Skip to main content

The City’s Impact: the State, Dominant Class, and Financial System

  • Chapter
Capitalism Divided?

Part of the book series: Contemporary Social Theory ((CONTSTHE))

Abstract

By the end of the nineteenth century, the City had made a decisive and enduring impact on British society. Despite the attempts of the modernisation movements, the major institutions and classes formed during this period have never been Subject to any drastic restructuring. Many of the economic conditions upon which the City’s position in the world economy had been partly based ceased to operate from the early years of the twentieth century, but the institutional arrangements and the class associated with the City’s dominance persisted and ultimately permitted the City’s revival. In this chapter, I shall outline what I consider to be the major features of the legacy bequeathed by the City’s role in British development: the Treasury’s close association with the City and Bank of England; the aristocratic and ‘anti-industrial’ complexion of the dominant class; and the apparent inability of the financial system to engage itself with domestic industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Henry Roseveare, The Treasury (London: Allen Lane, 1969). Roseveare tends to accept the general view that parliamentary control of public expenditure was increased in the nineteenth century, but includes much information which casts doubt upon such an interpretation. Formal constitutional control was provided for, but substantively the Commons were prisoners of the Treasury ‘view’ and ‘control’.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maurice Wright, ‘Treasury Control: 1854–1914’, in Gillian Sutherland (ed.) Studies in the Growth of Nineteenth Century Government (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972) p.221. The same practices are just as apparent throughout the twentieth century to the present.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Adrian Ham, Treasury Rules (London: Quartet Books, 1981),

    Google Scholar 

  4. and H. Heclo and A.B. Wildavsky, The Private Government of Public Money (London: Macmillan, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See P. Barret Whale, ‘A Retrospective view of the Bank Charter Act of 1844’, in T.S. Ashton and R.S. Sayers (eds) Papers in English Monetary History (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For what is the most forceful modern statement of this well established theme see the writings of Perry Anderson and Tom Nairn cited in ch.1 For an extended treatment of this issue, see Martin Wiener, English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit 1850–1980 (Cambridge University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. On the origins of this connection, see T.K. Rabb, Enterprise and Empire: Merchant and Gentry Investment in the Expansion of England 1575–1630 (Cambridge, Mass.; Harvard University Press, 1967).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Quoted in F.L.M. Thompson, English Landed Society in the Nineteenth Century (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963) p.9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The generational aspect of this estate mobility resembles the process of caste mobility in India presented by Srinivas as ‘Sanskritization’ (see M.N. Srinivas, Caste in Modern India and Other Essays (Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1962) pp.42–62).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Olive Anderson, ‘The Janus-face of Mid-Nineteenth Century English Radicalism: The Administrative Reform Association of 1855’, Victorian Studies, 8 (March, 1965) pp.231–42.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martin Shefter, ‘Party and Patronage: Germany, England and Italy’, Politics and Society, 7 (1977) no.4, p.436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peter Kellner and Lord Crowther-Hunt, The Civil Servants: An Inquiry into Britain’s Ruling Class (London: MacDonald, 1980) p.193.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S.G. Checkland, ‘The Mind of the City, 1870–1914’, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 9 (1957) pp.261–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 Geoffrey Ingham

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ingham, G. (1984). The City’s Impact: the State, Dominant Class, and Financial System. In: Capitalism Divided?. Contemporary Social Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86082-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics