Skip to main content

Conclusion: What do Elections do?

  • Chapter
Elections and Voters
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

Most research asks what decides elections. We have seen how governments try to organise elections to get the result they want. We have seen how the voters respond to the record of the government and the appeals of opposition parties. Together, these constraints and responses decide the results of elections. But the question of what elections decide is equally important. Indeed, if elections make no difference, there is no point in studying them at all. So what do elections decide? What do they do? We first touched on this question when we discussed communist and Third World elections. Now we return to it at greater length, and now with a focus on the functions of free, competitive elections. These are considerably wider than the functions of those elections without choice which we discussed in Chapter 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BEVAN, A. (1952) In Place of Fear (London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • BLUMLER, J. G. and MCQUAIL, D. (1968) Television and Politics: Its Uses and Influence (London: Faber).

    Google Scholar 

  • BRITTAN, S. (1976) ‘The Economic Contradictions of Democracy’ in A. King (ed.), Why is Britain Becoming Harder to Govern? (London: BBC).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUNCE, V. (1981) Do New Leaders Make a Difference? Executive Succession and Public Policy under Capitalism and Socialism (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUTLER, D., PENNIMAN, H. and RANNEY, A. (eds) (1981) Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • CASTLES, F. (1982) ‘Introduction: Politics and Public Policy’, in F. Castles (ed.), The Impact of Parties (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • DYE, T. and ZEIGLER, H. (1981) The Irony of Democracy (Belmont: Wadsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • FEIST, U., GULLNER, M. and LIEPELT, K. (1978) ‘Structural Assimilation versus Ideological Polarization’, in M. Kaase and K. V. Beyme (eds), Elections and Parties (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • FINER, S. (1980) The Changing British Party System 1945–1979 (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • GAMSON, W. (1968) Power and Discontent (Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey).

    Google Scholar 

  • GINSBERG, B. (1982) The Consequences of Consent (Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • HARE, T. (1873) The Election of Representatives (London: Longmans).

    Google Scholar 

  • HERMET, G., ROSE, R. and ROUQUIE, A. (eds) (1978) Elections Without Choice (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • KING, A. (1981) ‘What Do Elections Decide?’, in D. Butler, H. Penniman and A. Ranney (eds), Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • KIRCHEIMER, O. (1966) ‘The Transformation of Western European Party Systems’, in J. LaPalombara and M. Weiner (eds), Political Parties and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • LINDBLOM, C. (1977) Politics and Markets (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • MACKENZIE, W. J. M. (1958) Free Elections (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • MILIBAND, R. (1969) The State in Capitalist Society (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson).

    Google Scholar 

  • MILL, J. S. (1859, 1948) Considerations on Representative Government, 1948 edn, R. McCallum (ed.), (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. E. and SHANKS, J. M. (1982) ‘Policy Directions and Presidential Leadership: Alternative Explanations of the 1980 Presidential Election’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 12, pp. 299–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. L. (1983) The Survey Method in the Social and Political Sciences: Achievements, Failures, Prospects (London: Pinter).

    Google Scholar 

  • PITKIN, H. F. (1967) The Concept of Representation (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • POMPER, G. (1980) Elections in America: Control and Influence in Democratic Politics (New York: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • PULZER, P. G. J. (1975) Political Representation and Elections in Britain (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • RICHARDSON, J. J. and JORDAN, A. G. (1979) Governing under Pressure: the Policy Process in a Post-Parliamentary Democracy (Oxford: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • RIKER, W. H. (1982) Liberalism against Populism (New York: Freeman).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSE, R. (1978) ‘Is Choice Enough? Elections and Political Authority’, in G. Hermet, R. Rose and A. Rouqie (eds), Elections Without Choice (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSE, R. (1984) Do Parties Make A Difference? (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ROSE, R. and MACKIE, T. (1980) Incumbency in Government: Asset or Liability? (Glasgow: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde, Study Number 79).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHATTSCHNEIDER, E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHOENBACH, K. (1983) ‘What and How Voters Learned’, in J. Blumler with A. Fox (eds), Communicating to Voters: Television in the First European Parliamentary Elections (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHUMPETER, J. (1943) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • TAYLOR, P. (1984) ‘Accumulation, Legitimation and the Electoral Geographies within Liberal Democracy’, in P. Taylor and J. House (eds), Political Geography: Recent Advances and Future Directions (London: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

  • VEBLEN, T. (1904) The Theory of Business Enterprise (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • WILENSKY, H. (1975) The Welfare State and Equality (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • WOLINETZ, S. (1979) ‘The Transformation of Western European Party Systems Revisited’, West European Politics, vol. 2, pp. 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Martin Harrop and William L. Miller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrop, M., Miller, W.L. (1987). Conclusion: What do Elections do?. In: Elections and Voters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18912-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics