This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aiken, W. M. (1942). The story of the eight-year study with conclusions and recommendations. New York: Harper and Row.
Aitkin, M., & Longford, N. (1986). Statistical modeling issues in school effectiveness studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 149(1), 1–43.
Averch, H. A., Carroll, S. J., Donaldson, T. S., Kiesling, H. J., & Pincus, J. (1971). How effective is schooling? A critical review and synthesis of research findings. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1976). Implementation of educational innovation. Educational Forum, 40, 344–370.
Bickel, W. E. (1998). The implications of the effective schools literature for school restructuring. In C. R. Reynolds, & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 959–983). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Borman, G. D., & D’Agostino, J. V. (1996). Title I and student achievement: A meta-analysis of federal evaluation results. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 309–326.
Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2003, April). The Coleman report and the conventional wisdom: A multilevel analysis of Coleman’s Equality of Educational Opportunity data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Borman, G., Hewes, G., Overman, L., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125–230.
Bosker, R. J., & Witziers, B. (1996, April). The magnitude of school effects. Or: Does it really matter which school a student attends? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Bridges, E. (1986). The incompetent teacher. Philadelphia: Falmer.
Brookover, W., Beady, D., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School social systems and student achievement: Schools can make a difference. New York: Praeger.
Brookover, W. B., Beamer, L., Efthim, H., Hathaway, D., Lezotte, L., Miller, S. J., et al. (1982). Creating effective schools: An in-service program for enhancing school learning climate and environment. Holmes Beach, FL: Learning Publications, Inc.
Brookover, W. B., & Lezotte, L. W. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in student achievement. East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching College of Education, Michigan State University.
Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–376). New York: Macmillan.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York: Random House.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 10(1), 147–158.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W., & Congdon, R. T. (1986). MM4: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the MM/2L and MM/3L programs. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Burstein, L. (1980). The analysis of multi-level data in educational research and evaluation. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 8, 158–233.
Campbell, J., Hombo, C., & Mazzeo, J. (2000). Trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
Cawelti, G. (2003). Lessons from research that changed education. Educational Leadership, 60(3), 18–21.
Chrispeels, J. (1992). Purposeful restructuring: Creating a culture for learning and achievement in elementary schools. London: Falmer Press.
Chrispeels, J., & Beall, M. (1990). San Pasqual union school district: Working towards school effectiveness. In B. O. Taylor (Ed.), Case studies in effective schools research (pp. 127–142). Madison, WI: The National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
Chrispeels, J., & Gonzales, M. (2006). The challenge of systemic change in complex educational systems: A district model to scale up reform. In A. Harris, & J. Chrispeels (Eds.), Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives (pp. 241–273). London: Routledge.
Chrispeels, J., & Harris, A. (2006). Conclusions: Future directions for the field. In A. Harris, & J. Chrispeels (Eds.), Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives (pp. 295–307). London: Routledge.
Clark, T. A., & McCarthy, D. P. (1983). School improvement in New York City: The evolution of a project. Educational Researcher, 12(4), 17–24.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, R., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Crandall, D. P., & Loucks, S. F. (1983). A roadmap for school improvement: Executive summary of the study of dissemination efforts supporting school improvement. Andover, MA: The NETWORK.
Creemers, B., & Reezigt, G. J. (2005). Linking school effectiveness and school improvement: The background and outline of the project. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 359–372.
Creemers, B., & Scheerens, J. (Eds.). (1989). Developments in school effectiveness research. Special Issue of International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 685–825.
Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How should we measure “change” – or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.
Crone, J., Lang, M., Franklin, B., & Halbrook, A. (1994). Composite versus. component scores: Consistency of school effectiveness classification. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(4), 303–321.
Crone, L. J., Lang, M. H., Teddlie, C., & Franklin, B. (1995). Achievement measures of school effectiveness: Comparison of model stability across years. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 365–377.
Crone, L. J., & Teddlie, C. (1995). Further examination of teacher behavior in differentially effective schools: Selection and socialization processes. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 30(1), 1–9.
Cuban, L. (1983). Effective schools: A friendly but cautionary note. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 695–696.
Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3–13.
Cuban, L. (1993). Preface. In C. Teddlie, & S. Stringfield (Eds.), Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects (pp. ix–xi). New York: Teachers College Press.
D’Agostino, J. V. (2000). Instructional and school effects on students’ longitudinal reading and mathematics achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 197–236.
Daly, P. (1991). How large are secondary school effects in Northern Ireland? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2, 305–323.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1988). Policy and professionalism. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 55–77). New York: Teachers College Press.
Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, B. (2002). Extending educational reform. London: Falmer Press.
Datnow, A., Lasky, S., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2006). Integrating educational systems for successful reform in diverse contexts. New York: Cambridge University Press.
DeVries, R. (2002). What does research on constructivist education tell us about effective schooling? (Iowa Academy of Education Occasional Research Paper #5.) Des Moines, IA: FINE (First in the Nation in Education) Foundation.
Dow, P. (1997, February). Sputnik revisited: Historical perspectives on science reform. Paper presented at the symposium entitled Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the Past, Present, and Future of Educational Reform, hosted by the Center for Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education, the National Academies, Washington, DC. Retrieved on June 12, 2006, from http://www.nationalacademies.org/sputnik/dow1.htm
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Durland, M., & Teddlie, C. (1996, April). A network analysis of the structural dimensions of principal leadership in differentially effective schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Edmonds, R. R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(10), 15–24.
Elmore, R. F. (1991). Restructuring schools: The next generation of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Evans, L., & Teddlie, C. (1995). Facilitating change in schools: Is there one best style? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 1–22.
Fuhrman, S. (Ed.). (2001). From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states – One hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (NSSE). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.
Gallucci, C., Knapp, M. S., Markholt, A., & Ort, S. (2006). Standards-based reform and small schools of choice: How reform theories converge in three urban middle schools. In A. Harris, & J. Chrispeels (Eds.), Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives (pp. 186–216). London: Routledge.
General Accounting Office. (1989). Effective schools programs: Their extent and characteristics. Gaithersburg, MD: General Accounting Office.
Giles, H., McCutchen, S., & Zechiel, A. (1942). Exploring the curriculum: The work of the thirty schools from the viewpoint of curriculum consultants. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2001). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1986). School effects. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 570–602). New York: Macmillan.
Griffin, J. (2004). Ineffective schools as organizational reactions to stress. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 257–287.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of the empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94, 328–355.
Hauser, R. M., Sewell, W. H., & Alwin, D. F. (1976). High school effects on achievement. In W. H. Sewell, R. M. Hauser, & D. L. Featherman (Eds.), Schooling and achievement in American society (pp. 309–341). New York: Academic Press.
Hopkins, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001). The past, present and future of school improvement: Towards the third age. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 459–475.
Jencks, C. S., Smith, M., Ackland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Ginits, H., et al. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of the family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
Klitgaard, R. E., & Hall, G. R. (1974). Are there unusually effective schools? Journal of Human Resources, 74, 90–106.
Kochan, S., & Teddlie, C. (2005). ‘An evaluation of communication among high school faculty using network analysis’ in New Directions for Evaluation Volume 2005, Issue 107, Pages: 41–53.
Lasky, S., Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C., Kennedy, E., Schaffer, E., Chrispeels, J., et al. (2005). Designing and conducting a gold standard effective schools study. Journal for Effective Schools, 4(1), 27–45.
Lee, V., & Bryk, A. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172–92.
Leithwood, K. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8–12.
Levine, D. V., & Lezotte, L. W. (1990). Unusually effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice. Madison, WI: The National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
Lewis, A. (1989). Restructuring America’s schools. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
Lezotte, L. W. (1990). Lessons learned. In B. O. Taylor (Ed.), Case studies in effective schools research (pp. 195–199). Madison, WI: The National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
Little, J. W. (1995). Contested ground: The basis of teacher leadership in two restructuring high schools. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 47–63.
Louis, K. S., & Smith, B. (1991). Restructuring, teacher engagement and school culture: Perspectives on school reform and the improvement of teacher’s work. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2, 34–52.
Luyten, H., Visscher, A., & Witziers, B. (2005). School effectiveness research: From a review of the criticism to recommendations for further research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 249–279.
Madaus, G. F., Kellaghan, T., Rakow, E. A., & King, D. J. (1979). The sensitivity of measures of school effectiveness. Harvard Educational Review, 49, 207–230.
Mandeville, G. K., & Kennedy, E. (1991). The relationship of effective schools indicators and changes in the social distribution of achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(1), 14–33.
Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McCormack-Larkin, M. (1985). Ingredients in a successful school effectiveness project. Educational Leadership, 42(6), 31–37.
McDill, E. L., & Rigsby, L. C. (1973). Structure and process in secondary schools: The impact of educational climates. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
McLaughlin, M. (1990). The Rand Change Agent Study revisited: Macro perspectives, micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11–16.
McLaughlin, M., & Shepard, L. (1995). Improving education through standards-based reform – A report by the National Academy of Education Panel on Standards-based Educational Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
Mortimore, P. (2001). Globalization, effectiveness and improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(2), 229–250.
Mosteller, F., & Moynihan, D. P. (Eds.). (1972). On equality of educational opportunity. New York: Vintage.
Murnane, R. J. (1975). The impact of school resources on the learning of inner city children. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.
Murnane, R. J. (1981). Interpreting the evidence on school effectiveness. Teachers College Record, 83, 19–35.
Murphy, J. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. In P. Thurston, & L. Lotto (Eds.), Advances in educational leadership (pp. 163–200). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Murphy, J. (1991). Restructuring schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Murphy, J., & Beck, L. (1995). School-based management as school reform: Taking stock. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Murphy, J., & Wyant, L. (1990). Reaching for excellence in Prince George’s County public schools. In B. O. Taylor (Ed.), Case studies in effective schools research (pp. 13–37). Madison, WI: The National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Nunnery, J. (1998). Reform ideology and the locus of development problem in educational restructuring. Education and Urban Society, 30(3), 277–295.
Pink, W. T. (1990). Staff development for urban school improvement: Lessons learned from two case studies. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1, 41–60.
Purkey, S., & Smith, M. (1983). Effective schools: A review. Elementary School Journal, 83, 427–452.
Raudenbush, S. W. (1989). The analysis of longitudinal, multilevel data. In B. P. M. Creemers, & J. Scheerens (Eds.), Developments in school effectiveness research. Special issue of International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 721–739.
Reynolds, D., Hopkins, D., & Stoll, L. (1993). Linking school effectiveness knowledge and school improvement practice: Towards a synergy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4, 37–58.
Reynolds, D., Stringfield, S., & Schaffer, E. (2006). The High Reliability Schools project: Some preliminary results and analyses. In A. Harris & J. Chrispeels (Eds.), Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives (pp. 56–76). London: Routledge.
Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2000a). The future agenda for school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie, & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 322–343). London: Falmer Press.
Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2000b). The processes of school effectiveness. In C. Teddlie, & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 134–159). London: Falmer Press.
Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2001). Reflections on the critics, and beyond them. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 99–114.
Reynolds, D., Teddlie, C., Creemers, B., Scheerens, J., & Townsend, T. (2000). An introduction to school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie, & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 3–25). London: Falmer Press.
Reynolds, D., Teddlie, C., Hopkins, D., & Stringfield, S. (2000). Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. In C. Teddlie, & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 206–231). London: Falmer Press.
Rich, W. (2004). Walking the tightrope: Improving test scores, student learning, and teacher commitment through effective and improving school practices – follow-up to a case study. Journal for Effective Schools, 3(1), 57–74.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.
Rosenshine, B. (1983). Teaching functions in instructional programs. Elementary School Journal, 83, 335–351.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobsen, L. (1968) Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, whole No. 609).
Rowan, B. (1984). Shamanistic rituals in effective schools. Issues in Education, 2, 76–87.
Rutter, M., & Maughan, B. (2002). School effectiveness findings: 1979–2002. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 451–475.
Sackney, L. (1991). Effective schools: An international perspective. In W. Walker, R. Farquhar, & M. Hughes (Eds.), Advancing education: School leadership in action (pp. 51–63). London: Falmer Press.
Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. London: OFSTED.
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of school effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Scheerens, J., Bosker, R. J., & Creemers, B. (2000). Time for self-criticism: On the viability of school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 131–157.
Senge, P. M., Cambron-McGabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
Slavin, R., & Madden, N. (2006). Success for all: Research and reform in reading. In A. Harris, & J. Chrispeels (Eds.), Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives (pp. 41–55). London: Routledge.
Slavin, R., Madden, N., Karweit, N., Livermon, B., & Dolan, L. (1990). Success for all: First-year outcomes of a comprehensive plan for reforming urban education. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 255–278.
Slee, R., Weiner, G., & Tomlinson, S. (1998). School effectiveness for whom? Challenges to the school effectiveness and school improvement movements. London: Falmer Press.
Smylie, M. A., & Brownlee-Conyers, J. (1992). Teacher leaders and their principals: Exploring the development of new working relationships. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(2), 150–184.
Stallings, J., & Kaskowitz, D. (1974). Follow through classroom observation evaluation 1972–1973 (SRI Project URU-7370). Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
Stringfield, S., & Herman, R. (1996). Assessment of the state of school effectiveness research in the United States of America. School Effectiveness and School Research, 7(2), 159–180.
Stringfield, S., Kemper, E., & Teddlie, C. (2000, April). Louisiana School Effectiveness Study, Phase 5: A longitudinal examination of the historical ineffective and effective status of schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Stringfield, S., Millsap, M., & Herman, R. (1997). Special strategies for educating disadvantaged children: Results and policy implications. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Stringfield, S., Ross, S., & Smith, A. (1996). Bold plans for school restructuring. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C., & Suarez, S. (1985). Classroom interaction in effective and ineffective schools: Preliminary results from phase III of the Louisiana School Effectiveness Study. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 20(2), 31–37.
Stringfield, S. C., & Yakimowski-Srebnick, M. E. (2005). Promise, progress, problems, and paradoxes of three phases of accountability: A longitudinal case study of the Baltimore City Public Schools. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 43–75.
Sudlow, R. E. (1990). Implementing effective schools research in Spencerport, New York. In B. O. Taylor (Ed.), Case studies in effective schools research (pp. 155–181). Madison, WI: The National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
Summers, A. A., & Wolfe, B. L. (1977). Do schools made a difference? American Economic Review, 67, 639–652.
Taylor, B. O. (1990). Case studies in effective schools research. Madison, WI: The National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
Taylor, D., & Teddlie, C. (1992, April). Restructuring and the classroom: A view from a reform district. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Teddlie, C., Kirby, P., & Stringfield, S. (1989). Effective versus ineffective schools: Observable differences in the classroom. American Journal of Education, 97, 221–236.
Teddlie, C., & Meza, J. (1999). Using informal and formal measures to create classroom profiles. In J. Freiberg (Ed.), School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments (pp. 48–64). London: Falmer Press.
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.
Teddlie, C., Reynolds, D., & Sammons, P. (2000). The methodology and scientific properties of school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie, & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 55–133). London: Falmer Press.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1985). A differential analysis of effectiveness in middle and lower socioeconomic status schools. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 20(2), 38–44.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2006). A brief history of school improvement research in the United States. In A. Harris & J. Chrispeels (Eds.), Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives (pp. 23–38). London: Routledge.
Teddlie, C., Virgilio, I., & Oescher, J. (1990). Development and validation of the Virgilio Teacher Behavior Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 421–430.
Thomas, L. (1979). The medusa and the snail: More notes of a biology watcher. New York: Viking.
Thrupp, M. (2001). Sociological and political concerns about school effectiveness research: Time for a new research agenda. School Effectiveness and School Research, 12, 7–40.
Townsend, T., Clarke, P., & Ainscow, M. (Eds.). (1999). Third millennium schools: A world of difference in effectiveness and improvement. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Venezky, R. L., & Winfield, L. F. (1979). Schools that succeed beyond expectations in teaching reading. Newark, Delaware: University of Delaware.
Virgilio, I., Teddlie, C., & Oescher, J. (1991). Variance and context differences in teaching at differentially effective schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2, 152–168.
Wayman, J. C. (Ed.). (2005). Transforming data into knowledge: Applications of data-based decision making to improve instructional practice [Special issue]. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10(3).
Wayman, J. C., & Stringfield, S. (Eds.). (2006). Data use for school improvement [Special issue]. American Journal of Education, 112(4).
Weber, G. (1971). Inner-city children can be taught to read: Four successful schools. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
Weiss, C. (1992, April). Shared decision making about what? A comparison of schools with and without teacher participation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Wetherill, K. S., & Applefield, J. M. (2005). Using school change states to analyze comprehensive school reform projects. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 197–216.
Wimpelberg, R., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1989). Sensitivity to context: The past and future of effective schools research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 82–107.
Witte, J. F., & Walsh, D. J. (1990). A systematic test of the effective schools model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 188–212.
Wong, K. K., & Meyer, S. J. (1998). Title I schoolwide programs: A synthesis of findings from recent evaluations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(2), 115–136.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S. (2007). A History of School Effectiveness and Improvement Research in the USA Focusing on the Past Quarter Century. In: Townsend, T. (eds) International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5747-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5747-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4805-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5747-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)