Skip to main content

An Economic Perspective on Selection, Optimization, and Compensation (SOC)

  • Chapter
Understanding Human Development

Abstract

This chapter first presents and summarizes the standard economic model of individual human development and resource management. In this model, human development is viewed as a sequence of dynamic optimizing decisions under uncertainty that maximize the welfare of the decision maker period by period subject to the basic resource constraints (including outcomes of previous periods that were affected in part by the decision maker and resources that are given from the point of view of the decision maker including genetic endowments and the nature of the larger environment in which the decision maker operates), prices broadly defined (past, present, and expected), the distribution of future shocks including those related to health and mortality as well as to resource availability, and other aspects of the market, cultural, social, and policy environments in which the individual operates. Some attention is paid to important aspects of this formulation, such as whether individual preferences are assumed to be given or determined in these processes, how individual preferences are aggregated within collectives such as households, lifecycle aspects of such development including changes in the relevant decision makers who affect an individual (such as parents when children are very young, collective decisions between parents and children as the children age, primarily the adult children when they are prime-age adults, and their children and the broader society as they become elderly), information problems, when stochastic processes are resolved, and the role of characteristics such as risk aversion. The chapter then considers selection, compensation, and optimization with regard to three basic questions: (1) How do these concepts relate to the standard economic approach to lifespan human developmental processes and resource management? (2) Do these concepts raise questions regarding the formulation of the standard economic approach to lifespan human developmental processes and resource management? (3) Does the standard economic approach to lifespan human developmental processes and resource management raise questions about usefully modifying the use of these concepts?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashenfelter, O., & Krueger, A. (1994). Estimates of the economic return to schooling from a new sample of twins. American Economic Review, 84, 1157–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of development theory. American Psychologist, 32, 366–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (1998). Life-span theory in developmental psychology. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1, Theoretical Models of Human Development (5th ed., pp. 1029–1143). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1967). Human capital and the personal distribution of income: An analytical approach. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Woytinsky Lecture. Republished in G. S. Becker, Human capital (2nd ed., pp. 94–117). (New York: NBER, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1975). Human capital (2nd ed.). New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 385–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. R. (1997). Intrahousehold distribution and the family. In M. R. Rosenzweig & O. Stark (Eds.), Handbook of population and family economics (pp. 107–168). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. R. (1999). Labor markets in developing countries. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 2859–2939). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. R., Foster, A., Rosenzweig, M. R., & Vashishtha, P. (1999). Women*s schooling, home teaching, and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 682–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. R., Hrubec, Z., Taubman, P., & Wales, T. J. (1980). Socioeconomic success: A study of the effects of genetic endowments, family environment, and schooling. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. R., Pollak, R. A., & Taubman, P. (1982). Parental preferences and provision for progeny. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 52–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. R., Pollak, R. A., & Taubman, P. (1995). The wealth model: Efficiency in education and equity in the family. In J. R. Behrman, R. A. Pollak, & P. Taubman (Eds.), From parent to child: Intrahousehold allocations and intergenerational relations in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. R., Rosenzweig, M. R., & Taubman, P. (1994). Endowments and the allocation of schooling in the family and in the marriage market: The twins experiment. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1131–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. R., & Taubman, P. (1976). Intergenerational transmission of income and wealth. American Economic Review, 66, 436–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori, P.-A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica, 56, 63–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori, P.-A. (1992). Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 437–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devarajan, S., Squire L., & Suthiwart-Nameput, S. (1997). Beyond rate of return: Reorienting project appraisal. World Bank Research Observer, 12, 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J., & Alderman, H. (Eds.). (1996). Intrahousehold resource allocation: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press for the International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 6, 988–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining analysis. International Economic Review, 21, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, M. B., & Homey, M. J. (1981). Nash-bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review, 22, 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. B. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. (1993). The rising price of husbands: A hedonic analysis of dowry increases in rural India. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 666–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wolpin, K. J. (1986). Evaluating the effects of optimally distributed public programs. American Economic Review, 76, 470–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wolpin, K. J. (1988). Migration selectivity and the effects of public programs. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 265–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1963). The economic value of education. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udry, C. (1996). Gender, agricultural production and the theory of the household. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 1010–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Behrman, J.R. (2003). An Economic Perspective on Selection, Optimization, and Compensation (SOC). In: Staudinger, U.M., Lindenberger, U. (eds) Understanding Human Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0357-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0357-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7383-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0357-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics