Abstract
Ellen is furious because a colleague has been given the pay raise Ellen felt she in fact deserved. Tom is angry with his wife; although he is the breadwinner with a busy job, his wife accuses him of shirking his child care responsibilities. Many will feel indignation when confronted with the abject living conditions of those existing in the slums of the developing countries. Public opinion will be outraged by a new tax law favoring the rich. These examples serve to illustrate the omnipresence of concerns about justice. Undoubtedly, human beings experience unfairness and the accompanying emotion—anger—on a daily basis and on all levels of life, from everyday inconveniences to fundamental societal problems. But there are great interindividual differences in the reaction to unfairness and the striving for justice. Some people devote a significant part of their lives to promoting justice (e.g., civil rights activists, members of Amnesty International), and others show little or no concern for the underprivileged. Indeed, some people readily break societal rules to maximize their own profits. Theories of psychological justice aim to explain these interindividual differences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dalbert, C. (2001). The Meaning of the Belief in a Just World. In: The Justice Motive as a Personal Resource. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3383-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3383-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3357-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3383-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive