p. 20.
Ibid., p. 22.
R. Hoggart, ‘English studies in extra-mural education’, Universities Quarterly, 5, 3 (May 1951) — reprinted in Speaking to Each Other, Volume Two (London: Chatto and Windus, 1970) p. 221.
Hoggart, The Uses of Literacy, p. 11. (Subsequent page references are to this title.)
R. Hoggart, ‘A sense of occasion’, in N. Mackenzie (ed.), Conviction (London: MacGibbon and Kee, 1958) pp. 122–3.
M. Poole and J. Wyver, Powerplays (London: BFI, 1984) p. 12. This error does not prevent the book as a whole from providing an authoritative and indispensable account of Trevor Griffiths’s television work.
R. Williams, Politics and Letters (London: New Left Books, 1979) p. 65. (Subsequent page references are to this title.)
Williams, Communications, p. 9.
Hoggart and Williams, ‘Working class attitudes’, p. 26.
R. Williams, Culture and Society (London: Chatto and Windus, 1958) p. 327.
Ibid., pp. 327–8.
Hoggart and Williams, ‘Working class attitudes’, p. 26.
Williams, Politics and Letters, p. 113.
Hoggart and Williams, ‘Working class attitudes’, p. 28.
R. Williams, ‘Culture is ordinary’, in Mackenzie (ed.), Conviction, p. 76.
R. Williams, The Long Revolution (London: Chatto and Windus, 1961) pp. 301, 317.
Ibid., p. 331.
Ibid., p. 338.
Popular Culture and Personal Responsibility, p. 3. (Subsequent page references are to this title.)
Hoggart, The Uses of Literacy, p. 11.
Popular Culture and Personal Responsibiliy, p. 35.
Hoggart, The Uses of Literacy, in the closing pages of Chapter 3.
Popular Culture and Personal Responsibility, p. 211. (Subsequent page references are to this title.)
Hoggart, ‘A sense of occasion’, p. 131.
A transcript of the trial is contained in C. H. Rolph (ed.), The Trial of Lady Chatterley (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1961).
See, for example, B. Sendall, Independent Television in Britain, vol. 2. Expansion and Change, 1958–68 (London: Macmillan, 1983) pp. 85–137.
Cited in Contrast on Pilkington (London: Contrast, no date — probably 1962), Part Two.
Ibid., Part Three.
Williams, Communications, p. 10.
B. Ford, ‘General Introduction’, in B. Ford (ed.), The Modern Age (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964) p. 7.
G. H. Bantock, ‘The social and intellectual background’, in Ford (ed.), The Modern Age, p. 38.
Ibid., p. 15.
Williams, Culture and Society, p. 260.
Bantock, ‘The social and intellectual background’, p. 39.
D. Thompson, ‘Introduction’, in D. Thompson (ed.), Discrimination and Popular Culture (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964) p. 14. (Subsequent page references are to this title.)
A. Hunt, ‘The film’, in Thompson (ed.), Discrimination and Popular Culture, p. 115.
D. Hughes, ‘Recorded music’, in Thompson (ed.), Discrimination and Popular Culture, pp. 156, 161, 172.
Hall and Whannel, The Popular Arts, p. 15. (Subsequent page references are to this title.)
Williams, Communications, pp. 9–10.
Copyright information
© 1986 Stuart Laing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laing, S. (1986). Oasis in the Desert: Education and the Media. In: Representations of Working-Class Life 1957–1964. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18459-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18459-0_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-37999-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18459-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)