Abstract
Peer-Led Team Learning (PLTL) is a well-researched active-learning pedagogy that has been disseminated and widely adopted beyond its originators for about two decades. One way to define PLTL is to ponder carefully the meaning of each word in the phrase. The term peer in Peer-Led Team Learning refers to an undergraduate student who has done well in the course in which she or he subsequently serves; the model does away with graduate-student-led recitation sections. Led refers to leader, which is a person who guides and influences a group of people. A team is a small group that collaborates in joint action. Learning is the active process of acquiring knowledge and skills. PLTL also may be described by delineating its seven critical components, the essential constituents of the model that have crucial importance in its success, and this chapter explains these components and explores the limits to which they may be stretched. We then consider a few hypotheses that may explain the efficacy of the PLTL approach: the zone of proximal development, disequilibrium, and emotional regulation. We conclude with a discussion of factors to consider when assessing the value of a PLTL-formatted course.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amaral, K. E., & Vala, M. (2009). What teaching teaches: Mentoring and the performance gains of mentors. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(5), 630–633.
Chase, A., Rao, A. S., Lakmala, P., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2018). Beyond content knowledge: Transferrable skills connected to experience as a peer-leader in a PLTL program and long-term impacts. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Coleman, E. B. (1998). Using explanatory knowledge during collaborative problem solving in science. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 387–427.
Cyber Peer-Led Team Learning (cPLTL). https://cpltl.iupui.edu. Last accessed 12 Dec 2018.
Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). Introduction. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: Science in the classroom (pp. 1–26). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Eagan, M. K., Stolzenberg, E. B., Zimmerman, H. B., Aragon, M. C., Whang Sayson, H., & Rios- Aguilar, C. (2017). The American freshman: National norms fall (p. 2016). Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
Feder, E., Khan, I., Mazur, G., Vernon, T., Janke, T., Newbrough, J., Shuck, L., Zhu, L., & Varma- Nelson, P. (2016, April). Accessing collaborative online learning with mobile technology in cyberpeer-led team learning.EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2016/4/accessing-collaborative-online-learning-with-mobile-technology-in-cyber-peer-led-team-learning
Gafney, L. (2001). Workshop evaluation. In D. K. Gosser, M. S. Cracolice, J. A. Kampmeier, V. Roth, V. S. Strozak, & P. Varma-Nelson (Eds.), Peer-led team learning: A guidebook (pp. 75–93). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Gafney, L., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2008). Peer-led team learning: Evaluation, dissemination, and institutionalization of a college-level educational initiative (Innovations in science education and technology). Dordrecht: Springer.
Gosser, D. (2012). Project notes: Where do answers come from? Peer-led team learning: Leader training. Online at http://www.pltlis.org. Originally published in Progressions: The Peer-Led Team Learning Project Newsletter, 1(3), Spring 2000.
Gosser, D., Cracolice, M., Kampmeier, J., Roth, V., Strozak, V., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2001a). Peer-led team learning: A guidebook. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Gosser, D. K., Strozak, V. S., & Cracolice, M. S. (2001b). Peer-led team learning: General chemistry. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Gosser, D. K., Kampmeier, J. A., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2010). Peer-led team learning: 2008 James Flack Norris award address. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(4), 374–380.
Hess, J. L., Chase, A., Fore, G. A., & Sorge, B. (2018). Quantifying interpersonal tendencies of engineering and science students: A validation study. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(6), 1754–1787.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures. (A. Parsons & S. Milgram, Trans.). New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Ishitani, T. T. (2016). Time-varying effects of academic and social integration on student persistence for first and second years in college: National data approach. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 18(3), 263–286.
Kampmeier, J. A., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2001). Institutionalizing the workshops. In D. K. Gosser, M. S. Cracolice, J. A. Kampmeier, V. Roth, V. S. Strozak, & P. Varma-Nelson (Eds.), Peer-led team learning: A guidebook (pp. 20–34). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Kampmeier, J. A., Varma-Nelson, P., & Wedegaertner, D. K. (2001). Peer-led team learning: Organic chemistry. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Mauser, K., Sours, J., Banks, J., Newbrough, J., Janke, T., Shuck, L., Zhu, L., Ammerman, G., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2011, December). Cyber peer-led team learning (cPLTL): Development and implementation. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2011/12/cyber-peerled-team-learning-cpltl-development-and- implementation.
McDaniel, J., Metcalf, S., Sours, J., Janke, T., Newbrough, J., Shuck, L., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2013, November). Supporting student collaboration in cyberspace: A cPLTL study of web conferencing platforms. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved fromhttps://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/11/supporting-student-collaboration-in-cyberspace-a-cpltl-study-of-web-conferencing-platforms
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools for science and mathematics education. Instructional Science, 19(1), 29–52.
Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. (T. Brown & K. J. Thampy, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, J., Wilson, S. B., Banks, J., Zhu, L., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2014). Replicating peer-led team learning in cyberspace: Research, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(6), 714–740.
Spady, W. G. (1970). Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis. Interchange, 1(1), 64–85.
Strozak, V. S., & Wedegaertner, D. K. (2001). Writing workshop materials. In D. K. Gosser, M. S. Cracolice, J. A. Kampmeier, V. Roth, V. S. Strozak, & P. Varma-Nelson (Eds.), Peer-led team learning: A guidebook (pp. 20–34). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Taber, K. (2002). Chemical misconceptions—Prevention, diagnosis, and cure. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Turner, P., & Thompson, E. (2014). College retention initiatives meeting the needs of millennial freshman students. College Student Journal, 1(11), 94–104.
Varma-Nelson, P., & Cracolice, M. S. (2001). Peer-led team learning: General, organic and biological chemistry. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Trans. and Ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Wilson, S. B., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2016). Small groups, significant impact: A review of peer-led team learning research with implications for STEM education researchers and faculty. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(10), 1686–1702.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Varma-Nelson, P., Cracolice, M.S. (2020). Peer-Led Team Learning. In: Mintzes, J.J., Walter, E.M. (eds) Active Learning in College Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33599-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33600-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)