Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
Capitalism Divided?

Part of the book series: Contemporary Social Theory ((CONTSTHE))

  • 6 Accesses

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that sociology — in both its liberal and Marxist guises — was the outcome of efforts to understand the dramatic changes which began to take place in western societies during the late eighteenth century. The ‘theory of industrial society’ and Marxism’s theory of capitalist society both claim to explain the major contours of development associated with the ‘great transformation’ from either traditional/agrarian to modern/industrial societies, or from feudalism to capitalism. The debate involving the proponents of these two avowedly opposed traditions has been keenly contested and the subject of numerous reappraisals over the past twenty years or so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Anthony Giddens, The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies (London: Hutchinson University Library, 1973) pp.19–22; Central Problems in Social Theory (London: Macmillan, 1979) pp.225–30. This common ground was quite explicit in the early work of one of the leading theorists of industrial society. In what was intended as an ironic critique of Marxism, Lipset argued that ‘history has validated a basic premise of Marxist sociology at the expense of Marxist politics’. As the USA was the most technologically advanced industrial society, it now ‘presented the image of the European future’: Seymour Martin Lipset, ‘The Changing Class Structure and Contemporary European Politics’, Daedalus, (Winter 1964) p.272.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keith Joseph, Reversing the Trend (London: Rose Books, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Theda Skocpol, States and Social Revolutions (Cambridge University Press, 1979) p.22, for a similar line of argument which stresses the importance of treating the international state system as an ‘analytically autonomous level of transnational reality’.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Max Weber, Economy and Society (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978) vol.1, p. 164, section 31, ‘The Principle Modes of Capitalistic Orientation of Profit-Making’. Weber distinguishes clearly between trading capitalism and that which is oriented ‘to the profit possibilités in continuous production of goods in enterprises with capital accounting’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 Geoffrey Ingham

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ingham, G. (1984). Introduction. In: Capitalism Divided?. Contemporary Social Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86082-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics