Skip to main content

How Voters Think About Politics: Ideologies, Issues and Images

  • Chapter
Elections and Voters

Abstract

Ordinary voters do not think very long or very hard about political questions. Their lives are dominated by private and personal concerns — their health, their family, their friends. These are the things that give them most pleasure and most pain, the things that demand their most immediate attention. For most people most of the time, politics is peripheral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ABRAMSON, P. R. (1983) Political Attitudes in America (San Francisco: Freeman).

    Google Scholar 

  • ADORNO, T. W., FRENKEL-BRUNSWIK, E., LEVINSON, D. J. and SANFORD, R. N. (1950) The Authoritarian Personality (New York, Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • AITKIN, D. (1977) Stability and Change in Australian Politics (Canberra: Australian National University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • ALT, J. E. (1979) The Politics of Economic Decline (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, S. H. and KAASE, M. (1979) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies (Beverly Hills: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • BERELSON, B. R., LAZARSFELD, P. F. and MCPHEE, W. N. (1954) Voting: a Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign (Chicago: University of Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • BISHOP, G. F., OLDENDICK, R. W. and TUCHFARBER, A. J. (1978) ‘Effects of Question Wording and Format on Political Attitude Consistency’, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 42, pp. 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BLUMLER, J. G. and McQUAIL, D. (1968) Television in Politics: its Uses and Influence (London: Faber).

    Google Scholar 

  • BLUMLER, J. G., McQUAIL, D. and NOSSITER, T. J. (1975) Political Communication and the Young Voter 1970–71 (London: Report to Social Science Research Council).

    Google Scholar 

  • BLUMLER, J. G., McQUAIL, D. and NOSSITER, T. J. (1976) Political Communication and the Young Voter in the General Election of February 1974 (London: Report to Social Science Research Council).

    Google Scholar 

  • BREWSTER SMITH, M., BRUNER, J. and WHITE, R. (1958) Opinions and Personality (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUTLER, D. and STOKES, D. (1974) Political Change in Britain: the Evolution of Electoral Choice (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • CAMPBELL, A., CONVERSE, P. E., MILLER, W. E. and STOKES, D. E. (1960) The American Voter (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • CARMINES, E. G. and STIMSON, J. A. (1980) ‘The Two Faces of Issue Voting’, American Political Science Review, vol. 74, pp. 78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CITRIN, J. (1974) ‘Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government’, American Political Science Review, vol. 68, pp. 973–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CLARKE, H. D., JENSON, J., LEDUC, L. and PAMMETT, J. (1979) Political Choice in Canada (Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson).

    Google Scholar 

  • CONVERSE, P. E. (1964) ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’, in D. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • CONVERSE, P. and DUPEUX, G. (1962, 1966) ‘Politicization of the Electorate in France and the United States’, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 26, pp. 1–23; reprinted in A. Campbell et al., Elections and the Political Order (New York: Wiley).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CONVERSE, P. E. and MARKUS, G. B. (1979) ‘Plus ça Change…: the New CPS Election Study Panel’, American Political Science Review, vol. 73, pp. 32–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DYE, T. R. and ZEIGLER, L. H. (1981) The Irony of Democracy: an Uncommon Introduction to American Politics, (5th edn) (Belmont, Ca.: Wadsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • EIJK, C. and NIEMOLLER, C. (1983) Political Change in the Netherlands (Amsterdam: Erasmus University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • EYSENCK, H. (1951) The Psychology of Politics (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • HARROP, M. (1982) ‘Labour-voting conservatives: Policy Differences between the Labour Party and Labour Voters’, in R. Worcester and M. Harrop (eds), Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1979 (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEATH, A., JOWELL, R. and CURTICE, J. (1985) How Britain Votes (Oxford: Pergamon).

    Google Scholar 

  • INGLEHART, R. and KLINGEMANN, H. (1976) ‘Party Identification, Ideological Preference and the Left-Right Dimension among Western Mass Publics’, in I. Budge, I. Crewe and D. Farlie (eds), Party Identification and Beyond (London: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • KATZ, D. (1960) ‘The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes’, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 24, pp. 163–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KINDER, D. R. (1983) ‘Diversity and Complexity in American Public Opinion’, in A. W. Finifter (ed.), Political Science: the State of the Discipline (Washington: American Political Science Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • KLINGEMANN, H. D. (1979) ‘Measuring Ideological Conceptualizations’ in S. H. Barnes and M. Kaase (eds), Political Action (Beverly Hills: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • LANE, R. (1969) Political Thinking and Consciousness (Chicago: Markham).

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVITIN, T. E. and MILLER, W. E. (1979) ‘Ideological Interpretations of Presidential Elections’, American Political Science Review, vol. 73, pp. 751–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LUTTBEG, N. R. (1968) ‘The Structure of Beliefs among Leaders and the Public’, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 32, pp. 398–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, A. H. (1974) ‘Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970’, American Political Science Review, vol. 68, pp. 951–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. E. and SHANKS, J. M. (1982) ‘Policy Directions and Presidential Leadership: Alternative Interpretations of the 1980 Presidential Election’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 12, pp. 299–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. L. (1981) The End of British Politics? Scots and English Political Behaviour in the Seventies (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • MILNE, R. S. and MACKENZIE, H. C. (1954) Straight Fight 1951 (London: Hansard Society).

    Google Scholar 

  • MILNE, R. S. and MACKENZIE, H. C. (1958) Marginal Seat 1955 (London: Hansard Society).

    Google Scholar 

  • NIE, N. H., VERBA, S. and PETROCIK, J. R. (1976, 1979) The Changing American Voter (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • NIMMO, D. and SAVAGE, R. L. (1976) Candidates and Their Images: Concepts, Methods and Findings (Santa Monica: Goodyear).

    Google Scholar 

  • PAGE, B. I. and BRODY, R. A. (1972) ‘Policy Voting and the Electoral Process: the Vietnam War Issue’, American Political Science Review, vol. 66, pp. 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PATTERSON, T. E. and McCLURE, R. D. (1976) The Unseeing Eye: the Myth of Television Power in National Politics (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • PETROCIK, J. R. (1980) ‘Contextual Sources of Voting Behaviour: The Changeable American Voter’, in J. C. Pierce and J. L. Sullivan (eds), The Electorate Reconsidered (Beverly Hills: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • PIERCE, J. C. and SULLIVAN, J. L. (1980) The Electorate Reconsidered (Beverly Hills: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • POMPER, G. (1980) Elections in America: Control and Influence in Democratic Politics (New York: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • REPASS, D. E. (1971) ‘Issue Salience and Party Choice’, American Political Science Review, vol. 65, pp. 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTSON, D. (1984) Class and the British Electorate (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • SARLVIK, B. and CREWE, I. (1983) Decade of Dealignment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCARBOROUGH, E. (1984) Political Ideology and Voting: An Exploratory Study (Oxford: University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • STONE, W. F. (1974) The Psychology of Politics (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOKES, D. E. (1966) ‘Some Dynamic Elements of Contests for the Presidency’, American Political Science Review, vol. 60, pp. 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SULLIVAN, J. L., PIERSON, J. E. and MARKUS, G. B. (1978) ‘Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public: a Methodological Critique and Some New Findings’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 22, pp. 233–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TRENAMAN, J. and McQUAIL, D. (1961) Television and the Political Image (London: Methuen).

    Google Scholar 

  • WALKER, M. (1977) The National Front (Glasgow: Fontana).

    Google Scholar 

  • WORCESTER, R. and HARROP, M. (1982) Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1979 (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Martin Harrop and William L. Miller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrop, M., Miller, W.L. (1987). How Voters Think About Politics: Ideologies, Issues and Images. In: Elections and Voters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18912-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics