Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to present a framework for assessing young learners of foreign languages for diagnostic purposes. The first section outlines the most important trends in language assessment and describes the educational context where the project was implemented. Then, the chapter discusses how children between the ages of 6 and 12 develop in a foreign language and outlines the most important principles of assessing young language learners. The actual framework was designed for the four skills; it aimed to cover the first 6 years of primary education in Hungarian public schools. The document used the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR, 2001) as a point of departure and includes age-specific ‘can do statements’ and task types corresponding to them. Readers are encouraged to critically reflect on how the findings could be adopted in their own contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London: Continuum.
Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Wall, D. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alexiu, T. (2009). Young learners’ cognitive skills and their role in foreign language vocabulary learning. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Early learning of modern foreign languages: Processes and outcomes (pp. 46–61). Clevedon/Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning. Retrieved from http://www.assessmentforlearning.edu.au/default.asp
Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bacsa, É., & Csíkos, C. (2016). The role of individual differences in the development of listening comprehension in the early stages of language learning. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives. New York: Springer.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–71.
Bors, L., Lugossy, R., & Nikolov, M. (2001). Az angol nyelv oktatásának átfogó értékelése pécsi általános iskolákban [A comprehensive evaluation study of the teaching of English in Pecs primary schools]. Iskolakultúra, 11(4), 73–88.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Csapó, B., & Csépe, V. (2012). Framework for diagnostic assessment of reading. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.
Csapó, B., & Nikolov, M. (2009). The cognitive contribution to the development of proficiency in a foreign language. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 203–218.
Csapó, B., & Szendrei, M. (Eds.). (2011). Framework for diagnostic assessment of mathematics. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.
Csapó, B., & Szabó, G. (Eds.). (2012). Framework for diagnostic assessment of science. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.
Csapó, B., & Zsolnai, A. (Eds.). (2011). A kognitív és affektív fejlődés diagnosztikus mérése az iskola kezdő szakaszában. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon/Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Curtain, H. A., & Dahlberg, C. A. (2010). Languages and children – Making the match: New languages for young learners (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
Davison, C., & Leung, C. (2009). Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 393–415.
DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean? In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., Csizér, K., & Németh, N. (2006). Motivation, language attitudes and globalisation: A Hungarian perspective. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.
Eurobarometer. (2006). Europeans and their languages. Brussels: European Commission.
Eurobarometer. (2012). Europeans and their languages. Brussels: European Commission.
García Mayo, M. P., & García Lecumberri, M. L. (Eds.). (2003). Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon/Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Hasselgren, A. (2005). Assessing the language of young learners. Language Testing, 22, 337–354.
Hild, G., & Nikolov, M. (2011). Teachers’ views on tasks that work with primary school EFL learners. In M. Lehmann, R. Lugossy, & J. Horváth (Eds.), UPRT 2010: Empirical studies in English applied linguistics (pp. 47–62). Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport. Retrieved from http://mek.oszk.hu/10100/10158
Hung, Y.-J., Samuelson, B. L., & Chen, S.-C. (2016). The relationships between peer- and self-assessment and teacher assessment of young EFL learners’ oral presentations. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives. New York: Springer.
Kiss, C., & Nikolov, M. (2005). Preparing, piloting and validating an instrument to measure young learners’ aptitude. Language Learning, 55, 99–150.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
Leung, C., & Scott, C. (2009). Formative assessment in language education policies: Emerging lessons from Wales and Scotland. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 64–79.
MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language development. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McKay, P. (2006). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNamara, T., & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Medgyes, P., & Nikolov, M. (2010). Curriculum development: The interface between political and professional decisions. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 264–274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Medgyes, P., & Nikolov, M. (2014). Foreign language learning and teaching in Hungary: A review of empirical research literature from 2006 to 2012. Language Teaching, 47(4), 504–537.
Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (2001). Do young learners know how to learn a foreign language? In Y. Vrhovac (Ed.), Children and Foreign Languages III (pp. 57–71). Zagreb: Faculty of Philosophy.
Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (2009a). Impact of learning conditions on young FL learners’ motivation. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Early learning of modern foreign languages. Processes and outcomes (pp. 75–89). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (2009b). Individual differences in early language programmes. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), The age factor and early language learning (pp. 199–225). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (2012). Early EFL learning in context – Evidence from a country case study. London: The British Council.
Muñoz, C. (Ed.). (2006). Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon/Avon: Multilingual Matters.
National core curriculum (NCC). (2007). Budapest: Oktatási és Művelődési Minisztérium.
National core curriculum (NCC). (2012). Budapest: EMMI.
Nikolov, M. (1999). “Why do you learn English?” “Because the teacher is short”. A study of Hungarian children’s foreign language learning motivation. Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 33–56.
Nikolov, M. (2001). A study of unsuccessful language learners. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 149–170). Honolulu, HI: The University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
Nikolov, M. (2002). Issues in English language education. Bern: Peter Lang AG.
Nikolov, M. (2003). Angolul és németül tanuló diákok nyelvtanulási attitűdje és motivációja [Attitudes and motivation of English and German learners]. Iskolakultúra, XIII(8), 61–73.
Nikolov, M. (2008). “Az általános iskola, az módszertan!” Alsó tagozatos angolórák empirikus vizsgálata [“Primary school means methodology!” An empirical study of lower-primary EFL classes]. Modern Nyelvoktatás, 10(1–2), 3–19.
Nikolov, M. (2009). Early modern foreign language programmes and outcomes: Factors contributing to Hungarian learners’ proficiency. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Early learning of modern foreign languages: Processes and outcomes (pp. 90–107). Clevedon/Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Nikolov, M. (2011). Az angol nyelvtudás fejlesztésének és értékelésének keretei az általános iskola első hat évfolyamán [A framework for developing and assessing proficiency in English as a foreign language in the first six years of primary school]. Modern Nyelvoktatás, XVII(1), 9–31.
Nikolov, M., & Csapó, B. (2010). The relationship between reading skills in early English as a foreign language and Hungarian as a first language. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14, 315–329.
Nikolov, M., & Józsa, K. (2006). Relationships between language achievements in English and German and classroom-related variables. In M. Nikolov & J. Horváth (Eds.), UPRT 2006: Empirical studies in English applied linguistics (pp. 197–224). Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport, PTE.
Nikolov, M., & Mihaljevic-Djigunovic, J. (2006). Recent research on age, second language acquisition, and early foreign language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 234–260.
Nikolov, M., & Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (2011). All shades of every color: An overview of early teaching and learning of foreign languages. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 95–119.
Nikolov, M. & Szabó, G. (2011a). Az angol nyelvtudás diagnosztikus mérésének és fejlesztésének lehetőségei az általános iskola 1–6. évfolyamán [Possibilities of developing English diagnostic tests for years 1–6 in the primary school]. In Csapó Benő & Zsolnai Anikó (szerk.) A kognitív és affektív fejlődés diagnosztikus mérése az iskola kezdő szakaszában (pp. 13–40). Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.
Nikolov, M., & Szabó, G. (2011b). Establishing difficulty levels of diagnostic listening comprehension tests for young learners of English. In J. Horváth (Ed.), UPRT 2011: Empirical studies in English applied linguistics (pp. 73–82). Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport. Retrieved from http://mek.oszk.hu/10300/10396
Nikolov, M., & Szabó, G. (2012a). Developing diagnostic tests for young learners of EFL in grades 1 to 6. In E. D. Galaczi & C. J. Weir (Eds.), Voices in language assessment: Exploring the impact of language frameworks on learning, teaching and assessment – Policies, procedures and challenges, Proceedings of the ALTE Krakow Conference, July 2011 (pp. 347–363). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
Nikolov, M., & Szabó, G. (2012b). Assessing young learners’ writing skills: A pilot study of developing diagnostic tests in EFL. In G. Pusztai, Z. Tóth, & I. Csépes (Eds.), Current research in the field of disciplinary didactics (Hungarian Educational Research Journal, Special Issue, Vol. 2, pp. 50–62). Retrieved from http://herj.hu/2012/08/marianne-nikolov-and-gabor-szabo-assessing-young-learners%E2%80%99-writing-skills-a-pilot-study-of-developing-diagnostic-tests-in-efl/
Papp, S., & Salamoura, A. (2009). An exploratory study into linking young learners’ examinations to the CEFR (Research Notes, 37, pp. 15–22). Cambridge: Cambridge ESOL.
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pinter, A. (2006). Verbal evidence of task-related strategies: Child versus adult interactions. System, 34, 615–630.
Pinter, A. (2007a). Benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practising with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11, 189–207.
Pinter, A. (2007b). What children say: Benefits of task repetition. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 126–149). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Pižorn, K. (2009). Designing proficiency levels for English for primary and secondary school students and the impact of the CEFR. In N. Figueras & J. Noijons (Eds.), Linking to the CEFR levels: Research perspectives (pp. 87–102). Arnhem: Cito/EALTA.
Rixon, S. (2016). Do developments in assessment represent the ‘coming of age’ of young learners English language teaching initiatives? The international picture. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives. New York: Springer.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Lingustics, 11, 129–158.
Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 213–223.
Singleton, D., & Ryan, L. (2004). Language acquisition: The age factor (2nd ed.). Clevedon/Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Szabó, G., & Nikolov, M. (2013). An analysis of young learners’ feedback on diagnostic listening comprehension tests. In J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic & M. Medved Krajnovic (Eds.), UZRT 2012: Empirical studies in English applied linguistics (pp. 7–21). Zagreb: FF Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.hu/books?id=&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquistion through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teasdale, A., & Leung, C. (2000). Teacher assessment and psychometric theory: A case of paradigm crossing? Language Testing, 17(2), 163–184.
Ullman, M. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105–122.
Wilden, E., & Porsch, R. (2016). Learning EFL from Year 1 or Year 3? A Comparative study on children’s EFL listening and reading comprehension at the end of primary education. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives. New York: Springer.
Wong Fillmore, L. (1998). Supplemental declaration of Lily Wong Fillmore. Retrieved from http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/humnet/linguistics/people/grads/macswan/fillmor2.htm
Acknowledgements
Special thanks go to members of the team for developing the can do statements, drawing up the list of topics and task types based on curricula, teaching materials and research findings. The team included twelve anonymous classroom teachers with over a decade of teaching experience in Hungarian classrooms and the following experienced teachers of young learners and experts on assessment and early language learning research: Lidia Bors, Judit Font, Gabriella Hild, Csilla Kiss, Réka Lugossy, Ildikó Pathó, Gábor Szabó, Zsófia Turányi (Hungary) and four international experts: Heini-Marja Järvinen (Finnland), Lucilla Lopriore (Italy), Jelena Mihaljević Djigunović (Croatia), and Karmen Prizorn (Slovenia)
I am grateful to Jelena Mihaljević Djigunović for her helpful comments on the first draft of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nikolov, M. (2016). A Framework for Young EFL Learners’ Diagnostic Assessment: ‘Can Do Statements’ and Task Types. In: Nikolov, M. (eds) Assessing Young Learners of English: Global and Local Perspectives. Educational Linguistics, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22422-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22422-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22421-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22422-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)