Skip to main content
  • 6 Accesses

Abstract

By the end of the 1950s the rapid expansion of the television audience (particularly for ITV) had provided a new stimulus to that debate about popular cultural standards which had been continuous in Britain since the mid nineteenth century. Increasingly this debate came to be structured in terms of a modern morality play, with the cultural health of Everyman (the ‘ordinary’ person or, more usually, the schoolchild) being protected by the good angel (the education system) and corrupted by the bad angel (the commercial mass media). This was at least how it looked from the point of view of many teachers and educationalists, as is apparent from a resolution passed at the National Union of Teachers (NUT) Conference in the spring of 1960:

Conference believes that a determined effort must be made to counteract the debasement of standards which results from the misuse of press, radio, cinema and television; the deliberate exploitation of violence and sex; and the calculated appeal to self-interest.

It calls especially upon those who use and control the media of mass communication, and upon parents, to support the efforts of teachers in an attempt to prevent the conflict which too often arises between the values inculcated in the classroom and those encountered by young people in the world outside.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. S. Hall and P. Whannel, The Popular Arts (London: Hutchinson, 1964) p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Williams, Communications (London: Chatto and Windus, 1966) p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A full transcript of the conference was later published under the title of Popular Culture and Personal Responsibility (National Union of Teachers: London, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Sparks, ‘The abuses of literacy’, Working Papers in Cultural Studies No. 6, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Hoggart and R. Williams, ‘Working class attitudes’, New Left Review, No. 1 (January-February 1960) p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Hoggart, The Uses of Literacy (London: Chatto and Windus, 1957) p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Hoggart, ‘English studies in extra-mural education’, Universities Quarterly, 5, 3 (May 1951) — reprinted in Speaking to Each Other, Volume Two (London: Chatto and Windus, 1970) p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoggart, The Uses of Literacy, p. 11. (Subsequent page references are to this title.)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Hoggart, ‘A sense of occasion’, in N. Mackenzie (ed.), Conviction (London: MacGibbon and Kee, 1958) pp. 122–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Poole and J. Wyver, Powerplays (London: BFI, 1984) p. 12. This error does not prevent the book as a whole from providing an authoritative and indispensable account of Trevor Griffiths’s television work.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Williams, Politics and Letters (London: New Left Books, 1979) p. 65. (Subsequent page references are to this title.)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, Communications, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoggart and Williams, ‘Working class attitudes’, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Williams, Culture and Society (London: Chatto and Windus, 1958) p. 327.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., pp. 327–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoggart and Williams, ‘Working class attitudes’, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williams, Politics and Letters, p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hoggart and Williams, ‘Working class attitudes’, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Williams, ‘Culture is ordinary’, in Mackenzie (ed.), Conviction, p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Williams, The Long Revolution (London: Chatto and Windus, 1961) pp. 301, 317.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 331.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., p. 338.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Popular Culture and Personal Responsibility, p. 3. (Subsequent page references are to this title.)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoggart, The Uses of Literacy, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Popular Culture and Personal Responsibiliy, p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hoggart, The Uses of Literacy, in the closing pages of Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Popular Culture and Personal Responsibility, p. 211. (Subsequent page references are to this title.)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hoggart, ‘A sense of occasion’, p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A transcript of the trial is contained in C. H. Rolph (ed.), The Trial of Lady Chatterley (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  32. See, for example, B. Sendall, Independent Television in Britain, vol. 2. Expansion and Change, 1958–68 (London: Macmillan, 1983) pp. 85–137.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cited in Contrast on Pilkington (London: Contrast, no date — probably 1962), Part Two.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid., Part Three.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Williams, Communications, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  36. B. Ford, ‘General Introduction’, in B. Ford (ed.), The Modern Age (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964) p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  37. G. H. Bantock, ‘The social and intellectual background’, in Ford (ed.), The Modern Age, p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ibid., p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Williams, Culture and Society, p. 260.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bantock, ‘The social and intellectual background’, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  41. D. Thompson, ‘Introduction’, in D. Thompson (ed.), Discrimination and Popular Culture (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964) p. 14. (Subsequent page references are to this title.)

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. Hunt, ‘The film’, in Thompson (ed.), Discrimination and Popular Culture, p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  43. D. Hughes, ‘Recorded music’, in Thompson (ed.), Discrimination and Popular Culture, pp. 156, 161, 172.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hall and Whannel, The Popular Arts, p. 15. (Subsequent page references are to this title.)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Williams, Communications, pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 Stuart Laing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Laing, S. (1986). Oasis in the Desert: Education and the Media. In: Representations of Working-Class Life 1957–1964. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18459-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics