Abstract
Peers do not learn because they are two, but because they perform some activities which trigger specific learning mechanisms Dillenbourg (1999, p. 5).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Azmitia, M. (1988). Peer interaction and problem solving: when are two heads better than one? Child Development, 59(1), 87–96.
Burtis, J. (1998). The Analytic Toolkit. The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. Knowledge Building Team, The University of Toronto.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.
Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. London: Routledge.
Gee, J., & Green, J. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning and social practice: a methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169.
Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. (Eds.). (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Jordan, G., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.
Law, N., Lu, J., Leng, J., Yuen. J., & Lai, M. (2008). Understanding knowledge building from multiple perspectives. Paper presented in the Workshop on common framework for CSCL interaction analysis, International Conference for the Learning Sciences 2008, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Law, N., Yuen, J., Huang, R., Li, Y., & Pan, N. (2007). A Learnable Content & Participation Analysis Toolkit for Assessing CSCL Learning Outcomes and Processes. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Mice, Minds & Society: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2007 (pp. 408–417). Rutgers University, New Jersey: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialog: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lui, L. (2008). Trajectories of collaborative scientific conceptual change: Middle school students learning about ecosystems in a CSCL environment. Unpublished Dissertation, New Brunswick.
Luckin, R., Plowman, L., Laurillard, D., Stratfold, M., & Corben, S. (2001). Narrative evolution: Learning from students’ talk about species variation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 100–123.
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic.
Ross, S. M. (1996). Stochastic processes. New York: Wiley.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building environments: extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In A. DiStefano, K. E. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 269–272). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Teasley, S. D., Fisher, F., Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Dillenbourg, P., Kapur, M., & Chi, M. (2008). Cognitive convergence in collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 360–367). Utrecht, Netherlands, LEA.
Teplovs, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2007). Visualizations for Knowledge Building. Paper presented at IKIT Knowledge Building Summer Institute 2007, Toronto, Canada.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130.
Weisband, S. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53(3), 352–380.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teasley, S.D. (2011). Thinking about Methods to Capture Effective Collaborations. In: Puntambekar, S., Erkens, G., Hmelo-Silver, C. (eds) Analyzing Interactions in CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7710-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7710-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7709-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7710-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)