Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 122))

Abstract

It is the purpose of this paper to address ethical issues concerning the development and application of Assistive Technology at Workplaces (ATW). We shall give a concrete technical concept how such technology might be constructed and propose eight technical functions it should adopt in order to serve its purpose. Then, we discuss the normative questions why one should use ATW, and by what means. We argue that ATW is good to the extent that it ensures social inclusion and consider four normative domains in which its worth might consists in. In addition, we insist that ATW must satisfy two requirements of good workplaces, which we specify as (a) an exploitation restraint and (b) a duty of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is believed, more generally, that the human brain develops in a way that can be described by a so-called “use-it-or-lose-it”-principle according to which synapses are formed or recede dependent on the usage (cf. e.g. Blakemore and Choudhury 2006).

  2. 2.

    Cf. the instructive distinction between labor and work made by Arendt (1998). We do not, however, make this distinction in the following since we are not interested in a comprehensive anthropological analysis of work as an activity, but rather examine normative implications of the narrow institutional concept of gainful work as originally proposed by Kambartel (1993).

  3. 3.

    The applied concepts of claim-, and freedom-rights are explained in Wenar (2005).

References

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 2011. Nicomachean ethics. Trans. Robert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bay, Herbert, Tuytelaars Tinne, and Gool Luc Van. 2006. Surf: Speeded up robust features. In Computer vision–ECCV 2006, 404–417. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bieker, Rudolf. 2005. Individuelle Funktionen und Potenziale der Arbeitsintegration. In Teilhabe am Arbeitsleben, ed. Rudolf Bieker, 12–24. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne, and Suparna Choudhury. 2006. Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 47(3): 296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanke, Ulf, Bernd Schiele, Matthias Kreil, Paul Lukowicz, Bernard Sick, and Thiemo Gruber. 2010. All for one or one for all? Combining heterogeneous features for activity spotting. In Proceedings of the IEEE PerCom workshop on context modeling and reasoning, 18–24. Mannheim: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blesinger, Berit. 2005. Persönliche Assistenz am Arbeitsplatz. In Teilhabe am Arbeitsleben, ed. Rudolf Bieker, 282–285. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bude, Heinz, and Andreas Willisch (eds.). 2008. Exklusion. Die Debatte über die Überflüssigen. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), BGBl. III 155/2008. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml

  • Darwall, Stephan. 2013. Morality’s distinctiveness. In Morality, authority, & law, 3–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Forst, Rainer. 2012. Toleration in conflict. Past and present. Trans. Ciaran Cronin. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frehe, Horst. 2005. Das arbeitsrechtliche Verbot der Diskriminierung behinderter Menschen. In Teilhabe am Arbeitsleben, ed. Rudolf Bieker, 62–80. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, Markus, Oliver Korn, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2014. An augmented workplace for enabling user-defined tangibles. In CHI’14 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 1285–1290. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosepath, Stefan. 2004. Gleiche Gerechtigkeit. Grundlagen eines liberalen Egalitarismus. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, James. 1986. Well-being: Its meaning, measurement and moral importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Trans. William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, John, and Jason Alexander. 2012. Toolkit support for interactive projected displays. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia, 42. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich August. 1944. The road to selfdom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heines, Hartmut. 2005. Teilhabe am Arbeitsleben – Sozialrechtliche Leitlininien, Leistungsträger, Förderinstrumente. In Teilhabe am Arbeitsleben, ed. Rudolf Bieker, 44–61. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höffe, Ottfied. 2006. Lebenskunst und moral. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel. 1992. Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel. 2008. Arbeit und Anerkennung. Versuch einer Neubestimmung. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 56(3): 327–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel. 2011. Das Recht der Freiheit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurka, Thomas. 1993. Perfectionism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joiko, Karin, Schmauder Martin, and Wolff Gertrud. 2006. In Psychische Belastung und Beanspruchung im Berufsleben, ed. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin. Bönen/Westphalen: Kettler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, Shelly. 1998. Normative ethics. Oxford: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambartel, Friedrich. 1993. Arbeit und Praxis. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 41(2): 239–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals (ed. and trans. Allen W. Wood). New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodny, Niko, and John Brunero. 2013. Instrumental rationality. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/rationality-instrumental/. Accessed 15 Sept 2014.

  • Korn, Oliver, Albrecht Schmidt, and Thomas Hörz. 2012. Assistive systems in production environments: exploring motion recognition and gamification. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on pervasive technologies related to assistive environments, 9. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, Oliver, Albrecht Schmidt, and Thomas Hörz. 2013. The potentials of in-situ-projection for augmented workplaces in production. A study with impaired persons. In CHI ’13 proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 979–984. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, Oliver, Markus Funk, Stephan Abele, Thomas Hörz, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2014. Context-aware assistive systems at the workplace. Analyzing the effects of projection and gamification. In PETRA’14 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on pervasive technologies related to assistive environments. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, Herbert. 1934. In Mind, self, and society, ed. Charles W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, George Edward. 1993. In Principia ethica, ed. T. Baldwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and persons. New York: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek. 2011. On what matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999a. Two concepts of rules. In Collected papers, ed. Samuel Freeman, 20–46. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999b. Distributive justice: Some Addenda. In Collected papers, ed. Samuel Freeman, 154–175. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, Dieter. 2011. Von der “Humanisierung der Arbeit” zur “Guten Arbeit”. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 15: 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, Thomas. 1998. What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlothfeldt, Stephan. 1999. Erwerbsarbeitslosigkeit als sozialethisches Problem. Freibung/München: Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmelzle, Cord. 2012. Zum Begriff politischer Legitimität. Leviathan 27: 419–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, Marianne. 2011. Menschenrechte für alle: Die Konvention über die Rechte von Menschen mit Behinderung. In Menschenrechte – Integration – Inklusion. Aktuelle Perspektiven aus der Forschung, ed. Petra Flieger and Volker Schönwiese, 11–26. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, Richard. 2008. The craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1976. In An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, ed. Roy H. Campbell and Andrew S. Skinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, Titus. 2013. Immanente Kritik. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfath, Holmer (ed.). 1998. Was ist ein gutes Leben? Philosophische Reflexionen. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenar, Leif. 2005. The nature of rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs 33(3): 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard. 1972. Morality: An introduction to ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hauke Behrendt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Behrendt, H., Funk, M., Korn, O. (2015). Ethical Implications Regarding Assistive Technology at Workplaces. In: Misselhorn, C. (eds) Collective Agency and Cooperation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 122. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15515-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics