Skip to main content

Social Comparison

Lessons from Basic Research on Judgment

  • Chapter
Handbook of Social Comparison

Abstract

Social comparisons may be thought to serve two basic functions: (1) to provide a check on one’s version of reality, and (2) to serve as a basis for self-evaluation. The former function is demonstrated in the classic Schacter (1959) experiments on affiliation and in the social comparison mechanisms mediating bystander intervention (Latane & Darley, 1970). The latter is exemplified by the typical finding that regardless of the absolute level of one’s performance, one is happier being near the top rather than the bottom of the relevant referent group (Brickman & Campbell, 1971; Marsh & Parker, 1984; Smith, Diener, & Wedell, 1989). Common to both functions is the idea that social comparisons can provide norms or standards with which to evaluate the situation or oneself. In this chapter we will focus on the cognitive processes underlying the formation of these judgmental standards. We examine basic judgment research from both social and nonsocial domains, with an aim to explicate some of the principles underlying the comparison process and consider the import of these principles for social comparisons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, S. (1977). Temporal comparison theory. Psychological Review, 84, 485–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieri, J., Atkins, A. L., Briar, S., Leaman, R. L., Miller, H., & Tripodi, T. (1966). Clinical and social judgment: The discrimination of behavioral information. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M. H. (1974). Using contextual effects to derive psychophysical scales. Perception and Psychophysics, 15, 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., & Bullman, R. (1977). Pleasure and pain in social comparison. In J. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 149–186). New York: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory (pp. 287–302). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. R. (1953). Stimulus similarity and the anchoring of subjective scales. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 199–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, A. D. J., & Meilers, B. A. (1998). Multiattribute judgment: Attribute spacing influences single attributes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 496–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, L. P. (1944). Quantitative variation of incentive and performance in the white rat. American Journal of Psychology, 55, 467–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1972). A model of egoisticial relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 84–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R. (1990). Social judgment. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R., & van der Pligt, J. (1982). Accentuation and perspective in altitudinal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 224–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes, Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. W., & Schoen, R. A. (1962). Differentiation and abstraction in concept formation. Psychological Monographs (Whole No. 560).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gati, I., & Tversky, A. (1984). Weighting common and distinctive features in perceptual and conceptual judgments. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 341–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goethals, G. R., & Darley, J. M. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In J. Suls & R. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 259–278). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haubensak, G. (1992). The consistency model: A process model for absolute judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 202–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. (1947). Adaptation-level as a frame of reference for prediction in psychophysical data. American Journal of Psychology, 60, 1–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., & Lurie, L. (1983). Context, categorization and recall: The “change-of-standard” effect. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 525–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1980). Contrast effects in attitude judgment, An examination of the accentuation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Varey, C. (1991). Notes on the psychology of utility. In J. Elster & J. E. Roemer (Eds.), Interpersonal comparisons of well-being. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192–238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D. L., & Campbell, D. T. (1961). Separating perceptual and linguistic effects of context shifts upon absolute judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 35–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krupat, E. (1974). Context as a determinant of perceived threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 731–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, A. J., & Wedell, D. H. (1991). The self and social judgment: The effects of affective reaction and “own position” on judgments of unambiguous and ambiguous information about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 884–897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1(2), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J., & Green, S. M. (1984). Acquisition of relative performance information: The roles of intrapersonal and interpersonal comparison. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 385–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1991). Self esteem and intergroup comparisons: Toward a theory of collective self-esteem. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 211–234). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Testa, M., & Bylsma, W. H. (1991). Responses to upward and downward social comparisons: The impact of esteem-relevance and perceived control. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 237–260). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis, M. (1967). Context effects in communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 326–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Parker, J. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish is a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. F., & Gilovich, T. (1995). When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 603–610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meilers, B. A. (1983). Evidence against “absolute” scaling. Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 523–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meilers, B. A. (1986). “Fair” allocations of salaries and taxes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meilers, B. A., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1983). Contextual effects is social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meilers, B. A., & Cooke, A. D. J. (1994). Trade-offs depend on attribute range. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1055–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meilers, B. A., & Cooke, A. D. J. (1996). The role of task and context in preference measurement. Psychological Science, 7, 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. (1982). The role of performance-related similarity on social comparison of abilities: A test of the related attribute hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 513–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. L., & Wright, J. C. (1984). Changes in conceptual structure with expertise: Differences between real-world experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1956). Direction of shift in the judgment of single stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 169–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1965). Category Judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 72, 407–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1968). The relativism of absolute judgments. Scientific American, 219, 84–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1982). Category Ratings: Still more context effects. In B. Wegener (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement (pp. 262–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1989). Hedonic judgments for Aristotelian domains. In G. Canevet, B. Scharf, A.-M. Bonnel, & C.-A. Possamai (Eds.), Fechner Day 89 (pp. 36–41), Cassis, France: International Society for Psychophysics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A., Calfee, R. C., Marshall, L. M., & Davidson, L. P. (1960). Context effects in judgment: Adaptation level as a function of mean, midpoint, and median of the stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 65–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A., & Marshall, L. M. (1962). Assimilation versus contrast in the anchoring of perceptual judgment of weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 426–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A., & Perrett, L. F. (1971). Category rating scales: Effects of relative spacing and frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 89, 427–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A., & Wedell, D. H. (1986). The category effect with rating scales: Number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 496–516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W., Bettman. J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, L. J. (1969). The Peter principle. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. S. & Wedell, D. H. (1994). Context effects on similarity judgments of multidimensional stimuli: Inferring the structure of the emotion space. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riskey, D. R., Parducci, A., & Beauchamp, G. K. (1979). Effects of context in judgments of sweetness and pleasantness. Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A., & Fehr, B. (1987). Relativity of perception of emotion in facial expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarris, V. (1967). Adaptation-level theory: Two critical experiments on Helson’s weighted-average model. American Journal of Psychology, 80, 331–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. Stanford. CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., Taub, D., & Hovland, C. I. (1958). Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 150–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Trade-off contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 281–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. H., Diener, E., & Wedell, D. H. (1989). Intrapersonal and social comparison determinants of happiness: A range-frequency analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 317–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stice, E., Schupak, N. E., Shaw, H. E., & Stein, R. I. (1994). Relation of media exposure to eating disorder symptomatology: An examination of mediating mechanisms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 836–840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J., & Mullen, B. (1982). From the cradle to the grave: Comparison and self-evaluation across the life-span. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 97–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology, 23, 457–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96, 569–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A. (1991). Emotion in social comparison and reflection processes. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 115–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A., Miller, M., & Moore, J. (1988). Some affective consequences of social comparison and reflection processes: The pain and pleasure of being close. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 49–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Borne, H. W., Pruyn, J. F. A., & van Dam-de Mey, K. (1986). Self-help in cancer patients: A review of studies on the effects of contacts between fellow-patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 9, 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkmann, J. (1951). Scales of judgment and their implications for social psychology. In J. H. Roherer & M. Sherif (Eds.), Social psychology at the crossroads (pp. 279–294). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, D. H. (1991). Distinguishing among models of contextually induced preference reversals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 767–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, D. H. (1994). Contextual contrast in evaluative judgments: Test of pre-versus postintegration models of contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1007–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, D. H. (1996). A constructive-associative model of the contextual dependence of unidimensional similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 634–661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, D. H. (1998). Testing models of tradeoff contrast in pairwise choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, D. H., & Parducci, A. (1988). The category effect in social judgment: Experimental ratings of happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 341–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, D. H., Parducci, A., & Geiselman, R. E. (1987). A formal analysis of ratings of physical attractiveness: Successive contrast and simultaneous assimilation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 230–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, D. H., Parducci, A., & Lane, M. (1990). Reducing the dependence of clinical judgment on the immediate context: Effects of number of categories and type of anchors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 319–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, D. H., Parducci, A., & Roman, D. (1989). Student perceptions of fair grading: A range-frequency analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 102, 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, D. H., & Pettibone, J. C. (1996). Using judgments to understand decoy effects in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 326–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, D. H., & Pettibone, J. C. (1999). Preference and the contextual basis of ideals in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 346–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, T. A. (1991). Similarity and self-esteem in downward comparison. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 51–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wedell, D.H., Parducci, A. (2000). Social Comparison. In: Suls, J., Wheeler, L. (eds) Handbook of Social Comparison. The Springer Series in Social Clinical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6903-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4237-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics