Skip to main content

The Value of Small Preserves in Chronically Fragmented Landscapes

  • Chapter
Conservation in Highly Fragmented Landscapes

Abstract

The 1990s has ushered in a transition among conservation practitioners from focusing on maximizing quality in preserve acquisition to a “bigger is better” philosophy. This change seems to be driven both by the difficulty in managing many small preserves and an urge to incorporate the concepts of biological sustainability on a regional scale. Bioreserves, bioregions, biosphere reserves, and sustainable development areas are the popular conservation terms for the 1990s. Noss and Cooperrider (1994, 142) assert that the “old model of isolated parks has failed. Unless it contains many millions of acres, no reserve can maintain its biodiversity for long.” Similarly, Pickett and Thompson (1978, 34) define a minimum dynamic area for preserves the “smallest area with a natural disturbance regime which maintains internal recolonization sources.” A variety of authors who have focused on large-scale wilderness preserves have made estimates, based primarily on personal experience, to suggest that anywhere between 25% and 75% of a region must be dedicated to the maintenance of biodiversity to succeed over the long term (sources reviewed in Noss and Cooperrider 1994, 167–172). Within this context, Noss and Cooperrider (1994, 172) refer to U.S. Forest Service Research and Natural Areas with sizes under 1,000 ha as “tiny.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnold, A.A. 1985. Private and government-funded conservation programs for endangered insects in California. Natural Areas Journal. 5: 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, M. 1995. A broader view. Endangered Species Bulletin. 20: 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R.B. G. Norton and B.D. Haskell. 1992. Ecosystem health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, G. 1987. Community dynamics on an artificial prairie. In W.R. Jordan, M.E. Gilpin and J.D. Aber, eds. Restoration Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 257–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. 1995. Land Mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K.J., T.R. New, and M.J. Samways, eds. 1993. Perspectives on Insect Conservation. Intercept Ltd, Andover, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R.E. 1994. What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology 8: 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. 1994. Patch occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L.D. 1984. The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J.R. I 994a. Breeding bird communities of midwestern prairie fragments: The effects of prescribed burning and habitat-area. Natural Areas Journal 14: 128–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J.R. 1994b. The effects of habitat fragmentation on Midwestern grassland bird communities. Ecological Applications 4: 461–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J., and L.F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity and invasion: Implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6: 324–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honing, C.S. 1995. What Barriers? What Bridges? In L.H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling, and S.S. Light, eds. Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). 1980. World Conservation Strategy. Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, L.R., R.L. Oliver, D.P. Tucker, P.G. Risser, C.D. Burnett, and R.G. Rayburn. 1989. The Forest Resources of Illinois: An Atlas of Spatial and Temporal Trends. Illinois Natural History Survey special publication 11. Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D.H. 1986. The eternal external threat. In M.E. Soule, ed. Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, M., E. Ely, V. Lee, and A. Desbonnet. 1994. National Directory of Volunteer Environmental Programs 4th ed. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Rhode Island Sea Grant. EPA 841-B-94–001. Narragansett, R.I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luken, J.O. 1994. Valuing plants in natural areas. Natural Areas Journal 14: 295–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFall, D, ed. 1991. A Directory of Illinois Nature Preserves. Illinois Department of Conservation, Division of Natural Heritage, Springfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges, E.S. 1992. Stochastic modeling of extinction in plant populations. In P.F. Fielder, and S.K. Jain, eds. Conservation Biology: The Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation, Preservation and Management. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G. 1991. Toward Unity among Environmentalists. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G. 1994. On what we should save: The role of culture in determining conservation targets. In P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries, and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds. Systematics and Conservation Evaluations. Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R.F., and A.Y. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving Nature’s Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., and J.N. Thompson. 1978. Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves. Biological Conservation 13: 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S.L. 1991. The Balance of Nature?: Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polasky, S. 1994. What role for economic considerations in species conservation policy? Endangered Species Update 11 (11): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. 1995. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6: 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, K.R., and M.W. Schwartz. 1994. Prairie. In The Changing Illinois Environment: Critical Trends. Technical Report of the Critical Trends Assessment Project. Vol. 3: Ecological Resources. Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources, Springfield, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R.E. 1979. Ecology. 2nd en. Chiron Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M.W. 1994. Conflicting goals for conserving biodiversity: Issues of scale and value. Natural Areas Journal 14: 213–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M.W., and J.M. Randall. 1995. Valuing natural areas and controlling non-indigenous plants. Natural Areas Journal 15: 98–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, C.L. 1994. Beyond park boundries. In E.A. Cook, and H.N. van Lier, eds. Landscape Planning and Ecological Networks. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, C.L. 1995. Values and shortcomings of small preserves. Bioscience 45: 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D.S., and N.J. Gotelli. 1984. Effects of insularization on plant species richness in the prairie-forest ecotone. Biological Conservation 29: 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D., J.A. Farr, J. Cox, and D.W. Mehlman. 1992. Movement corridors-conservation bargains or poor investments. Conservation Biology 4: 493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soule, M.E., and D. Simberloff. 1986. What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves? Biological Conservation 35: 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soule, M.E. 1987. Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D.R. 1992. Are trophic cascades all wet? Differentiation and donor-control in speciose ecosystems. Ecology 73 (3): 747–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., and R.H. Gardner. 1990. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Ecological Studies, vol. 82. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westemeier, R.L., and W.R. Edwards. 1987. Prairie-chickens: Survival in the Midwest. In H. Kallman, C.P. Agee, W.R. Goforth, and J.P. Linduska, eds. Restoring America’s Wildlife. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. 1978. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory technical report, vol. 1. Survey Methods and Results. Illinois Department of Conservation. Springfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildlands Project. 1992. Largest remaining roadless areas in the continental United States. Map. Wild Earth (Special Issue), 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. W.W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Chapman & Hall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwartz, M.W., van Mantgem, P.J. (1997). The Value of Small Preserves in Chronically Fragmented Landscapes. In: Schwartz, M.W. (eds) Conservation in Highly Fragmented Landscapes. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0656-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0656-7_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0658-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0656-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics