Skip to main content

The Influence of Informal Groups in Multilateral Diplomacy

  • Chapter
Innovation in Diplomatic Practice

Part of the book series: Studies in Diplomacy ((STD))

Abstract

Interdependence in, and the continued globalization of, the international system encourages states with shared interests to cooperate in the practice of diplomacy by pooling resources and by building institutional links and informal networks to facilitate this. Coordination and cooperation can help states to advance both individual and shared agendas through the use of collective lobbying and bargaining power. A long-held recognition in the diplomatic world of the value of collective action has combined with the growth and expansion of multilateral diplomacy, in the post-war years in particular, to promote joint action through coalitions and contact groups as means of managing complex diplomatic exercises and of ensuring that national and regional resources are used to their best effect internationally.

On any matter on which certain states agree, it pays them not to act alone, but in association.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Recommended Reading

  • N. B. Atiyas, ‘Mediating Regional Conflicts and Negotiating Flexibility: Peace Efforts in Bosnia-Herzegovina’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 542, November 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Berridge and A. Jennings (eds), Diplomacy at the UN (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Chan and V. Jabri (eds), Mediation in Southern Africa (London: Macmillan, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Duran, ‘The Contadora Approach to Peace in Central America’, The World Today 40, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. P. Karns, ‘Ad hoc Multilateral Diplomacy: the United States, the Con- tact Group and Namibia’, International Organization 41/1, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kaufmann, United Nations Decision Making (Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. K. Purcell, ‘Demystifying Contadora’, Foreign Affairs 64/1, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V. Rittberger, ‘Global Conference Diplomacy and International Policymaking: the Case of UN-sponsored World Conferences’, European Journal of Political Research 11, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Scott, Ambassador in Black and White (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Simic, ‘Dynamics of the Yugoslav Crisis’, Security Dialogue 26/2, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Touval, ‘Multilateral Negotiation: an Analytic Approach’, Negotiation Journal 5/2, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leigh-Phippard, H. (1999). The Influence of Informal Groups in Multilateral Diplomacy. In: Melissen, J. (eds) Innovation in Diplomatic Practice. Studies in Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27270-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics