Skip to main content

Trichogramma Nontarget Impacts: A Method for Biological Control Risk Assessment

  • Chapter
Nontarget Effects of Biological Control

Abstract

For much of its history, insect biological control has enjoyed a reputation as an environmentally safe and effective means of managing insect pests (DeBach 1974, Doutt 1972, Caltagirone 1981). However, over the past 15 years, questions have been raised regarding the potential impact of biological control on nontarget organisms (Howarth 1983, 1991; Simberloff 1992; Lockwood 1993a, b; Simberloff and Stiling 1996; Lockwood 1997). These concerns have prompted a much-needed discussion regarding the potential for nontarget effects and approaches for addressing this issue (Carruthers and Onsager 1993, Duan and Messing 1997, Van Driesche and Hoddle 1997, Frank 1998, Simberloff and Stiling 1998). Most of the discussion has focused on the risks posed by the importation and release of exotic natural enemies against exotic pests, i.e., classical biological control. Far less attention has been paid to the potential for nontarget effects from augmentative releases of natural enemies, even though this form of biological control may become more widespread in the future (Hoy et al. 1991, Moffat 1991, Parrella et al. 1992, Nordlund and Greenberg 1994, Nordlund et al. 1998).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altieri, M. A., W. J. Lewis, D. A. Nordlund, R. C. Gueldner, and J. W. Todd. 1981. Chemical interactions between plants and Trichogramma wasps in Georgia soybean fields. Prot. Ecol. 3: 259–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andow, D., and D. Olson. 1992. Biological control of European corn borers with Trichogramma. Proc., Illinois Agric. Pesticides Conf. p. 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andow, D. A., and D. R. Prokrym. 1990. Plant structural complexity and host-finding by a parasitoid. Oecologia. 82: 162–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andow, D. A., C. P. Lane, and D. M. Olson. 1995. The use of Trichogramma in maize-estimating environmental risks. In H. M. T. Hokkanen and J. M. Lynch (eds.) Biological control: benefits and risks. Cambridge Univ. Press. p. 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, F. 1986. Mass production of Trichogramma maidis Pint. et Voeg. and its field application against Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn. in Switzerland. J. Appl. Entomol. 101: 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, F. 1989. Quality assessment and control in entomophagus insects used for biological control. J. Appl. Entomol. 108: 390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, F., J. Baldinger, and L. Luisoni. 1982. L’impact de la methode d’elevage it de l’hote sur la qualite intrinseque de Trichogramma evanescens Westw. Les Trichogrammes, Colloques INRA 9: 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, F., M. Bieri, A. Fritschy, and K. Seidel. 1988. Variation in locomotion between laboratory strains of Trichogramma maidis and its impact on parasitism of eggs of Ostrinia nubilalis in the field. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 49:283–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, F., S. Bosshart, and M. Waldburger. 1989. Bisherige und neue Entwicklungen bei der biologischen Bekampfung des Maiszunslers, Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn., mit Trichogramma maidis Pint. et Voeg. in der Schweiz. Landwirtschaft Schweiz Band 2: 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, F., S. Bosshart, M. Waldburger, and M. Ingold. 1990. Dispersal of Trichogramma evanescens Westw. and its impact on parasitism of eggs of Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn. Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique Suisse 63: 381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldt, P. E. 1974. Temperature, humidity, and host: effect on rate of search of Trichogramma evanescens and T. minutum auctt. (not Riley, 1871). In Biological control of insects research, U.S. Dept. Agric., Agric. Res. Svc, Colombia, Missouri. p. 706–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenière, J. 1965. Les Trichogrammes parasites de Proceras sacchariphages Boj. borer de la canne a sucre a Madagascar. Quatrieme partie: etude comparee de plusieurs espèces de Trichogrammes. Entomophaga 10:273–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caltagirone, L. E. 1981. Landmark examples in classical biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26: 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, R. I., and J. A. Onsager. 1993. Perspective on the use of exotic natural enemies for biological control of pest grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Environ. Entomol. 22: 885–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti, F., and F. Bigler. 1991. Methods for the quality evaluation of Trichogramma evanescens Westw. used against the European corn borer. Proc. 5th workshop of the global IOBC working group “Quality control of mass reared organisms.” Wageningen, Netherlands, March 1991. p 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, C. P. 1940. Entomophagous Insects. Hafher Publishing Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curl, G., and P. P. Burbutis. 1978. Host-preference studies with Trichogramma nubilale. Environ. Entomol. 7: 541–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, E. J., and G. A. Pak. 1984. Factors determining host-egg recognition of two host-species by different Trichogramma spp. Mededelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwweten Shappen Rijksuniversiteit Gent 49: 815–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBach, P. 1974. Biological control by natural enemies. Cambridge Univ. Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doutt, R. L. 1972. Biological control: parasites and predators. In Pest control strategies for the future. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, J. J., and R. H. Messing. 1997. Biological control of fruit flies in Hawaii: factors affecting nontarget risk analysis. Agric. Human Values. 14: 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frandon, J., and F. Kabiri. 1990. [Biological control of second generation European corn borer with Trichogramma.] Proc., ANPP Second International Conference on Agricultural Pests, Versailles, December 4–6, 1990. (in French, translated by P. Matteson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. H. 1998. How risky is biological control?; comment. Ecology 79: 1829–1834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Salazar, C., D. B. Orr, and D. A. Landis. Dispersal and nontarget habitat exploration by Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). In prep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S. A., and M. F. Guo. 1991. Selection of effective strains of egg parasites of the genus Trichogramma (Hym., Trichogrammatidae) to control the European corn borer Ostrinia nubiialis Hb. (Lep., Pyralidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 111: 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, F. G. 1983. Classical biological control: panacea or Pandora’s box? Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc. 24: 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, F. G. 1991. Environmental impacts of classical biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36: 485–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, M. A., R. M. Nowierski, M. W. Johnson, and J. L. Flexner. 1991. Issues and ethics in commercial releases of arthropod natural enemies. Am. Entomologist 37: 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huettel, M. D. 1976. Monitoring the quality of laboratory-reared insects. A biological and behavioral perspective. Environ. Entomol. 5: 807–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabiri, F., J. Frandon, J. Voegele, N. Hawlitzky, and M. Stengel. 1990 [Evolution of a strategy for inundative releases of Trichogramma brassicae Bezd. (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae) against the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubiialis Hbn. (Lep.: Pyralidae)]. In Proc., ANPP—2nd Intl. Conf. on Agricultural Pests, Versailles, Dec. 4–6, 1990. (in French, translated by P. Matteson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, L., H. Pham-Delegue, and C. Masson. 1989a. Behavioral study of plasticity in host preferences of Trichogramma maidis (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae). Physiol. Entomol. 14: 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, L., H. Pham-Delegue, E. Bakchine, and C. Masson. 1989b. Olfactory responses of Trichogramma maidis Pint. et Voeg.: Effects of chemical cues and behavioral plasticity. J. Insect Behav. 2: 701–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanour, W. W., and P. P. Burbutis. 1984. Trichogramma nubilale (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) field releases in corn and a hypothetical model for control of European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 77: 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing. J. 1937. Host finding by insect parasites; chances of Trichogramma evanescens finding its host. J. Biol. 15:281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Li-Yang. 1994. Worldwide use of Trichogramma for biological control on different crops: a survey. p. 37–54. In E. Wajnberg, and S.A. Hassan (eds.) Biological control with egg parasitoids. CAB International, Oxon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, J. A. 1993a. Environmental issues involved in biological control of rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) with exotic agents. Environ. Entomol. 22: 503–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, J. A. 1993b. Benefits and costs of controlling rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) with exotic organisms: Search for a null hypothesis and regulatory compromise. Environ. Entomol. 22: 904–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood. J. A. 1997. Competing values and moral imperatives: an overview of ethical issues in biological control. Agric. Human Values 14: 205–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marston, N., and L. R. Ertle. 1973. Host influence on the bionomics of Trichogramma minutum. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 66: 1155–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K., and W. Quednau. 1959. Verhaltensanderungen bei Eiparasiten der Gattung Trichogramma unter dem Einjluss des Wirtes. Z. fur Parasitenkunde 19:35–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, S. J., and N. J. Mills. 1997. Dispersal of Trichogramma platneri Nagarkatti (Hym., Trichogramatidae) from point-source releases in an apple orchard in California. J. Appl. Entomol. 121: 205–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffat, A. S. 1991. Research on biological pest control moves ahead. Science 252:211–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Need, J. T., and P. P. Burburtis. 1979. Searching efficiency of Trichogramma nubilale. Environ. Entomol. 8: 224–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noldus, L. P. J., and J. C. van Lenteren. 1985. Kairomones for the egg parasite Trichogramma evanescens Westwood. II. Effect of contact chemicals produced by two of its hosts, Pieris brassicae L. and Mamestra brassicae L. J. Chem. Ecol. 11: 781–791.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund, D. A., and S. M. Greenberg. 1994. Facilities and automation for the mass production of arthropod predators and parasitoids. Biol. Control News Info. 4: 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund, D. A., R. B. Chalfant, and W. J. Lewis. 1985. Response of Trichogramma pretiosum females to volatile synomones from tomato plants. J. Entomol. Sci. 20: 372–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund, D. A., Z. X. Wu, A. C. Cohen, and S. M. Greenberg. 1998. Recent Advances in the In Vitro Rearing of Trichogramma spp. Proc. 5th Intl. Symp. “Trichogramma and other egg parasitoids.” In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. B. 1993. Biological control tactics for European corn borer. Proc. Illinois Crop Prot. Workshop, March 3–5, 1993, Champaign, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. B., L. C. Lewis, J. J. Obrycki, and M. E. Rice. 1992. Economic comparison of biological and chemical control of the European corn borer. Proc. 1992 Iowa Crop Prod. and Prot. Conf., December 3–4, 1992, Ames, Iowa., p. 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. B., D. A. Landis, and G. V. Manley. Range, quality and acceptance of Midwestern Lepidoptera species as hosts for Trichogramma brassicae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). In prep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrella, M. P., K. M. Heinz, and L. Nunney. 1992. Biological control through augmentative release of natural enemies: a strategy whose time has come. Am. Entomologist 38: 172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. D., and R. Stouthamer. 1994. Systematics of the Trichogrammatidae with emphasis on Trichogramma In E. Wajnberg and S. A. Hassan (eds.) Biological control with egg parasitoids. CAB International, Oxon, UK. p. 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintureau, B. 1990. Polymorphisme, biogeographie et specificite parasitaire des Trichogrammes europeens (Hym. Trichogrammatidae). Bull. Soc. Ent. Fr., 95: 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokrym, D. R., D. A. Andow, J. A. Ciborowski, and D. D. Sreenivasam. 1992. Suppression of Ostrinia nubilalis by Trichogramma nubilale in sweet corn. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 64: 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renou, M., P. Nagnan, A. Berthier, and C. Durier. 1992. Identification of compounds form the eggs of Ostrinia nubilalis and Mamestra brassicae having kairomone activity on Trichogramma brassicae. 63: 291–303.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G. 1934. Experimental studies in insect parasitism. II. Superparasitism. Proc. Royal Soc. London, Series B, 114:455–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G. 1935. Experimental studies in insect parasitism III: Host selection. Proc. Royal Soc. London, Series B, 117:413–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G. 1940. Experimental studies in insect parasitism VII: The effects of different hosts on the parasite Trichogramma evanescens West. (Hym.: Chalcidoidae). Proc. Royal Soc. London, Series A, 15: 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu, S., and R.L. Jones. 1989. Kinetic effects of a kairomone in moth scales of the European corn borer on Trichogramma nubilale Ertle and Davis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). J. Insect Behav. 2: 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, S., P. D. Swedenborg, and R. L. Jones. 1990. A kairomone for Trichogramma nubilale (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) isolation, identification, and synthesis. J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 521–529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. 1992. Conservation of pristine habitats and unintended effects of biological control. In W.C. Kauffman and J. E. Nechols (eds.), Thomas Say Proc.: Selection criteria and ecological consequences of importing natural enemies. Entomol. Soc. Amer. Lanham, Maryland. p. 103–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D., and P. Stiling. 1996. How risky is biological control? Ecology 77: 1865–1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D., and P. Stiling. 1998. How risky is biological control?; Reply. Ecology 79: 1834–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southard, S. G., M. W. Houseweart, D. T. Jennings, and W.A. Halteman. 1982. Size differences of laboratory reared and wild populations of Trichogramma minutum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Can. Entomol. 114: 693–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, V. M., E. I. Schlinger, and W. R. Bowen. 1965. Dispersal studies of Trichogramma semifumatum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) tagged with radioactive phosphorous. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 58: 234–240.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. A., and V. M. Stern. 1971. Host-preference studies with the egg parasite Trichogramma semifumatum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64: 1381–1390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. S. and R. E. Stinner. 1990. The scale response of Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) variation among species in host specificity and the effect of conditioning. Entomophaga, 35: 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Bergeijk, K. E., F. Bigler, N. K. Kaashoek and G. A. Pak. 1989. Changes in host acceptance and host suitability as an effect of rearing Trichogramma maidis on a factitious host. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 52: 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driesche, R.G. and M. Hoddle. 1997. Should arthropod parasitoids and predators be subject to host range testing when used as biological control agents. Agric. Human Values 14: 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajnberg, E. and S. A. Hassan. 1994. Biological control with egg parasitoids. CAB International, Oxon, UK. 286 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaki, P. N. 1985. Reactions of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma evanescens Westw. to certain insect sex pheromones. J. Appl. Entomol. 99: 448–453.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Orr, D.B., Garcia-Salazar, C., Landis, D.A. (2000). Trichogramma Nontarget Impacts: A Method for Biological Control Risk Assessment. In: Follett, P.A., Duan, J.J. (eds) Nontarget Effects of Biological Control. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4577-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4577-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7067-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4577-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics