Skip to main content

Opinion Comparison

The Role of the Corroborator, Expert, and Proxy in Social Influence

  • Chapter
Handbook of Social Comparison

Part of the book series: The Springer Series in Social Clinical Psychology ((SSSC))

Abstract

The power of opinions to inspire individual and collective action is well-documented in history, such as the tulip mania of Europe in the 1400s, the Salem witch trials of the 1600s, and the genocide practiced in contemporary Bosnia. But just as dramatic as the power of opinion is the speed with which opinions about values and beliefs change. For example, not too long ago, most of Eastern Europe was dominated by communist governments and a wall separated East and West Berlin. Important events illustrate both the power of opinions and their quixotic nature, but the same observations can be made about seemingly mundane things, such as hairstyles, manners, and taste in cuisine. These features of opinions can be attributed in part to the fact that they are formed through a process of comparison with others. This was demonstrated by the results of several important programs of research beginning in the 1930s and continuing into the 1950s. (1936) experimental studies of social influence, Newcomb’s (1943) field study of the changing attitudes of students at Bennington College, Asch’s(1956) conformity experiments, and Merton and Kitt’s(1950) use of the reference group concept to account for the morale of the American soldier during World War II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, R. P., & Rosenberg, M. J. (1958). Symbolic psycho-logic: A model of attitudinal cognition. Behavioral Science, 3, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., & Cope, V. (1968). My enemy’s enemy is my friend. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 8–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arrowood, A. J. (1978). Social comparison theory: Revived from neglect. Contemporary Psychology, 23, 490–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, No. 9, (No. 416).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bern, D. J. (1970). Beliefs, attitudes, and human affairs. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bern. D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 2–62). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., & Bulman, R. J. (1977). Pleasure and pain in social comparison. In J. Suls & R. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 149–186). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, C. S. (1988). Social contagion of binge eating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 588–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Aronson, E. (1966). Self-evaluation vs. direct anxiety reduction as determinant of the fear-affiliation relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Suppl. 1, 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R. M. (1965). Theories in social psychology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954a). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954b). Motivation leading to social behavior. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 191–218). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, H., & Orive, R. (1987). The dynamics of opinion formation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 171–202). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goethals, G. R. (1972). Consensus and modality in the attribution process: The role of similarity and information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goethals, G. R., & Darley, J. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In J. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.) Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 259–278). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethals, G. R., Darley, J., & Kris, M. (1978). The impact of opinion agreement as a function of the grounds for agreement. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 9, 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethals, G. R., Messick, D., & Allison, S. T. (1991). The uniqueness bias: Studies of constructive social comparison. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 149–173). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethals, G. R., & Nelson, R. E. (1973). Similarity in the influence process: The belief-value distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, B. F. (1966). Influence and social comparison as motives for affiliation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Suppl. 1, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorenflo, D. W., & Crano, W. D. (1989). Judgmental subjectivity/objectivity and locus of choice in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 605–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hains, S. C., Hogg, M. A., & Duck, J. M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakmiller, K. (1966). Need for self-evaluation, perceived similarity, and comparison choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Suppl. 1, 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jellison, J., & Arkin, R. (1977). Social comparison of abilities: A self-presentation approach to decision-making in groups. In J. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 235–258). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Gerard, H. B. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., & Regan, D. (1974). Ability evaluation through social comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. L. (1952). Two functions of reference groups. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (rev. ed., pp. 210–214). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. L. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. L. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192–241). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A., & Mayseless, O. (1990). Classic and current social comparison research: Expanding the perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z. (1989). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ei]Latané, B. (Ed.). (1966). Studies in social comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Suppl. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191–229). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K., & Kitt, A. (1950). Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. In R. K. Merton & P. F. Lazarfield (Eds.), Continuities in social research: Studies in the scope and method of “The American Soldier” (pp. 40–105). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B., Atkins, J. L., Champion, D. S., Edwards, C., Hardy, D., Story, J. E., & Venderklok, M. (1985). The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 262–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, T. (1943). Personality and social change: Attitude formation in the student community. New York: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, T. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, H. W. (1954). Comments on Professor Festinger’s paper. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 219–223). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orive, R. (1988). Social projection and social comparison of opinions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 953–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckman, R. F., & Goethals, G. R. (1973). Deviancy and group-orientation as determinants of group composition preferences. Sociometry, 36, 419–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B., & Gross, N. C. (1943). The diffusion of seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J. (1986). Notes on the occasion of social comparison theory’s thirtieth birthday. Personality and Social Psycholgy Bulletin, 12, 289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J., Martin, R., & Leventhal, H. (1997). Social comparison, lay referral, and the decision to seek medical care. In B. Buunk & F. Gibbons (Eds.), Health and coping: Perspectives from social comparison theory (pp. 195–226). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (in press). Three types of opinion comparison: The triadic model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J., & Wills, T. A. (Eds.). (1991). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L. (1991). A brief history of social comparison theory. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L., Martin, R., & Suls, J. (1997). The proxy social comparison model for self-assessment of ability. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 54–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L., Shaver, K. G., Jones, R. A., Goethals, G. R., Cooper, J., Robinson, J. E., Grader, C. L., & Butzine, K. W. (1969). Factors determining choice of a comparison other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Suls, J. (2000). Opinion Comparison. In: Suls, J., Wheeler, L. (eds) Handbook of Social Comparison. The Springer Series in Social Clinical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6903-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4237-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics