Skip to main content

The Electoral Message: Interpreting Election Results

  • Chapter
Elections and Voters
  • 62 Accesses

Abstract

In the opening chapter we classified elections into free competitive elections, dominant-party elections, candidate-choice elections, and elections by acclamation. When freedom is curtailed we naturally focus on how much, if any, is left; and we classify elections according to the way they are organised and conducted. Elections without choice tell us about the regime, not the electorate. Indeed such elections are designed to prevent us finding out about the opinions, attitudes, prejudices and choices of the electorate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BECK, P. (1982) ‘Realignment Begins?’, American Politics Quarterly, vol. 10, pp. 421–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BERRINGTON, H. (1972) ‘Local Swings and National Roundabouts’, Swinton Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLUMLER, J. and FOX, A. (1982) The European Voter: Popular Responses to the First Community Election (London: Policy Studies Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • BRODER, D. S. (1980) ‘The Democrats’, in R. Harwood (ed.), The Pursuit of the Presidency (New York: Berkley Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • BURNHAM, W. D. (1978) ‘Great Britain: the Death of the Collectivist Consensus?’, in L. Maisel and J. Cooper (eds), Political Parties: Development and Decay (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUTLER, D. and ROSE, R. (1960) The British General Election of 1959 (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUTLER, D. and PINTO-DUSCHINSKY, M. (1971) The British General Election of 1970 (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • CAMPBELL, A., CONVERSE, P. E., MILLER, W. E. and STOKES, D. E. (1966) Elections and the Political Order (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • CARMINES, E. and STIMSON, J. (1984) ‘The Dynamics of Issue Evolution: The United States’ in R. Dalton et al. (eds), Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Societies (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • CREWE, I. and DENVER, D. (1985) Electoral Change in Western Democracies: Patterns and Sources of Electoral Volatility (Beckenham: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

  • DAHL, R. A. (1964) ‘Minorities Rules’, in L. J. Fein (ed.), American Democracy: Essays on Image and Realities (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston).

    Google Scholar 

  • DREW, E. (1981) Portrait of an Election (New York: Simon & Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  • DYE, T. R. and ZEIGLER, L. H. (1983) American Politics in the Media Age (Monterey: Brooks Cole).

    Google Scholar 

  • FLANIGAN, W. and ZINGALE, N. (1985) ‘United States’, in I. Crewe and D. Denver (eds), Electoral Change in Western Democracies: Patterns and Sources of Electoral Volatility (Beckenham: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEATH, A., JOWELL, R. and CURTICE, J. (1985) How Britain Votes (Oxford: Pergamon).

    Google Scholar 

  • JACOBSON, G. C. (1983) The Politics of Congressional Elections (Boston: Little, Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • KELLY, S. (1983) Interpreting Elections (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • KEY, V. (1955) ‘A Theory of Critical Elections’, Journal of Politics, vol. 17, pp. 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KIRKPATRICK, J. J. (1983) The Reagan Phenomenon and Other Speeches on Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • MANN, T. E. (1978) Unsafe at Any Margin: Interpreting Congressional Elections (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. L. (1984) ‘There Was No Alternative: the British General Election of 1983’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 37, pp. 364–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. L. (1986) ‘Local Electoral Behaviour’, Committee of Inquiry into the Conduct of Local Authority Business, Research, Vol. III: The Local Government Elector. Cmnd 9800 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • NIE, N. H., VERBA, S. and PETROCIK, J. R. (1976, 1979) The Changing American Voter (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • SARLVIK, B. and CREWE, I. (1983) Decade of Dealignment: the Conservative Victory of 1979 and Electoral Trends in the 1970s (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHNEIDER, W. (1981) ‘The November Vote for President: What Did it Mean? in A. Ranney (ed.), The American Elections of 1980 (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOKES, D. (1981) ‘What Decides Elections?’ in D. Butler et al. Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • TUFTE, E. R. (1975) ‘Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections’, American Political Science Review, vol. 69, pp. 816–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TUFTE, E. R. (1978) Political Control of the Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • WALLER, R. (1980) ‘The 1979 Local and General Elections in England and Wales: Is There a Local/National Differential?’, Political Studies, vol. 28, pp. 443–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHITE, T. H. (1961) The Making of the President 1960 (New York: Atheneum).

    Google Scholar 

  • WHITE, T. H. (1973) The Making of the President 1972 (New York: Atheneum).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Martin Harrop and William L. Miller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrop, M., Miller, W.L. (1987). The Electoral Message: Interpreting Election Results. In: Elections and Voters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18912-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics