Skip to main content

Analyzing the Contextual Nature of Collaborative Activity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analyzing Interactions in CSCL

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series ((CULS,volume 12))

Abstract

This chapter discusses a methodology designed to explore the ­contextual nature of collaborative activity. The methods that can be generally considered to be based on ‘socio-cultural’ discourse analysis are discussed as a means to explore how different aspects of a situation mediate students’ shared meaning-making. First, an analysis is demonstrated, illustrating how different immediate and mediated contexts are embedded in students’ discourse as they are engaged in face-to-face collaborative activity in a computer-mediated context. Second, a multidimensional coding scheme is presented for analyzing the contextualized process of collaborative knowledge construction in an asynchronous web-based discussion. The strengths and weaknesses of the methods are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arvaja, M. (2007a). Contextual resources in meaning negotiations of a student pair in a web-based history project. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3/4), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvaja, M. (2007b). Contextual perspective in analysing collaborative knowledge construction of two small groups in web-based discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2/3), 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvaja, M. (2008). Discursive approach for studying contexts in students’ collaborative activity. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P. A. Kirschner & F. J. Prins (Eds.), Proceedings of the eight ­international conference for the learning sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 52–59). International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvaja, M., & Hämäläinen, R. (2008). Collaborative knowledge construction during structured tasks in an online course at higher education context. In G. Ollington (Ed.), Teachers and teaching: Strategies, innovations and problem solving. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and ­group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 448–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Lund, K., van Amelsvoort, M., & Quignard, M. (2007). Rainbow: A framework for analysing computer-mediated pedagogical debates. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2/3), 315–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, L. (2007). Analysing cultural models in socio-cultural discourse analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1–2), 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, J., & Säljö, R. (1999). The human-technological dialectic. In J. Bliss, R. Säljö, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological resources of learning (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C. (1999). Computers in the community of classrooms. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers. Analysing productive interaction (pp. 102–117). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1981). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In J. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 147–160). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Bruhn, C., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J., & Green, J. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as interactive phenomenon (pp. 1–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossen, M. (2009). Social interaction, discourse and learning. Methodological challenges of an emergent transdisciplinary field. In K. Kumpulainen, C. Hmelo-Silver & M. César (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction. Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (1996). Contextual inquiries: A discourse-oriented study of classroom activity. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning and schooling (pp. 104–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. (2003). Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: Multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education, 41(4), 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C., Chernobilsky, E., & Jordan, R. (2008). Understanding collaborative learning processes in new learning environments. Instructional Science, 36(5–6), 409–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpulainen, K., & Mutanen, M. (1999). The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction, 9(5), 449–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, C., & McCarthy, J. (2001). Reviewing the “community of practice” metaphor: An analysis of control relations in a primary classroom. Mind, Culture and Activity, 8(2), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., Littleton, K., & Wegerif, R. (2009). Methods for studying the processes of interaction and collaborative activity in computer-based educational settings. In K. Kumpulainen, C. Hmelo-Silver, & M. César (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction. Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, C., Varelas, M., Barry, A., & Rife, A. (2002). Dialogic inquiry around information texts: The role of intertextuality in constructing scientific understanding in urban primary classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 13(4), 435–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasku-Puttonen, H., Eteläpelto, A., Arvaja, M., & Häkkinen, P. (2003). Is successful scaffolding an illusion? - Shifting patterns of responsibility and control in teacher-student interaction during a long term learning project. Instructional Science, 31(6), 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference scripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staarman, J. K., Aarnoutse, C., & Verhoeven, L. (2004). Connecting discourses: Intertextuality in a primary school CSCL practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 807–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 169–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2004). Building collaborative knowing. Elements of a social theory of CSCL. In P. Dillenbourg (Series Ed.) & J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning, What we know about CSCL… and implementing it in higher education (Vol. 3, pp. 53–85). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (2007). Who we become depends on the company we keep and on what we do and say together. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1–2), 100–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 85–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarit Arvaja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arvaja, M. (2011). Analyzing the Contextual Nature of Collaborative Activity. In: Puntambekar, S., Erkens, G., Hmelo-Silver, C. (eds) Analyzing Interactions in CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7710-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics