Skip to main content

Thinking about Methods to Capture Effective Collaborations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analyzing Interactions in CSCL

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series ((CULS,volume 12))

Abstract

Peers do not learn because they are two, but because they ­perform some activities which trigger specific learning mechanisms Dillenbourg (1999, p. 5).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Azmitia, M. (1988). Peer interaction and problem solving: when are two heads better than one? Child Development, 59(1), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtis, J. (1998). The Analytic Toolkit. The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. Knowledge Building Team, The University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J., & Green, J. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning and social practice: a methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. (Eds.). (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., Lu, J., Leng, J., Yuen. J., & Lai, M. (2008). Understanding knowledge building from multiple perspectives. Paper presented in the Workshop on common framework for CSCL interaction analysis, International Conference for the Learning Sciences 2008, Utrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., Yuen, J., Huang, R., Li, Y., & Pan, N. (2007). A Learnable Content & Participation Analysis Toolkit for Assessing CSCL Learning Outcomes and Processes. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Mice, Minds & Society: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2007 (pp. 408–417). Rutgers University, New Jersey: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialog: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lui, L. (2008). Trajectories of collaborative scientific conceptual change: Middle school students learning about ecosystems in a CSCL environment. Unpublished Dissertation, New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckin, R., Plowman, L., Laurillard, D., Stratfold, M., & Corben, S. (2001). Narrative evolution: Learning from students’ talk about species variation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 100–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M. (1996). Stochastic processes. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building environments: extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In A. DiStefano, K. E. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 269–272). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, S. D., Fisher, F., Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Dillenbourg, P., Kapur, M., & Chi, M. (2008). Cognitive convergence in collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 360–367). Utrecht, Netherlands, LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teplovs, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2007). Visualizations for Knowledge Building. Paper presented at IKIT Knowledge Building Summer Institute 2007, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisband, S. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53(3), 352–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Teasley, S.D. (2011). Thinking about Methods to Capture Effective Collaborations. In: Puntambekar, S., Erkens, G., Hmelo-Silver, C. (eds) Analyzing Interactions in CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7710-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics