Skip to main content

Political Choice: Competitive Electoral Systems

  • Chapter
Elections and Voters
  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we look at electoral arrangements in countries where elections do offer a choice, and a choice that is given structure and meaning by the existence of genuinely competitive parties. Our focus here is on the liberal democracies of Western Europe, North America and parts of the British Commonwealth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BERRINGTON, H. (1985) ‘MPs and their Constituents in Britain: the History of the Relationship’, in V. Bogdanor (ed.), Representatives of the People (Aldershot: Gower).

    Google Scholar 

  • BLEWETT, N. (1972) The Peers, the Parties and the People: the General Elections of 1910 (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOCHEL, J. and DENVER, D. T. (1983) ‘Candidate Selection in the Labour Party: What the Selectors Seek’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 13, pp. 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BOGDANOR, V. (1983) ‘Conclusion: Electoral Systems and Party Systems’, in V. Bogdanor and D. Butler (eds), Democracy and Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • BRAMS, S. J. (1980) ‘Approval Voting in Multi-candidate Elections’, Policy Studies Journal, vol. 9, pp. 102–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRAMS, S. J. and FISHBURN, P. C. (1978) ‘Approval Voting’, American Political Science Review, vol. 72, pp. 831–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BUTLER, D. (1981) ‘Electoral Systems’, in D. Butler et al. (eds), Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUTLER, D. et al. (eds) (1981) Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUTLER, D. (1983) ‘Variants of the Westminster Model’ in V. Bogdanor and D. Butler (eds), Democracy and Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUTLER, D. and CAIN, B. (1985) ‘Reapportionment: a Study in Comparative Government’, Electoral Studies, vol. 4, pp. 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CREWE, I. (1981) ‘Electoral Participation’, in D. Butler et al. (eds) Democracy At The Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • CRIDDLE, B. (1984) ‘Candidates’, in D. Butler and D. Kavanagh (eds), The British General Election of 1983 (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • DUVERGER, M. (1954, 1959) Political Parties (London: Methuen).

    Google Scholar 

  • EHRENHALT, A. (1983) ‘Reapportionment and Redistricting’, in T. E. Mann and N. J. Ornstein (eds), The American Elections of 1982 (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • GUDGIN, G. and TAYLOR, P. J. (1979) Seats, Votes and the Spatial Organisation of Elections (London: Pion).

    Google Scholar 

  • JACOBSON, G. C. (1983) The Politics of Congressional Elections (Boston: Little Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • LAKEMAN, E. (1970) How Democracies Vote: a Study of Majority and Proportional Systems (London: Faber).

    Google Scholar 

  • LAKEMAN, E. (1982) Power to Elect: the Case for Proportional Representation (London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • LIJPHART, A. and GROFMAN, B. (eds) (1984) Choosing an Electoral System (New York: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • MCKEE, P. (1983) ‘The Republic of Ireland’, in V. Bogdanor and D. Butler (eds), Democracy and Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • MACKIE, T. T. and ROSE, R. (1986) International Almanac of Electoral History (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • MARSH, M. (1985) ‘The Voters Decide? Preferential Voting in European List Systems’, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 13, pp. 365–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. L. (1978) ‘Social Class and Party Choice in England: A New Analysis’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 8, pp. 257–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. L. (1981) The End of British Politics? Scots and English Political Behaviour in the Seventies (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. L. (1984) ‘There Was No Alternative: the British General Election of 1983’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 37, pp. 364–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIEMI, R. G. (1984) ‘The Problem of Strategic Behaviour under Approval Voting’, American Political Science Review, vol. 78, pp. 952–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • POLSBY, N. (1983) The Consequences of Party Reform (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • POMPER, G. M. (1968, 1980), Elections in America: Control and Influence in Democratic Politics (New York: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • POWELL, G. BINGHAM (1982) Contemporary Democracies (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • RAE, D. W. (1967, 1971) The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • RANNEY, A. (1965) Pathways to Parliament (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • RANNEY, A. (1981) ‘Candidate Selection’, in D. Butler et al., Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • RIKER, W. (1982) ‘The Two-party System and Duverger’s Law’, American Political Science Review, vol. 76, pp. 753–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROKKAN, S. (1968) ‘Electoral Systems’, in D. L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 5 (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROKKAN, S. (1970) Citizens, Elections, Parties (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSE, R. (1983) ‘Elections and Electoral Systems: Choices and Alternatives’, in V. Bogdanor and D. Butler (eds), Democracy and Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • SARLVIK, B. (1983) ‘Scandinavia’, in V. Bogdanor and D. Butler (eds), Democracy and Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • SHAMIR, M. (1985) ‘Changes in Electoral Systems as Interventions: Another Test of Duverger’s Hypothesis’, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 13, pp. 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TODD, J. E. and DODD, P. A. (1982) The Electoral Registration Process in the United Kingdom (London: Office of Population Censuses and Surveys).

    Google Scholar 

  • WALLER, R. J. (1983) ‘The 1983 Boundary Commission: Policies and Effects’, Electoral Studies, vol. 2, pp. 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Martin Harrop and William L. Miller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrop, M., Miller, W.L. (1987). Political Choice: Competitive Electoral Systems. In: Elections and Voters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18912-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics