Skip to main content

Metatraits: Interitem Variance as Personality Assessment

  • Chapter
Personality Psychology

Abstract

Many researchers studying individual differences conduct studies in which they ask a large number of individuals to complete a questionnaire designed to measure a specific trait. The researchers then examine whether the individuals receiving a high score on the trait measure will perform differently on a behavioral measure, or other questionnaire, than individuals receiving a low score on the trait. An implicit assumption of this methodology is that the trait dimension being measured applies equally well to all individuals. In other words, a particular individual participating in the study may receive a high score on the trait (or may receive a medium score or a low score), but every individual’s score is equally meaningful as a representation of that individual’s personality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G.W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R.F., & Tice, D.M. (1988). Metatraits. Journal of Personality, 56, 571–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R.F. (1988). On the stability of variability: Retest reliability of metatraits. Unpublished manuscript, Case Western Reserve University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D.J., & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 506–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, W.F., & Goldberg, L.R. (1984). A failure to replicate the Bem and Allen study of individual differences in cross-situational consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1074–1090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P.E. (1970). Attitudes and non-attitudes: Continuation of a dialogue. In E.R. Tufte (Ed.), The quantitative analysis of social problems (pp. 168–189 ). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R.H., Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Powell, M.C., & Kardes, F.R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M.F., & Buss, A.H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C.I. (1959). Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. American Psychologist, 14, 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S.V., & Jackson, D.N. (1985). Idiographic measurement strategies for personality and prediction: Some unredeemed promissory notes. Psychological Review, 92, 486–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W.A., & Hill, C.A. (1982). When our identities are mistaken: Reaffirming self-conceptions through social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W.A., & Predmore, S.C. (1985). Intimates as agents of social support: Sources of consolation or despair? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1609–1617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A. (1988). The analysis of consistency in personality assessment. Journal of Personality, 56, 621–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A., Kamp, J., & Watson, D. (1982). Recognizing individual differences in predictive structure. Psychological Review, 89, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B., & Moore, B.S. (1981). Sources of behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 780–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tice, D.M. (1989). Metatraits: Interitem Variance as Personality Assessment. In: Buss, D.M., Cantor, N. (eds) Personality Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0634-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0634-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-0636-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-0634-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics