Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Chinese Models of Conflict Resolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Foundations of Chinese Psychology

Part of the book series: International and Cultural Psychology ((ICUP,volume 1))

  • 2777 Accesses

Abstract

Findings of empirical researches in reference to several models of conflict resolution constructed by Western psychologists were reviewed to demonstrate the limitation of imposed etic approach, some indigenous models were also criticized for their emic approach of naïve positivism. Based on the premise of methodological relationalism, it argued that a theoretical framework for managing conflicts with vertical in-group, horizontal out-group, or horizontal in-group people should consider the following aspects: (1) harmony maintenance, (2) personal goal attainment, (3) coordination strategies, and (4) dominant responses.

When a subordinate is in conflict with his/her superior in a vertical relationship, s/he has to protect his/her superior’s face for the sake of maintaining interpersonal harmony. In this case, the dominant response may be endurance. If s/he wants to express his/her opinion, s/he usually uses the strategy of indirect communication. If s/he intends to pursue his/her personal goal, s/he may do so privately.

The conflict management strategies one may utilize in a horizontal relationship depend on whether the other party is an in-group or out-group member. When an actor is in conflict with an in-group member, they may communicate directly. In order to maintain a harmonious relationship, they may “give face” to each other and reach a compromise. When one of them insists on attaining his/her personal goal in spite of the other’s feelings, they may struggle amid confrontations until the issue is resolved. On the other hand, if both of them insist on attaining their personal goals, they may treat each other as out-group members and confront each other. Meanwhile, they may disregard interpersonal harmony and strive to protect their own face. In order to resolve the conflict, a third party may be invited to serve as a mediator, and the relationship may be severed as a consequence of their conflict.

When a superior insists on the attainment of his/her personal goal disregarding feelings of his/her subordinate in a vertical relationship, the subordinate may also oppose him/her in reaction, leading to the severance of their relationship.

Findings of empirical researches were cited to elaborate the major propositions of the aforementioned framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Double Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. H., & Wang, S. H. (1981). Aggressive behavior in Chinese society: The problem of maintaining order and harmony. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 23, 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, F. P., & Cairns, D. R. (2004). Styles of managing interpersonal workplace conflict in relation to status and face concerns: A study with Anglos and Chinese. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. R. (1977). Face-saving and face-restoration in negotiation. In D. Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations: Social-psychological perspectives. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. K. S., & Goto, S. G. (2003). Conflict resolution in the culturally diverse workplace: Some data from Hong Kong employees. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 441–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che, S. H. (1997). Wondering in and out: The power relationship between the bride and her mother-in-law (in Chinese). Unpublished Master thesis, Taipei: Soochow University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. J. C. (1992). The nature, process, and influence of marriage violence in Taiwan (in Chinese). Journal of Female and Sex, 3, 117–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. W. (1994). Social relationships and the choices of conflict resolution procedures: In a perspective of patterns of the properties of relationships (in Chinese). Unpublished Master thesis, National Taiwan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Chen, L., & Zhang, J. (2006). A research on the styles of handling superior-subordinate conflicts: Its questionnaire and analysis. Psychological Science (China), 29, 926–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. F., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Co-operative conflict management: An approach to strengthen relationships between foreign managers and Chinese employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45, 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. F., Tjosvold, D., & Fang, S. S. (2005). Working with foreign managers: Conflict management for effective leader relationships in China. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16, 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiao, J. (1981). A preliminary research of stratagems in Chinese culture (in Chinese). In Y. Y. Li & J. Chiao (Eds.), Chinese people, society and culture. Taipei: Shihuo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiao, J. (1985). A preliminary model of Chinese strategic behaviors (in Chinese). In K. S. Yang (Ed.), Chinese psychology. Taipei: Laureate Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, R. K., & Kosinski, F. A. (1994). Is Chinese conflict-handling behavior influenced by Chinese values? Social Behavior and Personality, 22, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. A. (1967). Chinese mediation on the eve of modernization. In D. C. Buxbaum (Ed.), Traditional and modern legal institutions in Asia and Africa. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, C. W. H. (1986). Critical succession and creative development. Taipei, Taiwan: Dong-Da Publishing co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, H., Watkins, D., & Hui, E. K. P. (2004). Personality correlates of the disposition towards interpersonal forgiveness: A Chinese perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (1969). Conflict management survey. Rochester, NY: Technometrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. G., & Miller, D. T. (1976). Interpersonal conflict. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 265–308). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. L., & DeVore, C. J. (2005). Culture, gender, organizational role, and styles of conflict resolution: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 165–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Psychological homeostasis and jen: Conceptual tools for advancing psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L. L. (1996). The harmony and conflict in Chinese social relationships: Theory and ­empirical analysis (in Chinese). Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, National Taiwan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. K. (1995). The contemporary transformation of Confucian values: Theoretical values and empirical research (in Chinese). Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 3, 276–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. K. (1997a). The whirlpool of power (in Chinese). Taipei, Taiwan: Business Weekly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. K. (1997b). Guanxi and mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. Intercultural Communication Studies, 7, 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. K. (2005). Concepts of face in Chinese Society. In K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, & C. F. Yang (Eds.), Indigenous psychological research (in Chinese). Taipei, Taiwan: Lanreate Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. Y. C. (1988). “Face”, “shame” and an analysis of Chinese behavior (in Chinese). In K. S. Yang (Ed.), Chinese psychology. Taipei, Taiwan: Laureate Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkbride, P. S., Tang, S. F., & Westwood, R. I. (1991). Chinese conflict preferences and negotiation behavior: Cultural and psychological influences. Organization Studies, 12, 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, S.-H. (1994). Argumentative strategies in Chinese political talks. Proceedings of the National Science Council, ROC Part C: Humanities and Social Sciences, 4, 88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBarre, W. (1945). Some observations on character structure in the Orient. Psychiatry, 8, 319–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1977/1992). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. L. (1994). The Chinese concept of Ren (forbearance): Theory and empirical analysis (in Chinese). Unpublished master thesis, National Taiwan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y. (2003). The effect of culture and self-construal on face-concerns and mediation techniques of an informal third-party intermediary in intercultural/ interpersonal conflict. Dissertations Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 63, 3790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. (1987). Some determinants of reactions to procedural models for conflict resolution: A cross-national study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 898–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. (1988). Some determinants of conflict avoidance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19, 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., & Lind, E. A. (1986). Procedural justice and culture: Effects of culture, gender, and investigator status on procedural preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1134–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. Y. (1988). Ancestor workshop and the psychological stability of family members in Taiwan. In K. Yoshimatsu & W. S. Tseng (Eds.), Asian family mental health (pp. 26–33). Tokyo: Psychiatric Research Institute of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. Y. (1992). In search of equilibrium and harmony: On the basic value orientation of traditional Chinese peasants. In C. Nakane & C. Chiao (Eds.), Home bound: Studies in East Asian society (pp. 127–148). Hong Kong: The Center for East Asian Cultural Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, T. S. (1995). The interaction process of couples: A preliminary investigation on young couples in Taipei (in Chinese). Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 4, 260–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. C. (1997). The properties and functions of Chinese important social relationship: Parents and Children (in Chinese). Paper presented at the Vocational Class of Indigenous Psychology, National Taiwan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z. J., & Lin, H. Y. (1999). The process of coping with the conflicts between parents and children among junior high school students. Indigenous Psychological Research, 12, 47–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W. Y., & Wang, C. W. (1995). Chinese parents’ views about child-rearing: Discipling or beating (in Chinese)? Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 3, 2–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. Q. (1999). A dialectic perspective on the process of conflicts between husband and wife. Indigenous Psychological Research, 11, 153–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lung, A. Y. (2000). Parent-adolescent conflict and resolution in Chinese American and causation families (cross cultural, intergenerational conflict). Dissertations Abstracts International Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 60, 3571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, R. (1992). The role of unofficial intermediaries in interpersonal conflicts in the Chinese culture. Communication Quarterly, 40, 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z. Z. (2007). Chinese conflict management styles and negotiation behaviors: An empirical test. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 7, 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niber, R., & Harris, K. L. (2003). The effect of culture and cohesiveness on intragroup conflict and effectiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 143(5), 613–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niem, C. T. I., & Collard, R. R. (1972). Parental discipline of aggressive behaviors in four-year-old Chinese and American children. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 7, 95–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oetzel, J., Ting-Toomey, S., Masumoto, T., Yokochi, Y., Pan, X. H., Takai, J., et al. (2001). Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Monographs, 68, 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, N. (1999). The concept of facework: Its functions in the Hawaii model of mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 17, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A. (1986). Managing conflict in organizations. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryback, D., Sanders, A. L., Lorentz, J., & Koestenblatt, M. (1980). Child-rearing practices reported by students in six cultures. Journal of Social Psychology, 110, 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E. E. (1985). The decentralization of identity: Toward a revised concept of personal and social order. American Psychologist, 36, 730–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silin, R. H. (1976). Leadership and values. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollenberger, R. T. (1968). Chinese-American child-rearing practices and juvenile delinquency. Journal of Social Psychology, 74, 13–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. H. (1971). Mao’s revolution and the Chinese political culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterba, R. L. (1978). Clandestine management in the imperial Chinese bureaucracy. Academy of Management Review, 3, 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stover, L. E. (1974). The cultural ecology of Chinese civilization. New York: PICA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, B., & Carrutbers, W. L. (1996). Conflict resolution: History, philosophy, theory, and educational applications. School Counselor, 43, 326–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S. F., & Kirkbride, P. S. (1986). Developing conflict management skills in Hong Kong: An analysis of some cross-cultural implications. Management Education and Development, 17, 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. W. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting-Toomey, S. (1985). Toward a theory of conflict and culture. In W. Gudykunst, L. Stewart, & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), Communication, culture, and organizational processes (pp. 71–86). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213–235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting-Toomey, S. (Ed.). (1994). The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues. New York: State University of New York-Albany Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 71–92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting-Toomey, S., & Oetzel, J. G. (2001). Managing intercultural conflict effectively. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, C. H., & Brett, J. M. (2001). Managing workplace conflict in the United States and Hong Kong. Behaviors and Human Decision Process, 85, 360–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, C. H., & Weldon, E. (2003). Response to a normative conflict among American and Chinese managers. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3, 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. (2001). Constructive conflict in China: Cooperative conflict as a bridge between East and West. Journal of World Business, 36, 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., & Sun, H. F. (2004). Can Chinese discuss conflict openly? Field and experimental studies of face dynamics in China. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 351–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., Leung, K., & Johnson, D. W. (2006). Co-operative and competitive conflict in China. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: The theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 671–692). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., Nibler, R., & Wan, P. (2001). Motivation for conflict among Chinese university students: Effects of others’ expertise and one’s own confidence on engaging in conflict. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 353–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., Poon, M., & Yu, Z. Y. (2005). Team effectiveness in China: Co-operative conflict for relationship building. Human Relations, 58, 341–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. (2001). Effects of influence tactics and social contexts in conflict: An experiment on relationships in China. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. (2002). Understanding conflict avoidance: Relationship, motivations, actions and consequences. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 142–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. F. (2003). Openness among Chinese in conflict: Effects of direct discussion and warmth on integrative decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1878–1897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walder, A. G. (1983). Organized dependency and cultures of authority in Chinese industry. Journal of Asian Studies, 43, 51–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, J. A., & Blum, M. (1991). Community mediation in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallner, F. (1994). Constructive realism: Aspects of new epistemological movement. Vienna: W. BraumŸller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R. H. (1996). The logic of using stratagems by traditional Chinese (in Chinese). Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, National Taiwan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, B. E. (1965). Varieties of the conscious model: The fisherman of South China. In M. Bauton (Ed.), The relevance of models for social anthropology. London: Travistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, R. I., Tang, S. F., & Kirkbride, P. S. (1992). Chinese conflict behavior: Antecedents and behavioral consequence. Organization Development Journal, 10, 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (1970). Child training and the Chinese family. In M. Freedman (Ed.), Family and kinship in Chinese society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. L., Tjosvold, D., & Lee, F. (1992). Managing conflict in a diverse work force: A Chinese perspective in North America. Small Group Research, 23, 302–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X. Y. (1994). People’s conciliation: A model of conflict management of civil disputes in China. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5, 326–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, J., & Sorenson, R. L. (2004). The influence of Confucian ideology on conflict in Chinese family business. Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 4, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. F. (1988). Familism and development: An examination of the role of family in contemporary China Mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In D. Sinha & H. S. R. Kao (Eds.), Social values and development: Asian perspectives. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, K. H. (1995). Solution types in filial dilemmas and their various correlates. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica, 79, 87–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, K. H., & Bedford, O. (2004). Filial belief and parent-child. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 132–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zai, S. W. (1995). Chinese views of Lian and Mian. Taipei: Laureate Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. B. (2004). Initiating factors of Chinese intergenerational conflict: Young adults’ written accounts. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 19, 299–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, V. B., Harwood, J., & Hummert, M. L. (2005). Perceptions of conflict management styles in Chinese intergenerational dyads. Communication Monographs, 72, 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, T. H. (1995). The reasons of obeying publicly and defying privately: A preliminary research of the action logic in traditional Chinese society (in Chinese). Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, National Taiwan University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Kwang-Kuo Hwang

Authors
  1. Kwang-Kuo Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwang-Kuo Hwang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hwang, KK. (2012). Chinese Models of Conflict Resolution. In: Foundations of Chinese Psychology. International and Cultural Psychology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1439-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation