Skip to main content

Abstract

There are marked differences in usage of polygraphy between various countries. Many of these differences are of limited interest, because polygraphy requires a certain level of technical development and resources to support the reliable measurement of physiological changes, and many underdeveloped countries do not have the necessary resources. In addition, countries that do not strongly protect individual rights are not likely to use polygraphy, because other third-degree methods are available, and the question of guilt vs. innocence can be decided on the political grounds of what is in the best interests of the state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ben-Shakhar, G., Furedy, J.J. (1990). International Usage Contrasts: Cultural Factors. In: Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3282-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3282-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7949-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3282-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics