Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Conservation of Aquatic Systems

  • Chapter
Conservation Biology

  • 7816 Accesses

In this chapter, you will learn about:

  1. 1.

    The ecological properties of aquatic habitats

  2. 2.

    Types of freshwater and marine ecosystems

  3. 3.

    Conservation problems, goals, and management strategies associated with freshwater and marine ecosystems

The majority of literature in conservation biology, as in the rest of biology, focuses on terrestrial environments and the creatures that inhabit them. Yet 71% of the globe is covered by oceans, not land. Freshwater and marine environments may hold the majority of all earth’s species, but because they are foreign and threatening to us as humans, and more difficult to investigate, they are not as well studied as terrestrial sites. The resources of aquatic habitats are vast and essential, but even those we use most frequently are mysterious to us. We often receive them, or exploit them, without truly understanding their value or the processes that sustain them.

Aquatic creatures are important in the diet of most people throughout the world, yet we have no real idea of the sizes of the populations that support these fisheries, especially in the oceans. Our lakes, rivers, and seas are repositories for all types and quantities of human and industrial refuse, yet we do not know the capacity of these systems to hold such waste, or its effects on ecosystem functions. The majority of our commercial fisheries are fully exploited, over-exploited, or in decline, yet we go on taking. The oceans of the world have long been one of the principal regulators of its climate, yet, as human activity alters such climate, we are only beginning to appreciate how such changes will affect ocean systems. Subsurface ocean topography and structure determine the abundance of many creatures on which humans depend for food, yet humans alter ocean topography and structure in harvesting food and other resources. Such alterations leave us with less food to harvest and fewer resources to use. Because aquatic habitats are different from terrestrial ones, the problems associated with their conservation also are different. Their uniqueness deserves special attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abell, R. A., D. M. Olson, E. Dinerstein, P. T. Hurley, J. T. Diggs, W. Eichbaum, S. Walters, W. Wettengel, T. Allnutt, C. J. Loucks, and P. Hedao. 2000. Freshwater ecoregions of North America: a conservation assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Agardy, T. 1997. Marine protected areas and ocean conservation. R. G. Landes Company and Academic, Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Agardy, T. 1999. Creating havens for marine life. Issues in Science and Technology 16:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Auster, P. J., R. J. Malatesta, and S. C. LaRosa. 1995. Patterns of microhabitat utilization by mobile megafauna on the southern New England (USA) continental shelf and slope. Marine Ecology Progress Series 127:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auster, P. J., et al. 1996. The impacts of mobile fishing gear on seafloor habitats in the Gulf of Maine (Northwest Atlantic): implications for conservation of fish populations. Reviews in Fisheries Science 4:185–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auster, P. J. 1998. A conceptual model of the impacts of fishing gear on the integrity offish habitats. Conservation Biology 12:1198–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. C. 2001. Reef corals bleach to survive change. Nature 411:765–766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. 1995. Tropical wetland values and environmental functions. In: C. A. Perrings, K. G. Mäler, C. Folke, C. S. Holling, and B.-O. Jansson (eds) Biodiversity conservation: problems and policies. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 147–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Blindow, I., A. Hargeby, and G. Andersson. 1997. Alternative stable states in shallowlakes–what causes a shift? In: E. Jeppesen, M. Søndergaard, and K.Christoffersen (eds) The structuring of submerged macrophytes in lakes. Springer, Berlin, pp 353–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaire Marine Park. 2006. Bonaire Marine Park Management Plan. Available at http://www.bmp.org/management.html (Accessed December 2007)

  • Bond, W. K., K. W. Cox, T. Heberlein, E. W. Manning, D. R. Witty, and D. A. Young. 1992. Wetland evaluation guide: final report of the wetlands are not wastelands project. Sustaining wetlands issues paper, Number 1992–1. North American Wetlands Conservation Council, Ottawa, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Brix, H. 1994. Constructed wetlands for municipal waste treatment in Europe. In: W. J. Mitsch (ed) Global wetlands: old world and new. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 325–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark, C., and L. A. Hansson. 1998. The biology of lakes and ponds. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chescheir, G. M., R. W. Skaggs, and J. W. Gilliam. 1992. Evaluation of wetland buffer areas for treatment of pumped agricultural drainage water. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 35:175–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. US Government Printing office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dextrase, A. J., and N. E. Mandrak. 2006. Impacts of alien invasive species on freshwater fauna at risk in Canada. Biological Invasions 8:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. A., L. F. Scura, and T. van’t Hof. 1995. Ecology and microeconomics as ‘joint products’: the Bonaire Marine Park in the Caribbean. In: C. A. Perrings, K.-G. Mäler, C. Folke, C. S. Holling, and B.-O. Jansson (eds) Biodiversity conservation: problems and policies. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 127–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeppner, T. 2007. Tom Doeppner’s underwater photos. Available at http://cs.brown.edu/ twd/fish/start.htm (accessed August 2007)

  • Dudgeon, D. et al. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status, and conservation challenges. Biological Review 81:163–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, D. 1992. The business of conservation. Conservation Biology 6:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filipe, A. F., T. A. Marques, S. Seabra, P. Tiago, F. Ribeiro, L. Moreira Da Costta, I. G. Cowx, and M. J. Collares-Pereira. 2004. Selection of priority areas for fish conservation in Guadiana River Basin, Iberian Peninsula. Conservation Biology 18:189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, C. S., and J. Houlahan. 1997. Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conservation Biology 11:1000–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, H. E. P. J. Mous, J. S. Pet, A. H. Muljadi, and R. L. Caldwell. 2005. Experimental assessment of coral reef rehabilitation following blast fishing. Conservation Biology 19:98–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genkai-Kato, M., and S. R. Carpenter. 2005. Eutrophication due to phosphorus recyclingin relation to lake morphometry, temperature, and macrophytes. Ecology 86:210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselink, J. G., and E. Maltby. 1990. Wetland losses and gains. In: M. Williams (ed) Wetlands: a threatened landscape. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 296–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Granek, E. F., and M. A. Brown. 2005. Co-management approach to marine conservation in MohĂ©li, Comoros Islands. Conservation Biology 19:1724–1732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassle, J. F., and N. J. Maciolek. 1992. Deep-sea species richness: regional and local diversity estimates from quantitative bottom samples. American Naturalist 13:313–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, C. R. 2003. Drafting a conservation blueprint: a practitioner’s guide to regional planning for biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. V., M. T. Bryer, M. L. Khoury, and T. W. Fitzhugh. 2005. A freshwater classification approach for biodiversity conservation planning. Conservation Biology 19:432–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R., C. J. Walters, and D. Ludwig. 1995. Sustainable exploitation of renewable resources. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26:45–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichsen, D. 1997. Coral reefs in crisis. BioScience 47: 554–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg, O. 2004. Coral reefs and projections of future change. In: E. Rosenberg and Y. Loya (eds) Coral health and disease. Springer, Berlin, pp 463–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg, O. 2005. Climate change and marine ecosystems. In: T. E. Lovejoy and L. Hannah (eds) Climate change and biodiversity. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp 256–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg, O., R. J. Jones, S. Ward, and W. K. Loh. 2002. Is coral bleaching really adaptive? Nature 415:601–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, O. W. 1931. New Jersey v. New York. 283 US 336, 342 (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlahan, J. E., and C. S. Findlay. 2004. Effect of invasive plant species on temperate wetland plant diversity. Conservation Biology 18:1132–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature, United Nations Environmental Programme, and World Wide Fund for Nature. 1991. Caring for the earth: a strategy for sustainable living. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenchington, R. A. 1990. Managing marine environments. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennish, M. J. 2004. National estuarine research preserve system: program components. In: M. J. Kennish (ed) Estuarine research, monitoring, and resource protection. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Koester, V. 1989. The Ramsar convention on the conservation of wetlands: a legal analysis of the adoption and implementation of the convention in Denmark. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambshead, P. J. D. 1993. Recent developments in marine biodiversity research. Oceanis 19:5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, R. W., P. J. Auster, and D. C. Schneider. 1995. A spatial and temporal perspective on research and management of groundfish in the Northwest Atlantic. Reviews in Fisheries Science 3:201–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauck, T., C. W. Clark, M. Mangel, and G. R. Munro. 1998. Implementing the precautionary principle in fisheries management through marine reserves. Ecological Applications 8:S72–S78

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J. S. 1994. The biology, exploitation, and mariculture of giant clams (Tridacnidae). Reviews in Fisheries Science 2:181–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J. S. 1997. Giant clams: mariculture for sustainable exploitation. In: M. Bolton (ed) Conservation and the use of wildlife resources. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 77–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, E., and R. E. Turner. 1983. Wetlands of the world. Geography Magazine 55:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, E., and I. Fung. 1987. Methane emission from natural wetlands: global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of sources. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 1:61–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. 1992. Bottoms up for the oceans. Nature 357:278–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norse, E. A. 1993. Global marine biodiversity: a strategy for building conservation into decision making. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, L. L., and D. A. Kovacic. 1993. Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshwater Biology 29:243–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. H. 1979. Predation, competitive exclusion, and diversity in soft-sediment benthic communities of estuaries and lagoons. In: R. J. Livingston (ed) Ecological processes in coastal and marine systems. Plenum, New York, pp 223–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, S., R. Lande, and B. B. Roper. 1997. Population viability analysis of spring Chinook salmon in the South Umpqua River, Oregon. Conservation Biology 11:879–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, A. J., P. Drinker, and S. Northridge. 2006. Bycatch of marine mammals in the U.S. and global fisheries. Conservation Biology 20:163–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricker, W. E. 1958. Maximum sustained yields from fluctuating environments and mixed stocks. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 15:991–1006, Bulletin Number 191

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickerl, D. H., L. L. Janssen, and R. Woodland. 2000. Buffered wetlands in agricultural landscapes in the prairie pothole region: environmental, agronomic, and economic evaluations. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 55:220–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeckner, E., J. M. Oberhuber, A. Bacher, and C. M. Kirchner. 1996. ENSO variability and atmospheric response in a global atmosphere ocean GCM. Climate Dynamics 12:737–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubec, C. D. A. 1994. Canada’s federal policy on wetland conservation: a global model. In: W. J. Mitsch (ed) Global wetlands: old world and new. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 909–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckelshaus, M. H., and C. G. Hays. 1998. Conservation and management of species in the sea. In: P. L. Fiedler and P. M. Kareiva (eds) Conservation biology: for the coming decade, 2nd edition. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 112–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, G. M., J. T. Carlton, E. D. Grosholz, and A. H. Hines. 1997. Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent, and consequences. American Zoologist 37:621–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, G. R., and A. C. Alcala. 1996. Marine reserves: rates and patterns of recovery and decline of large predatory fish. Ecological Applications 6:947–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M. 1990. Multiplicity of stable states in freshwater systems. Hydrobiologia 200/201:475–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, K., J. O’Reilly, and J. Kane. 2003. Assessment and sustainability of the US Northeast Shelf Ecosystem. In: G. Hempel and K. Sherman (eds) Large marine ecosystems of the world: trends in exploitation, protection, and research. Large marine ecosystems, v. 12. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 93–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelly, D. S., and E. Meir. 1997. Rule-based models for evaluating mechanisms of distributional change. Conservation Biology 11:531–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snelgrove, P. V. R. 1999. Getting to the bottom of marine biodiversity: sedimentary habitats. BioScience 49:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, J. 1993. Conserving biological diversity through marine protected areas: a global challenge. Oceans 36:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalding, M. D. 2004. A guide to the coral reefs of the Caribbean. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, K. 2000. Trouble in the North Pacific: sea lions vs. fisheries. Earth Island Journal 15(2):11

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Q. 2003. The Yellow Sea LME and mitigation action. In: G. Hempel and K. Sherman (eds) Large marine ecosystems of the world: trends in exploitation, protection, and research. Large marine ecosystems, v. 12. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 121–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, M. C., D. K. Skelly, D. Burchsted, W. Price, and S. Lowry. 2006. Stream communities across a rural-urban landscape gradient. Diversity and Distributions 12:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1992. Adoption of agreements on environment and development: agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, United Nations Document A/CONS.151/26

    Google Scholar 

  • Van DeVeer, S. D. 2000. Protecting Europe’s seas. Environment 42:10–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, F. 2003. Conservation Biology: Foundation, Concepts, Applications. McGraw-Hill, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • von Zharen, W. M. 1999. An ecopolicy perspective for sustaining living marine species. Ocean Development and International Law 30:1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlatch, R. B. 1977. Seasonal change in the community structure of the macrobenthos inhabiting the intertidal sand and mud flats of Barnstable Harbor, Massachusetts. Biological Bulletin 152:275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, and United Nations Environmental Programme. 1992. Global biodiversity strategy. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). The Conservation of Aquatic Systems. In: Conservation Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6891-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation