Skip to main content

The Data-Assisted Approach to Building Intelligent Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning Analytics

Abstract

This chapter deals with the sensemaking activity in learning analytics. It provides a detailed description of the data-assisted approach to building intelligent technology-enhanced learning systems, which focuses on helping instructional experts discover insight into the teaching and learning process, and leverages that insight as instructional interventions. To accomplish this, three different scenarios and associated case studies are provided: the use of information visualization in online discussion forums, the use of clustering for lecture capture viewership, and the ability to customize indexes in lecture capture playback. As each case study is described, the sensemaking process is contextualized to the different instructional experts that are involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In particular see the Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) and Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) conference series, as well as the Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (UMUAI).

  2. 2.

    Portions of this section appear in Brooks et al. (2011a).

  3. 3.

    A threshold of at least 5 min of viewing was arbitrarily chosen to remove behaviours that were deemed to be tool experimentation over tool use for learning. As the time period for this course was in the second semester of the academic year, the 1 week of data over midterm break was excluded from analysis.

  4. 4.

    The choice of the number of clusters (i.e. the value of k) to make affects outcomes greatly. This was an initial investigation to determine if unsupervised machine learning approaches can be used for clustering of subjective responses to data. Given the results shown here it is reasonable to continue exploration with an aim to find ideal values for k.

  5. 5.

    Portions of this section appear in Brooks and Amundson (2009).

References

  • Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (2012). A data-assisted approach to supporting instructional interventions in technology enhanced learning environments. PhD thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., & Amundson, K. (2009). Detecting significant events in lecture video using supervised machine learning. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, B. du Boulay, & A. Graesser (Eds.), 2009 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED09) (pp. 483–490), Brighton, UK. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., Epp, C. D., Logan, G., & Greer, J. (2011). The who, what, when, and why of lecture capture. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge—LAK’11 (pp. 86–92). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., Greer, J., & Gutwin, C. (2012). Using an instructional expert to mediate the locus of control in adaptive E-learning systems. In Second International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2012 (LAK’12) (pp. 84–87), Vancouver, BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., Johnston, G. S., Thompson, C., & Greer, J. (2013). Detecting and categorizing indices in lecture video using supervised machine learning. In 26th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Regina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., McKenzie, A., Meyer, D., Moormann, M., Rihtar, M., Rolf, R., et al. (2011). OpenCast Matterhorn 1.1. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia—MM’11 (pp. 703–706). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., Winter, M., Greer, J., & McCalla, G. (2004). The massive user modelling system (MUMS). In Intelligent tutoring systems 2004 (ITS04) (pp. 73–112). Maceio-Alagoas, Brazil: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskist, W. (2004). Ways of the master teacher. Association for Psychological Science: Observer. Available online at http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/uncategorized/ways-of-the-master-teacher.html.

  • Carnegie Learning. (1998). The cognitive tutor: Applying cognitive science to education. Technical report. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Learning, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P., Adrion, W., & Hanson, A. (2006). Automatic capture of significant points in a computer based presentation. In Proceedings of the eighth IEEE international symposium on multimedia (pp. 921–926). San Diego, CA: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, J., McCalla, G., & Vassileva, J. (2001). Lessons learned in deploying a multi-agent learning support system: The I-Help experience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G., Moon, B., Hoffman, R. R., & Associates, K. (2006). Making sense of sensemaking 2: A macrocognitive model. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(5), 88–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCalla, G. (2004). The ecological approach to the design of e-learning environments: Purpose-based capture and use of information about learners. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2004(May), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najjar, J., & Wolpers, M. (2006). Attention metadata: Collection and management. In Workshop on logging traces of web activity: The mechanics of data collection, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckham, T., & McCalla, G. (2012). Mining student behavior patterns in reading comprehension tasks. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 87–94), Chania, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2012). Sensemaking: Beyond analytics as a technical activity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suraweera, P., & Mitrovic, A. (2002). KERMIT: A constraint-based tutor for database modeling. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Sixth International Conference, ITS 2002 (pp. 2012–216), 2–7 June, 2002. Biarritz, France: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weskamp, M. (2003). Social circles. Retrieved March 2006, from http://www.marumushi.com/apps/socialcircle

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Brooks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brooks, C., Greer, J., Gutwin, C. (2014). The Data-Assisted Approach to Building Intelligent Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments. In: Larusson, J., White, B. (eds) Learning Analytics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics