Abstract
By the end of the nineteenth century, the City had made a decisive and enduring impact on British society. Despite the attempts of the modernisation movements, the major institutions and classes formed during this period have never been Subject to any drastic restructuring. Many of the economic conditions upon which the City’s position in the world economy had been partly based ceased to operate from the early years of the twentieth century, but the institutional arrangements and the class associated with the City’s dominance persisted and ultimately permitted the City’s revival. In this chapter, I shall outline what I consider to be the major features of the legacy bequeathed by the City’s role in British development: the Treasury’s close association with the City and Bank of England; the aristocratic and ‘anti-industrial’ complexion of the dominant class; and the apparent inability of the financial system to engage itself with domestic industry.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Henry Roseveare, The Treasury (London: Allen Lane, 1969). Roseveare tends to accept the general view that parliamentary control of public expenditure was increased in the nineteenth century, but includes much information which casts doubt upon such an interpretation. Formal constitutional control was provided for, but substantively the Commons were prisoners of the Treasury ‘view’ and ‘control’.
Maurice Wright, ‘Treasury Control: 1854–1914’, in Gillian Sutherland (ed.) Studies in the Growth of Nineteenth Century Government (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972) p.221. The same practices are just as apparent throughout the twentieth century to the present.
See Adrian Ham, Treasury Rules (London: Quartet Books, 1981),
and H. Heclo and A.B. Wildavsky, The Private Government of Public Money (London: Macmillan, 1974).
See P. Barret Whale, ‘A Retrospective view of the Bank Charter Act of 1844’, in T.S. Ashton and R.S. Sayers (eds) Papers in English Monetary History (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953).
For what is the most forceful modern statement of this well established theme see the writings of Perry Anderson and Tom Nairn cited in ch.1 For an extended treatment of this issue, see Martin Wiener, English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit 1850–1980 (Cambridge University Press, 1981).
On the origins of this connection, see T.K. Rabb, Enterprise and Empire: Merchant and Gentry Investment in the Expansion of England 1575–1630 (Cambridge, Mass.; Harvard University Press, 1967).
Quoted in F.L.M. Thompson, English Landed Society in the Nineteenth Century (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963) p.9.
The generational aspect of this estate mobility resembles the process of caste mobility in India presented by Srinivas as ‘Sanskritization’ (see M.N. Srinivas, Caste in Modern India and Other Essays (Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1962) pp.42–62).
Olive Anderson, ‘The Janus-face of Mid-Nineteenth Century English Radicalism: The Administrative Reform Association of 1855’, Victorian Studies, 8 (March, 1965) pp.231–42.
Martin Shefter, ‘Party and Patronage: Germany, England and Italy’, Politics and Society, 7 (1977) no.4, p.436.
Peter Kellner and Lord Crowther-Hunt, The Civil Servants: An Inquiry into Britain’s Ruling Class (London: MacDonald, 1980) p.193.
S.G. Checkland, ‘The Mind of the City, 1870–1914’, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 9 (1957) pp.261–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1984 Geoffrey Ingham
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ingham, G. (1984). The City’s Impact: the State, Dominant Class, and Financial System. In: Capitalism Divided?. Contemporary Social Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86082-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86082-1_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-30118-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-86082-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)