Abstract
The transmission of property and assets following a death should be of fundamental interest to sociologists, since it is one of the key mechanisms through which social and economic structures are reproduced over time, in a society based upon private ownership. It is also of particular relevance to sociologists of family life, since inheritance is so closely associated with the idea of passing assets down the generations, from parent to child. Engels recognised this in his influential, if somewhat flawed, discussion of nineteenth-century bourgeois marriage in which he argued that inheritance was a critical driving force in producing different family formations. He also saw the significant gender implications, in arguing that the bourgeois view of the family was dominated by the need to ensure the transmission of property from father to son, leaving married women in a position analogous to prostitutes, needed only because their bodies were necessary to produce sons, but otherwise excluded from the process of inheritance (Engels, 1985 edition, pp. 101–3).
The inheritance project, on which this paper draws, is funded by the ESRC (grant no. 000232035). The research team comprises Janet Finch, Jennifer Mason and Judith Masson as directors, with Lynn Hayes and Lorraine Wallis as research associates. This paper is co-authored by Janet Finch and Lynn Hayes, who would like to acknowledge the assistance of other members of the team in data collection and preparation, and for their helpful comments about earlier drafts of this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Central Statistical Office (1993), Social Trends 23 (London: HMSO).
Cheal, D. (1988), The Gift Economy (London: Routledge).
Cretney, S. (1992), Elements of Family Law 2nd edn (London).
Delphy, C. and Leonard, D. (1986), ‘Class Analysis, Gender Analysis and the Family’, in Crompton, R. and Mann, M. (eds), Gender and Stratification (Cambridge: Polity).
Engels, F. (1985), The Family, Private Property and the State (Harmondsworth: Penguin; first published 1884).
Firth, R., Hubert, J. and Forge, A (1969), Families and Their Relatives (London: Routledge).
Finch, J. and Hayes, L. (1994), ‘Inheritance, Houses and the Concept of Home’, Sociology, vol. 28, pp. 417–33.
Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1993), Negotiating Family Responsibilities (London: Routledge).
Forrest, R. and Murie, A. (1989), ‘Differential Accumulation: Wealth Inheritance and Housing Policy Reconsidered’, Policy and Politics, vol. 17:1 pp. 25–79.
Forrest, R., Murie, A. and Williams, P. (1990), Home Ownership: Differentiation and Fragmentation (London: Unw in Hyman).
Hamnett, C., Harmer, M. and Williams, P. (1991), Safe as Houses: Housing Inheritance in Britain (London: Paul Chapman).
Holcombe, L. (1983), Wives and Property (Oxford: Mart in Robertson).
Law Society(1991), ‘Taking Wills to Market’, Law Society’s Gazzette vol. 88:39, PP. 4–5.
Lewis, J. (1984), Women in England 1870–1950 (Brighton: Wheatsheaf).
Morris, L. (1990), The Workings of the Household (Cambridge: Polity).
Pahl, J. (1989), Money and Marriage (London: Macmillan).
Wilson, G. (1987), Money in the Family: Financial Organisation and Women’s Responsibility (Aldershot: Avebury).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1996 British Sociological Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Finch, J., Hayes, L. (1996). Gender, Inheritance and Women as Testators. In: Morris, L., Lyon, E.S. (eds) Gender Relations in Public and Private. Explorations in Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24543-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24543-7_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-63088-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24543-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)